CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05509309Updated Jan 24, 2025

Promoting Inclusive Educational Environments for Children with Autism and Other Social-communication Challenges: Preschool Class and Primary School

An interventional study of APERS-based model in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Social Communication Challenges, sponsored by Stockholm University. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 9 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-24.

Sponsored by Stockholm University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
6 Years to 9 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the effect of using the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale (APERS) as the foundation for providing feedback, in-service training and coaching to teachers, to improve program quality for autistic (ASD) students and students with related social-communication challenges (SCC) in Swedish primary school classrooms. In the current study half of the participating classrooms will receive the APERS-based model for program quality improvement, while the other half will receive services as usual.

It is hypothesized that the APERS-based model will improve primary school program quality for children with ASD and SCC, as well as improve functioning for students with ASD/SCC and self-perceived self-efficacy among participating teachers, compared to the study's comparison group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Social Communication Challenges
03

In context

Autistic Disorder

1,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Autistic Disorder; 334 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 45 across 1,044 interventional studies indexed under Autistic Disorder.

Browse Autistic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Stockholm University is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 9 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • autism diagnosis
  • socio-communicative challenges identified by parents and/or school staff
  • attending a primary school classroom (i.e., from pre-school class to third grade)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    In the experimental group, in-service training on autism, program quality, and APERS will be provided to participating staff. Furthermore, APERS-rating to assess the program quality for students with ASD/SCC will be conducted. Pertaining feedback on program areas of strength and improvement will be provided by the APERS-raters to the classroom teachers. Subsequently, assigned coaches (already employed at the school as special educators or equivalent) will based on the APERS-ratings develop an action plan to improve program quality for students with ASD and SCC, in collaboration with classroom teachers. Subsequently, the coach will provide weekly or bi-weekly coaching to promote program quality during the course of two school semesters (approximately 8-9 months).

    Behavioral: APERS-based model

  • No intervention
    Comparison group

    The classrooms in the comparison group will also be rated with the APERS, and feedback will provided to classroom teachers. However, no further support will be provided in transforming APERS-ratings with pertaining feedback into best practice.

Interventions

  • BehavioralAPERS-based model

    APERS-assessments followed by in-service training, APERS-feedback and on-site coaching to improve primary school classroom quality for students with ASD/SCC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in autism program quality assessed with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale - Preschool and primary school (APERS-Fk/L-SE)

    The APERS-Fk/L-SE is a rating scale designed to examine primary school program quality for autistic students in Sweden. It contains 10 domains including areas such as students' personal independence and competence, and challenging behaviors. The scale consists of 59 items rated on a five-point Likert-scale (1= low quality - 5 = high quality) resulting in individual item scores, subdomain scores, domain scores and a total score.

    Time frame: Baseline and about 9 months from baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in how children feel about their school assessed with How I Feel About My School (HIFAMS)

    The HIFAMS is a questionnaire designed to assess the happiness and subjective well-being of children in school. It is to to be completed by all children in all participating classrooms in the study. The questionnaire is composed of seven questions which asks children how they feel about school life, which are scored using a three-point Likert "face" scale (sad face, neutral face, happy face).

    Time frame: Baseline and approximately 9 months from baseline

  2. Change from baseline in parents ratings on their children's body functions, activities and participation and contextual factors assessed with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for Autism

    the ICF Core Sets for Autism is a questionnaire for parents to complete about their children. It contains a number of statements about their children's body functions, activities and participation, and contextual factors that may affect their children's functioning rater on a Likert-scale from either 0 to 10, or -5 to 5 (contextual factors), where higher ratings indicate higher levels of functioning and participation.

    Time frame: Baseline and approximately 9 months from baseline

  3. Change from baseline in children's self-regulation and academic behavior assessed with children's self-regulation and academic behavior questionnaire

    The Children's self-regulation and academic behavior questionnaire is designed for teachers to rate children's self-regulation and academic behavior skills in various situations in the classroom, rated on a five-point Likert scale from 0 to 4, across 11 items, where higher ratings indicate more skills and better self-regulation.

    Time frame: Baseline and approximately 9 months from baseline

  4. Change from baseline in teachers' global impression of the child in the classroom

    Teachers' global impression of the child in school during the latest week. Rated on a four-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, across four items, where higher ratings indicate more well-being, participation, engagement and adaptive behaviors.

    Time frame: Baseline and approximately 9 months from baseline

  5. Change in teachers' stress assessed with the Teachers' Stress Scale

    The Teachers' Stress Scale is a questionnaire designed for teachers to complete about their perceived work-related stress. It consists of five items, and is rated on a six-point Likert scale from 0 to 6 where higher ratings are associated with more stress.

    Time frame: Baseline and approximately 9 months from baseline

  6. Change in teachers' perceived self-efficacy for supporting students with autism using the Autism Self-Efficacy Scale for Teachers

    The Autism Self-Efficacy Scale for Teachers is a questionnaire for teachers to complete about their perceived self-efficacy for supporting students with ASD and socio-communicative challenges in their classroom. It consists of 28 items, and is rated on a six-point Likert scale from 0 to 5. Higher ratings indicate more self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline and approximately 9 months from baseline

  7. Change in teachers' work satisfaction assessed with the Teacher Work Satisfaction Questionnaire

    The Teacher Work Satisfaction Questionnaire is designed for teachers to complete about their work satisfaction. It contains three items that are rated on a six-point Likert scale from 0 to 5, where higher ratings indicate more work satisfaction,

    Time frame: Baseline and approximately 9 months from baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Social validity assessed with the Social Validity Scale

    A scale designed to asses the social validity of the procedures, goals and outcomes of the study by participating school staff. It consists of 12 items rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 5, where higher ratings indicate higher levels of perceived social validity.

    Time frame: Follow-up approximately 9 months after onset of study

  2. Social responsiveness measured with the Social Responsiveness Scale 2 (SRS-2)

    The SRS-2 is a scale designed to identify the presence and severity of social impairment within the autism spectrum and to differentiate it from that which occurs in other conditions. In the current study used to assess the level of social challenges for the participating "index children" (i.e. children with autism or socio-communicative challenges participating in the study). The scale contains 65 items and is rated by the children's parents. Each item is rated on a scale from 1 to 4, where 1 is "not true" and 4 is "almost always true". Higher scores indicate more severe social impairment associated with autism, while lower scores indicate the opposite.

    Time frame: Baseline assessment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Stockholm Municipality
    Stockholm, Sweden
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05509309
Lead sponsor
Stockholm University
Collaborators
Karolinska Institutet
Responsible party
Lise Roll-Pettersson (Professor, Stockholm University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2022
Start date
Aug 15, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2024
Completion
Jul 1, 2024
Last update
Jan 24, 2025

Study contacts

Lise Pettersson Roll, PhD
principal investigator · Stockholm University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion