CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05484635Updated Oct 6, 2025

Mesh Removal Versus No Mesh Removal for Chronic Groin Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair

An interventional study of Diagnostic laparoscopy and inguinal mesh removal and Diagnostic laparoscopy in Chronic Groin Pain and Hernia, Inguinal, sponsored by David Krpata. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-06.

Sponsored by David Krpata · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2022; still recruiting 4 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is evaluating the management of chronic post-operative inguinal hernia pain and the impact of hernia mesh removal after previous minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs.

The study aims are to evaluate the change in chronic (>6 months), nociceptive, postoperative inguinal pain after mesh removal compared to no mesh removal in patients who have previously undergone minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with pre-peritoneal mesh.

Read the detailed description

This is a double-blinded, parallel (1:1) group, randomized-controlled, superiority trial. Patients will be blinded to their treatment allocation and will understand that by entering the study, they may receive diagnostic laparoscopy only in which case their mesh will not be removed. However, they will be allowed to consider crossing over to the mesh removal group 6 months or later after surgery if they do not have adequate pain relief. Patients will receive written and oral descriptions of the trial and will be provided time to review written documentation in private. Written and oral consent will be obtained, and patients will understand that their participation is voluntary and refusal to participate will not affect future medical care. Patients may also withdraw from the trial at any point throughout the study period.

The Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, a center within the Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute (DDSI), at Cleveland Clinic Foundation Main Campus in Cleveland, Ohio is the hosting department for this study. Cleveland Clinic - Hillcrest Hospital in Mayfield Heights, Ohio will also be a participating center in this study. Fellowship-trained surgeons with expertise in complex abdominal wall reconstruction and mesh removal will perform the operations. If enrollment fails to meet necessary accrual size within the study timeframe, additional centers may be invited to participate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Groin Pain
  • Hernia, Inguinal

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chronic groin pain
  • Hernia, Inguinal
  • Chronic pain groin
03

In context

Hernia, Inguinal

549 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Inguinal; 74 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is below the median of 90 across 406 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Inguinal.

Browse Hernia, Inguinal studies →

Lead sponsor

David Krpata is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • > 18 years of age
  • CPIP lasting > 6 months after laparoscopic or robotic inguinal hernia repair with pre-peritoneal mesh
  • Must exhibit 1 or more of the following characteristics of nociceptive pain:

History:

  • Pain while sitting in a chair for prolonged periods of time with relief when extending the hip or lying supine to straighten the leg
  • Severe pain when crossing the affected leg over the contralateral leg
  • "Foreign body sensation" or "tightness" in the groin

Exam:

-Diffuse tenderness with deep palpation along the inguinal ligament (over the mesh)

Somatosensory mapping:

  • Does not have a maximum trigger point for pain
  • Lacks characteristics of neuropathic pain (sharp, burning, shooting, paresthesias, allodynia, hyperalgesia, etc.)

    • Moderate to severe pain [4-10] when moving from supine to standing on NRS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No characteristics of nociceptive groin pain
  • Zero or mild pain [0-3] when moving from supine to standing on NRS
  • Recurrent inguinal hernia detected on clinical exam
  • Large, femoral, direct or indirect inguinal hernia (F2-3, M2-3, L2-3) on diagnostic laparoscopy as defined by European Hernia Society (EHS) classification
  • Prior open (anterior) approach to inguinal hernia repair (i.e. Lichtenstein)
  • Prior mesh plugs or Prolene Hernia Systems
  • History of prostatectomy or vascular procedures in the pelvis or groin
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Diagnostic laparoscopy

    Minimally invasive incisions will be made, and a diagnostic laparoscopy will be performed. The surgeon will evaluate the mesh configuration, ensuring proper positioning, perform adhesiolysis if indicated for bowel involvement with the mesh and assess the abdomen for alternative sources of chronic pain.

    Procedure: Diagnostic laparoscopy

  • Experimental
    Laparoscopic mesh removal

    Minimally invasive incisions will be made, and a diagnostic laparoscopy will be performed. The surgeon will evaluate the mesh configuration, ensuring proper positioning, perform adhesiolysis if indicated for bowel involvement with the mesh and assess the abdomen for alternative sources of chronic pain. If randomized to mesh removal, laparoscopic or robotic preperitoneal mesh removal.

    Procedure: Diagnostic laparoscopy and inguinal mesh removal

Interventions

  • ProcedureDiagnostic laparoscopy and inguinal mesh removal

    Surgical examination and treatment of groin pain following inguinal hernia surgery by surgical exploration with a laparoscope or removal of mesh laparoscopically

  • ProcedureDiagnostic laparoscopy

    Surgical examination through laparoscopy without removal of mesh

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11)

    NRS-11 is a validated, 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) and is commonly used to measure Chronic Post-operative Inguinal Pain (CPIP). NRS-11 categorizes pain as none \[0\], mild \[1-3\], moderate \[4-6\], and severe \[7-10\]. Patients will be asked to select the single number that best represents their groin pain intensity when moving from a supine to standing position.

    Time frame: Change in NRS-11 scores will be measured from baseline to 6 months after surgery for both groups.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    VAS is validated and consists of a 100 mm horizontal line anchored by two descriptors indicating the extremes: 0 (no pain) and 100 (worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-months and 6-months

  2. Activities Assessment Scale (AAS)

    AAS is a 13-item, validated tool measuring physical impairment due to chronic groin pain. AAS scores are converted to a range of 0-100, with higher values indicating better functional ability.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-months and 6-months

  3. EuroQOL (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire

    EQ-5D-5L is a validated tool evaluating 5 dimensions of health using 5 severity descriptors and includes a visual analog scale labeled from 0 to 100 to quantitatively measure overall health status. The larger the number the better the outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3-months and 6-months

  4. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11)

    NRS-11 is a validated, 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) and is commonly used to measure Chronic Post-operative Inguinal Pain (CPIP). NRS-11 categorizes pain as none \[0\], mild \[1-3\], moderate \[4-6\], and severe \[7-10\]. Patients will be asked to select the single number that best represents their groin pain intensity when moving from a supine to standing position.

    Time frame: Baseline NRS-11 scores will be measured and compared to scores at 3 months after surgery for both groups.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05484635
Lead sponsor
David Krpata
Responsible party
David Krpata (Staff Physician, The Cleveland Clinic) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 2, 2022
Start date
Jul 25, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 6, 2025

Study contacts

David Krpata, MD
Contact
krpatad@ccf.org
216-445-9989
David Krpata, MD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion