ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05534984STOMPUpdated Jun 23, 2026Results posted

Study of Tecovirimat for Human Mpox Virus

A Phase 3 interventional study of Tecovirimat Oral Capsule and Placebo for Tecovirimat in MPOX, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Terminated at 54 sites in 6 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-23.

Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
DSMB recommendation due to statistical futility
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
719
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to see if tecovirimat is safe and successful at treating mpox. The main questions were whether tecovirimat reduced time to lesion resolution and pain compared to placebo (no treatment).

Read the detailed description

This phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of tecovirimat for the treatment of mpox. Participants who had or were at higher risk for severe disease because of their age or medical history, were pregnant or breastfeeding, or were taking medications that could have decreased their exposure to tecovirimat were assigned to receive open-label tecovirimat for 14 days. All other participants were randomized 2:1 to receive either tecovirimat or placebo for 14 days.

Randomized participants who reported severe pain 5 days after randomization (on Day 6) or later or progressed to severe disease stopped blinded study treatment and started a 14-day course of open-label tecovirimat.

Participants self-monitored lesions daily through 28 days (Day 29) or resolution, whichever came first, and completed a daily pain scale and symptom diary. Study visits occurred weekly through 28 days (Day 29) and included safety and skin assessments and specimen collections. A final study visit occurred at 56 days (Day 57) to assess for recrudescence of infection (development of new lesions after initial resolution of disease).

Version 3 of the protocol gave participants the option to enroll and complete study visits remotely. Participants did not provide specimens at remote visits.

On November 26, 2024, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) recommended that the study close due to statistical futility. The study team and sponsor agreed with the DSMB's recommendation and the study closed to accrual on November 27, 2024. The primary analysis report forming the basis of the primary manuscript used data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024, the data cutoff for the November 2024 DSMB review (the primary completion date). Outcome measures submitted to clinicaltrials.gov were also based on data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024, and summaries of participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events submitted to clinicaltrials.gov were based on data from follow-up visits occurring through February 22, 2025 (the study completion date).

02

Conditions studied

  • MPOX

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • HMPXV
03

In context

Mpox, Monkeypox

72 studies on the registry are indexed under Mpox, Monkeypox; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 719 is above the median of 305 across 36 interventional studies indexed under Mpox, Monkeypox.

Browse Mpox, Monkeypox studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is the lead sponsor of 2,446 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Of its 405 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 302 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria (All participants; Arms A, B, and C):

  1. Laboratory-confirmed or presumptive human mpox virus (HMPXV) infection.
  2. HMPXV illness of \<14 days duration immediately prior to study entry.
  3. At least one active (not yet scabbed) skin lesion, mouth lesion, or proctitis with or without visible ulcers.
  4. Non-pregnant people of must agree to use at least one effective means of when engaging in sexual activities that can result in pregnancy, from the time of enrollment through the end of study participation.
  5. Ability to provide (for those above the legal age of consent and those providing consent for minors) and assent (for those who have reached the age of assent, but not the legal age of consent), as allowed by local ethics committees.
  6. For participants to be enrolled/followed remotely, ability and willingness to participate in remote telehealth assessments (i.e., video visits).

Additional Inclusion Criteria for Arms A and B:

1. Age ≥18 years at the time of study entry.

Additional Inclusion Criteria for Arm C:

Participants who meet the above entry criteria who also meet any of the following criteria will be registered to Arm C.

  1. Age \<18 years at the time of study entry.
  2. Those with severe HMPXV disease defined as having one or more of the following conditions:

    • Suspected or confirmed ocular involvement
    • Facial lesions on the malar, nose, or eyelid region
    • Confluent facial lesions
    • Hospitalization due to HMPXV infection or its complications
    • Lesions that require surgical intervention including debridement, urinary catheterization or sigmoidoscopy, or lesions extending below the dermis.

Those with or without severe disease and with one or more of the following:

  • Severe
  • Active skin conditions placing the person at higher risk for disseminated infection
  • Breastfeeding
  • Pregnancy
  • Receipt of potent inducers
  • Current or planned use of another drug at any point during tecovirimat/placebo dosing that would be predicted to have a significant drug-drug interaction with tecovirimat therapeutics.

Exclusion Criteria (All participants; Arms A, B, and C):

  1. Prior or concomitant receipt of tecovirimat (e.g., under an alternative access mechanism.
  2. Planned initiation of intramuscular cabotegravir/rilpivirine during study drug administration or for two weeks following completion of study drug administration. Participants who were stable on long-acting intramuscular cabotegravir/rilpivirine were allowed to enroll.
  3. Participants who, in the judgement of the investigator, will be at significantly increased risk as a result of participation in the study.
  4. Participants who require intravenous dosing of tecovirimat.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
719 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tecovirimat (Arm A)

    Participants randomized to tecovirimat.

    Drug: Tecovirimat Oral Capsule

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo (Arm B)

    Participants randomized to placebo.

    Drug: Placebo for Tecovirimat

  • Experimental
    Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)

    Participants assigned to open-label tecovirimat.

    Drug: Tecovirimat Oral Capsule (Open Label)

Interventions

  • * Participants weighing 25 kg to less than 40 kg - Tecovirimat 400 mg every 12 hours for 14 days * Participants weighing 40 kg to less than 120 kg - Tecovirimat 600 mg every 12 hours for 14 days * Participants weighing 120 kg and over - Tecovirimat 600 mg every 8 hours for 14 days

  • DrugPlacebo for Tecovirimat

    * Participants weighing 25 kg to less than 40 kg - Placebo for Tecovirimat 400 mg every 12 hours for 14 days * Participants weighing 40 kg to less than 120 kg - Placebo for Tecovirimat 600 mg every 12 hours for 14 days * Participants weighing 120 kg and over - Placebo for Tecovirimat 600 mg every 8 hours for 14 days

  • * Participants weighing \<3 kg - Tecovirimat 33.3 mg every 12 hours for 14 days * Participants weighing 3 kg to less than 6 kg- Tecovirimat 50 mg every 12 hours for 14 days * Participants weighing 6 kg to less than 13 kg - Tecovirimat 100 mg every 12 hours for 14 days * Participants weighing 13 kg to less than 25 kg - Tecovirimat 200 mg every 12 hours for 14 days * Participants weighing 25 kg to less than 40 kg - Tecovirimat 400 mg every 12 hours for 14 days * Participants weighing 40 kg to less than 120 kg - Tecovirimat 600 mg every 12 hours for 14 days * Participants weighing 120 kg and over - Tecovirimat 600 mg every 8 hours for 14 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 29

    Clinical resolution defined as all skin lesions scabbed, desquamated, or healed, and visible mucosal lesions healed. The cumulative proportion with clinical resolution was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. The treatment effect, i.e., the subdistribution hazard ratio of tecovirimat relative to placebo, was estimated using the Fine and Gray subdistribution proportional hazards model. All-cause death, start of open-label tecovirimat due to disease progression or severe pain, and use of other antivirals with expected activity against mpox were treated as competing events. Follow-up time was censored at last contact. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: From study entry through 28 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 29)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Time-weighted Average of Pain Intensity Difference Over 5 Days of Treatment

    Pain was measured on 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. Pain intensity difference at ith day of treatment (i = 2, ..., 6) calculated as NRS pain score at baseline (last available pre-treatment) minus NRS pain score on ith day of treatment Time-weighted average of pain intensity difference over 5 days of treatment was a weighted average of the pain intensity difference from treatment day 2 to treatment day 6, where the weights were calculated as the duration in days between the ith day of treatment and the day of the previous measurement. The lowest possible value that this could have been was -10, which would have indicated an increase in pain by 10 points on average over 5 days of treatment. The highest possible value that this could have been was +10, which would have indicated a decrease in pain by 10 points on average over 5 days of treatment. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Through 5 days of treatment (i.e., Treatment Day 6)

  2. Mean Time-weighted Average of Pain Intensity Difference Over 14 Days of Treatment

    Pain was measured on 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. Pain intensity difference at ith day of treatment (i = 2, ..., 15) calculated as NRS pain score at baseline (last available pre-treatment) minus NRS pain score on ith day of treatment Time-weighted average of pain intensity difference over 14 days of treatment was a weighted average of the pain intensity difference from treatment day 2 to treatment day 15, where the weights were calculated as the duration in days between the ith day of treatment and the day of the previous measurement. The lowest possible value that this could have been was -10, which would have indicated an increase in pain by 10 points on average over 5 days of treatment. The highest possible value that this could have been was +10, which would have indicated a decrease in pain by 10 points on average over 5 days of treatment. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Through 14 days of treatment (i.e., Treatment Day 15)

  3. Number of Participants Who Developed Severe HMPXV Disease

    Severe HMPXV disease was defined as one or more of the following conditions: suspected or confirmed ocular involvement, facial lesions on the malar, nose, or eyelid region, confluent facial lesions, hospitalization due to HMPXV infection or its complications, or lesions that required surgical intervention including debridement, urinary catheterization, or sigmoidoscopy, or extended below the dermis.

    Time frame: From study entry through 56 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 57)

  4. Number of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Skin Lesions

    HMPXV DNA was measured as detected or below limit of detection. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, and 57

  5. Number of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Oropharynx

    HMPXV DNA was measured as detected or below limit of detection. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, and 57

  6. Number of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Rectum

    HMPXV DNA was measured as detected or below limit of detection. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, and 57

  7. Number of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Blood

    HMPXV DNA measured as detected or below limit of detection. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, and 57

  8. Number of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Vaginal Swabs

    HMPXV DNA measured as detected or below limit of detection. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, and 57

  9. Cumulative Proportion With Complete Lesion Healing by Day 29

    Complete lesion healing was defined as all lesions re-epithelialized. The cumulative incidence of complete lesion healing was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. The treatment effect, i.e., the subdistribution hazard ratio of tecovirimat relative to placebo, was estimated using the Fine and Gray subdistribution proportional hazards model. All-cause death, start of open-label tecovirimat due to disease progression or severe pain, and use of other antivirals with expected activity against mpox were treated as competing events. Follow-up time was censored at last contact. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: From study entry through 28 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 29)

  10. Number of Participants With no Missed Doses (of Last Three Prescribed Doses)

    Since the adherence assessment was removed from protocol version 3.0, the number of participants with adherence data was expected to be small and no formal statistical comparison between treatment arms was done. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Days 8 and 15

  11. Median Change From Baseline in EuroQol (EQ) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

    Participants' self-rated health measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0 = "The worst health you can imagine" and 100 = "The best health you can imagine." Change in EQ VAS score at each timepoint calculated as absolute change from baseline (last available pre-treatment). Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Days 8, 15, and 29

  12. Number of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Mobility Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

    Participants' self-reported health state within mobility dimension of the five-dimension EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate their health state by selecting the most appropriate response level for them from five ordinal response levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5). Results were dichotomized into no problems (level 1) and any problems (levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 combined) for reporting and analysis. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 29

  13. Number of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Self-Care Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

    Participants' self-reported health state within self-care dimension of five-dimension EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate their health state by selecting the most appropriate response level for them from five ordinal response levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5). Results were dichotomized into no problems (level 1) and any problems (levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 combined) for reporting and analysis. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 29

  14. Number of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Usual Activities Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

    Participants' self-reported health state within usual activities dimension of five-dimension EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate their health state by selecting the most appropriate response level for them from five ordinal response levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5). Results were dichotomized into no problems (level 1) and any problems (levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 combined) for reporting and analysis. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 29

  15. Number of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Pain/Discomfort Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

    Participants' self-reported health state within pain/discomfort dimension of five-dimension EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate their health state by selecting the most appropriate response level for them from five ordinal response levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5). Results were dichotomized into no problems (level 1) and any problems (levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 combined) for reporting and analysis. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 29

  16. Number of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Anxiety/Depression Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

    Participants' self-reported health state within anxiety/depression dimension of five-dimension EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate their health state by selecting the most appropriate response level for them from five ordinal response levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5). Results were dichotomized into no problems (level 1) and any problems (levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 combined) for reporting and analysis. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 29

  17. Proportion of Participants With Grade 3 or Greater Treatment-emergent Adverse Event

    Study protocol required reporting of all adverse events (AEs) that (1) led to a change in study treatment regardless of grade, (2) met the serious AE (SAE) or Expedited AE (EAE) reporting requirement, and (3) were Grade 3 or greater. AEs were graded using the DAIDS AE Grading Table (Version 2.1). Severity Grade: 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Life-Threatening, 5 = Death Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Through 56 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 57)

  18. Number of Participants Who Died From Any Cause

    Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: Through 56 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 57)

  19. Tecovirimat Concentrations in Children Less Than 18 Years of Age

    Plasma tecovirimat concentrations were quantified using validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods. The lower limit of quantification was 5.0 ng/mL.

    Time frame: On Day 8, blood samples were collected pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose. On Day 15, a single blood sample was collected within 4 hours of study product administration.

Other outcomes

  1. Cumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 29 by Sex

    NIH-required analysis. Subgroup analysis of the primary outcome measure by sex. Interaction of treatment and sex was not tested because of the small number of females enrolled. Clinical resolution defined as all skin lesions scabbed, desquamated, or healed, and visible mucosal lesions healed. The cumulative proportion with clinical resolution in the presence of competing events was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, where all-cause death, start of open-label tecovirimat due to disease progression or severe pain, and use of other antivirals with expected activity against mpox were treated as competing events. Follow-up time was censored at last contact. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: From study entry through 28 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 29)

  2. Cumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 29 by Race

    NIH-required analysis. Subgroup analysis of the primary outcome measure by race (White, Non-White). "Non-White" includes participants who identified as Black or African American, Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, "other" race, having more than one race, or having unknown race. Clinical resolution defined as all skin lesions scabbed, desquamated, or healed, and visible mucosal lesions healed. The cumulative proportion with clinical resolution in the presence of competing events was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, where all-cause death, start of open-label tecovirimat due to disease progression or severe pain, and use of other antivirals with expected activity against mpox were treated as competing events. Follow-up time was censored at last contact. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: From study entry through 28 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 29)

  3. Cumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 29 by Ethnicity

    NIH-required analysis. Subgroup analysis of the primary outcome measure by ethnicity (Hispanic or Latino, Not Hispanic or Latino). Clinical resolution defined as all skin lesions scabbed, desquamated, or healed, and visible mucosal lesions healed. The cumulative proportion with clinical resolution in the presence of competing events was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, where all-cause death, start of open-label tecovirimat due to disease progression or severe pain, and use of other antivirals with expected activity against mpox were treated as competing events. Follow-up time was censored at last contact. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

    Time frame: From study entry through 28 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 29)

07

Results

Posted Feb 10, 2026
Limitations and caveats
Enrollment to the trial was stopped early due to statistical futility based on a recommendation from an independent DSMB at the second interim efficacy review.

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled at 58 clinical research sites in 7 countries (United States, Peru, Mexico, Thailand, Argentina, Japan, and Brazil) from September 2022 to November 2024.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Started290148281
Started treatment290146281
Started open-label tecovirimat2313281
Completed231112233
Not completed593648
Withdrew: Negative for hmpxv302120
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up231126
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject632
Withdrew: Adverse event010

Outcome measures

PrimaryCumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 29

Clinical resolution defined as all skin lesions scabbed, desquamated, or healed, and visible mucosal lesions healed. The cumulative proportion with clinical resolution was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. The treatment effect, i.e., the subdistribution hazard ratio of tecovirimat relative to placebo, was estimated using the Fine and Gray subdistribution proportional hazards model. All-cause death, start of open-label tecovirimat due to disease progression or severe pain, and use of other antivirals with expected activity against mpox were treated as competing events. Follow-up time was censored at last contact. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
From study entry through 28 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 29)
Reported as:
Number · cumulative proportion of participants
Cumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 29
cumulative proportion of participantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Cumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 290.83 (0.77 to 0.87)0.84 (0.76 to 0.90)0.85 (0.79 to 0.90)
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Fine and Gray · p = 0.89 (Threshold for statistical significance was 0.01907. Significance level used adjusts for interim looks according to the Lan and DeMets spending function analog of the O'Brien-Fleming boundaries.) · Subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.98 · 98.09% CI 0.74 to 1.31Subdistribution hazard ratio expressed as tecovirimat relative to placebo. Nominal 98.09% confidence interval presented adjusts for interim looks according to the Lan and DeMets spending function analog of the O'Brien-Fleming boundaries.
SecondaryMean Time-weighted Average of Pain Intensity Difference Over 5 Days of Treatment

Pain was measured on 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. Pain intensity difference at ith day of treatment (i = 2, ..., 6) calculated as NRS pain score at baseline (last available pre-treatment) minus NRS pain score on ith day of treatment Time-weighted average of pain intensity difference over 5 days of treatment was a weighted average of the pain intensity difference from treatment day 2 to treatment day 6, where the weights were calculated as the duration in days between the ith day of treatment and the day of the previous measurement. The lowest possible value that this could have been was -10, which would have indicated an increase in pain by 10 points on average over 5 days of treatment. The highest possible value that this could have been was +10, which would have indicated a decrease in pain by 10 points on average over 5 days of treatment. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Through 5 days of treatment (i.e., Treatment Day 6)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Time-weighted Average of Pain Intensity Difference Over 5 Days of Treatment
score on a scaleTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Mean Time-weighted Average of Pain Intensity Difference Over 5 Days of Treatment3.2 ± 2.13.1 ± 2.03.6 ± 2.1
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Mean difference (net): 0.1 · 95% CI -0.8 to 1.0Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. Confidence interval estimation assumed equal variances.
SecondaryMean Time-weighted Average of Pain Intensity Difference Over 14 Days of Treatment

Pain was measured on 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. Pain intensity difference at ith day of treatment (i = 2, ..., 15) calculated as NRS pain score at baseline (last available pre-treatment) minus NRS pain score on ith day of treatment Time-weighted average of pain intensity difference over 14 days of treatment was a weighted average of the pain intensity difference from treatment day 2 to treatment day 15, where the weights were calculated as the duration in days between the ith day of treatment and the day of the previous measurement. The lowest possible value that this could have been was -10, which would have indicated an increase in pain by 10 points on average over 5 days of treatment. The highest possible value that this could have been was +10, which would have indicated a decrease in pain by 10 points on average over 5 days of treatment. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Through 14 days of treatment (i.e., Treatment Day 15)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Time-weighted Average of Pain Intensity Difference Over 14 Days of Treatment
score on a scaleTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Mean Time-weighted Average of Pain Intensity Difference Over 14 Days of Treatment4.8 ± 2.24.9 ± 2.15.5 ± 2.0
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Mean difference (net): -0.2 · 95% CI -1.1 to 0.8Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. Confidence interval estimation assumed equal variances.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Developed Severe HMPXV Disease

Severe HMPXV disease was defined as one or more of the following conditions: suspected or confirmed ocular involvement, facial lesions on the malar, nose, or eyelid region, confluent facial lesions, hospitalization due to HMPXV infection or its complications, or lesions that required surgical intervention including debridement, urinary catheterization, or sigmoidoscopy, or extended below the dermis.

Time frame:
From study entry through 56 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 57)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Developed Severe HMPXV Disease
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Number of Participants Who Developed Severe HMPXV Disease961
SecondaryNumber of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Skin Lesions

HMPXV DNA was measured as detected or below limit of detection. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, and 57
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Skin Lesions
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Baseline181223
Day 8682666
Day 1510653122
Day 2211059105
Day 2911264102
Day 571156092
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.10 · Risk difference (rd): 11.6 · 95% CI -2.3 to 25.5Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.84 · Risk difference (rd): 1.2 · 95% CI -10.4 to 12.9Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Oropharynx

HMPXV DNA was measured as detected or below limit of detection. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, and 57
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Oropharynx
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Baseline854548
Day 813767140
Day 1513268142
Day 2212163115
Day 2912364107
Day 571206195
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.71 · Risk difference (rd): 1.4 · 95% CI -6.1 to 8.9Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Fisher Exact · p = 0.61 · Risk difference (rd): 1.4 · 95% CI -3.5 to 8.7Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Rectum

HMPXV DNA was measured as detected or below limit of detection. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, and 57
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Rectum
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Baseline462639
Day 81084891
Day 1513464120
Day 2212463103
Day 2912365103
Day 571206088
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.34 · Risk difference (rd): 6.4 · 95% CI -6.6 to 19.4Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Fisher Exact · p = 0.12 · Risk difference (rd): 5.1 · 95% CI -1.6 to 14.2Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Blood

HMPXV DNA measured as detected or below limit of detection. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, and 57
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Blood
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Baseline694540
Day 813965127
Day 1513665133
Day 2212262106
Day 2912567105
Day 571186299
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.68 · Risk difference (rd): 1.8 · 95% CI -6.7 to 10.3Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Fisher Exact · p = 0.12 · Risk difference (rd): 5.0 · 95% CI -1.6 to 14.0Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Vaginal Swabs

HMPXV DNA measured as detected or below limit of detection. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, and 57
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With HMPXV DNA Below Limit of Detection in Vaginal Swabs
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Baseline001
Day 8102
Day 15102
Day 22313
Day 29413
Day 57312
SecondaryCumulative Proportion With Complete Lesion Healing by Day 29

Complete lesion healing was defined as all lesions re-epithelialized. The cumulative incidence of complete lesion healing was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. The treatment effect, i.e., the subdistribution hazard ratio of tecovirimat relative to placebo, was estimated using the Fine and Gray subdistribution proportional hazards model. All-cause death, start of open-label tecovirimat due to disease progression or severe pain, and use of other antivirals with expected activity against mpox were treated as competing events. Follow-up time was censored at last contact. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
From study entry through 28 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 29)
Reported as:
Number · cumulative proportion of participants
Cumulative Proportion With Complete Lesion Healing by Day 29
cumulative proportion of participantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Cumulative Proportion With Complete Lesion Healing by Day 290.75 (0.68 to 0.80)0.75 (0.66 to 0.83)0.69 (0.62 to 0.75)
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Fine and Gray · p = 0.82 · Subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.97 · 95% CI 0.75 to 1.26Subdistribution hazard ratio expressed as tecovirimat relative to placebo.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With no Missed Doses (of Last Three Prescribed Doses)

Since the adherence assessment was removed from protocol version 3.0, the number of participants with adherence data was expected to be small and no formal statistical comparison between treatment arms was done. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Days 8 and 15
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With no Missed Doses (of Last Three Prescribed Doses)
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Day 8 — 0 missed doses431827
Day 8 — 1 missed doses001
Day 8 — 2 missed doses120
Day 8 — 3 missed doses110
Day 15 — 0 missed doses361624
Day 15 — 1 missed doses112
Day 15 — 2 missed doses001
Day 15 — 3 missed doses000
SecondaryMedian Change From Baseline in EuroQol (EQ) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

Participants' self-rated health measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0 = "The worst health you can imagine" and 100 = "The best health you can imagine." Change in EQ VAS score at each timepoint calculated as absolute change from baseline (last available pre-treatment). Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Days 8, 15, and 29
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Median Change From Baseline in EuroQol (EQ) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
score on a scaleTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Day 810 (0 to 20)10 (5 to 25)15 (5 to 30)
Day 1520 (5 to 35)20 (10 to 30)25 (10 to 40)
Day 2920 (10 to 35)24.5 (10 to 30)25 (10 to 45)
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.98
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.57
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.73
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Mobility Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

Participants' self-reported health state within mobility dimension of the five-dimension EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate their health state by selecting the most appropriate response level for them from five ordinal response levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5). Results were dichotomized into no problems (level 1) and any problems (levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 combined) for reporting and analysis. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 29
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Mobility Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Baseline — No problems16986153
Baseline — Any problems582871
Day 8 — No problems19798180
Day 8 — Any problems21839
Day 15 — No problems18496188
Day 15 — Any problems6114
Day 29 — No problems17083176
Day 29 — Any problems8215
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.52 · Risk difference (rd): 0.021 · 95% CI -0.043 to 0.085Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Fisher Exact · p = 0.43 · Risk difference (rd): 0.021 · 95% CI -0.030 to 0.061Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.51 · Risk difference (rd): 0.021 · 95% CI -0.044 to 0.071Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Self-Care Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

Participants' self-reported health state within self-care dimension of five-dimension EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate their health state by selecting the most appropriate response level for them from five ordinal response levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5). Results were dichotomized into no problems (level 1) and any problems (levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 combined) for reporting and analysis. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 29
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Self-Care Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Baseline — No problems17786170
Baseline — Any problems492854
Day 8 — No problems20399195
Day 8 — Any problems15724
Day 15 — No problems18494186
Day 15 — Any problems6316
Day 29 — No problems17483185
Day 29 — Any problems426
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.93 · Risk difference (rd): 0.003 · 95% CI -0.055 to 0.061Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Fisher Exact · p = 1.00 · Risk difference (rd): 0.001 · 95% CI -0.061 to 0.047Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Fisher Exact · p = 1.00 · Risk difference (rd): -0.001 · 95% CI -0.063 to 0.042Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Usual Activities Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

Participants' self-reported health state within usual activities dimension of five-dimension EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate their health state by selecting the most appropriate response level for them from five ordinal response levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5). Results were dichotomized into no problems (level 1) and any problems (levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 combined) for reporting and analysis. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 29
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Usual Activities Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Baseline — No problems14072123
Baseline — Any problems8742101
Day 8 — No problems17188164
Day 8 — Any problems471855
Day 15 — No problems17993176
Day 15 — Any problems11426
Day 29 — No problems17282171
Day 29 — Any problems6320
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.32 · Risk difference (rd): 0.046 · 95% CI -0.044 to 0.136Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Fisher Exact · p = 0.78 · Risk difference (rd): 0.017 · 95% CI -0.052 to 0.072Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Fisher Exact · p = 1.00 · Risk difference (rd): -0.002 · 95% CI -0.071 to 0.049Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Pain/Discomfort Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

Participants' self-reported health state within pain/discomfort dimension of five-dimension EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate their health state by selecting the most appropriate response level for them from five ordinal response levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5). Results were dichotomized into no problems (level 1) and any problems (levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 combined) for reporting and analysis. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 29
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Pain/Discomfort Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Baseline — No problems411523
Baseline — Any problems18699201
Day 8 — No problems1195998
Day 8 — Any problems9947121
Day 15 — No problems15281148
Day 15 — Any problems381654
Day 29 — No problems15880157
Day 29 — Any problems20534
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.86 · Risk difference (rd): 0.011 · 95% CI -0.105 to 0.126Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.46 · Risk difference (rd): 0.035 · 95% CI -0.058 to 0.128Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.12 · Risk difference (rd): 0.054 · 95% CI -0.015 to 0.122Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Anxiety/Depression Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

Participants' self-reported health state within anxiety/depression dimension of five-dimension EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate their health state by selecting the most appropriate response level for them from five ordinal response levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5). Results were dichotomized into no problems (level 1) and any problems (levels 2, 3, 4, and 5 combined) for reporting and analysis. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 8, 15, and 29
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Each Level of Response on Anxiety/Depression Dimension of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Baseline — No problems785063
Baseline — Any problems14964161
Day 8 — No problems12159114
Day 8 — Any problems9747105
Day 15 — No problems12370119
Day 15 — Any problems672783
Day 29 — No problems13865127
Day 29 — Any problems402064
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.98 · Risk difference (rd): 0.002 · 95% CI -0.114 to 0.117Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.19 · Risk difference (rd): 0.074 · 95% CI -0.038 to 0.186Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.85 · Risk difference (rd): -0.011 · 95% CI -0.120 to 0.098Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. If there were \<5 events in at least one arm, melded confidence intervals are presented. Otherwise, Wald confidence intervals are presented.
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Grade 3 or Greater Treatment-emergent Adverse Event

Study protocol required reporting of all adverse events (AEs) that (1) led to a change in study treatment regardless of grade, (2) met the serious AE (SAE) or Expedited AE (EAE) reporting requirement, and (3) were Grade 3 or greater. AEs were graded using the DAIDS AE Grading Table (Version 2.1). Severity Grade: 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Life-Threatening, 5 = Death Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Through 56 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 57)
Reported as:
Number · proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Grade 3 or Greater Treatment-emergent Adverse Event
proportion of participantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Proportion of Participants With Grade 3 or Greater Treatment-emergent Adverse Event0.044 (0.019 to 0.068)0.044 (0.010 to 0.079)0.071 (0.040 to 0.102)
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.98 · Risk difference (rd): -0.000 · 95% CI -0.043 to 0.042Treatment group difference calculated as tecovirimat minus placebo. Wald confidence intervals are presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Died From Any Cause

Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
Through 56 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 57)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Died From Any Cause
ParticipantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Number of Participants Who Died From Any Cause000
SecondaryTecovirimat Concentrations in Children Less Than 18 Years of Age

Plasma tecovirimat concentrations were quantified using validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods. The lower limit of quantification was 5.0 ng/mL.

Time frame:
On Day 8, blood samples were collected pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose. On Day 15, a single blood sample was collected within 4 hours of study product administration.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedCumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 29 by Sex

NIH-required analysis. Subgroup analysis of the primary outcome measure by sex. Interaction of treatment and sex was not tested because of the small number of females enrolled. Clinical resolution defined as all skin lesions scabbed, desquamated, or healed, and visible mucosal lesions healed. The cumulative proportion with clinical resolution in the presence of competing events was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, where all-cause death, start of open-label tecovirimat due to disease progression or severe pain, and use of other antivirals with expected activity against mpox were treated as competing events. Follow-up time was censored at last contact. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
From study entry through 28 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 29)
Reported as:
Number · cumulative proportion of participants
Cumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 29 by Sex
cumulative proportion of participantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Male0.83 (0.77 to 0.87)0.84 (0.75 to 0.90)0.84 (0.78 to 0.88)
Female1.00 (NA to NA)1.00 (NA to NA)0.89 (0.22 to 0.99)
Other pre-specifiedCumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 29 by Race

NIH-required analysis. Subgroup analysis of the primary outcome measure by race (White, Non-White). "Non-White" includes participants who identified as Black or African American, Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, "other" race, having more than one race, or having unknown race. Clinical resolution defined as all skin lesions scabbed, desquamated, or healed, and visible mucosal lesions healed. The cumulative proportion with clinical resolution in the presence of competing events was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, where all-cause death, start of open-label tecovirimat due to disease progression or severe pain, and use of other antivirals with expected activity against mpox were treated as competing events. Follow-up time was censored at last contact. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
From study entry through 28 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 29)
Reported as:
Number · cumulative proportion of participants
Cumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 29 by Race
cumulative proportion of participantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Non-White0.83 (0.74 to 0.89)0.85 (0.71 to 0.93)0.82 (0.72 to 0.88)
White0.83 (0.74 to 0.89)0.83 (0.70 to 0.91)0.86 (0.78 to 0.92)
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.99 (Threshold for statistical significance was 0.01907. Significance level used adjusts for interim looks according to the Lan and DeMets spending function analog of the O'Brien-Fleming boundaries.)Test of interaction constructed based on sHRs (tecovirimat relative to placebo) from Fine and Gray models implemented within each race subgroup.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.98 · 98.09% CI 0.65 to 1.48Subdistribution hazard ratio expressed as tecovirimat relative to placebo among non-White participants.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.98 · 98.09% CI 0.66 to 1.45Subdistribution hazard ratio expressed as tecovirimat relative to placebo among White participants.
Other pre-specifiedCumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 29 by Ethnicity

NIH-required analysis. Subgroup analysis of the primary outcome measure by ethnicity (Hispanic or Latino, Not Hispanic or Latino). Clinical resolution defined as all skin lesions scabbed, desquamated, or healed, and visible mucosal lesions healed. The cumulative proportion with clinical resolution in the presence of competing events was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, where all-cause death, start of open-label tecovirimat due to disease progression or severe pain, and use of other antivirals with expected activity against mpox were treated as competing events. Follow-up time was censored at last contact. Includes data from follow-up visits occurring through October 23, 2024.

Time frame:
From study entry through 28 days of follow-up (i.e., Day 29)
Reported as:
Number · cumulative proportion of participants
Cumulative Proportion With Clinical Resolution by Day 29 by Ethnicity
cumulative proportion of participantsTecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
Hispanic or Latino0.85 (0.76 to 0.91)0.88 (0.73 to 0.95)0.85 (0.76 to 0.91)
Not Hispanic or Latino0.81 (0.72 to 0.87)0.80 (0.67 to 0.88)0.83 (0.74 to 0.89)
Statistical analysis
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Z-test · p = 0.26 (Threshold for statistical significance was 0.01907. Significance level used adjusts for interim looks according to the Lan and DeMets spending function analog of the O'Brien-Fleming boundaries.)Test of interaction constructed based on sHRs (tecovirimat relative to placebo) from Fine and Gray models implemented within each ethnicity subgroup.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.82 · 98.09% CI 0.53 to 1.28Subdistribution hazard ratio expressed as tecovirimat relative to placebo among Hispanic or Latino participants.
  • Tecovirimat (Arm A) vs Placebo (Arm B) · Subdistribution hazard ratio: 1.09 · 98.09% CI 0.74 to 1.62Subdistribution hazard ratio expressed as tecovirimat relative to placebo among Not Hispanic or Latino participants.

Adverse events

Collected over From study entry to study completion at Day 57 or premature study discontinuation.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tecovirimat (Arm A)0/267 (0%)4/267 (1.5%)7/267 (2.6%)
Tecovirimat (Arm A) to Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)0/23 (0%)2/23 (8.7%)12/23 (52.2%)
Placebo (Arm B)0/132 (0%)0/132 (0%)4/132 (3%)
Placebo (Arm B) to Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)0/13 (0%)2/13 (15.4%)9/13 (69.2%)
Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)0/281 (0%)14/281 (5%)14/281 (5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent serious events
EventTecovirimat (Arm A)Tecovirimat (Arm A) to Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)Placebo (Arm B)Placebo (Arm B) to Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
HypersensitivityImmune system disorders1/2670/230/1321/130/281
Peritonsillar abscessInfections and infestations0/2670/230/1321/130/281
Skin infectionInfections and infestations0/2670/230/1321/131/281
MonkeypoxInfections and infestations0/2671/230/1320/133/281
Rectal abscessInfections and infestations1/2671/230/1320/131/281
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/2670/230/1320/132/281
Haemoglobin decreasedInvestigations0/2670/230/1320/132/281
LymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/2670/230/1320/130/281
Skin ulcerSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/2670/230/1320/130/281
Abscess limbInfections and infestations0/2670/230/1320/131/281
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent other events
EventTecovirimat (Arm A)Tecovirimat (Arm A) to Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)Placebo (Arm B)Placebo (Arm B) to Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)
MonkeypoxInfections and infestations0/2674/230/1325/130/281
ProctalgiaGastrointestinal disorders0/2674/230/1322/130/281
Penile swellingReproductive system and breast disorders0/2671/230/1321/130/281
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/2670/231/1321/130/281
LymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/2671/230/1320/130/281
SwellingGeneral disorders0/2671/230/1320/130/281
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/2671/230/1320/130/281
Penile painReproductive system and breast disorders0/2671/230/1320/130/281
Pain of skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/2671/230/1320/130/281
Skin ulcerSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/2671/230/1320/130/281

Baseline characteristics

All eligible participants. One participant randomized to the placebo arm was later found ineligible for study participation and excluded from all analyses.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Tecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)Total
Median34 (28 to 40)34 (29 to 41)35 (30 to 41)34 (28 to 41)
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Tecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)Total
<40 years214103194511
>=40 years764487207
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Tecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)Total
Cisgender284141269694
Transgender spectrum661224
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Tecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)Total
Female451221
Male286142269697
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Tecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)Total
Hispanic or Latino13760133330
Not Hispanic or Latino15082143375
Unknown or Not Reported35513
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Tecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)Total
White14986150385
Black or African American351169115
Asian19161247
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander2013
American Indian or Alaska Native3014
Other28111554
Multiple63716
Unknown48202694
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Tecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)Total
Argentina3238
United States234120241595
Japan1124
Brazil101314
Mexico137828
Thailand104721
Peru2813748
Days from Symptom Onset, Continuous
Days from Symptom Onset, Continuous(days)Tecovirimat (Arm A)Placebo (Arm B)Open-Label Tecovirimat (Arm C)Total
Median7 (5 to 10)8 (5 to 10)8 (6 to 10)8 (5 to 10)

11 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

54 sites
  • Alabama CRS
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • Los Angeles LGBT Center CRS
    Los Angeles, California 90028, United States
  • UCLA CARE Center CRS
    Los Angeles, California 90035, United States
  • University of California, Davis CRS
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • UCSD Antiviral Research Center CRS
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • University of California, San Francisco HIV/AIDS CRS
    San Francisco, California 94110, United States
  • Harbor University of California Los Angeles Center
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
  • University of Colorado Denver NICHD CRS
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • University of Colorado Hospital CRS
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Denver Public Health CRS
    Denver, Colorado 80204, United States
  • University of Florida
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
  • University of Florida Jacksonville NICHD CRS
    Jacksonville, Florida 32209, United States
  • University of Miami / Jackson Memorial Hospital
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Univ. of South Florida (USF) College of Medicine A
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • The Ponce de Leon Center CRS
    Atlanta, Georgia 30308, United States
  • Rush University Cook County Hospital Chicago NICHD CRS
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University CRS
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital CRS (MGH CRS)
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital Therapeutics
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Henry Ford Hospital CRS
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Washington University Therapeutics (WT) CRS
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • New Jersey Medical School Clinical Research Center
    Newark, New Jersey 07103, United States
  • Weill Cornell Chelsea CRS
    New York, New York 10010, United States
  • Mount Sinai West Samuels CRS
    New York, New York 10019, United States
  • Harlem Prevention Center
    New York, New York 10027, United States
  • Columbia Physicians & Surgeons (P&S) CRS
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Weill Cornell Uptown CRS
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center NICHD CRS
    New York, New York 10457, United States
  • Infectious Disease Clinical and Translational Research
    New York, New York 11029, United States
  • University of Rochester Adult HIV Therapeutic
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • SUNY Stony Brook NICHD CRS
    Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center CRS
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center CRS
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • Cincinnati CRS
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, United States
  • Case Western Reserve University CTU
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • Ohio State University CRS
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Penn Therapeutics CRS
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh CRS
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital ATN CRS
    Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States
  • North Texas Infectious Disease Consultants
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • UT Southwestern Infectious Disease Research Unit
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • Houston AIDS Research Team (HART) CRS
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Washington Positive Research
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
  • Fundacion Huesped CRS
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Centro de Pesquisas Clínicas IC-HCFMUSP CRS
    São Paulo, Brazil
  • Nutricion Mexico CRS
    Mexico City, Mexico
  • Centro de Investigaciones Tecnológicas, Biomédicas y Medioambientales CRS (CITBM) - Unidad de Ensayos Clínicos (UNIDEC) CRS
    Callao, Peru
  • Barranco CRS
    Lima, Peru
  • San Miguel CRS
    Lima, Peru
  • Socios En Salud Sucursal Peru
    Lima, Peru
  • Via Libre CRS
    Lima, Peru
  • Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre
    Bangkok, Thailand
  • Vaccine Trial Centre, Mahidol University CRS
    Bangkok, Thailand
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Zucker J, Fischer WA 2nd, Zheng L, McCarthy C, Saha PT, Javan AC, Greninger A, Hamill MM, Leslie K, Brooks KM, Berardi J, Smith D, Hosey L, Aldrovandi G, Ferbas K, Day C, Bender Ignacio RA, Bolan R, Glesby MJ, Landovitz RJ, Luetkemeyer AF, Sierra Madero J, Gandhi RT, Nachman S, Eron J, Currier JS, Wilkin T; STOMP/A5418 Investigators. Tecovirimat for the Treatment of Mpox. N Engl J Med. 2026 Feb 26;394(9):884-895. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2506495. PubMed 41740032 ↗
  • Chenchula S, Atal S, Ghanta MK, Uppugunduri CR, Karunakaran S, Amerneni KC, Sarma P, Prakash S, Amerneni LS, Padmavathi R, Anitha K, Sri Varshini T, Vishnu Vardhan K, Kaore S, Sadasivam B. Emerging variants of Mpox virus and tecovirimat resistance: Genomic insights and implications for treatment strategies. Virology. 2025 Jul;608:110532. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2025.110532. Epub 2025 Apr 12. PubMed 40245474 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underlie results in the publication after deidentification

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Beginning 3 months following publication and available throughout period of funding of the Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally (ACTG) by NIH

Access criteria: With whom? Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use of the data that is approved by the ACTG. For what types of analyses? To achieve aims in the proposal approved by the ACTG. By what mechanism will data be made available? Researchers may submit a request for access to data using the ACTG "Data Request" form at: https://actgnetwork.org/submit-a-proposal/. Researchers of approved proposals will need to sign an ACTG Data Use Agreement before receiving the data

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2022 to primary completion in Oct 2024, 25 months.

Results were first posted in Feb 2026, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 8, 2022
First posted
Sep 10, 2022
StartActual
Sep 8, 2022
Primary completionActual
Oct 23, 2024
CompletionActual
Feb 22, 2025
Results first posted
Feb 10, 2026
Last update
Jun 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05534984
Collaborators
SIGA Technologies
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 10, 2022
Start date
Sep 8, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 23, 2024
Completion
Feb 22, 2025
Results posted
Feb 10, 2026
Last update
Jun 23, 2026

Study contacts

Timothy Wilkin, MD, MPH
study chair · Cornell

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tecovirimat

Start the discussion