ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05479279Updated Jul 29, 2022

Effectiveness of Neck Stabilization Training Program With Conventional Therapy in Management of Text Neck Syndrome

An interventional study of Neck Stabilization Training Program and Conventional physical therapy in Neck Syndrome, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-29.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2021, registered Jul 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  1. To compare the effectiveness of neck stabilization training program with conventional physical therapy in management of neck pain and disability in individuals with text neck syndrome.
  2. To compare the effectiveness of neck stabilization training program with conventional physical therapy in improving muscle strength and range of motion of cervical spine in individuals with text neck syndrome.
Read the detailed description

The text neck syndrome was described as a compilation of signs and symptoms due to the repetitive load, stress and pain in the body regions including; neck, shoulder joints, shoulder muscles, and thoracic region initiated by the excessive usage of smartphones for the prolonged time. The text neck syndrome is also called as 'Turtle neck neck syndrome' or 'anterior head syndrome.

Neck flexion in forward direction for using any smart phone could directly affects the cervical and upper thoracic spine. It is stated that increased tilt of the head forward to fifteen degrees exaggerate about 13 Kgs of mechanical force on the cervical spine.

Likewise it progresses to 18 Kgs at 30 degrees, 23 Kgs at 45 degrees and 28 Kgs at 60 degrees of forward neck flexion. The pathological consequences caused by incase of not managing the text neck could be alike to occupational overuse disease or repetitive stress and strain pathology.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Syndrome
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,176 studies on the registry; 637 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Gender (both men and women)
  • Age: 18-30 years
  • Participants using smart phones, laptops and tablets with screen time >3 hours daily, for >6 months.
  • Patient diagnosed with text neck syndrome
  • Trigger points in cervical muscles (trapezius, levator scapulae and scalene muscles)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient diagnosed with neck pain other than text neck syndrome
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Neck Stabilization Training Program

    Patient education Tens Hot pack Cervical muscle stretching trigger/ tender point release postural re-education cranio-cervical isometrics training of intrascapular, shoulder and upper extremity musculature resistance training with theraband

    Other: Neck Stabilization Training Program

  • Active comparator
    Conventional physical therapy

    Patient education Tens Hot pack Cervical muscle stretching trigger/ tender point release

    Other: Conventional physical therapy

Interventions

  • OtherNeck Stabilization Training Program

    3 times a week stretching exercises approximately 10 mins dumb bell exercises - 2 sets of 15 reps with weights varying from 1 to 2 kg cranio-cervical isometrics for 10 sec with 15 sec breaks between holds with 10-15 reps Tens 5-10 mins Hotpack 5-10 mins neck stretches home plan - 5 reps/set, 3 sets/ day

  • OtherConventional physical therapy

    Tens 5-10 mins Hotpack 5-10 mins neck stretches home plan - 5 reps/set, 3 sets/ day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neck disability index

    It is a functional status questionnaire with 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. The test can be interpreted as a raw score, with a maximum score of 50, or as percentage. Highest the score or percentage, higher will be disability.

    Time frame: 6th week

  2. NPRS

    It is a segmented numeric scale in which respondent selects a whole number (0-10). The best reflects the intensity of pain.

    Time frame: 6th week

  3. Range of motion

    ROM of cervical flexion, extension, lateral rotation and side bending will be measured by universal goniometer.

    Time frame: 6th Week

  4. Cranio-vertebral angle

    This angle is identified as intersection of a horizontal line passing through the C7 spinous process and a line joining the midpoint of the tragus of the ear to the skin overlying the C7 spinous process.

    Time frame: 6th Week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Railway General Hospital
    Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05479279
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 29, 2022
Start date
Sep 30, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2022
Completion
Jul 15, 2022
Last update
Jul 29, 2022

Study contacts

maria Khalid, MSOMPT
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion