CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05475236Updated Jun 11, 2025Results posted

Neural Underpinnings of Turning

An interventional study of Experimental: Locomotor Learning in Aging, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-11.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Older adults and stroke survivors often have difficulty performing complex walking tasks, due in part to changes in the brain. One task often overlooked is turning, which can lead to injury when performed poorly. The investigators will use non-invasive brain stimulation to assess brain activity and relate those observations to turning performance in older adults and stroke survivors.

Read the detailed description

This study is associated with an ongoing Clinical Trial (NCT03790657) called the CONTROL Walking Study, which combines locomotor learning and a form of non-invasive electrical brain stimulation call transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The CONTROL Walking Study, randomly places participants into one of two experimental groups (transcranial direct current stimulation or sham stimulation). Following group placement participants complete a 2 week long walking and turning locomotor learning intervention while receiving a group dependent the form of tDCS or sham stimulation.

In leveraging the CONTROL Walking Study infrastructure to further examine the neural control of turning while walking, which is often impaired for older adults and people who have had a stroke. This study will assess neurophysiological brain function using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) which is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation as well as assessing multiple forms of turning performance in older adults. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) will be used to assess cortical inhibitory neurophysiological function in motor networks of the brain. Importantly, recent work demonstrates significant associations between brain excitatory/inhibitory function and turning performance in older adults, although these results remain largely preliminary.

Therefore, the objective of this proposal is to further elucidate associations between neurophysiological function (measured with TMS) and 360 degree and 180 degree turning performance. The investigators will address the following specific aims:

Specific Aim 1 will test the hypothesis that greater cortical inhibition will be associated with shorter turn duration for 360 degree turns and 180 degree turns.

Specific Aim 2 will test the hypothesis that participants with greater baseline cortical inhibition will demonstrate larger 360 degree and 180 degree turning performance gains (i.e., shorter turn durations).

This new knowledge will provide additional information as to the neural mechanisms associated with turning performance in older adults. Moreover, these results could reveal mechanistic targets for future interventions to enhance turning performance learning and retention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aging

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Walking
  • Brain
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Turning
03

In context

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • age 65 years or older
  • preferred 10m walking speed \< 1.1 m/s
  • self-report of "some difficulty with walking tasks, such as becoming tired when walking a quarter mile, or when climbing two flights of stairs, or when performing household chores."
  • Willingness to be randomized to either study group and to participate in all aspects of study assessment and intervention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed neurological disorder or injury of the central nervous system, or observation of symptoms consistent with such a condition (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, stroke, etc.)
  • Contraindications to non-invasive brain stimulation (e.g., metal in head, wound on scalp)
  • Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (e.g., metal in body, claustrophobia, etc).
  • Use of medications affecting the central nervous system
  • severe arthritis, such as awaiting joint replacement
  • severe obesity (body mass index > 35)
  • current cardiovascular, lung or renal disease; diabetes; terminal illness
  • myocardial infarction or major heart surgery in the previous year
  • cancer treatment in the past year, except for nonmelanoma skin cancers and cancers having an excellent prognosis (e.g., early stage breast or prostate cancer)
  • current diagnosis of schizophrenia, other psychotic disorders, or bipolar disorder
  • uncontrolled hypertension at rest (systolic > 180 mmHg and/or diastolic > 100 mmHg)
  • bone fracture or joint replacement in the previous six months
  • current participation in physical therapy for lower extremity function or cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
  • current enrollment in any clinical trial
  • difficulty communicating with study personnel, and/or non-English speaking
  • planning to relocate out of the area during the study period
  • clinical judgment of investigative team regarding safety or non-compliance
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Stimulation

    Participants will undergo 30 seconds of 2 mA electrical current to the head through saline soaked electrodes.

    Behavioral: Experimental: Locomotor Learning

  • Experimental
    Transcranial Direct Current Simulation

    Participants will undergo 20 minutes of 2 mA electrical stimulation to the head through saline soaked electrodes.

    Behavioral: Experimental: Locomotor Learning

Interventions

  • BehavioralExperimental: Locomotor Learning

    Participants will undergo four sessions of locomotor and turn learning. Locomotor learning will involve practicing walking over different terrains (i.e., soft and firm mats) and obstacles at different walking speeds (slow or fast) and turning practice at each end of the walking course. The full cohort will undergo either transcranial direct current stimulation or sham stimulation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of Cortical Silent Period (CSP) (ms)

    Cortical Silent Period (CSP) is a single-pulse TMS measure of GABA-mediated cortical inhibition, in which stimulation is applied to the motor cortex while participants are activating a target muscle (here, the tibialis anterior muscle), resulting in a brief reduction in muscle activity. CSP is measured as the time during which the muscle activity is less than the pre-simulation muscle activity level until the return of voluntary muscle activity. CSP is measured in milliseconds (ms).

    Time frame: 30 minutes, Measured at Baseline

  2. 360 Degree Turn Duration From Baseline

    Change in 360 degree turn duration during a 360 degree turn test

    Time frame: Measured at follow up visit (approximately three weeks after baseline)

  3. 180 Degree Turn Duration From Baseline

    Change in 180 degree turn duration as measured during a 2 minute walking task where participants walk back and forth down a corridor.

    Time frame: Measured at follow up visit (approximately three weeks after baseline)

  4. Resting Motor Threshold (Percent of Machine Output)

    Resting motor threshold (rMT) is obtained by single-pulse TMS and assesses voltage-gated sodium-channel-mediated cortical excitability. rMT is the minimum intensity (% machine output) of stimulation needed to repeatedly evoke a motor evoked potential (MEP) of at least 50 microvolts in over 50% of trials. It is reported as a percentage of total machine output.

    Time frame: 20 minutes, Measured at Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Katz Independence Questionnaire

    6-item participant reported questionnaire assessing level of independence \[bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, feeding\]. Total scores range: 0-6, the higher the score, the more independent.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Results

Posted Jun 11, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Technical challenges during TMS data collection led to incomplete or unreliable neurophysiological data for several participants, limiting the interpretability of outcomes. Additionally, the overall sample size was small, which constrains the generalizability of the findings. The TMS component of the protocol required an FDA risk determination, which delayed the initiation of data collection and further contributed to the limited number of participants available for analysis.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current Simulation
Started115
Completed114
Not completed01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimaryDuration of Cortical Silent Period (CSP) (ms)

Cortical Silent Period (CSP) is a single-pulse TMS measure of GABA-mediated cortical inhibition, in which stimulation is applied to the motor cortex while participants are activating a target muscle (here, the tibialis anterior muscle), resulting in a brief reduction in muscle activity. CSP is measured as the time during which the muscle activity is less than the pre-simulation muscle activity level until the return of voluntary muscle activity. CSP is measured in milliseconds (ms).

Time frame:
30 minutes, Measured at Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds (ms)
Duration of Cortical Silent Period (CSP) (ms)
milliseconds (ms)Sham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current Simulation
Duration of Cortical Silent Period (CSP) (ms)104.34 ± 34.9399.71 ± 40.45
Primary360 Degree Turn Duration From Baseline

Change in 360 degree turn duration during a 360 degree turn test

Time frame:
Measured at follow up visit (approximately three weeks after baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · Seconds (s)
360 Degree Turn Duration From Baseline
Seconds (s)Sham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current Simulation
360 Degree Turn Duration From Baseline0.306 (-0.1 to 0.98).367 (0.24 to 0.43)
Primary180 Degree Turn Duration From Baseline

Change in 180 degree turn duration as measured during a 2 minute walking task where participants walk back and forth down a corridor.

Time frame:
Measured at follow up visit (approximately three weeks after baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · Seconds (s)
180 Degree Turn Duration From Baseline
Seconds (s)Sham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current Simulation
180 Degree Turn Duration From Baseline0.11 (-0.725 to 0.94)0.22 (0.04 to 0.49)
PrimaryResting Motor Threshold (Percent of Machine Output)

Resting motor threshold (rMT) is obtained by single-pulse TMS and assesses voltage-gated sodium-channel-mediated cortical excitability. rMT is the minimum intensity (% machine output) of stimulation needed to repeatedly evoke a motor evoked potential (MEP) of at least 50 microvolts in over 50% of trials. It is reported as a percentage of total machine output.

Time frame:
20 minutes, Measured at Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · % Maximal Stimulator Output (%MSO)
Resting Motor Threshold (Percent of Machine Output)
% Maximal Stimulator Output (%MSO)Sham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current Simulation
Resting Motor Threshold (Percent of Machine Output)56.13 (47.5 to 63.5)68.25 (59 to 72)
SecondaryKatz Independence Questionnaire

6-item participant reported questionnaire assessing level of independence \[bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, feeding\]. Total scores range: 0-6, the higher the score, the more independent.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Katz Independence Questionnaire
score on a scaleSham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current Simulation
Katz Independence Questionnaire6 (6 to 6)6 (6 to 6)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were monitored from the baseline visit through the follow-up visit, approximately 3 weeks later (i.e., a monitoring period of about 3 weeks per participant).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sham Stimulation0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)
Transcranial Direct Current Simulation0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Sham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current SimulationTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years11516
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current SimulationTotal
Mean70 (66 to 76)72 (65 to 80)71.4 (65 to 80)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current SimulationTotal
Female628
Male538
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Sham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current SimulationTotal
Hispanic or Latino112
Not Hispanic or Latino10414
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Sham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current SimulationTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White11516
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Sham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current SimulationTotal
United States11516
Height
Height(Meters (m))Sham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current SimulationTotal
Mean1.71 (1.55 to 1.93)1.73 (1.63 to 2.00)1.73 (1.55 to 2.00)
Weight
Weight(Kilograms (kg))Sham StimulationTranscranial Direct Current SimulationTotal
Mean83.38 (54.43 to 140.16)74.84 (54.43 to 93.89)80.71 (54.43 to 140.16)

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL
    Gainesville, Florida 32608-1135, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 13, 2022
  • Informed consent form · Feb 1, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — A limited dataset will be created and shared pursuant to a Data Use Agreement appropriately limiting use of the dataset and prohibiting the recipient from identifying or re-identifying (or taking steps to identify or re-identify) any individual whose data are included in the dataset.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05475236
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 26, 2022
Start date
Feb 28, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 28, 2024
Completion
Jun 28, 2024
Results posted
Jun 11, 2025
Last update
Jun 11, 2025

Study contacts

Clayton W Swanson, PhD
principal investigator · North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion