CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05459714Updated Jul 15, 2022

Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscope System in Stomach Examination of Moderately and Severely Obese Patients

An interventional study of MCE for obese patients in Obesity, sponsored by Changhai Hospital. Status unknown at 3 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-15.

Sponsored by Changhai Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2022), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. The study is planned to be conducted at a qualified clinical trial center, and 30 subjects are planned to be enrolled to evaluate the feasibility and safety of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) system in the examination of gastric disorders in patients with moderate to severe obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2).

Read the detailed description

Metabolic surgery, as one of the most important treatments for obesity, has been widely used worldwide. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is mostly used in the perioperative preoperative application of metabolic surgery to improve or exclude preoperative diagnosis, including gastrointestinal tumors, various types of upper GI mucosal lesions, esophagitis, esophageal hiatal hernia, gastrointestinal interstitial tumors, etc. However, EGD is an invasive examination and can cause discomfort without anesthesia, resulting in low patient compliance. In 2013, ANKON took the lead in developing the world's first capsule endoscope system that utilizes precise multi-dimensional rotational movement of a robotic arm and adaptive matching to achieve precise magnetic control, which is convenient for observing specific lesions from an appropriate angle and has been shown to have high diagnostic accuracy for gastric diseases (highly consistent with EGD, with sensitivity and specificity of 90.4% and 95.7%, respectively, and accuracy of 93.4%). It has been clinically proven that MCE is safe and effective in the upper gastrointestinal tract, but there is a lack of clinical systematic studies on its application to moderately and severely obese people.In summary, this exploratory study is designed to preliminarily verify the clinical feasibility and safety of MCE for upper gastrointestinal examination in moderately obese people (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2).

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • obesity
  • capsule endoscopy
03

In context

Obesity

6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,695 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 78 across 4,878 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

Changhai Hospital is the lead sponsor of 342 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Clinical diagnosis of obesity: BMI ≥ 35kg/m2;
  2. Be scheduled to undergo gastric examination;
  3. Be able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. With swallowing obstruction or disorders; 2. With known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, stenosis and fistula; 3. Have no conditions for surgery or refuse to undergo any abdominal surgery; 4. Be allergic to or have other known contraindication or intolerance to the drug used in the study; 5. With pacemakers or other electronic devices such as electronic cochlear implants, implanted magnetic metal drug infusion pumps, neurostimulators, and magnetic metal foreign bodies; 6. Women during pregnancy; 7. Currently enrolled in another clinical trial of a drug or device; 8. Other conditions determined by the investigator to be inappropriate for enrollment.

-

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MCE for obese patients

    After a standardized gastrointestinal preparation, the patient will undergo MCE examination. After completing the MCE procedure, the patient is evaluated for examination comfort and can then leave the hospital on his or her own and watch for capsule excretion.

    Device: MCE for obese patients

Interventions

  • DeviceMCE for obese patients

    Sequence of stomach examination: The stomach examination is performed sequentially according to the order of fundus, cardia, gastric body, angulus, antrum, and pylorus, which should ensure the integrity of the observation of each part of the stomach and achieve the purpose of comprehensive observation by means of different observation distances such as distant view and close view, and different observation angles such as front and side.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Complete Observation

    The number of participants with complete observation. Complete observation of the mucosa means over 90% of the mucosa observed in gastric cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum and pylorus.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gastric Examination Time

    Gastric examination time was defined as the time taken for the endoscopist to complete the gastric examination to his or her satisfaction

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  2. The Total Number of Patients Who Who Had a Diagnosis of Positive Findings

    It was calculated using the following formula: number of patients with positive findings divided by the total number of patients that underwent examination.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  3. Evaluation of patient satisfaction through questionaires

    The investigators use a satisfaction questionnaire to evaluate the satisfaction of each patient, including ease of capsule swallowing, discomfort during the examination, discomfort after the examination and comfort level of MCE examination.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Changhai Hospital
    Shanghai, China
    • Kai Yin · Contact
  • Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital
    Shanghai, China
    • Bing Wang · Contact
  • Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
    Shanghai, China
    • Pin Zhang · Contact
08

References and documents

Publications

  • GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators; Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K, Lee A, Marczak L, Mokdad AH, Moradi-Lakeh M, Naghavi M, Salama JS, Vos T, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Ahmed MB, Al-Aly Z, Alkerwi A, Al-Raddadi R, Amare AT, Amberbir A, Amegah AK, Amini E, Amrock SM, Anjana RM, Arnlov J, Asayesh H, Banerjee A, Barac A, Baye E, Bennett DA, Beyene AS, Biadgilign S, Biryukov S, Bjertness E, Boneya DJ, Campos-Nonato I, Carrero JJ, Cecilio P, Cercy K, Ciobanu LG, Cornaby L, Damtew SA, Dandona L, Dandona R, Dharmaratne SD, Duncan BB, Eshrati B, Esteghamati A, Feigin VL, Fernandes JC, Furst T, Gebrehiwot TT, Gold A, Gona PN, Goto A, Habtewold TD, Hadush KT, Hafezi-Nejad N, Hay SI, Horino M, Islami F, Kamal R, Kasaeian A, Katikireddi SV, Kengne AP, Kesavachandran CN, Khader YS, Khang YH, Khubchandani J, Kim D, Kim YJ, Kinfu Y, Kosen S, Ku T, Defo BK, Kumar GA, Larson HJ, Leinsalu M, Liang X, Lim SS, Liu P, Lopez AD, Lozano R, Majeed A, Malekzadeh R, Malta DC, Mazidi M, McAlinden C, McGarvey ST, Mengistu DT, Mensah GA, Mensink GBM, Mezgebe HB, Mirrakhimov EM, Mueller UO, Noubiap JJ, Obermeyer CM, Ogbo FA, Owolabi MO, Patton GC, Pourmalek F, Qorbani M, Rafay A, Rai RK, Ranabhat CL, Reinig N, Safiri S, Salomon JA, Sanabria JR, Santos IS, Sartorius B, Sawhney M, Schmidhuber J, Schutte AE, Schmidt MI, Sepanlou SG, Shamsizadeh M, Sheikhbahaei S, Shin MJ, Shiri R, Shiue I, Roba HS, Silva DAS, Silverberg JI, Singh JA, Stranges S, Swaminathan S, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Tadese F, Tedla BA, Tegegne BS, Terkawi AS, Thakur JS, Tonelli M, Topor-Madry R, Tyrovolas S, Ukwaja KN, Uthman OA, Vaezghasemi M, Vasankari T, Vlassov VV, Vollset SE, Weiderpass E, Werdecker A, Wesana J, Westerman R, Yano Y, Yonemoto N, Yonga G, Zaidi Z, Zenebe ZM, Zipkin B, Murray CJL. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):13-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362. Epub 2017 Jun 12. PubMed 28604169 ↗
  • Praveenraj P, Gomes RM, Kumar S, Senthilnathan P, Parathasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Palanivelu C. Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Implications of Preoperative Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Jun;25(6):465-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0041. Epub 2015 May 5. PubMed 25942627 ↗
  • Liao Z, Duan XD, Xin L, Bo LM, Wang XH, Xiao GH, Hu LH, Zhuang SL, Li ZS. Feasibility and safety of magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy system in examination of human stomach: a pilot study in healthy volunteers. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct-Dec;2(4):155-160. doi: 10.4161/jig.23751. Epub 2012 Oct 1. PubMed 23687601 ↗
  • Liao Z, Hou X, Lin-Hu EQ, Sheng JQ, Ge ZZ, Jiang B, Hou XH, Liu JY, Li Z, Huang QY, Zhao XJ, Li N, Gao YJ, Zhang Y, Zhou JQ, Wang XY, Liu J, Xie XP, Yang CM, Liu HL, Sun XT, Zou WB, Li ZS. Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;14(9):1266-1273.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 May 20. PubMed 27211503 ↗
  • Jiang X, Qian YY, Liu X, Pan J, Zou WB, Zhou W, Luo YY, Chen YZ, Li ZS, Liao Z. Impact of magnetic steering on gastric transit time of a capsule endoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct;88(4):746-754. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.06.031. Epub 2018 Jul 11. PubMed 30005825 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — After finishing this study, the investigators will make the data available to other researchers: including study protocol, statistical analysis plan (SAP), informed consent form (ICF), clinical study report (CSR)

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 15, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05459714
Lead sponsor
Changhai Hospital
Collaborators
Shanghai 6th People's Hospital, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Responsible party
Zhuan Liao (Professor, Changhai Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 15, 2022
Start date
Oct 15, 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 1, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 15, 2022

Study contacts

Zhuan Liao
Contact
liaozhuan@smmu.edu.cn
86-21-31161004
Pin Zhang
principal investigator · Shanghai 6th People's Hospital
Kai Yin
principal investigator · Changhai Hospital
Bin Wang
principal investigator · Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion