ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05540379Updated Sep 14, 2022

Role of Virtual Reality Simulators in Basic Hysteroscopy Training Competence

An interventional study of Virtual Reality Training in Hysteroscopy, sponsored by Egymedicalpedia. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 26 Years to 36 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-14.

Sponsored by Egymedicalpedia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2021, registered Sep 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
26 Years to 36 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evaluation the efficacy of Virtual Reality simulator training in improving basic gynecological hysteroscopic skills and assess training levels in Ob/Gyn residents, as compared to others with previous hysteroscopic experience.

Read the detailed description

Diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy is one of the most common surgical intervention in gynecological surgery. In recent years, it has acquired a central role in diagnosis and treatment of a variety of uterine pathologies like fibroids, polyps and uterine malformations It is also pivotal in the management of primary or secondary infertility. Biopsy specimens are also sampled with hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.

In recent years, the technological advancements such as the use of small diameter (3,5mm) rigid hysteroscopes combined with "no touch" techniques have made hysteroscopy a commonly accepted procedure .

As a minimally invasive procedure, hysteroscopy is associated with fewer complications than traditional open surgery However, it is challenging to gain manual dexterity in hysteroscopy because of the fulcrum effect and the orientation between the two-dimensional screen and the three-dimensional uterine cavity. Other difficulties are the diminished tactile feedback and limited degrees of freedom, . Lack of proficiency in hysteroscopy can compromise patient safety by causing uterine perforation and trauma to neighboring organs. Also, pulmonary air embolisms and pulmonary edema are potential life-threatening complications.

Today it is generally accepted that the traditional apprentice-tutor model is no longer valid for training all skills necessary in Gynecological surgery and more specifically endoscopic surgery This agreement is based on the recognition that, in contrast to open surgery, endoscopic surgery demands surgical skills and psychomotor skills that should not necessarily be trained simultaneously. Increasing evidence strongly suggests that psychomotor skills must be trained earlier and outside the operating room, and several models have been proposed for this aim

02

Conditions studied

  • Hysteroscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Egymedicalpedia is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
26 Years to 36 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Residents, assistant lecturers, lecturers, associate professors and professors in Ob/Gyn department.
  2. Group A: Ob/Gyn physicians who had performed less than 50 diagnostic hysteroscopies and hysteroscopic polypectomy.
  3. Group B: Ob/Gyn physicians who had performed at least 50 diagnostic hysteroscopies and hysteroscopic polypectomy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

1- Physicians who had previously attended VR simulator training course

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A: Ob/Gyn physicians

    It is about 51 participants whom had performed less than 50 diagnostic hysteroscopies and hysteroscopic polypectomy.

    Device: Virtual Reality Training

  • Active comparator
    Group B: Ob/Gyn physicians

    It is about 51 participants whom had performed at least 50 diagnostic hysteroscopies and hysteroscopic polypectomy.

    Device: Virtual Reality Training

Interventions

  • DeviceVirtual Reality Training

    Training the obstetrics and Gynecologist Residents on Virtual endoscopic simulation and skills acquisition

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Virtual Reality Training Score

    • To compare the final score achieved by the physicians who had performed less than 50 diagnostic hysteroscopies and hysteroscopic polypectomy after 3 training sessions on VR hysteroscopy simulator with the score achieved by physicians who had performed at least 50 diagnostic hysteroscopies and hysteroscopic polypectomy to ensure the role of VR in training for hysteroscopic polypectomy.

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months after the trainig

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Medicine - Cairo University
    Giza, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05540379
Lead sponsor
Egymedicalpedia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 14, 2022
Start date
May 1, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2022
Completion
Apr 30, 2022
Last update
Sep 14, 2022

Study contacts

Ahmed M Fawzi El-Minawi, Professor
study chair · Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Faculty Of Medicine, Cairo University
Nadine A Sherif, Professor
principal investigator · Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Faculty Of Medicine, Cairo University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion