An observational study in Uterine Bleeding, Treatment Failures and Prognostic Factors, sponsored by Naser Al-Husban. Completed at 1 site in Jordan. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-02.
Sponsored by Naser Al-Husban · Observational
To determine the predictive factors of endometrial ablation failure in the management of uterine bleeding.
This is a retrospective cohort study for women who have been treated with Thermal endometrial ablation due to uterine bleeding. The main purpose of this study is to demonstrate the possible risk factors associated with endometrial ablation failure causing patients to need subsequent gynecological procedures or undergoing hysterectomy for definitive treatment. Such efforts are made in order to anticipate the morbidity and mortality associated with patients in such conditions and to effectively stratify those patients to appropriate treatment techniques.
156 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Hemorrhage; 19 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 95 is below the median of 121 across 40 observational studies indexed under Uterine Hemorrhage.
Browse Uterine Hemorrhage studies →This is the only study on the registry with Naser Al-Husban as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
All patients who had attended the gynecology department at Jordan University Hospital.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients included in this group experienced abnormal uterine bleeding and underwent endometrial ablation. Successful ablation was defined as not undergoing subsequent gynecological procedures such as hysterectomy for any benign indication, D\&C or repeat ablation within 36 months after the endometrial ablation.
Procedure: Endometrial Ablation
Patients included in this group experienced abnormal uterine bleeding and underwent endometrial ablation. Unsuccessful ablation was defined as undergoing subsequent gynecological procedures such as hysterectomy for any benign indication, D\&C or repeat ablation within 36 months after the endometrial ablation.
Procedure: Endometrial Ablation · Procedure: Repeated gynecological procedure
Thermal endometrial ablation
subsequent gynecological procedures such as hysterectomy for any benign indication, D\&C or repeat ablation.
Clinical Predictive factors of successful endometrial ablation
the outcome of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation whether it was a failure or a success; failure was defined as persistent of heavy bleeding after the ablation.
Time frame: from September 2016 through February 2022
The failure rate of endometrial ablation for uterine bleeding
To find the failure rate of endometrial ablation that is done for uterine bleeding
Time frame: from September 2016 through February 2022
Subsequent gynecological procedures after failed ablation
To find the subsequent gynecological procedures that patients with unsuccessful ablation had
Time frame: from September 2016 through February 2022
Plan to share: Undecided — It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make IPD available
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.