CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05517850Updated Mar 12, 2025

Therapist-guided vs Self-guided CBT for AD: Non-inferiority Trial

An interventional study of Therapist-guided cognitive behavioral therapy administered online and Self-guided digital intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy in Atopic Dermatitis, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-12.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
168
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to test the hypothesized non-inferiority of a self-guided digital intervention compared to a therapist-guided variant for people with atopic dermatitis (AD). Both interventions are based on Cognitive behavioral therapy. Participants will be recruited from advertisements in social media. Measurements of AD symptoms and psychological well-being will be conducted at pre-treatment, post-treatment as well as 6-month and one-year follow-up.

Read the detailed description

Background: Digital self-care based on Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) could be an effective alternative to guided CBT for people with atopic dermatitis (AD) and has the theoretical potential to significantly increase access to psychological treatment for patients with AD, whilst being cost-effective for health care organizations.

Aim: To investigate whether a shortened digital self-care intervention is noninferior to, and cost-effective compared with, a comprehensive and therapist-guided CBT treatment for AD.

Intervention: Participants randomized to guided care will receive internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for 12 weeks. Participants randomized to digital self-care will have access to a self-guided intervention for 12 weeks_

Design, setting, and participants: This is a single-blind, randomized clinical non-inferiority trial at Karolinska Institutet, a medical university in Stockholm, Sweden. 174 adult participants with AD will be recruited through self-referral. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to the two experimental conditions. At post-treatment (primary endpoint), non-inferiority will be tested and resource use will be compared between the two treatment groups. Cost-effectiveness will be explored at 1-year follow-up. Potential mediators will be investigated. Data will be analyzed intention-to-treat.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atopic Dermatitis

Keywords

  • Cognitive behavioral therapy
  • Self-guided intervention
  • Digital intervention
  • Exposure therapy
03

In context

Dermatitis, Atopic

1,419 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatitis, Atopic; 258 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 168 is above the median of 83 across 1,125 interventional studies indexed under Dermatitis, Atopic.

Browse Dermatitis, Atopic studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,113 studies on the registry; 267 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Self-reported AD diagnosed by physician (potential participants will disclose the circumstances of their diagnosis)
  • No new types of medications introduced for six months prior, with no intention of future change
  • Able to understand Swedish
  • Access to the internet and a smartphone

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other disease or condition that has immediate treatment priority over AD. This could be an ongoing demanding treatment of a severe somatic or psychiatric condition. No specific diagnoses are inevitably a cause for exclusion, as potential participants will rather be evaluated on a case-to-case basis.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
168 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Therapist-guided

    12 weeks of therapist-guided, exposure-based intervention via tha internet, with comprehensive material

    Behavioral: Therapist-guided cognitive behavioral therapy administered online

  • Experimental
    Self-guided

    12 weeks of self-guided, exposure-based intervention via the internet, with shortened and improved material

    Behavioral: Self-guided digital intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralTherapist-guided cognitive behavioral therapy administered online

    This intervention consists of 10 modules of education and interventions and lasts 12 weeks. An introduction provides information about CBT and AD. Step by step, the participants are introduced to the proposed active treatment components: mindfulness training, and exposure with response prevention. Through this whole process, the participant is guided by a therapist. The therapist may be contacted through a secure internet platform at any time and responds within 48 hours. Participants reads the education material, construct exercises to perform, describes their progress in homework assignments, and receives feedback from their therapist.

  • BehavioralSelf-guided digital intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy

    Participants will access a digital platform, read information, and perform exercises in their everyday life. The main treatment components are mindfulness and exposure with response prevention, with a specific focus on itch. Participants will be able to practice mindfulness with the help of instructions and examples. Participants will receive detailed instructions and guidance, and get to choose exposure exercises from a long list of examples. Participants will also be free to create their own relevant exposure situations within the intervention. Digital self-care consists of 8 modules. The only active interventions, mindfulness and exposure are introduced week 1 and 2, respectively. From week 3-7, no new interventions are introduced and participants are advised to continue practicing the interventions, but there is a new theme of education each week, to act as inspiration for exercises. The last 4 weeks, the participant is merely advised to continue practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in atopic dermatitis symptoms

    Patient oriented eczema scale (POEM). 7 items. Higher scores indicate greater severity of eczemic symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 28.

    Time frame: Change from pre-treatment (baseline) to post-treatment (week 12); weekly (week1-11); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 6 month follow-up (week 36); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 1 year follow-up (week 60)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in itching sensation

    Peak pruritus rating scale (NRS). 2 items. Higher scores indicate more severe itch. Scores range from 1-10

    Time frame: Change from pre-treatment (baseline) to post-treatment (week 12); weekly (week1-11); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 6 month follow-up (week 36); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 1 year follow-up (week 60)

  2. Change in stress reactivity

    Perceived stress scale (PSS). 14 items. Higher scores indicate more stressed mood and greater reactivity. Score ranges from 0-56.

    Time frame: Change from pre-treatment (baseline) to post-treatment (week 12); weekly (week1-11); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 6 month follow-up (week 36); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 1 year follow-up (week 60)

  3. Change in depressive symptoms

    Patient Health Questionnaire.(PHQ-9). 9 items. Higher total scores indicate greater severity of depression. Scores range from 0 to 27.

    Time frame: Change from pre-treatment (baseline) to post-treatment (week 12); weekly (week1-11); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 6 month follow-up (week 36); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 1 year follow-up (week 60)

  4. Change in skin-related quality of life

    Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI). 10 items. Higher score indicate lower quality of life related to skin symptoms.Scores range from 0 to 30.

    Time frame: Change from pre-treatment (baseline) to post-treatment (week 12); weekly (week1-11); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 6 month follow-up (week 36); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 1 year follow-up (week 60)

  5. Change in insomnia symptoms

    Insomnia severity index (ISI). 7 items. Higher scores indicates more severe insomnia. Scores range from 0 to 28.

    Time frame: Change from pre-treatment (baseline) to post-treatment (week 12); weekly (week1-11); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 6 month follow-up (week 36); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 1 year follow-up (week 60)

  6. Treatment credibility

    Credibility/expectancy questionnaire (CEQ). The CEQ ranges from 0 to 10 points per item and 0 to 50 points in total, where a higher score reflects better treatment credibility.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after treatment start (baseline).

  7. Intervention satisfaction

    Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Scores range from 8-32 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. An average Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 score of at least 22 will provide support for the acceptability and feasibility of this intervention.

    Time frame: Post-treatment (12 weeks)

  8. Quality of life for health economy analysis

    Euro quality of life 5 dimensions (EQ5D). 5 items. Higher scored indicate higher quality of life. A calculation gives a total score from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: Post treatment (week 12) to one-year follow-up (week 60)

  9. Health economics

    Treatment Inventory of Costs in Psychiatric Patients (TIC-P)

    Time frame: Change from pre-treatment (baseline) to post-treatment (week 12); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 6 month follow-up (week 36); change from pre-treatment (baseline) to 1 year follow-up (week 60)

  10. Post-treatment adherence to exposure exercises

    Time spent on exercises (ToE) Adherence to the exposure exercises will be determined by an online questionnaire where it will be stated on a four point Likert scale will state to what extent participants have worked with exposure: "not at all", "occasionally", "more than half of the days" and "daily". Acceptable level of adherence will be set to at least 50 % of participants working actively with exposure a majority of the days during a week for 4 weeks or more.

    Time frame: Post-treatment (12 weeks)

  11. Usability

    The System Usability Scale (SUS). The SUS consists of ten items, with a range of 0-4 points per item. The items are summed up and calculated with a formula resulting in a total score between 0 and 100, with a higher score reflecting better system usability.

    Time frame: Post-treatment (12 weeks)

  12. Adverse events

    Adverse events (AE). Participants are asked if they have had an adverse event as a result of treatment, and if so to describe it. If they have experienced more than oneadverse event, the question is repeated.

    Time frame: Post-treatment (12 weeks)

  13. Time spent on treating

    Time spent on treatment (ToT): Time in minutes spent by therapists on writing messeges, phone calls, etc.

    Time frame: From week 1 to 12, throughout

Other outcomes

  1. Telephone interview

    A semi-structured interview concerning the experience of the intervention and format will be conducted via telephone

    Time frame: Post treatment (12 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre for psychatry research
    Stockholm, Stockholms Län 11364, Sweden
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual data will be available upon reasonable request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05517850
Lead sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
Collaborators
Karolinska University Hospital
Responsible party
Martin Kraepelien (Licensed clinical psychologist, Principal investigator, PhD, Karolinska Institutet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 26, 2022
Start date
Nov 29, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 5, 2023
Completion
Oct 1, 2024
Last update
Mar 12, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion