ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05507333EpHectUpdated Oct 6, 2025Results posted

Clinical Performance of the Gedea Pessary in Adult Women With Vulvovaginal Candidiasis

An interventional study of pHyph generation II in Vulvovaginal Candidiasis, sponsored by Gedea Biotech AB. Completed at 4 sites in Sweden. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-06.

Sponsored by Gedea Biotech AB · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a multi-centre, multi-national study to evaluate the clinical performance and safety of treatment with Gedea Pessary in adult women with confirmed vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC).

The study population will consist of post-menarchal, pre-menopausal females, 18 years or older, seeking care for VVC symptoms. A total of 26 patients are planned to be included in the study. On Day 0 (Screening, Visit 1), eligible patients will undergo a gynaecological examination, including collection of composite vulvovaginal signs-and-symptoms (CVVS) score data, and vaginal samples. Patients will be provided with 6 doses of Gedea Pessary that will be self-administered as a daily treatment (Days 0 to 5).

Patients will visit the clinic on Day 7 (+2 days, Visit 2) for gynaecological examinations, including collection of CVVS data for the assessment of clinical cure and reporting of AEs and concomitant medications. On Day 14 (±2 days, Visit 3), patients that did not have a clinical and mycological cure Day 7 will re-visit the clinic for additional gynaecological examinations, including collection of CVVS data for the assessment of clinical cure. Rescue treatment will be offered during visits 2 and 3, if necessary. Patients will have a final telephone follow-up on Day 25 (±3 days, Visit 4), for for reporting of AEs, concomitant medications and potential menstruation onset. Vaginal sampling for culture and sequencing, as well as vaginal pH measurements will be performed at the clinic on Day 0, Day 7, and Day 14. On Day 25, patients will self-perform vaginal swabs at home for sequencing and vaginal culture. Patient questionnaires for assessing VVC symptoms, will be used during the treatment period (Days 0 to 5), 1 day after the treatment (Day 6) and on Days 11 and 25. Usability will be assessed on Day 7, also via the patient questionnaire. The patient questionnaire will be based on an electronic patient reported outcomes (ePRO) system, i.e. a mobile application (ViedocMe™).

02

Conditions studied

  • Vulvovaginal Candidiasis

Keywords

  • Vaginal Yeast Infection
  • Candidiasis, vulvovaginal
  • Genital diseases, female
  • Vaginitis
  • Vulvovaginitis
  • Vaginal diseases
03

In context

Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal

109 studies on the registry are indexed under Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 126 across 91 interventional studies indexed under Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal.

Browse Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal studies →

Lead sponsor

Gedea Biotech AB is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Having decisional capacity and providing written .
  2. Adult, post-menarchal, pre-menopausal women, aged 18 years or older
  3. Diagnosis of VVC, defined as:

    • Having a white or creamy vaginal discharge
    • At least 2 of the following signs and symptoms of VVC that are characterised as at least moderate: itching, burning, irritation, oedema, erythema, or excoriation.
    • KOH or saline preparation from the inflamed vaginal mucosa or secretions revealing yeast forms (hyphae or pseudohyphae) or budding yeasts.
  4. Negative urine pregnancy test at Screening.
  5. Refrain from using any intravaginal products (i.e. creams, gels, foams, sponges, lubricants, or tampons, etc.) until Day 14.
  6. Refrain from sexual intercourse or use a condom until Day 7.
  7. Signed informed consent and willing and able to comply with all study requirements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with known or apparent signs of other infectious causes of vaginal infection (BV, Trichomonas vaginalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Herpes simplex, or human papillomavirus) at Screening.
  2. Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  3. Patients who were treated for VVC within 14 days prior to Screening.
  4. Patients who are currently receiving anti-fungal therapy unrelated to VVC or has taken anti-fungal therapy within 14 days prior to Screening.
  5. Patients who have received an drug in a clinical investigation within 30 days prior to Screening.
  6. Known/previous allergy or to any product constituent or fluconazole.
  7. Any medical condition that in the Investigator's judgements would make the patient unsuitable for inclusion.
  8. More than 3 previous VVC infections during the last 12 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Gedea pessary

    Gedea pessary administration

    Device: pHyph generation II

Interventions

  • DevicepHyph generation II

    Daily administration of the Gedea pessary during 6 days

    Also known as: Gedea pessary

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Cure Rate at Day 7-14

    Clinical cure was defined as the absence of signs and symptoms of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) in terms of having a composite vulvovaginal signs-and-symptoms (CVVS) score equal to or below 3, with no intercurrent events (concomitant anti-fungal therapy or other treatments related to VVC due to lack of clinical performance prior to CVVS evaluation for the primary endpoint definition, treatment discontinuation due to lack of clinical performance, or rescue medication prior to CVVS evaluation for the primary endpoint definition). Each of the following vulvovaginal signs and symptoms was individually scored using the scoring scale below. The CVVS score is the sum of the 6 individual scores. * Vulvovaginal signs: erythema, edema, or excoriation * Vulvovaginal symptoms: itching, burning, or irritation Scoring scale: each score was objectively defined as: 0 = none (absent), 1 = mild (slight), 2 = moderate (definitely present), 3= severe (marked, intense)

    Time frame: Day 7-14

Secondary outcomes

  1. Continued Clinical Response to Treatment at Day 25

    Defined as the proportion of patients clinically cured on Day 7-14 and thereafter responding "no" to the yes/no question, "Have the symptoms recurred?" via telephone on Day 25.

    Time frame: Day 25

  2. Combined Clinical and Mycological Cure at Day 7-14

    The proportion of patients reporting clinical cure Day 7-14 according to the primary endpoint and mycological cure (culture negative for growth of Candida species).

    Time frame: Day 7-14

  3. Mycological Cure at Day 7-14

    Defined as the proportion of patients having a mycological cure as assessed by vaginal culture at Day 7-14.

    Time frame: Day 7-14

  4. Mycological Cure at Day 25

    Defined as the proportion of patients achieving mycological cure as assessed by vaginal culture at Day 25.

    Time frame: Day 25

  5. Absence of Candida Hyphae in the Wet Smear

    Proportion of patients having an absence of Candida hyphae in the wet smear at Day 7-14.

    Time frame: Day 7-14

  6. Change in the Composite Vulvovaginal Signs and Symptoms (CVVS) Score From Screening to Day 7-14

    Each of the following vulvovaginal signs and symptoms was individually scored using the scoring scale below. The CVVS score is the sum of the 6 individual scores. A lower CVVS score means fewer vulvovaginal signs and symptoms. Change from the score at screening to the score at Day 7-14 is presented. * Vulvovaginal signs: erythema, edema, or excoriation (Investigator-assessed) * Vulvovaginal symptoms: itching, burning, or irritation (Patient-assessed) Scoring scale: each score was objectively defined as: 0 = none (absent), 1 = mild (slight), 2 = moderate (definitely present), 3= severe (marked, intense)

    Time frame: From Screening to Day 7-14

  7. Change in the Composite Vulvovaginal Signs and Symptoms (CVVS) Score From Screening to Day 7-14 - Proportions

    Proportion of patients having a reduction in composite vulvovaginal signs and symptoms (CVVS) score on Day 7-14 compared to screening. NB. If the patient used rescue medication between Day 7 and Day 14, Day 7 data was used. Each of the following vulvovaginal signs and symptoms was individually scored using the scoring scale below. The CVVS score is the sum of the 6 individual scores. * Vulvovaginal signs: erythema, edema, or excoriation * Vulvovaginal symptoms: itching, burning, or irritation Scoring scale: each score was objectively defined as: 0 = none (absent), 1 = mild (slight), 2 = moderate (definitely present), 3= severe (marked, intense)

    Time frame: From Screening to Day 7-14

  8. Proportion of Patients Having a Reduction in the Sum of the 3 Vulvovaginal Symptoms Scores (Itching, Burning, and Irritation) Over Time Compared to Screening

    The number of participants reported as "Yes" for having a reduction in CVVS score compared to screening is presented. Each of the following vulvovaginal signs and symptoms was individually scored using the scoring scale below. A lower CVVS score means fewer vulvovaginal symptoms. • Vulvovaginal symptoms: itching, burning, or irritation Scoring scale: each score was objectively defined as: 0 = none (absent), 1 = mild (slight), 2 = moderate (definitely present), 3= severe (marked, intense). Please note that assessments at Day 0 refer to the evening assessment post-treatment.

    Time frame: Day 1-7, Day 11, Day 14, Day 25

  9. Change in the Sum of the 3 Vulvovaginal Symptoms Scores (Itching, Burning, and Irritation) Over Time Compared to Screening

    Change in the sum of the 3 vulvovaginal symptoms scores (itching, burning, and irritation) on Days 1-7, Day 11, Day 14 and Day 25, compared to screening. Vulvovaginal symptoms were individually scored using the scoring scale below. • Vulvovaginal symptoms: itching, burning, or irritation Scoring scale: each score was objectively defined as 0 = none (absent), 1 = mild (slight), 2 = moderate (definitely present), 3= severe (marked, intense). Please note that assessments at Day 0 refer to the evening assessment post-treatment.

    Time frame: Day 1-7, Day 11, Day 14, Day 25

  10. Usability, Measured by Patient Questionnaire on Day 6.

    Response to the question "is the vaginal pessary easy to use?"

    Time frame: Day 6

07

Results

Posted Oct 6, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGedea Pessary
Started26
Completed25
Not completed1
Withdrew: Protocol violation1

Outcome measures

PrimaryClinical Cure Rate at Day 7-14

Clinical cure was defined as the absence of signs and symptoms of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) in terms of having a composite vulvovaginal signs-and-symptoms (CVVS) score equal to or below 3, with no intercurrent events (concomitant anti-fungal therapy or other treatments related to VVC due to lack of clinical performance prior to CVVS evaluation for the primary endpoint definition, treatment discontinuation due to lack of clinical performance, or rescue medication prior to CVVS evaluation for the primary endpoint definition). Each of the following vulvovaginal signs and symptoms was individually scored using the scoring scale below. The CVVS score is the sum of the 6 individual scores. * Vulvovaginal signs: erythema, edema, or excoriation * Vulvovaginal symptoms: itching, burning, or irritation Scoring scale: each score was objectively defined as: 0 = none (absent), 1 = mild (slight), 2 = moderate (definitely present), 3= severe (marked, intense)

Time frame:
Day 7-14
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Cure Rate at Day 7-14
ParticipantsGedea Pessary
Clinical cure - No10
Clinical cure - Yes16
Statistical analysis
  • Gedea Pessary · Proportion of clinically cured patients: 0.62 · 95% CI 0.4073 to 0.7909The proportion of clinically cured patients at Day 7-14 was calculated and presented together with a two-sided 95% CI based on the Wilson score for the proportion of "Yes" with continuity correction.
SecondaryContinued Clinical Response to Treatment at Day 25

Defined as the proportion of patients clinically cured on Day 7-14 and thereafter responding "no" to the yes/no question, "Have the symptoms recurred?" via telephone on Day 25.

Time frame:
Day 25
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Continued Clinical Response to Treatment at Day 25
ParticipantsGedea Pessary
Continued clinical response to treatment at Day 25 - Yes11
Continued clinical response to treatment at Day 25 - No2
Statistical analysis
  • Gedea Pessary · Proportion with cont. clinical response: 0.85 · 95% CI 0.5366 to 0.9729The proportion of participants with continued clinical response at Day 25 ("Yes") was calculated and presented together with a two-sided 95% CI. The CI was based on the Wilson score for the proportion of "Yes" with a continuity correction.
SecondaryCombined Clinical and Mycological Cure at Day 7-14

The proportion of patients reporting clinical cure Day 7-14 according to the primary endpoint and mycological cure (culture negative for growth of Candida species).

Time frame:
Day 7-14
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Combined Clinical and Mycological Cure at Day 7-14
ParticipantsGedea Pessary
Clinical cure and mycological cure - No16
Clinical cure and mycological cure - Yes10
Statistical analysis
  • Gedea Pessary · Proportion with clin and mycol. cure: 0.38 · 95% CI 0.2091 to 0.5927The proportion of participants with clinical and mycological cure at Day 7-14 ("Yes") was calculated and presented with a 95% CI. The CI was based on the Wilson score for the proportion of participants with "Yes" with a continuity correction.
SecondaryMycological Cure at Day 7-14

Defined as the proportion of patients having a mycological cure as assessed by vaginal culture at Day 7-14.

Time frame:
Day 7-14
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mycological Cure at Day 7-14
ParticipantsGedea Pessary
Mycological cure - No12
Mycological cure - Yes14
Statistical analysis
  • Gedea Pessary · Proportion with mycological cure: 0.54 · 95% CI 0.3375 to 0.7286The proportion of participants with mycological cure at Day 7-14 ("Yes") was calculated and presented with a 95% CI. The CI was based on the Wilson score for the proportion of participants with "Yes" with a continuity correction.
SecondaryMycological Cure at Day 25

Defined as the proportion of patients achieving mycological cure as assessed by vaginal culture at Day 25.

Time frame:
Day 25
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mycological Cure at Day 25
ParticipantsGedea Pessary
Mycological cure - No3
Mycological cure - Yes10
Statistical analysis
  • Gedea Pessary · Proportion with mycological cure: 0.77 · 95% CI 0.4598 to 0.9384The proportion of participants with mycological cure at Day 25 ("Yes") was calculated and presented with a 95% CI. The CI was based on the Wilson score for the proportion of participants recorded as "Yes" with a continuity correction.
SecondaryAbsence of Candida Hyphae in the Wet Smear

Proportion of patients having an absence of Candida hyphae in the wet smear at Day 7-14.

Time frame:
Day 7-14
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Absence of Candida Hyphae in the Wet Smear
ParticipantsGedea Pessary
"Absence of Candida hyphae in the wet smear" - No11
"Absence of Candida hyphae in the wet smear" - Yes15
Statistical analysis
  • Gedea Pessary · Proportion with absence of candida: 0.58 · 95% CI 0.3719 to 0.7603The proportion of participants that did not show Candida hyphae in the wet smear (absence of/"Yes") at Day 7-14 was calculated and presented together with a 95% CI based on the Wilson score for the proportion of "Yes" with a continuity correction.
SecondaryChange in the Composite Vulvovaginal Signs and Symptoms (CVVS) Score From Screening to Day 7-14

Each of the following vulvovaginal signs and symptoms was individually scored using the scoring scale below. The CVVS score is the sum of the 6 individual scores. A lower CVVS score means fewer vulvovaginal signs and symptoms. Change from the score at screening to the score at Day 7-14 is presented. * Vulvovaginal signs: erythema, edema, or excoriation (Investigator-assessed) * Vulvovaginal symptoms: itching, burning, or irritation (Patient-assessed) Scoring scale: each score was objectively defined as: 0 = none (absent), 1 = mild (slight), 2 = moderate (definitely present), 3= severe (marked, intense)

Time frame:
From Screening to Day 7-14
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale (Total range 0-18)
Change in the Composite Vulvovaginal Signs and Symptoms (CVVS) Score From Screening to Day 7-14
score on a scale (Total range 0-18)Gedea Pessary
CVVS score - Screening7.46 ± 2.02
CVVS score - Day 7-142.96 ± 2.54
Statistical analysis
  • Gedea Pessary · Mean difference (net): -4.5 · 95% CI -5.77 to -3.23The mean change in the score for composite vulvovaginal signs and symptoms from Screening to Day 7-14 was calculated and presented together with a 95% CI.
SecondaryChange in the Composite Vulvovaginal Signs and Symptoms (CVVS) Score From Screening to Day 7-14 - Proportions

Proportion of patients having a reduction in composite vulvovaginal signs and symptoms (CVVS) score on Day 7-14 compared to screening. NB. If the patient used rescue medication between Day 7 and Day 14, Day 7 data was used. Each of the following vulvovaginal signs and symptoms was individually scored using the scoring scale below. The CVVS score is the sum of the 6 individual scores. * Vulvovaginal signs: erythema, edema, or excoriation * Vulvovaginal symptoms: itching, burning, or irritation Scoring scale: each score was objectively defined as: 0 = none (absent), 1 = mild (slight), 2 = moderate (definitely present), 3= severe (marked, intense)

Time frame:
From Screening to Day 7-14
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in the Composite Vulvovaginal Signs and Symptoms (CVVS) Score From Screening to Day 7-14 - Proportions
ParticipantsGedea Pessary
Reduction in signs/symptoms -No3
Reduction in signs/symptoms -Yes23
Statistical analysis
  • Gedea Pessary · Proportion with reduction cvvs score: 0.88 · 95% CI 0.6872 to 0.9697The proportion of participants having a reduction in signs and symptoms (CVVS scores) on Day 7-14 vs. Screening was calculated and presented with a 95% CI based on the Wilson score for the prop. with "Yes" with a continuity correction.
SecondaryProportion of Patients Having a Reduction in the Sum of the 3 Vulvovaginal Symptoms Scores (Itching, Burning, and Irritation) Over Time Compared to Screening

The number of participants reported as "Yes" for having a reduction in CVVS score compared to screening is presented. Each of the following vulvovaginal signs and symptoms was individually scored using the scoring scale below. A lower CVVS score means fewer vulvovaginal symptoms. • Vulvovaginal symptoms: itching, burning, or irritation Scoring scale: each score was objectively defined as: 0 = none (absent), 1 = mild (slight), 2 = moderate (definitely present), 3= severe (marked, intense). Please note that assessments at Day 0 refer to the evening assessment post-treatment.

Time frame:
Day 1-7, Day 11, Day 14, Day 25
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Patients Having a Reduction in the Sum of the 3 Vulvovaginal Symptoms Scores (Itching, Burning, and Irritation) Over Time Compared to Screening
ParticipantsGedea Pessary
Day 0 (post-treatment)6
Day 114
Day 215
Day 317
Day 416
Day 521
Day 622
Day 722
Day 1116
Day 149
Day 2520
SecondaryChange in the Sum of the 3 Vulvovaginal Symptoms Scores (Itching, Burning, and Irritation) Over Time Compared to Screening

Change in the sum of the 3 vulvovaginal symptoms scores (itching, burning, and irritation) on Days 1-7, Day 11, Day 14 and Day 25, compared to screening. Vulvovaginal symptoms were individually scored using the scoring scale below. • Vulvovaginal symptoms: itching, burning, or irritation Scoring scale: each score was objectively defined as 0 = none (absent), 1 = mild (slight), 2 = moderate (definitely present), 3= severe (marked, intense). Please note that assessments at Day 0 refer to the evening assessment post-treatment.

Time frame:
Day 1-7, Day 11, Day 14, Day 25
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in the Sum of the 3 Vulvovaginal Symptoms Scores (Itching, Burning, and Irritation) Over Time Compared to Screening
units on a scaleGedea Pessary
Day 0 (post-treatment)-0.200 ± 1.28
Day 1-0.560 ± 1.92
Day 2-1.24 ± 1.94
Day 3-1.40 ± 2.31
Day 4-1.50 ± 2.45
Day 5-2.48 ± 1.90
Day 6-2.75 ± 1.96
Day 7-3.00 ± 2.19
Day 11-2.63 ± 2.36
Day 14-2.70 ± 2.16
Day 25-3.77 ± 2.54
SecondaryUsability, Measured by Patient Questionnaire on Day 6.

Response to the question "is the vaginal pessary easy to use?"

Time frame:
Day 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Usability, Measured by Patient Questionnaire on Day 6.
ParticipantsGedea Pessary
No3
Yes22

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from the first administration of the Gedea Pessary until the end-of-investigation visit (e.g., 25 days). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Gedea Pessary0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)16/26 (61.5%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventGedea Pessary
Vulvovaginal discomfortReproductive system and breast disorders3/26
Vulvovaginal pruritusReproductive system and breast disorders3/26
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations3/26
Vulvovaginal burning sensationReproductive system and breast disorders2/26
Vulvovaginal pruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/26
DysmenorrhoeaReproductive system and breast disorders1/26
Bacterial vaginosisInfections and infestations1/26
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/26
Anal pruritusGastrointestinal disorders1/26
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/26

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Gedea Pessary
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years26
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Gedea Pessary
Mean33.1 ± 9.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Gedea Pessary
Female26
Male0
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Gedea Pessary
African descent0
Asian or Pacific Islander3
Caucasian22
Mixed/Multi-racial0
Other, Central American1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Gedea Pessary
Sweden26
Childbearing potential
Childbearing potential(Participants)Gedea Pessary
No0
Yes26
Number of vulvovaginal candidiasis infections during the last 12 months
Number of vulvovaginal candidiasis infections during the last 12 months(participants)Gedea Pessary
01
112
27
36
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Carlanderska
    Gothenburg, 405 45, Sweden
  • KS Huddinge
    Stockholm, 141 86, Sweden
  • Danderyds sjukhus
    Stockholm, 182 88, Sweden
  • CTC MTC
    Uppsala, 75237, Sweden
09

References and documents

Related links

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2023 to primary completion in Feb 2024, 11 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2025, 1 year 7 months after primary completion.

Of 20 interventional studies with no phase under Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 34. This study's 11 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 24, 2022
First posted
Aug 18, 2022
StartActual
Mar 16, 2023
Primary completionActual
Feb 22, 2024
CompletionActual
Mar 5, 2024
Results first posted
Oct 6, 2025
Last update
Oct 6, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05507333
Lead sponsor
Gedea Biotech AB
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2022
Start date
Mar 16, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 22, 2024
Completion
Mar 5, 2024
Results posted
Oct 6, 2025
Last update
Oct 6, 2025

Study contacts

Helena Kopp-Kallner, MD PhD
principal investigator · Obstetrics & Gynecology, Danderyd Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion