ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05512702Updated Sep 1, 2022

Reduced Dose Thrombolytic in Intermediate/High Risk Pulmonary Thromboembolism

An observational study in Pulmonary Embolism, sponsored by Ege University. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-01.

Sponsored by Ege University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pulmonary Embolism(PE) requires multidisciplinary approach as a highly morbid and mortal disease. This multidisciplinary approach creates clinical benefits in diagnostic and therapeutic process. And these benefits are pointed out in certain studies and guidelines. For these reasons, a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) was established on 5 th November 2018 which is called as Ege Pulmonary Embolism Team (EGEPET) in our university.

In recent years, it is stated that the carefully use of thrombolytic in patients with intermediate-high risk PE based on early mortality classification. Some studies have reported that the use of thrombolytic may cause clinical benefits. But which used drug and which dose are not defined clearly yet.

After establishment of EGEPET, the investigators observed that patients with intermediate-high risk PE more receive reduced dose thrombolytic than the pre-EGEPET period. And the investigators aimed to compare treatment changes after and before the establishment of EGEPET. Also, the investigator will compare initial reduced dose thrombolytic therapy after EGEPET with initial anticoagulation therapy before EGEPET (historical group) in terms of mortality and complication.

As the reduced dose thrombolytic, Alteplase 50 mg is used in our hospital. Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), standard heparin and rarely Fondaparinux are used for anticoagulation therapy. Low-molecular weight heparin is generally applied for treatment, in case there is no contraindication.

Our primary end-point is to assess 30-day mortality and secondary-end points are to detect in one year-mortality and complications. The investigators will compare the mortality and complication rates in these groups.

N0 hypothesis; In the intermediate-high risk group diagnosed with PE, there is an increased mortality rate in the patients treated with half-dose thrombolytic (Alteplase 50 mg) than our historical group or the literature.

N1 hypothesis; In the intermediate-high risk group diagnosed with PE, there is no an increased mortality rate in the patients treated with half-dose thrombolytic (Alteplase 50 mg) than our historical group or the literature.

Read the detailed description

Pulmonary thromboembolism ranks 3rd among cardiovascular diseases in terms of mortality. Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a challenging disease that requires rapid approach both in the diagnosis and treatment process. Due to the challenging nature of the disease, Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERT) have emerged for quick intervention in patients with PE. In the management of PE, multidisciplinary approach that includes the branches of pulmonary diseases, cardiology, emergency medicine, cardiovascular surgery, anesthesiology and radiology provides clinical advantages. Therefore, a PERT was established and called Ege Pulmonary Embolism Team (EGEPET). EGEPET established on 5th of November 2018. This team contains specialists from Pulmonary Diseases, Cardiology, Emergency Medicine, Cardiovascular Surgery, Anesthesiology and Radiology Departments. EGEPET works during 7/24 as a response team. It has been stated in recent publications and pulmonary thromboembolism guidelines that the establishment of multidisciplinary study group which is similar to our group will be more effective in the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up processes of PE patients.

Specially, there are some different opinions for the treatment of Intermediate-High risk based on according to early mortality with PE patients. While some guidelines suggest initial anticoagulation treatment without thrombolytic treatment, some researchers state that thrombolytic treatment can be used in Intermediate-High risk patients. These researchers indicate that the careful use of thrombolytic can be improved in clinical situation of PE patients. The careful usage is meant to use reduced dose thrombolytic and to follow up the patients closely for bleeding complication.

In cases diagnosed with intermediate-high risk PE in related to early mortality, it has been seen that half-dose thrombolytics are given mostly in our daily life practice after EGEPET.

So, the investigators planned to evaluate the mortality and morbidity rates in the patients who were diagnosed with pulmonary thromboembolism with intermediate-high risk in terms of early mortality and who received half-dose thrombolytics according to the result of the EGEPET consultation.

50 mg Alteplase is used as thrombolytic treatment and, low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), standard heparin and rarely Fondaparinux are used for initial anticoagulation treatment. Low-molecular weight heparin is generally applied for treatment, in case there is no contraindication.

This study is an observational drug study. Researchers of this study did not and will not intervene the treatment of patients. Treatment decision of the patients is decided by EGEPET physicians.

The investigators will compare the patients diagnosed with intermediate-high risk PE who received reduced dose thrombolytic which the decision is made by EGEPET with the other patients who did not get thrombolytic treatment in terms of mortality and morbidity.

The other patient group with intermediate-high risk PE will be created from our historical data to prevent to selection bias. Because, EGEPET offers generally reduced dose thrombolytic in intermediate-high risk PE patients. Otherwise, patients having high bleeding scores (e.g. RIETE bleeding score), multiple and severe comorbidities or patients who are quite old generally receive only anticoagulation treatment.

The patients assessed our study were classed into three groups. All of the patients have PE and are stated into intermediate-high risk according to early mortality.

First group is prospective group, which contains patients recruited after approval of ethic committee of this study. Ethic committee was taken from both organization Ege University and The Ministry of Health-Türkiye.

Second group is retrospective group, which contains patients evaluated by EGEPET and received reduced dose thrombolytic treatment.

Third group is called as historical control group. This patients group were diagnosed and treated with anticoagulants not thrombolytic treatment before establishment of EGEPET.

First and second groups compose the thrombolytic group, third group create the anticoagulant group (control)

The investigators are going to collect data (clinical, laboratory and radiological variables) of these patients to get detailed clinical information.

The investigators will compare the thrombolytic group with anticoagulant group (control). The primary end-point is to evaluate 30-day mortality and secondary-end point are to detect in one year-mortality and complications.

The investigators will compare mortality and complication rates in both groups.

N0 hypothesis; In the intermediate-high risk group diagnosed with PE, there is an increased mortality rate in the patients treated with half-dose thrombolytic (Alteplase 50 mg) than our historical group or the literature.

N1 hypothesis; In the intermediate-high risk group diagnosed with PE, there is no an increased mortality rate in the patients treated with half-dose thrombolytic (Alteplase 50 mg) than our historical group or the literature.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Embolism

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pulmonary Embolism
  • Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams
  • Thrombolytic Treatment
  • Anticoagulation Treatment
  • Mortality
  • Complication
03

In context

Pulmonary Embolism

753 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Embolism; 157 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 370 across 332 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Embolism.

Browse Pulmonary Embolism studies →

Lead sponsor

Ege University is the lead sponsor of 375 studies on the registry; 47 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

In this study, intermediate-high risk PE patients will divide whether receice thrombolytic treatment or not. And two group are going to compare in the context of mortality rate. We anticipate that 50 patients should be enough for statistically powerful study. We predict this number according to previous studies and power analyses.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients which are in intermediate-high risk class ased on mortality in the ESC/ERS Pulmonary Embolism Risk Classification

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwillingness of patient to participate in the study
  • The case is in the intermediate-high risk class, but there is an unstable disease that will affect mortality due to malignancy or general medical condition.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Thrombolytic Treatment Group

    These are the patients with intermediate-high riskPE and consulted by EGEPET. They received reduced dose thrombolytic treatment.

    Drug: Tissue Plasminogen Activator, Alteplase

  • Anticoagulation Treatment Group

    This group includes patients who diagnosed wit PE before the establishment of EGEPET. And these patients are classed into intermediate-high risk based on early mortality and received anticoagulation treatment, not thrombolytic treatment.

    Drug: Low-molecular weight heparin

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 30 day Mortality

    Includes 30-day mortality and contains all causes of death.

    Time frame: 30 day after diagnosis of pulmonary tromboembolism

Secondary outcomes

  1. 1 year Mortality

    Includes 1 year mortality and contains all causes of death.

    Time frame: 1 year after diagnosis of pulmonary tromboembolism

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mirambeaux R, Leon F, Bikdeli B, Morillo R, Barrios D, Mercedes E, Moores L, Tapson V, Yusen RD, Jimenez D. Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism. TH Open. 2019 Dec 4;3(4):e356-e363. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3401003. eCollection 2019 Oct. PubMed 31815247 ↗
  • Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing GJ, Harjola VP, Huisman MV, Humbert M, Jennings CS, Jimenez D, Kucher N, Lang IM, Lankeit M, Lorusso R, Mazzolai L, Meneveau N, Ni Ainle F, Prandoni P, Pruszczyk P, Righini M, Torbicki A, Van Belle E, Zamorano JL; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 21;41(4):543-603. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405. No abstract available. PubMed 31504429 ↗
  • Sharifi M, Bay C, Skrocki L, Rahimi F, Mehdipour M; "MOPETT" Investigators. Moderate pulmonary embolism treated with thrombolysis (from the "MOPETT" Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 15;111(2):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.027. Epub 2012 Oct 24. PubMed 23102885 ↗
  • Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T, Agnelli G, Becattini C, Beyer-Westendorf J, Bluhmki E, Bouvaist H, Brenner B, Couturaud F, Dellas C, Empen K, Franca A, Galie N, Geibel A, Goldhaber SZ, Jimenez D, Kozak M, Kupatt C, Kucher N, Lang IM, Lankeit M, Meneveau N, Pacouret G, Palazzini M, Petris A, Pruszczyk P, Rugolotto M, Salvi A, Schellong S, Sebbane M, Sobkowicz B, Stefanovic BS, Thiele H, Torbicki A, Verschuren F, Konstantinides SV; PEITHO Investigators. Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 10;370(15):1402-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302097. PubMed 24716681 ↗
  • Wendelboe AM, Raskob GE. Global Burden of Thrombosis: Epidemiologic Aspects. Circ Res. 2016 Apr 29;118(9):1340-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306841. PubMed 27126645 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2023, 12 months after the start.

Of 122 non-industry observational studies under Pulmonary Embolism, half reached primary completion within 53 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 120. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 145 studies reached it within 48 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 105.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 22, 2022
First posted
Aug 23, 2022
StartActual
Jun 3, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jun 3, 2023
CompletionEst.
Jun 3, 2024
Last update
Sep 1, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05512702
Lead sponsor
Ege University
Responsible party
Pervin KORKMAZ (Associated Professor, Ege University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 23, 2022
Start date
Jun 3, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 3, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 3, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 1, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion