ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05558527Updated Apr 13, 2026

The Social Regulation of Threat-related Vigilance and Arousal

An interventional study of social support in Psychological Trauma, Historical, Discrimination, Racial and Emotion Regulation, sponsored by University of Nevada, Reno. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by University of Nevada, Reno · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will examine the effects of social support on threat vigilance and arousal using eye tracking. We will also test the moderating effects of trauma and discrimination history.

Read the detailed description

Both interpersonal trauma (IPT) and ethno-racial discrimination amplify risk for hyper-arousal symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but the mechanism of this effect is unclear. Prior research suggests that social support plays an important role in regulating emotional responses, a process called social emotion regulation. This study will test whether a history of IPT and/or ethno-racial discrimination influence the social regulation of arousal and vigilance. Social regulation will be tested by contrasting responses under conditions with and without social support.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psychological Trauma, Historical
  • Discrimination, Racial
  • Emotion Regulation
  • Social Interaction
  • Hypervigilance
  • Anxiety

Keywords

  • psychological trauma
  • ethnoracial discrimination
  • hypervigilance
  • anticipated threat
  • social emotion regulation
  • social touch
03

In context

Racism

47 studies on the registry are indexed under Racism; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is below the median of 106 across 34 interventional studies indexed under Racism.

Browse Racism studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Nevada, Reno is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • In a stable romantic relationship for 6 months or more
  • Normal vision or corrected-to-normal vision
  • Fluent in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If vision is corrected-to-normal, needs to use hard contact lenses, bifocal contact lenses, or glasses
  • Experienced a traumatic event within the past 4 weeks
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Social support from a romantic partner

    Participants will hold the hand of their romantic partner

    Behavioral: social support

  • Active comparator
    Social support from a stranger

    Participants will hold the hand of a stranger

    Behavioral: social support

  • No intervention
    No social support

    Participants will hold a stress ball

Interventions

  • Behavioralsocial support

    social support is provided in the form of social touch (hand holding)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vigilance Related Eye Movements - Number of Eye Fixations

    Participants will view 15 pictures of natural environmental scenes for 10 seconds per image. We will use an eye tracker to examine the number of eye fixations per scene. A greater number of fixations during the 10 second presentation of a scene would indicate greater vigilance.

    Time frame: Collected from minute 15 to minute 45 of study participation, approximately

  2. Vigilance Related Eye Movements - Visual Scanning

    Participants will view 15 pictures of natural environmental scenes for 10 seconds per image. We will use an eye tracker to examine the proportion of the scene that they look at (fixate on) out of approximately 80 possible sectors. A greater proportion of the scene they fixate on would indicate greater vigilance.

    Time frame: Collected from minute 15 to minute 45 of study participation, approximately

  3. Threat-Related Physiological Arousal - Pupil Dilation

    Participants will view a series of visual cues (either an 'X' or an 'O') where an 'X' signals a possible (20% probability) aversive auditory stimulus (human scream). We will examine pupil dilation during the task in order to measure arousal in response to uncertain threat. We will calculate average pupil dilation during the wait period after threat cues (X) and after safety cues (O). We will subtract average pupil dilation after safety cues from threat cues to create an index of threat-related arousal. Greater pupil dilation (for threat minus safety cues) would indicate greater threat-related arousal.

    Time frame: Collected from minute 45 to minute 75 of study participation, approximately

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — de-identified data including primary and secondary outcomes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: within 6 months after publication

Access criteria: email request to the study PI (cynthialancaster@unr.edu)

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05558527
Lead sponsor
University of Nevada, Reno
Responsible party
Cynthia Lancaster (Associate Professor Psychology/Associate Director, Clinical Training, University of Nevada, Reno) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 28, 2022
Start date
Dec 18, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Study contacts

Kylie Baer, MS
Contact
kyliebaer@unr.edu
(775) 682-8145
Cynthia L Lancaster, PhD
Contact
cynthialancaster@unr.edu
(775) 682-8145
Cynthia L Lancaster, PhD
principal investigator · University of Nevada, Reno

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion