CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05512117Updated Aug 23, 2022

Midline Catheters Versus Peripheral Catheters in Internal Medicine Unit

An interventional study of Midline insertion in Vascular Access Complication and Vascular Access Device Complications, sponsored by Hospital General Universitario de Valencia. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-23.

Sponsored by Hospital General Universitario de Valencia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2017, registered Aug 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to evaluate the rate of complications and the duration of cannulation of a midline intravenous catheter compared to a short peripheral catheter in patients hospitalized in an Internal Medicine service of a Spanish hospital.

Read the detailed description

A randomized, longitudinal experimental study is designed, which will allow comparisons to be made between the results obtained in the experimental group and the control group.

The study will be carried out in the Internal Medicine and medium and long stay unit of the CHGUV, during the period of time necessary to complete the required sample size, which has finally been established at six months.

When the patient is admitted to our unit, a number is assigned from the admission service, based on their admission order; this number will serve for subsequent random assignment to one another group. In this case, the use of a website to generate said numbers is proposed.

Using established procedures for the generation of random numbers, the numbers that correspond to the subjects that are going to be part of each of the groups will be identified.

The list of random numbers that will make up the experimental group has been prepared previously by the Internal Medicine Unit secretary and will be known by the person who will carry out the placement of the midline catheter (two nurses from the unit trained in the placement and handling of this type of device, who will also be those in charge of training the rest of the staff).

The list will be reviewed daily in the morning shift, and those patients who have not given their informed consent will be eliminated, those in whom, due to their pathology, a brief admission is expected or patients who are in a terminal or palliative care situation, in those who consider the step of treatment to the subcutaneous route as the best option.

The informed consent to participate in the study will be given to the patient and/or relatives at the time of admission, also informing them that the next morning those responsible for the study will explain the object of the study in more depth and answer their questions.

Before the third day after admission, in the morning shift, the peripheral catheters will be reviewed and replaced by another peripheral catheter or by a midline catheter depending on the group to which the patient has been assigned. In case of being a patient assigned to the experimental group, the midline catheter will be placed by personnel trained for it.

The procedures for inserting and maintaining the catheters are already established in the unit and will be those that will be followed during the study, depending on the type of catheter; The care in the insertion and maintenance of midline catheters does not differ from the care of peripherally inserted central catheters, since they require a sterile technique; therefore, although the insertion of the midline catheters will be done by the selected investigators, maintenance will be performed by the unit's staff, following, as we have indicated, the procedures already established.

When the patient requires a change of venous access for whatever reason, it will be replaced by the same type of catheter (midline or conventional catheter) and the necessary information will be added to the information record sheet.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vascular Access Complication
  • Vascular Access Device Complications

Keywords

  • phlebitis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hospital General Universitario de Valencia is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The patients included were those who were hospitalized in the Internal Medicine Service of the Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia who needed intravenous therapy and who had signed the Informed Consent for placement of a midline at the time of the change of the PIVC placed in the emergency unit.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with a forecast hospitalization of less than one week, those who were receiving palliative or symptomatic treatment, those who were carriers of a CVC or those who had presented difficulty in venous access with midline after two consecutive attempts were excluded
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Midline Catheter

    Midline catheter insertion

    Device: Midline insertion

  • No intervention
    Peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC)

    Peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC)

Interventions

  • DeviceMidline insertion

    Midline catheter insertion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of canalization

    Days of catheter stay

    Time frame: Four weeks

  2. Number of punctures

    Number of times a catheter is inserted

    Time frame: Four weeks

  3. Phlebitis

    Presence of catheter related phlebitis

    Time frame: Four weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
    Valencia, 46014, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Millington SJ, Hendin A, Shiloh AL, Koenig S. Better With Ultrasound: Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion. Chest. 2020 Feb;157(2):369-375. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.139. Epub 2019 Oct 22. PubMed 31654617 ↗
  • Prasanna N, Yamane D, Haridasa N, Davison D, Sparks A, Hawkins K. Safety and efficacy of vasopressor administration through midline catheters. J Crit Care. 2021 Feb;61:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Oct 2. PubMed 33049486 ↗
  • Nickel B. Does the Midline Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Have a Place in Critical Care? Crit Care Nurse. 2021 Dec 1;41(6):e1-e21. doi: 10.4037/ccn2021818. PubMed 34851379 ↗
  • Moureau N, Chopra V. Indications for peripheral, midline and central catheters: summary of the MAGIC recommendations. Br J Nurs. 2016 Apr 28-May 11;25(8):S15-24. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.8.S15. PubMed 27126759 ↗
  • Skaggs MKD, Daniels JF, Hodge AJ, DeCamp VL. Using the Evidence-Based Practice Service Nursing Bundle to Increase Patient Satisfaction. J Emerg Nurs. 2018 Jan;44(1):37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 20. PubMed 29167032 ↗
  • Mohn-Brown E. Implementing Quality and Safety Education for Nurses in Postclinical Conferences: Transforming the Design of Clinical Nursing Education. Nurse Educ. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5S Suppl 1):S18-S21. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000410. PubMed 28832457 ↗
  • Johansen H, Helgesen AK. Palliative care in the community - the role of the resource nurse, a qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Oct 14;20(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00860-w. PubMed 34645424 ↗
  • Selby LM, Rupp ME, Cawcutt KA. Prevention of Central-Line Associated Bloodstream Infections: 2021 Update. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2021 Dec;35(4):841-856. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2021.07.004. PubMed 34752222 ↗
  • Panepinto R, Harris J, Wellette J. A Review of Best Practices Related to Intravenous Line Management for Nurses. Nurs Clin North Am. 2021 Sep;56(3):389-399. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2021.05.001. PubMed 34366159 ↗
  • Timsit JF, Baleine J, Bernard L, Calvino-Gunther S, Darmon M, Dellamonica J, Desruennes E, Leone M, Lepape A, Leroy O, Lucet JC, Merchaoui Z, Mimoz O, Misset B, Parienti JJ, Quenot JP, Roch A, Schmidt M, Slama M, Souweine B, Zahar JR, Zingg W, Bodet-Contentin L, Maxime V. Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00713-4. PubMed 32894389 ↗
  • Farina J, Cornistein W, Balasini C, Chuluyan J, Blanco M. [Central venous catheter related infections. Inter-Societies update and recommendations]. Medicina (B Aires). 2019;79(1):53-60. Spanish. PubMed 30694189 ↗
  • Scoppettuolo G, Pittiruti M, Pitoni S, Dolcetti L, Emoli A, Mitidieri A, Migliorini I, Annetta MG. Ultrasound-guided "short" midline catheters for difficult venous access in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis. Int J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;9(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12245-016-0100-0. Epub 2016 Feb 4. PubMed 26847572 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 23, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05512117
Lead sponsor
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Responsible party
Elena Chover Sierra (Principal Investigator, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 23, 2022
Start date
Feb 1, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2017
Completion
Sep 30, 2017
Last update
Aug 23, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion