CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05523479METEORUpdated May 8, 2026

The Maximizing Extubation Outcomes Through Educational and Organizational Research (METEOR) Trial

An interventional study of Traditional online education and Interprofessional education in Acute Respiratory Failure and Airway Extubation, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Active, not recruiting at 17 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-08.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13,018
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The METEOR Trial will compare four implementation strategies-traditional online education, protocol-directed care, interprofessional education, and a combination of protocol-directed care and interprofessional education-to test the hypotheses that interprofessional education is superior to traditional online education as an implementation strategy in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the benefits of interprofessional education are increased when interprofessional education is paired with a clinical protocol. Additionally, the trial will also test the hypothesis that preventive post-extubation NIV for high-risk patients and preventive post-extubation HFNC for low-risk patients are both superior to current clinical practice (i.e., conventional post-extubation oxygen therapy).

Read the detailed description

Nearly one million patients require invasive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure in the United States each year. Most of these patients will recover to the point of extubation, yet even those who are extubated remain vulnerable to complications and poor outcomes. Multiple high-profile randomized controlled trials have shown that two preventive post-extubation respiratory therapies-noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC)-can prevent recurrent respiratory failure, reintubation, and death in this population. Despite this evidence, however, these therapies remain severely underutilized, leading to preventable morbidity and mortality. To address this implementation gap, the investigators will conduct the Maximizing Extubation outcomes Through Educational and Organizational Research (METEOR) Trial, a cluster-randomized, stepped-wedge, type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of interprofessional education about preventive post-extubation NIV and HFNC with and without clinical protocols. The METEOR Trial was designed based on extensive preliminary studies, during which the investigators identified barriers to adoption of preventive post-extubation respiratory care and pilot tested interprofessional education as an implementation strategy in the ICU. These studies revealed that a major barrier to implementation is the lack of a shared understanding about the value of these therapies within the interprofessional ICU team; a theory-based interprofessional education intervention designed to create a shared understanding and support "transactive memory" among team members is both feasible and acceptable; and interprofessional education can be strengthened by linking it with a clinical protocol. During the METEOR Trial, the investigators will randomize ICUs to one of four implementation strategies: an active control, protocol-directed care, interprofessional education, or a combination of protocol-directed care and interprofessional education. In parallel, the investigators will randomize ICUs to one of two clinical strategies, one emphasizing either post- extubation NIV or HFNC based on patient risk vs. one emphasizing post-extubation HFNC for all patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Failure
  • Airway Extubation

Keywords

  • Interprofessional Education
  • Clinical Protocols
  • Noninvasive Ventilation
  • Oxygen Inhalation Therapy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,385 studies on the registry; 167 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All adults treated with invasive mechanical ventilation >24 hours in participating ICUs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
13,018 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Online education about risk-stratified post-extubation NIV/HFNC

    During this period, ICU providers receive traditional online education that demonstrates the evidence supporting use of preventive post-extubation respiratory support (NIV or HFNC) over conventional post-extubation oxygen and supports the implementation of risk-stratified, preventive post-extubation NIV/HFNC.

    Behavioral: Traditional online education · Other: Risk-stratified preventive post-extubation noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC)

  • Active comparator
    Interprofessional education about risk-stratified post-extubation NIV/HFNC

    During this period, ICU providers receive interprofessional education that demonstrates the evidence supporting use of preventive post-extubation respiratory support (NIV or HFNC) over conventional post-extubation oxygen and supports the implementation of risk-stratified, preventive post-extubation NIV/HFNC.

    Behavioral: Interprofessional education · Other: Risk-stratified preventive post-extubation noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC)

  • Active comparator
    Clinical protocol about risk-stratified post-extubation NIV/HFNC

    During this period, ICU providers deploy a clinical protocol that supports the implementation of risk-stratified, preventive post-extubation NIV/HFNC.

    Behavioral: Clinical protocol · Other: Risk-stratified preventive post-extubation noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC)

  • Active comparator
    Interprofessional education plus clinical protocol about risk-stratified post-extubation NIV/HFNC

    During this period, ICU providers receive interprofessional education and use a clinical protocol that supports the implementation of risk-stratified, preventive post-extubation NIV/HFNC.

    Behavioral: Interprofessional education · Behavioral: Clinical protocol · Other: Risk-stratified preventive post-extubation noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC)

  • Active comparator
    Online education about post-extubation HFNC

    During this period, ICU providers receive traditional online education that demonstrates the evidence supporting use of preventive post-extubation respiratory support (NIV or HFNC) over conventional post-extubation oxygen and supports the implementation of preventive post-extubation HFNC for all eligible patients.

    Behavioral: Traditional online education · Other: Preventive post-extubation high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC)

  • Active comparator
    Interprofessional education about post-extubation HFNC

    During this period, ICU providers receive interprofessional education that demonstrates the evidence supporting use of preventive post-extubation respiratory support (NIV or HFNC) over conventional post-extubation oxygen and supports the implementation of preventive post-extubation HFNC for all eligible patients.

    Behavioral: Interprofessional education · Other: Preventive post-extubation high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC)

  • Active comparator
    Clinical protocol about post-extubation HFNC

    During this period, ICU providers deploy a clinical protocol that supports the implementation of preventive post-extubation HFNC for all eligible patients.

    Behavioral: Clinical protocol · Other: Preventive post-extubation high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC)

  • Active comparator
    Interprofessional education plus clinical protocol about post-extubation HFNC

    During this period, ICU providers receive interprofessional education and use a clinical protocol that supports the implementation of preventive post-extubation HFNC for all eligible patients.

    Behavioral: Interprofessional education · Behavioral: Clinical protocol · Other: Preventive post-extubation high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC)

  • No intervention
    Usual care

    During this period, ICU providers receive no structured education about preventive, post-extubation respiratory support therapies

Interventions

  • BehavioralTraditional online education

    A 30-60 minute, online, interactive, educational video that is customized to each provider type and offered with provider-specific continuing education credits

  • BehavioralInterprofessional education

    Interprofessional education (IPE) consists of both classroom-based IPE and just-in-time IPE. In classroom-based IPE, a trained physician educator with content expertise who works in the ICU leads a 60-to-90-minute, in-person, IPE workshop consisting of a 30-minute didactic session and a 30-to-60-minute small group session, during which participants work together to apply the content to authentic cases. The workshops, which are designed according to modern principles of adult learning and IPE, present the rationale and evidence supporting the preventive, post-extubation therapies. They are specifically designed to foster authenticity, reinforce role identity, and relate the content to life experience. In just-in-time IPE, trained local champions meet with the interprofessional ICU team each morning to identify eligible patients and, as needed, briefly review the evidence supporting proper use of the assigned preventive, post-extubation strategy.

  • BehavioralClinical protocol

    An "adequately explicit" protocol provides specific rules for use of the preventive, post-extubation therapy based on patient data. A "ready-to-customize" version of the protocol with instructions to work with key local stakeholders to revise the protocol, accounting for local needs and resources, is provided. After local customization, a local champion then disseminates the protocol based on local practices.

  • OtherRisk-stratified preventive post-extubation noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC)

    Preventive post-extubation NIV for high-risk patients and preventive post-extubation HFNC for low-risk patients

  • OtherPreventive post-extubation high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC)

    Preventive post-extubation HFNC for all eligible patients (without risk stratification)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of use of post-extubation NIV or HFNC among eligible participants (primary implementation outcome)

    Defined the number of participants who received post-extubation NIV or HFNC divided by the number of participants eligible for post-extubation NIV or HFNC

    Time frame: 60 days after initiating invasive mechanical ventilation

  2. In-hospital mortality truncated at 60 days from intubation (primary clinical outcome)

    Defined as the number of participants who died during hospitalization

    Time frame: 60 days after initiating invasive mechanical ventilation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of eligible participants receiving care from providers who completed an implementation intervention

    Defined as the total number of participants who received care from ICU providers (physicians, nurses, and/or respiratory therapists) who completed an implementation intervention (traditional online education, interprofessional education, and/or clinical protocol)

    Time frame: Up to 3 years

  2. Use of post-extubation NIV or HFNC among eligible participants 6 months after the implementation intervention (IPE plus protocol) is fully deployed

    Defined the number of participants who received post-extubation NIV or HFNC divided by the number of participants eligible for post-extubation NIV or HFNC during the one-month period beginning 6 months after the implementation intervention (IPE plus protocol) is fully deployed

    Time frame: 6 months after the implementation intervention (IPE plus protocol) is fully deployed

  3. 90-day survival

    Defined as time from initiating invasive mechanical ventilation to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored)

    Time frame: 90 days after initiating invasive mechanical ventilation

  4. ICU length of stay

    Defined as time from the time of initiating invasive mechanical ventilation to successful discharge from the ICU, where "successful" indicates that discharge was followed by at least 48 hours alive without ICU readmission

    Time frame: 60 days after initiating invasive mechanical ventilation

  5. Hospital length of stay

    Defined as time from the time of initiating invasive mechanical ventilation to successful hospital discharge, where "successful" indicates that discharge was followed by at least 48 hours alive without hospital readmission

    Time frame: 60 days after initiating invasive mechanical ventilation

  6. Post-extubation respiratory failure

    Defined as reintubation and resumption of invasive mechanical ventilation during the 48 hours after extubation

    Time frame: 60 days after initiating invasive mechanical ventilation

  7. Duration of mechanical ventilation

    Defined as time from the time of initiating invasive mechanical ventilation to successful extubation, where "successful" indicates that extubation was followed by at least 48 hours alive without reintubation

    Time frame: 60 days after initiating invasive mechanical ventilation

  8. 28-day ventilator-free days (VFDs)

    Defined as the number of days a participant was breathing without assistance from the day they of intubation (initiating invasive mechanical ventilation) to 28 days later, where "breathing without assistance" indicates that discontinuation of assisted breathing was followed by at least 48 hours alive without reintubation

    Time frame: 28 days after initiating invasive mechanical ventilation

  9. Ventilator-associated events (VAEs)

    Defined as the number of participants who have a VAE according to Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria divided by the number of participants who received invasive mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: Up to 60 days after initiating invasive mechanical ventilation

  10. Organ failure (daily SOFA)

    Defined as mean daily sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score from initiating invasive mechanical ventilation to up to 60 days later

    Time frame: Up to 60 days after initiating invasive mechanical ventilation

07

Study locations

17 sites
  • UPMC Carlisle
    Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17015, United States
  • UPMC Hanover
    Hanover, Pennsylvania 17331, United States
  • UPMC Harrisburg
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101, United States
  • UPMC Community Osteopathic
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17109, United States
  • UPMC West Shore
    Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17050, United States
  • UPMC East
    Monroeville, Pennsylvania 15146, United States
  • UPMC Jameson
    New Castle, Pennsylvania 16105, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • UPMC Presbyterian
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • UPMC St. Margaret
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15215, United States
  • UPMC Mercy
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219, United States
  • UPMC Shadyside
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232, United States
  • UPMC Passavant
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15237, United States
  • UPMC Northwest
    Seneca, Pennsylvania 16346, United States
  • UPMC Williamsport
    Williamsport, Pennsylvania 17701, United States
  • UPMC Memorial
    York, Pennsylvania 17408, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ouellette DR, Patel S, Girard TD, Morris PE, Schmidt GA, Truwit JD, Alhazzani W, Burns SM, Epstein SK, Esteban A, Fan E, Ferrer M, Fraser GL, Gong MN, Hough CL, Mehta S, Nanchal R, Pawlik AJ, Schweickert WD, Sessler CN, Strom T, Kress JP. Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults: An Official American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: Inspiratory Pressure Augmentation During Spontaneous Breathing Trials, Protocols Minimizing Sedation, and Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately After Extubation. Chest. 2017 Jan;151(1):166-180. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.036. Epub 2016 Nov 3. PubMed 27818331 ↗
  • Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, Hess D, Hill NS, Nava S, Navalesi P Members Of The Steering Committee, Antonelli M, Brozek J, Conti G, Ferrer M, Guntupalli K, Jaber S, Keenan S, Mancebo J, Mehta S, Raoof S Members Of The Task Force. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2017 Aug 31;50(2):1602426. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02426-2016. Print 2017 Aug. PubMed 28860265 ↗
  • Granton D, Chaudhuri D, Wang D, Einav S, Helviz Y, Mauri T, Mancebo J, Frat JP, Jog S, Hernandez G, Maggiore SM, Hodgson CL, Jaber S, Brochard L, Trivedi V, Ricard JD, Goligher EC, Burns KEA, Rochwerg B. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy or Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately Postextubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):e1129-e1136. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004576. PubMed 32947472 ↗
  • Sang L, Nong L, Zheng Y, Xu Y, Chen S, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Liu X, Li Y. Effect of high-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation for preventing reintubation: a Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review. J Thorac Dis. 2020 Jul;12(7):3725-3736. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1050. PubMed 32802452 ↗
  • Fernando SM, Tran A, Sadeghirad B, Burns KEA, Fan E, Brodie D, Munshi L, Goligher EC, Cook DJ, Fowler RA, Herridge MS, Cardinal P, Jaber S, Moller MH, Thille AW, Ferguson ND, Slutsky AS, Brochard LJ, Seely AJE, Rochwerg B. Noninvasive respiratory support following extubation in critically ill adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2022 Feb;48(2):137-147. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06581-1. Epub 2021 Nov 25. PubMed 34825256 ↗
  • Argote L, Miron-Spektor E. Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science 2011;22:1123-37.
  • Kasza J, Bowden R, Hooper R, Forbes AB. The batched stepped wedge design: A design robust to delays in cluster recruitment. Stat Med. 2022 Aug 15;41(18):3627-3641. doi: 10.1002/sim.9438. Epub 2022 May 21. PubMed 35596691 ↗
  • Prendergast NT, Kahn JM, Angus DC, Argote L, Barnes B, Chang CH, Graff S, Hess DR, Onyemekwu CA, Rak KJ, Russell JL, Seaman JB, Toth KM, Girard TD. Maximizing Extubation Outcomes Through Educational and Organizational Research (METEOR) Trial: protocol for a batched, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Oct 23;15(10):e108956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108956. PubMed 41130691 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 7, 2025
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 27, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The University of Pittsburgh will comply with applicable NIH guidelines on data sharing as published online. The investigators will make scientific data as widely and freely available as possible while safeguarding the privacy of participants and protecting confidential and proprietary data. Data will be shared as elements that meet or exceed the HIPAA Privacy Rule definition of "safe harbor de-identified" data, so that the rights and privacy of human subjects who participate in research are protected at all times. Principles and guidelines as outlined by the NIH Office of Technology Transfer will be observed in sharing all scientific resources.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05523479
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Timothy Girard, MD, MSCI (Professor of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 31, 2022
Start date
Mar 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2026
Completion
May 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 8, 2026

Study contacts

Timothy D Girard, MD, MSCI
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion