ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05520463Updated Jul 7, 2023

Fluoroscopy Versus Ultrasound Guidance for Sacral Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Ablation

An interventional study of Sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation under ultrasound guidance and Sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation under fluoroscopy guidance in Sacroiliac Joint Arthritis and Back Pain, sponsored by Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-07.

Sponsored by Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sacroiliac joint is a diarthroidal and synovial joint that receives sensory innervatin by the sacral lateral branches ( commonly S1-3, with variable contributions from L5 dorsal ramus and S4 lateral branch). Sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation and block techniques are widely used for the management of sacroiliac joint pain. With the increasing use of ultrasound technology in pain medicine, the ultrasound guided approaches gained popularity. To our knowledge, there are no randomized controlled trials comparing the ultrasound and fluoroscopy approaches for sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation. This study aims to compare the ultrasound and fluoroscopy guidance techniques for sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sacroiliac Joint Arthritis
  • Back Pain
03

In context

Sacroiliitis

42 studies on the registry are indexed under Sacroiliitis; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 48 across 28 interventional studies indexed under Sacroiliitis.

Browse Sacroiliitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 106 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Low back pain due to sacroiliac joint dysfunction >6 months with a score ≥ 4 on a numeric rating scale.

    • 50% pain relief after prognostic sacral lateral branch block
  • At least 3 positive physical examination maneuvers [ Faber ( flexioni abduction and external rotation), POSH (posteripr shear), REAB ( resisted abduction), Gaenslen's test, Distraction test]
  • to conservative therapy

Exclusion Criteria: The exclusion criteria were;

  • Uncontrolled psychiatric or neurological illness
  • Sacroiliac joint pain due to other disorders,
  • Lumbar radiculopathy
  • Rheumatological diseases
  • Systemic active infections
  • , previous surgery on the affected sacroiliac joint,
  • History of traumatic hip injury,
  • History of bleeding disorders,
  • values \< 150.000 / µl,
  • Sacroiliac joint injection within the preceding 3 months,
  • Allergy to local anesthetics and ,
  • Pregnancy, inability to concent, Implanted pacemaker or defibrilator.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ultrasound guided sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation

    Patients in this group will receive sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation under ultrasound guidance.

    Procedure: Sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation under ultrasound guidance

  • Active comparator
    Fluoroscopy guided sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation

    Patients in this group will receive sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation under fluoroscopy guidance.

    Procedure: Sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation under fluoroscopy guidance

Interventions

  • ProcedureSacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation under ultrasound guidance

    Sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation will be performed under ultrasound guided approach.

  • ProcedureSacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation under fluoroscopy guidance

    Sacral lateral branch radiofrequency ablation will be performed under fluoroscopy guided approach.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in pain numerical rating score from baseline

    The numerical rating score (NRS) will be used to assess the severity of pain felt by a patient. . The patient rates pain on a scale of 0 to 10; 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 ,represents 'worst pain imaginable'

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Performance time

    Radiofrequency ablation performance time will be recorded from the time the first image is obtained, until the procedure is completed

    Time frame: During the procedure

  2. Patient satisfaction

    Changes in overall satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. (1, very dissatisfied; 2, dissatisfied; 3, neutral; 4, satisfied; 5, very satisfied).

    Time frame: At 3 months

  3. Pain medication use

    Mean change in analgesic consumption is assessed using QAQ, a tool designed to record patient-reported pain medication use. The higher score indicates higher pain medication use

    Time frame: At 3 months

  4. Success rate

    Proportions of reporting \>50% pain relief.

    Time frame: At 3 months

  5. Functional disability

    Change in Oswestry Disabilit Index ( Scale 0-100). 0 point is equated with no disability and 100 point is maximum disability possible

    Time frame: At 1 and 3 months

  6. Quality of life ( SF-36)

    Quality of life (QoL) will assessed via SF-36, which consists of 36 items ad 2 summary values for Physical Component Summary ( PSC) and Mental Component Summary (MSC). Subscale scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 being the most positive QoL in that area and 0 the lowest;

    Time frame: At 1 and 3 months

  7. The number of needle passess

    The number of attempts during the performance will be analysed.

    Time frame: During the procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Health Science University Diskapi Yildirim Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital
    Yenimahalle, Ankara 06170, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Finlayson RJ, Etheridge JB, Elgueta MF, Thonnagith A, De Villiers F, Nelems B, Tran DQ. A Randomized Comparison Between Ultrasound- and Fluoroscopy-Guided Sacral Lateral Branch Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):400-406. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000569. PubMed 28178092 ↗
  • Cox RC, Fortin JD. The anatomy of the lateral branches of the sacral dorsal rami: implications for radiofrequency ablation. Pain Physician. 2014 Sep-Oct;17(5):459-64. PubMed 25247902 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Findings of this study will be available from the principle investigator upon reasonable request.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05520463
Responsible party
Halil Cihan Kose (Principle Investigator, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 30, 2022
Start date
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 25, 2023
Completion
Jul 5, 2023
Last update
Jul 7, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion