CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05544786Updated May 10, 2024Results posted

Relative Bioavailability Study of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Oral Powder Relative to the Commercial Tablets and Estimation of the Effect of Food on Bioavailability of the Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Oral Powder in Healthy Participants.

A Phase 1 interventional study of Nirmatrelvir/ ritonavir and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Biological Availability, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-10.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 1, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to estimate the relative bioavailability (rBA) of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder in 3 different food vehicles relative to the Paxlovid® tablets under fasted condition in healthy adult participants, and to estimate the effect of food on the rBA of the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder formulation. The study will also assess the safety, tolerability, and palatability of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder in healthy adult participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Biological Availability

Keywords

  • Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
  • Nirmatrelvir
  • Paxlovid
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants who are overtly healthy as determined by medical evaluation including medical history, physical examination (PE), laboratory tests, vital signs and standard 12 lead ECGs.
  • Body mass index (BMI) of 17.5 to 30.5 kg/m2; and a total body weight >50 kg (110 lb).
  • Participants who are willing and able to comply with all scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, lifestyle considerations, and other study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of Screening or Day -1.
  • Evidence or history of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, psychiatric, neurological, or allergic disease (including drug allergies, but excluding untreated, asymptomatic, seasonal allergies at the time of dosing).
  • Clinically relevant abnormalities requiring treatment (eg, acute myocardial infarction, unstable ischemic conditions, evidence of ventricular dysfunction, serious tachy or brady arrhythmias) or indicating serious underlying heart disease (eg, prolonged PR interval, cardiomyopathy, heart failure greater than New York Heart Association (NYHA) 1, underlying structural heart disease, Wolff Parkinson-White syndrome).
  • Any condition possibly affecting drug absorption (eg, gastrectomy, cholecystectomy).
  • History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C; positive testing for HIV, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or hepatitis B surface antibody (HCVAb). Hepatitis B vaccination is allowed.
  • Use of prescription or nonprescription drugs and dietary and herbal supplements within 7 days or 5 half lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study intervention.
  • Participant who have received a COVID-19 vaccine within 7 days before screening or admission, or who are to be vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine at any time during the study confinement period.
  • A positive urine drug test.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treatment A: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir

    Nirmatrelvir and ritonavir tablets

    Drug: Nirmatrelvir/ ritonavir

  • Experimental
    Treatment B: Nirmatrelvir/ ritonavir

    Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir with water

    Drug: Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir

  • Experimental
    Treatment C: Nirmatrelvir/ ritonavir

    Nirmatrelvir/ ritonavir with infant formula

    Drug: Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir

  • Experimental
    Treatment D: Nirmatrelvir/ ritonavir

    Nirmatrelvir/ ritonavir with vanilla pudding

    Drug: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir

  • Experimental
    Treatment E: Nirmatrelvir/ ritonavir

    Nirmatrelvir/ ritonavir with food and vanilla pudding

    Drug: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir

Interventions

  • DrugNirmatrelvir/ ritonavir

    Single oral dose of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir tablets under fasted condition

  • DrugNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir

    Single oral dose of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir mixed in water under fasted condition

  • DrugNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir

    Single oral dose of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir mixed in infant formula under fasted condition

  • DrugNirmatrelvir/ritonavir

    Single oral dose of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir mixed in vanilla pudding under fasted condition

  • DrugNirmatrelvir/ritonavir

    Single oral dose of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir mixed in vanilla pudding under fed condition

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. AUCinf of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

    AUCinf was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity. AUCinf for nirmatrelvir was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration time curve; AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration.

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

  2. AUClast of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

    AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast for nirmatrelvir was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method.

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

  3. Cmax of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

    Cmax was defined maximum observed concentration. Cmax for nirmatrelvir was observed directly from data.

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

  4. AUCinf of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

    AUCinf was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity. AUCinf for ritonavir was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration time curve; AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration.

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

  5. AUClast of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

    AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast for ritonavir was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method.

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

  6. Cmax of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

    Cmax was defined maximum observed concentration. Cmax for ritonavir was observed directly from data.

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

Secondary outcomes

  1. AUCinf of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions

    AUCinf was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity. AUCinf for nirmatrelvir (under fasted/fed conditions) was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration time curve; AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration.

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 4 and 5.

  2. AUClast of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions

    AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast for nirmatrelvir (under fasted/fed conditions) was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method.

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 4 and 5.

  3. Cmax of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions

    Cmax was defined maximum observed concentration. Cmax for nirmatrelvir (under fasted/fed conditions) was observed directly from data.

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 4 and 5.

  4. AUCinf of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions

    AUCinf was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity. AUCinf for ritonavir (under fasted/fed conditions) was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration time curve; AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration.

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 4 and 5.

  5. AUClast of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions

    AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast for ritonavir (under fasted/fed conditions) was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method.

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 4 and 5.

  6. Cmax of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions

    Cmax was defined maximum observed concentration. Cmax for ritonavir (under fasted/fed conditions) was observed directly from data.

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 4 and 5.

  7. Number of Participants With All-Causality and Treatment-Related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study intervention without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study intervention and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. A serious AE (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; suspected transmission via a Pfizer product of an infectious agent, pathogenic or non-pathogenic. TEAEs included SAEs and all non-SAEs that occurred during the study.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (ie, up to 48 days).

  8. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)

    The following laboratory test abnormalities (without regard to baseline abnormality) were reported during the study: monocytes/leukocytes (percentage \[%\]) is larger than (\>) 1.2x upper limit of normal (ULN), specific gravity (scalar) \>1.030, and urine hemoglobin was larger or equal to (\>=) 1.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 4 of Period 5 (approximately 20 days)

  9. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs

    Supine blood pressure and pulse rate were measured with the participant's arm supported at the level of the heart and recorded after approximately 5 minutes of rest. Vital signs were done predose, 2 hours and 6 hours post dose on Day 1 of each treatment period and also on Day 4 of Period 5. Clinical significance of vital signs was determined at the investigator's discretion.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 4 of Period 5 (approximately 20 days).

  10. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

    A single 12-lead ECG was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QT, and QTc intervals and QRS complex. All scheduled ECGs were performed after the participant has rested quietly for at least 5 minutes in a supine position. Clinical significance of ECG values was determined at the investigator's discretion.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 4 of Period 5 (approximately 20 days).

  11. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination (PE) Values

    A complete physical examination included, at a minimum, head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, skin, heart and lung examinations, lymph nodes, and gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and neurological systems. A brief physical examination included, at a minimum, assessments of general appearance, the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, and participant reported symptoms. Completed PE were performed by trained medical personnel at the investigator site at Screening or Period 1 Day 1 only. A brief PE might be performed at other designated time points at the discretion of the investigator. Clinical significance of physical examination values was determined at the investigator's discretion.

    Time frame: Screening, Baseline up to Day 4 of Period 5 (approximately 20 days).

  12. Taste Assessment of Mouth Feel After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

    The sensory attributes of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder were evaluated by the participant using a Palatability Questionnaire. Each participant complete the palatability survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder. For the taste assessment of the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 (good) to 100 (bad) from the raw measurements on the questionnaire.

    Time frame: 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.

  13. Taste Assessment of Bitterness After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

    The sensory attributes of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder were evaluated by the participant using a Palatability Questionnaire. Each participant complete the palatability survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder. For the taste assessment of the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 (good) to 100 (bad) from the raw measurements on the questionnaire.

    Time frame: 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.

  14. Taste Assessment of Tongue/Mouth Burn After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

    The sensory attributes of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder were evaluated by the participant using a Palatability Questionnaire. Each participant complete the palatability survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder. For the taste assessment of the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 (good) to 100 (bad) from the raw measurements on the questionnaire.

    Time frame: 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.

  15. Taste Assessment of Throat Burn After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

    The sensory attributes of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder were evaluated by the participant using a Palatability Questionnaire. Each participant complete the palatability survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder. For the taste assessment of the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 (good) to 100 (bad) from the raw measurements on the questionnaire.

    Time frame: 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.

  16. Taste Assessment of Overall Liking After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

    The sensory attributes of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder were evaluated by the participant using a Palatability Questionnaire. Each participant complete the palatability survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder. For the taste assessment of the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 (good) to 100 (bad) from the raw measurements on the questionnaire.

    Time frame: 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.

07

Results

Posted May 10, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment A->B->C->D->ETreatment B->C->A->D->ETreatment C->A->B->D->ETreatment A->C->B->E->DTreatment B->A->C->E->DTreatment C->B->A->E->D
Started222222
Completed222222
Not completed000000

Outcome measures

PrimaryAUCinf of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

AUCinf was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity. AUCinf for nirmatrelvir was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration time curve; AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration.

Time frame:
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)
AUCinf of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
AUCinf of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles27090 ± 1830650 ± 2233030 ± 2434000 ± 2232810 ± 18
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 113.13 · 90% CI 102.77 to 124.53The ratios (and 90% confidence Intervals \[CIs\]) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 121.91 · 90% CI 110.75 to 134.20The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 125.49 · 90% CI 114.43 to 137.61The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 121.09 · 90% CI 110.42 to 132.79The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
PrimaryAUClast of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast for nirmatrelvir was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method.

Time frame:
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng*hr/mL
AUClast of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
ng*hr/mLNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
AUClast of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles26500 ± 2030110 ± 2332470 ± 2533540 ± 2232410 ± 19
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 113.62 · 90% CI 102.96 to 125.40The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 122.53 · 90% CI 111.02 to 135.22The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 126.55 · 90% CI 115.00 to 139.27The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 122.28 · 90% CI 111.11 to 134.57The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
PrimaryCmax of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

Cmax was defined maximum observed concentration. Cmax for nirmatrelvir was observed directly from data.

Time frame:
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Cmax of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
ng/mLNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
Cmax of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles2862 ± 203156 ± 264034 ± 234287 ± 224208 ± 23
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 110.28 · 90% CI 99.01 to 122.82The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 140.97 · 90% CI 126.57 to 157.01The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 149.83 · 90% CI 132.86 to 168.96The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 147.05 · 90% CI 130.40 to 165.83The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
PrimaryAUCinf of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

AUCinf was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity. AUCinf for ritonavir was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration time curve; AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration.

Time frame:
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng*hr/mL
AUCinf of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
ng*hr/mLNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
AUCinf of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles4005 ± 373876 ± 343479 ± 403986 ± 343176 ± 30
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 96.76 · 90% CI 87.31 to 107.23The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 86.86 · 90% CI 78.38 to 96.26The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 99.29 · 90% CI 87.39 to 112.80The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 79.29 · 90% CI 70.07 to 89.73The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
PrimaryAUClast of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast for ritonavir was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method.

Time frame:
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng*hr/mL
AUClast of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
ng*hr/mLNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
AUClast of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles3818 ± 383663 ± 353303 ± 403371 ± 492959 ± 32
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 95.92 · 90% CI 86.45 to 106.44The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 86.50 · 90% CI 77.96 to 95.98The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 88.29 · 90% CI 72.97 to 106.83The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 77.49 · 90% CI 64.04 to 93.76The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
PrimaryCmax of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

Cmax was defined maximum observed concentration. Cmax for ritonavir was observed directly from data.

Time frame:
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Cmax of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
ng/mLNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
Cmax of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles398.4 ± 47406.1 ± 46368.1 ± 52386.6 ± 66280.7 ± 35
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 101.92 · 90% CI 87.71 to 118.44The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 92.40 · 90% CI 79.52 to 107.38The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 97.04 · 90% CI 78.40 to 120.10The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 70.45 · 90% CI 56.92 to 87.19The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
SecondaryAUCinf of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions

AUCinf was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity. AUCinf for nirmatrelvir (under fasted/fed conditions) was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration time curve; AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration.

Time frame:
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 4 and 5.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng*hr/mL
AUCinf of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions
ng*hr/mLNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
AUCinf of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions34000 ± 2232810 ± 18
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 96.50 · 90% CI 90.08 to 103.37The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
SecondaryAUClast of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions

AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast for nirmatrelvir (under fasted/fed conditions) was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method.

Time frame:
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 4 and 5.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng*hr/mL
AUClast of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions
ng*hr/mLNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
AUClast of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions33540 ± 2232410 ± 19
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 96.63 · 90% CI 90.13 to 103.59The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
SecondaryCmax of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions

Cmax was defined maximum observed concentration. Cmax for nirmatrelvir (under fasted/fed conditions) was observed directly from data.

Time frame:
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 4 and 5.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Cmax of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions
ng/mLNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
Cmax of Nirmatrelvir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions4287 ± 224208 ± 23
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 98.15 · 90% CI 87.28 to 110.36The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
SecondaryAUCinf of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions

AUCinf was defined as area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity. AUCinf for ritonavir (under fasted/fed conditions) was calculated by AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point from the log-linear regression analysis and kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration time curve; AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration.

Time frame:
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 4 and 5.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng*hr/mL
AUCinf of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions
ng*hr/mLNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
AUCinf of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions3986 ± 343176 ± 30
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 78.49 · 90% CI 72.42 to 85.07The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
SecondaryAUClast of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions

AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast for ritonavir (under fasted/fed conditions) was calculated by linear/log trapezoidal method.

Time frame:
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 4 and 5.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng*hr/mL
AUClast of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions
ng*hr/mLNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
AUClast of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions3371 ± 492959 ± 32
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 87.77 · 90% CI 69.45 to 110.92The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
SecondaryCmax of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions

Cmax was defined maximum observed concentration. Cmax for ritonavir (under fasted/fed conditions) was observed directly from data.

Time frame:
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after dose on Day 1 of Periods 4 and 5.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Cmax of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions
ng/mLNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
Cmax of Ritonavir Following the Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Mixed With Vanilla Pudding Under Fasted/Fed Conditions386.6 ± 66280.7 ± 35
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted) vs Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed) · Ratio (%) of adjusted geometric mean: 72.60 · 90% CI 56.87 to 92.68The ratios (and 90% CIs) are expressed as percentages.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With All-Causality and Treatment-Related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study intervention without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study intervention and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. A serious AE (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; suspected transmission via a Pfizer product of an infectious agent, pathogenic or non-pathogenic. TEAEs included SAEs and all non-SAEs that occurred during the study.

Time frame:
Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (ie, up to 48 days).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With All-Causality and Treatment-Related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
Participants with all-causality TEAEs24522
Participants with all-causality SAEs00000
Participants with treatment-related TEAEs23111
Participants with treatment-related SAEs00000
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)

The following laboratory test abnormalities (without regard to baseline abnormality) were reported during the study: monocytes/leukocytes (percentage \[%\]) is larger than (\>) 1.2x upper limit of normal (ULN), specific gravity (scalar) \>1.030, and urine hemoglobin was larger or equal to (\>=) 1.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Day 4 of Period 5 (approximately 20 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)
ParticipantsNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
Monocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2x ULN00032
Specific gravity (scalar) >1.03000010
Urine hemoglobin >=100021
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs

Supine blood pressure and pulse rate were measured with the participant's arm supported at the level of the heart and recorded after approximately 5 minutes of rest. Vital signs were done predose, 2 hours and 6 hours post dose on Day 1 of each treatment period and also on Day 4 of Period 5. Clinical significance of vital signs was determined at the investigator's discretion.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Day 4 of Period 5 (approximately 20 days).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs
ParticipantsNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs00000
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

A single 12-lead ECG was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QT, and QTc intervals and QRS complex. All scheduled ECGs were performed after the participant has rested quietly for at least 5 minutes in a supine position. Clinical significance of ECG values was determined at the investigator's discretion.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Day 4 of Period 5 (approximately 20 days).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
ParticipantsNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values00000
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination (PE) Values

A complete physical examination included, at a minimum, head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, skin, heart and lung examinations, lymph nodes, and gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and neurological systems. A brief physical examination included, at a minimum, assessments of general appearance, the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, and participant reported symptoms. Completed PE were performed by trained medical personnel at the investigator site at Screening or Period 1 Day 1 only. A brief PE might be performed at other designated time points at the discretion of the investigator. Clinical significance of physical examination values was determined at the investigator's discretion.

Time frame:
Screening, Baseline up to Day 4 of Period 5 (approximately 20 days).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination (PE) Values
ParticipantsNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination (PE) Values00000
SecondaryTaste Assessment of Mouth Feel After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

The sensory attributes of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder were evaluated by the participant using a Palatability Questionnaire. Each participant complete the palatability survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder. For the taste assessment of the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 (good) to 100 (bad) from the raw measurements on the questionnaire.

Time frame:
1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Taste Assessment of Mouth Feel After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
Units on a scaleNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)
1 minute66.8 (54.08 to 79.42)65.4 (55.79 to 75.05)56.3 (46.17 to 66.50)
5 minutes73.8 (62.36 to 85.14)60.3 (51.86 to 68.64)57.2 (48.16 to 66.17)
10 minutes72.4 (61.34 to 83.49)59.3 (52.22 to 66.28)56.7 (46.44 to 66.89)
20 minutes65.5 (55.87 to 75.13)56.3 (46.43 to 66.24)53.4 (43.30 to 63.54)
SecondaryTaste Assessment of Bitterness After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

The sensory attributes of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder were evaluated by the participant using a Palatability Questionnaire. Each participant complete the palatability survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder. For the taste assessment of the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 (good) to 100 (bad) from the raw measurements on the questionnaire.

Time frame:
1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Taste Assessment of Bitterness After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
Units on a scaleNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)
1 minute75.3 (62.27 to 88.23)72.0 (63.22 to 80.78)61.4 (51.35 to 71.49)
5 minutes75.4 (65.00 to 85.83)66.5 (59.09 to 73.91)58.2 (50.21 to 66.12)
10 minutes72.1 (62.72 to 81.44)56.8 (47.15 to 66.35)56.8 (46.59 to 67.08)
20 minutes66.2 (56.47 to 75.86)57.0 (48.14 to 65.86)55.4 (43.97 to 66.86)
SecondaryTaste Assessment of Tongue/Mouth Burn After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

The sensory attributes of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder were evaluated by the participant using a Palatability Questionnaire. Each participant complete the palatability survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder. For the taste assessment of the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 (good) to 100 (bad) from the raw measurements on the questionnaire.

Time frame:
1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Taste Assessment of Tongue/Mouth Burn After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
Units on a scaleNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)
1 minute31.3 (17.50 to 45.00)36.3 (20.15 to 52.52)32.4 (16.58 to 48.25)
5 minutes33.9 (18.74 to 49.09)29.9 (16.51 to 43.32)29.8 (14.73 to 44.93)
10 minutes36.3 (19.61 to 52.89)29.7 (17.17 to 42.17)29.7 (15.83 to 43.50)
20 minutes31.0 (17.22 to 44.78)25.8 (12.18 to 39.49)26.7 (13.46 to 39.87)
SecondaryTaste Assessment of Throat Burn After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

The sensory attributes of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder were evaluated by the participant using a Palatability Questionnaire. Each participant complete the palatability survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder. For the taste assessment of the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 (good) to 100 (bad) from the raw measurements on the questionnaire.

Time frame:
1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Taste Assessment of Throat Burn After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
Units on a scaleNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)
1 minute30.9 (17.52 to 44.31)31.7 (15.42 to 47.92)26.4 (12.35 to 40.48)
5 minutes34.5 (18.32 to 50.68)37.5 (21.44 to 53.56)27.3 (12.56 to 41.94)
10 minutes34.4 (18.62 to 50.21)34.8 (17.90 to 51.60)29.4 (15.89 to 42.95)
20 minutes33.7 (18.90 to 48.43)31.3 (16.10 to 46.40)27.8 (13.96 to 41.54)
SecondaryTaste Assessment of Overall Liking After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles

The sensory attributes of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder were evaluated by the participant using a Palatability Questionnaire. Each participant complete the palatability survey immediately following dosing (within 1 min) and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post oral administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir oral powder. For the taste assessment of the study, the data used in the analysis were transcribed and rescaled to a score from 0 (good) to 100 (bad) from the raw measurements on the questionnaire.

Time frame:
1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after tasting each study intervention on Day 1 of each period.
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Taste Assessment of Overall Liking After Administration of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Different Delivery Vehicles
Units on a scaleNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)
1 minute73.5 (62.24 to 84.76)65.0 (53.60 to 76.40)55.8 (45.43 to 66.24)
5 minutes74.7 (64.19 to 85.15)66.3 (54.81 to 77.69)55.9 (46.29 to 65.54)
10 minutes72.6 (63.09 to 82.08)62.4 (53.45 to 71.39)57.1 (47.06 to 67.11)
20 minutes64.7 (51.68 to 77.66)56.4 (42.48 to 70.35)56.3 (46.25 to 66.42)

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (ie, up to 48 days).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)2/12 (16.7%)
Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)4/12 (33.3%)
Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)5/12 (41.7%)
Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)2/12 (16.7%)
Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)2/12 (16.7%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent other events
EventNirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Tablets (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Water (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Infant Formula (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fasted)Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir 300/100 mg Oral Powder Mixed With Vanilla Pudding (Fed)
Dry skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/121/122/120/120/12
Cerumen impactionEar and labyrinth disorders0/121/120/120/120/12
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/120/121/120/120/12
Gastrooesophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disorders0/121/120/120/120/12
Lip dryGastrointestinal disorders0/121/120/120/120/12
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/121/120/120/120/12
Oral disorderGastrointestinal disorders1/120/120/120/120/12
FatigueGeneral disorders0/120/120/120/121/12
Vessel puncture site haematomaGeneral disorders0/120/121/120/121/12
Vessel puncture site painGeneral disorders0/120/121/120/120/12

Baseline characteristics

All participants who were enrolled in this study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)All Participants
Mean (SD)47.2 ± 8.88
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)All Participants
18-44 Years4
45-64 Years8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Participants
Female1
Male11
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Participants
Hispanic or Latino1
Not Hispanic or Latino11
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)All Participants
White10
Black or African American2
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Pfizer Clinical Research Unit - Brussels
    Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région DE B-1070, Belgium
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 19, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 8, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05544786
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2022
Start date
Sep 28, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 29, 2022
Completion
Nov 29, 2022
Results posted
May 10, 2024
Last update
May 10, 2024

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion