ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05558046Updated Sep 28, 2022

Predictive Value of Granulosa Cell DNA Damage in the Success of Assisted Reproductive Technique

An observational study in DNA Damage and Granulosa Cells, sponsored by Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital. Status unknown. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-28.

Sponsored by Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2022), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage of granulosa cells obtained during oocyte retrieval will be evaluated by flow cytometry with detection of Histone H2A.X and Phosphorylated Gamma H2A.X protein levels in patients with low ovarian reserve and unexplained infertile patients as a control group undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. Fertilization, embryo quality, transfer rate, implantation, clinical pregnancy will be recorded as well as demographic data. DNA damage of granulosa cells will be compared between two groups. The effect of DNA damage of granulosa cells on fertilization, quality of oocyte and embryo, implantation, and clinical pregnancy will be also evaluated.

Read the detailed description

Granulosa cells surrounding the oocytes will be mechanically obtained during the oocyte pick-up procedure in women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment due to unexplained infertility and low ovarian reserve. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage in these cells will be evaluated by flow cytometry. Fertilization rates, embryo quality by grading, and transfer rates will also be assessed. Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates will be recorded as well as demographic data such as age, body-mass index, smoking, alcohol use, employment, coexisting chronic disease, infertility duration, etiology of infertility, treatment protocol. Implantation will be evaluated by determination of serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at day 15 following an embryo transfer. Clinical pregnancy will be diagnosed upon presence of gestational sac on ultrasound examination. DNA damage of granulosa cells will be compared between low ovarian reserve group and control group. The effect of DNA damage of granulosa cells on fertilization, quality of oocyte and embryo, implantation, and clinical pregnancy will be also evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • DNA Damage
  • Granulosa Cells

Keywords

  • Ovarian Reserve
  • Flow Cytometry
  • Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital is the lead sponsor of 38 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Low ovarian reserve group will be included as Antimullerian hormone level results as lower than 1 ng/ml without any other infertility evidence.The control group received IVF for Unexplained infertile (UI) group UI was diagnosed after normal standard infertility evaluation according to the guideline of The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine which consist of the assesment of spermiogram, ovulation, hysterosalpingogram and if indicated ovarian reserve tests and laparoscopy as well as Antimullerian hormone level results as greater than 1,5 ng/ml. If the results of all this tests were normal, patients were accepted as UI.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • For patients who are undergoing in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) treatment with Low ovarian reserve, Antimullerian Hormone level must be lower than 1 ng/mL
  • For patients who are undergoing in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) treatment with Unexplained infetility, Antimullerian Hormone level must be greater than 1,5 ng/mL

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic systemic disease (rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, diabetes..)
  • Endocrinopathy (Thyroid, prolactin... abnormalities)
  • Chemotherapy or radiotherapy history
  • Endometriosis
  • Policystic ovary syndrome
  • Male infetility
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Low Ovarian Reserve

    Patients diagnosed as low ovarian reserve were recruited to the study who have Antimüllerian Hormone level of 1 ng/ml or lower. Patients with low ovarian reserve were diagnosed after normal standard infertility evaluation according to the guideline of The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine which consist of the assesment of spermiogram, ovulation, hysterosalpingogram and if indicated ovarian reserve tests and laparoscopy. Male infertility is an exclusion.

  • Unexplained Infertile (Control group)

    Patients diagnosed as unexplained infertility (UI) were recruited to the study who have Antimüllerian Hormone level of 1.5 ng/ml or higher as a control group. UI was diagnosed after normal standard infertility evaluation according to the guideline of The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine which consist of the assesment of spermiogram, ovulation, hysterosalpingogram and if indicated ovarian reserve tests and laparoscopy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Determining the correlation of ovarian reserve and age factor with DNA Damage markers in granulosa cells.

    Demographic data will be noted for each patient at the day of oocyte retrieval, and DNA damage markers will be shown by flowcytometry at the same day.

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fertilization defined as the presence of two pronuclei under light microscope one day after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure

    Presence of two pronuclei under light microscope

    Time frame: 1 day after ICSI procedure

  2. Implantation defined as positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels 12 days after embryo transfer

    Positive human chorionic gonadotropin levels

    Time frame: 12 days after embryo transfer

  3. Clinical pregnancy will be defined as the presence of gestational sac in transvaginal ultrasonographic examination 5 weeks after embryo transfer

    Presence of a gestational sac in transvaginal ultrasonographic examination

    Time frame: 5 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05558046
Lead sponsor
Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital
Responsible party
Erman Çiftçi (MD, Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 28, 2022
Start date
Oct 1, 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 20, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2022

Study contacts

Erman Ciftci, MD
Contact
ermanciftci1@gmail.com
+905074422414

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion