CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05509686Updated Aug 22, 2022

The Immediate Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation on Intracortical Excitability of the Primary Motor Cortex in Patients With Chronic Stroke

An interventional study of Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and Sham intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) in Stroke, sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Completed at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-22.

Sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2020, registered Aug 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is to investigate the immediate effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on intracortical excitatory and inhibitory circuits, neural connectivity, and network properties in patients with chronic stroke, using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogram (TMS-EEG) and TMS-electromyography (EMG) and approaches.

Read the detailed description

The neurophysiological effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has been examined with TMS-electromyography (EMG)-based outcomes in healthy people; however, its effects in intracortical excitability and inhibition are largely unknown in patients with stroke. Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogram (TMS-EEG) recording can be used to investigate both intracortical excitatory and inhibitory circuits of the primary motor cortex (M1) and the property of brain networks.

This study is to investigate the immediate effects of iTBS on intracortical excitatory and inhibitory circuits, neural connectivity, and network properties in patients with chronic stroke, using TMS-EEG and TMS-EMG approaches.

In this randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study, 21 patients with chronic stroke receive two separate stimulation conditions: a single-session iTBS or sham stimulation applied to the ipsilesional M1, in two separate visits, with a washout period of five to seven days between the two visits after crossover. A battery of TMS-EMG and TMS-EEG measurements are taken before and immediately after stimulation during the visit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stroke
  • theta burst stimulation
  • transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potentials
  • intracortical inhibition
  • cortical excitability
03

In context

Stroke

7,283 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,013 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 50 across 5,366 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University is the lead sponsor of 659 studies on the registry; 250 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. suffered from first-ever, ischemic or hemorrhagic, unilateral stroke, verified by neuroimaging examinations such as CT or MRI.
  2. detectable motor evoked potentials from the affected first dorsal interosseous muscle;
  3. provided written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. had any contraindication to transcranial magnetic stimulation;
  2. had a known neurological disease excluding stroke, or psychiatric disease;
  3. were using a psychostimulant, sedative, antidepressant, or antiepileptic medication.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    A single-session intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)

    The classical 600-pulse iTBS protocol is delivered to the motor hotspot over the ipsilesional hemisphere.

    Device: Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)

  • Sham comparator
    A single-session sham intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)

    The sham stimulation is the same as that of iTBS, but the coil is placed five centimeters away from the scalp.

    Device: Sham intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)

Interventions

  • DeviceIntermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)

    A single-session standard 600-pulse intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is applied to the ipsilesional primary motor cortex.

  • DeviceSham intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)

    The sham stimulation is the same as that of iTBS, but the coil is placed five centimeters away from the scalp. Electrical field simulation shows that the setups for sham stimulation would not induce any valid cortical activation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potential

    Single pulses evoked an initial response in electroencephalogram, followed by a series of time- and phase-locked positive and negative deflections which could spread to the connected brain areas. The evoked potential is called transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potential.

    Time frame: Baseline (before iTBS stimulation)

  2. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potential

    Single pulses evoked an initial response in electroencephalogram, followed by a series of time- and phase-locked positive and negative deflections which could spread to the connected brain areas. The evoked potential is called transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potential.

    Time frame: 10 minutes after a single-session iTBS stimulation

  3. Motor evoked potential (MEP)

    Single TMS pulses with suprathreshold intensity (120% of resting motor threshold of the stimulated cortex) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) can produce recordable MEPs in contralateral muscles; additionally, the peak-to-peak amplitude of MEPs can be used to represent the corticospinal excitability

    Time frame: Baseline (before iTBS stimulation)

  4. Motor evoked potential (MEP)

    Single TMS pulses with suprathreshold intensity (120% of resting motor threshold of the stimulated cortex) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) can produce recordable MEPs in contralateral muscles; additionally, the peak-to-peak amplitude of MEPs can be used to represent the corticospinal excitability

    Time frame: 10 minutes after a single-session iTBS stimulation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cortical silent period

    The cortical silent period (cSP) is a protocol measuring the intracortical inhibition, in which suprathreshold test pulses (120% of resting motor threshold of the stimulated cortex) are applied to the contralateral M1, while participants sustain 30% maximum voluntary contraction. Specifically, cSP refers to the interruption of background electromyographic (EMG) activity after the TMS pulse.

    Time frame: Baseline (before iTBS stimulation)

  2. Cortical silent period

    The cortical silent period (cSP) is a protocol measuring the intracortical inhibition, in which suprathreshold test pulses (120% of resting motor threshold of the stimulated cortex) are applied to the contralateral M1, while participants sustain 30% maximum voluntary contraction. Specifically, cSP refers to the interruption of background electromyographic (EMG) activity after the TMS pulse.

    Time frame: 10 minutes after a single-session iTBS stimulation

  3. Short-interval intracortical inhibition

    Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) is a form of paired-pulse protocol, in which a subthreshold conditioning pulse is delivered 2 ms before a suprathreshold test pulse. Theoretically, the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by a test pulse at a given intensity is suppressed compared with that evoked by a single pulse at the same intensity. Eight trials are recorded, with inter-trial intervals ranging from 4 s to 5 s. The intensity of test pulses is fixed at 120% of the resting motor threshold, and the intensity of the conditioning pulse is set at 80% of the resting motor threshold. The result of SICI is expressed as the ratio of a paired-pulse MEP amplitude to a single-pulse MEP amplitude.

    Time frame: Baseline (before iTBS stimulation)

  4. Short-interval intracortical inhibition

    Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) is a form of paired-pulse protocol, in which a subthreshold conditioning pulse is delivered 2 ms before a suprathreshold test pulse. Theoretically, the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by a test pulse at a given intensity is suppressed compared with that evoked by a single pulse at the same intensity. Eight trials are recorded, with inter-trial intervals ranging from 4 s to 5 s. The intensity of test pulses is fixed at 120% of the resting motor threshold, and the intensity of the conditioning pulse is set at 80% of the resting motor threshold. The result of SICI is expressed as the ratio of a paired-pulse MEP amplitude to a single-pulse MEP amplitude.

    Time frame: 10 minutes after a single-session iTBS stimulation

  5. Intracortical facilitation

    The setups for the intensity of intracortical facilitation (ICF) are almost the same as those for SICI; however, the interstimulus interval is longer, 10 ms. Eight trials are recorded, with inter-trial intervals ranging from 4 s to 5 s. The intensity of test pulses is fixed at 120% of the resting motor threshold, and the intensity of the conditioning pulse is set at 80% of the resting motor threshold. The result of ICF is expressed as the ratio of a paired-pulse MEP amplitude to a single-pulse MEP amplitude.

    Time frame: Baseline (before iTBS stimulation)

  6. Intracortical facilitation

    The setups for the intensity of intracortical facilitation (ICF) are almost the same as those for SICI; however, the interstimulus interval is longer, 10 ms. Eight trials are recorded, with inter-trial intervals ranging from 4 s to 5 s. The intensity of test pulses is fixed at 120% of the resting motor threshold, and the intensity of the conditioning pulse is set at 80% of the resting motor threshold. The result of ICF is expressed as the ratio of a paired-pulse MEP amplitude to a single-pulse MEP amplitude.

    Time frame: 10 minutes after a single-session iTBS stimulation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kenneth FONG
    Hong Kong, 000000, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The data will be shared for research purpose upon reasonable request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05509686
Lead sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Responsible party
Kenneth N. K. Fong (Professor in Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2022
Start date
Jul 15, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2021
Completion
May 15, 2022
Last update
Aug 22, 2022

Study contacts

Kenneth Fong, PhD
principal investigator · Hong Kong Polytechnic University, QT517, Hung Hom

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion