CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05560100DNICNGTUpdated Jun 13, 2023

Development of an Informed Consent Statement Which Communicates the Risk of Adverse Events Associated With Dry Needling

An observational study in Dry Needling, sponsored by Youngstown State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-13.

Sponsored by Youngstown State University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

As Dry Needling (DN) continues to see increased use in the clinic, there is a need to establish adverse events that could occur as a result of DN intervention. The adverse events are important to consider when an individual needs to make an informed decision regarding their care. It is important to consider how such information should be presented during the informed consent process to improve an individual's ability to make a sound decision regarding their own personal care.

Read the detailed description

Dry Needling (DN) has been defined by a Task Force organized by the Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy (FSBPT) as "a skilled intervention performed by a physical therapist using filiform needles to penetrate the skin and/or underlying tissues to affect change in body structures and functions for the evaluation and management of neuromusculoskeletal conditions, pain, movement impairments, and disability". As DN interest continues to expand and studies continue to show the feasibility of applying DN to a wider range of pathological conditions, there is a need to understand the risks related to the use of DN. Understanding the risks associated with DN will allow for improvements in clinical decision making regarding it's application in the clinic.

Enhancing patient choice is a central theme of medical ethics and law. Informed consent (IC) is the legal process used to promote patient autonomy while concepts of shared decision making (SDM) is a widely promoted ethical approach. IC is a means of respecting the autonomous preferences of persons seeking health care or participation in research. Empowerment of the patient is important in healthcare and can lead to improvements in overall quality of patient care and outcomes.

To date, there has been little research conducted that explored the topic of how risks should be presented during the IC process. The purpose of this study will be to utilize expert consensus to establish a risk statement for adverse events associated with DN that an be used during IC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Needling

Keywords

  • informed consent
  • adverse event
  • nominal group technique
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Youngstown State University is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Dry Needling Experts, Legal Experts, Policy Experts, and Patients (Defined with inclusion criteria above).

Inclusion criteria

Participants must be 18 years old or above and be able to read/write in English Participants must provide informed consent Participants must meet the criteria of one of the previously defined cohort groups used in the study

Dry Needling Experts

(1) Must have >= 5 years of clinical practice performing dry needling and at least ONE of the following secondary criteria:

  1. Certification in Dry Needling
  2. Completion of a manual therapy fellowship that included dry needling training
  3. >= 1 total scholarly product (poster presentation, author of a peer-reviewed publication) involving the use of dry needling

Legal Expert

An individual who is an attorney and who has had training in health law as evidenced by at least ONE of the following criteria:

  1. Training in health law as evidenced by ONE of the following:

    1. Concentration/Certification in Health Law
    2. L.L.M in health or medical law
    3. SJD in health law
  2. Experience in litigating medical malpractice cases involving failure to obtain informed consent
  3. Published scholarship on informed consent in an academic journal (>= 1) Policy Expert

An individual who has a degree in bioethics with at least ONE of the following criteria:

  1. >= 5 years of experience in obtaining informed consent or an advanced graduate degree in bioethics
  2. Has served on ethics related committee in a healthcare institution or healthcare society/professional association
  3. Is or has been a member of a state licensing board

Patient Must have participated in >= 1 session of dry needling treatment and not be a healthcare provider

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants who did not provide informed consent Participants who did not meet the inclusion criteria of one of the four cohort groups defined in the study.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients

    Must have participated in \>= 1 session of dry needling treatment and not be a healthcare provider.

    Other: Nominal Group Technique - 2 to 3 hour virtual meeting

  • Dry Needling Experts

    (1) Must have \>= 5 years of clinical practice performing dry needling and at least ONE of the following secondary criteria: 1. Certification in Dry Needling 2. Completion of a manual therapy fellowship that included dry needling training 3. \>= 1 total scholarly product (poster presentation, author of a peer-reviewed publication) involving the use of dry needling

    Other: Nominal Group Technique - 2 to 3 hour virtual meeting

  • Policy Experts

    An individual who has a degree in bioethics with at least ONE of the following criteria: 1. \>= 5 years of experience in obtaining informed consent or an advanced graduate degree in bioethics 2. Has served on ethics related committee in a healthcare institution or healthcare society/professional association 3. Is or has been a member of a state licensing board

    Other: Nominal Group Technique - 2 to 3 hour virtual meeting

  • Legal Experts

    An individual who is an attorney and who has had training in health law as evidenced by at least ONE of the following criteria: 1. Evidence of training based on ONE of the follow: 1. Concentration/Certification in Health Law 2. L.L.M in health or medical law 3. SJD in health law 2. Experience in litigating medical malpractice cases involving failure to obtain informed consent 3. Published scholarship on informed consent in an academic journal (\>= 1)

    Other: Nominal Group Technique - 2 to 3 hour virtual meeting

Interventions

  • OtherNominal Group Technique - 2 to 3 hour virtual meeting

    Participants will be invited to a 2-3 online virtual online meeting with the goal of constructing and defining elements for producing a risk statement for dry needling that can be used for informed consent.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Demographic Information Form

    Contains questions about the characteristics of the participants

    Time frame: Up to 2 hours

  2. Ranking of Statements

    Participants will rank statements generated during the meeting to determine which statement best meets consensus within the group

    Time frame: A 2 hour virtual meeting for participants to rank statements

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Youngstown State University
    Youngstown, Ohio 44555, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Whitney SN, McGuire AL, McCullough LB. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 6;140(1):54-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-1-200401060-00012. PubMed 14706973 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 13, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05560100
Lead sponsor
Youngstown State University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 29, 2022
Start date
Sep 19, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2022
Completion
Oct 31, 2022
Last update
Jun 13, 2023

Study contacts

Edmund C Ickert, PhD
principal investigator · Youngstown State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion