ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05558254Updated Apr 17, 2024

ROBERT® as an Intervention to Enhance Muscle Strength After Spinal Cord Injury

An interventional study of Robert - intervention to enhance muscle strength in Spinal Cord Injuries, sponsored by Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark. Status unknown at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-17.

Sponsored by Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2024), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating life event with long term consequences both physically and mentally. SCI is defined as either complete or incomplete according to the International Standards of the Neurological Classification of SCI. The primary consequence of a SCI is paralysis/partial paralysis affecting the person's ability to independently functioning in everyday life e.g. in and out of bed, sit to stand and walking.

To regain the ability to transfer and walk the most important prerequisite is to rebuild as much strength as possible in the lower extremities. The optimal training paradigm to increase strength in partial paralysed muscles is unclear.

Rehabilitation robots are upcoming methods to treat sensorimotor deficits after SCI.

The rehabilitation robot ROBERT might contribute to enhance muscle strength for people with very weak strength following an incomplete SCI.

The overall objective of this Ph.D project is to investigate the feasibility and effect size of a muscle strength training intervention assisted by ROBERT® for patients with SCI and severe paresis (muscle strength 1-3 in hip flexion).

Read the detailed description

SCI is a devastating life event with long term consequences both physically and mentally.

To regain the ability to transfer oneself and to walk, the most important prerequisite is to rebuild as much strength as possible in the lower extremities. The optimal training paradigm to increase strength in partial paralysed muscles is unclear. The question is whether strength is best improved by applying the principles of progressive resistance training or by focusing on high repetitions with limited resistance.

Rehabilitation robots are upcoming methods to treat sensorimotor deficits after SCI. The rationale is that the use of robotics allows adaptable support and the ability to increase therapy intensity and dose while reducing the physical burden on the therapist.

The rehabilitation robot ROBERT enables the SCI patient to conduct active or guided repetitions of specific movements in the lower extremities in the early rehabilitation phase. The hypothesis is that such use will increase muscle strength faster in the recovery process than when conducting usual physiotherapist training for people with incomplete SCI.

The objective of this PhD project is to:

  1. develop and feasibility test the optimal dose, timing and outcome measures and to examine feasibility, compliance and acceptability of an intervention for lower extremities for people with subacute SCI with the rehabilitation robot ROBERT?
  2. conduct a pilot with-in participant randomized controlled trail to estimate the effect size of an intervention to enhance muscle strength assisted by Robotic technology (ROBERT®) in subacute rehabilitation after spinal cord injury
  3. validate accelerometer-based method to identify the supine hip flexion/extension movement and be able to differentiate it from other activity movement based on the perviosely developed algorithm.

Hypothesis:

  • The patients with subacute SCI and muscle strength 1-3 in manuel muscle testing of hip flexion bilateral will be able to conduct the training with Robert.
  • There is a significant increase in muscle strength (hip flexion) in the leg practicing with ROBERT® for 8 weeks compared to the other leg receiving usual training. By using ROBERT® patients with very weak muscle strength are allowed to practise repetitions with the elimination of gravity and adopted resistance and guidance in the range of movement, where they don't have the strength to perform the entire range of movement.

The knowledge gained in this study will inform the design of a future RCT study and enable a power calculation.

- The refinement of the algorithm to monitor activity will be able to differentiate hip flexion from other activities in patients with SCI

Studies:

  1. Feasibility study This study will be conducted prior to the pilot with-in RCT. Consecutively, 4-8 patients admitted to Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark (SCICWD) from November 2021 - June 2022 will be recruited. Patients with SCI (\< 3 month), age ≥ 18 year and muscle strength 1 - 3 in one of the lower leg muscle groups measured by manual muscle testing will be included. Exclusion criteria: previous cerebral injury or SCI, previous damage to peripheral nervous system in lower extremities, instable fractures in thorax or lower extremities, muscle strength 0, 4 or 5, weight > 150 kg.

    The patients will conduct 4 weeks training with Robert of one leg 3 times a week.

    Muscle strength will be assessed with Handheld dynamometer (HHD) MicroFET2, (Hoggan Scientific) at baseline and after 4 week. Furthermore descriptive data of recruitment capability, resulting sample characteristics, procedures of the intervention, time consumption intervention will be evaluated. Interviews will be performed to get the patient perspective of the intervention and the acceptability.

    The study has been approved by The Danish Scientific Ethics Commission (ref. no. 1-10-72-276-21).

  2. Pilot with-in participant RCT It will take place at Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark (SCICWD) from September 2022 - December 2024. 12 consecutively patients admitted to SCICWD will be recruited. To be eligible to participate participants shall have incomplete SCI (\<12 months), be age ≥ 18 year and have weakened muscle strength grade 1 - 3 in hip flexion bilateral measured by manual muscle testing due to SCI. Exclusion criteria were: Previous cerebral injury or SCI, previous damage to peripheral nervous system in lower extremities, instable fractures in thorax or lower extremities, muscle strength 0, 4 or 5 in hip flexion, weight > 150 kg.

    The patient's legs will be randomised to either training with ROBERT® or usual training (control). The Control group/leg will recieve usual practice consisting of 3-5 times physiotherapy a week for 8 weeks. A session last 45 minutes. The sessions are individually adapted and can contain exercise therapy, functional training, assistive devices, electrical stimulation, hydrotherapy and tread mill training.

    Intervention group will receive usual practice. As add-on, the intervention leg will receive 3-4 sets of 15-20 repetitions (30 seconds rest between each set) of muscle strength training for hip flexion with ROBERT® three times a week. The ROBERT is attached to the patient's lower leg and thereby eliminating the gravity of the leg. The physiotherapist guides the patient's leg in hip flexion and ROBERT record the movement. ROBERT is set in active or guided mode and will be individually adjusted. When practice starts the patient get visual feedback to the range of movement of the hip flexion plus the amount of repetitions conducted and persisting.

    From the patients' medical records the following will be collected: Age, sex, injury onset, aetiology, neurological level of injury (NLI) and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade, and Walking Index for SCI (WISCI). At baseline and after completing the 8 weeks intervention (2-5 days after) muscle strength will be assessed with Handheld dynamometer (HHD) (19) MicroFET2, (Hoggan Scientific) as well as electrical activity in hip flexion muscles assessed by surface Electromyography (sEMG) Keypoint, (Alpine Biomed) (20, 21) and spasticity assessed by Modified Ashworth scale (22, 23). The thickness of the rectus femoris muscle and the quadriceps femoris muscle will be assessed by ultrasound Acuson S2000 (Siemens). Number of hip flexions and activity level will be monitored with accelerometer in both legs all day for three days at baseline, at week 4 of the intervention and the week after completing the intervention.

    Parametric analyses of paired data (post-pre). Discrete variables will be examined with non-parametric analysis. Preliminary data from the feasibility study estimate that it will be realistic to enroll 8-12 persons to complete the study in the period from August 2022 till December 2023.

    The study has been approved by The Danish Scientific Ethics Commission (ref. no. 1-10-72-108-22). The study will be conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 2008, the General Data Protection Regulation and legislation and the Data Protection Act. The study is registered at the internal list of research projects at the Central Denmark Region (Ref.nr.1-16-02-276-22).

  3. Validation study This study will be conducted from May 2022-December 2022. 10 healthy adults and 10 patients with SCI admitted SCICWD will be recruited. Accelerometer will be placed with non-allergenic tape at the front and the lateral side of the test person's legs. The test persons will perform supine hip flexion/extension with and without ROBERT® as well as sit-to stand, standing, walking, cycling (Motomed) and transfer from wheelchair to bench. These movements will be recorded with accelerometer as well as video. Validation of the algorithm will be established using video recordings as gold standard.
02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

  • Spinal cord injuries
  • Pilot study
  • robot
  • muscle strength
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,991 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 516 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 24 across 1,594 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • SCI (\< 12 month),
  • Age ≥ 18 year
  • Muscle strength 1 - 3 in hip flexion in both legs measured by manual muscle testing.
  • Sufficient Danish or English to be able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous cerebral injury or SCI
  • Previous damage to peripheral nervous system in lower extremities
  • Instable fractures in thorax or lower extremities
  • Muscle strength 0, 4 or 5 in hip flexion
  • Weight > 150 kg
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    ROBERT

    The intervention group will receive usual practice. As add-on, the intervention leg will receive 3-4 sets of 15-20 repetitions (30 seconds rest between each set) of muscle strength training for hip flexion with ROBERT® three times a week.

    Other: Robert - intervention to enhance muscle strength

  • No intervention
    Control

    Usual practice in the control group consist of 3-5 times physiotherapy a week for 8 weeks. A session last 45 minutes. The sessions are individually adapted and can contain exercise therapy, functional training, assistive devices, electrical stimulation, hydrotherapy and tread mill training.

Interventions

  • OtherRobert - intervention to enhance muscle strength

    Intervention: Training will be conducted with the robot ROBERT®. 3 times a week for 8 weeks the patient will conduct 60 repetitions of hip flexion of one leg. The patient is lying supine. ROBERT is attached to the patient's lower leg. The physiotherapist guides the patient's leg in hip flexion and ROBERT record the movement. The ROBERT is attached to the patient's lower leg and thereby eliminating the gravity of the leg. The physiotherapist guides the patient's leg in hip flexion and ROBERT record the movement. ROBERT is set in active or guided mode and will be individually adjusted. When practice starts the patient get visual feedback to the range of movement of the hip flexion plus the amount of repetitions conducted and persisting.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Muscle strength in Newton

    Change in maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in isometric muscle strength (N) of hip flexion (8 weeks - baseline)

    Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Chance in EMG activity

    Change in amplitude and Root Mean Square (8 weeks - baseline) of m. rectus femoris.

    Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks

  2. Change in repetitions

    Change in number of repetitions of hip flexions in both legs (8 weeks - baseline) monitored over 3 days

    Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks

  3. Difference between legs in numbers of hip flexion

    Difference between legs in number of repetitions of hip flexions at week 4 (Intervention leg - control leg) monitored over 3 days

    Time frame: At 4 weeks

  4. Change in spasticity

    Change in spasticity in hip flexors at (8 weeks - baseline)

    Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks

  5. Change in muscle thickness

    Change in muscle thickness rectus femoris and quadriceps femoris at (8 weeks - baseline)

    Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks

  6. Self-rated hip strength

    Difference between legs in self-rated hip strength at 8 weeks

    Time frame: At 8 weeks

  7. Self-rated ability to use leg in function

    Difference between legs in self-rated ability to use the leg in function at 8 weeks

    Time frame: At 8 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Acceptability and suitability of the intervention - patients' perspective

    Qualitative interviews: What are patients' experiences of the intervention? Interviews will be transcribed and analysed. Emerging themes will be discussed and if possible incorporated in the intervention

    Time frame: At 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark
    Viborg, Central Jutland 8800, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sorensen SL, Poulsen I. Patients' and physiotherapists' experiences with robotic technologies for lower extremity rehabilitation following spinal cord injury: a reflexive thematic analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2026 Jun;48(11):3365-3378. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2025.2573170. Epub 2025 Oct 17. PubMed 41105483 ↗
  • Lillelund Sorensen S, Lipperts M, Nielsen JF, Naess-Schmidt E. Clinical validation of a rule-based decision tree algorithm for classifying hip movements in people with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2026 Mar;49(2):340-349. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2025.2472096. Epub 2025 Mar 31. PubMed 40163036 ↗
  • Sorensen SL, Poulsen I, Harvey LA, Biering-Sorensen F, Nielsen JF. Robotic technology (ROBERT(R)) to enhance muscle strength in the hip flexor muscles following spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2024 Apr 10;10(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s41394-024-00630-9. PubMed 38600074 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2024, 20 months after the start.

Of 766 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Spinal Cord Injuries, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 65. This study's planned 20 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 816 studies reached it within 35 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 65.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 12, 2021
First posted
Sep 28, 2022
StartActual
Sep 21, 2022
Primary completionEst.
May 30, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Apr 17, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05558254
Lead sponsor
Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark
Collaborators
Svend Andersen Fonden
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 28, 2022
Start date
Sep 21, 2022
Primary completion
May 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 17, 2024

Study contacts

Susanne Lillelund, MSc, PT
principal investigator · Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion