An interventional study of CDSS and Patient Portal in Fall, Fall Injury and Fall Patients, sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA). Status unknown at 10 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-02.
Sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Falls in older adults represents a growing public health challenge. The use of certain medication is recognized as an important modifiable risk factor for falls. Research indicates fall-risk increasing drug (FRID) deprescribing is effective in reducing falls but difficult to initiate and to sustain over longer periods of follow-up. A clinical decision support system (CDSS) and patient portal for communicating medication-related fall risk to fall clinic patients may improve joint medication management between patients and physicians and consequently reduce the incidence of injurious falls.
This study investigates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the concurrent use of a CDSS and a patient portal for personalized FRID deprescribing, and will be assessed through a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial among new fall clinic patients, aged 65 years or older. The main study parameter is the time to first injurious fall. The primary objective of the ADFICE_IT study is to investigate the effects of a CDSS and accompanying patient portal for optimizing FRID deprescribing on injurious falls. This study has three secondary objectives. First, the effect of the CDSS and patient portal on a number of secondary outcomes will be investigated. Second, a process evaluation to evaluate the implementation of the CDSS and patient portal will be conducted. Third, the cost-effectiveness of the CDSS and patient portal will be investigated.
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) is the lead sponsor of 532 studies on the registry; 185 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
The intervention includes the combined use of the clinical decision support system (CDSS) that provides deprescribing advice and a personalized risk prediction and a patient portal.
Device: CDSS · Device: Patient Portal
Care as usual
A clinical decision support system (CDSS) that provides deprescribing advice and a personalized risk prediction
Also known as: Clinical Decision Support System
A Patient Portal that helps patients prepare for their fall clinic visit by giving them information about falls, falls prevention, and medication-related falls. After the fall clinic visit, the Patient Portal also shows the personalized fall-risk and treatment advice.
Also known as: Valportaal
Time to first injurious fall
This concerns the time to the first injurious fall. An injurious fall is defined as a fall resulting in wounds, bruises, sprains, cuts, medically recorded fractures, head or internal injury, requiring medical/health professional examination, accident and emergency treatment, or inpatient treatment.
Time frame: 12 months
Number of injurious falls
This concerns the total number of injuirous falls over the course of 12 months. An injurious fall is defined as a fall resulting in wounds, bruises, sprains, cuts, medically recorded fractures, head or internal injury, requiring medical/health professional examination, accident and emergency treatment, or inpatient treatment.
Time frame: 12 months
Total number of falls
Total number of any fall (I.e. a fall that results in no injuries, or minor, moderate, or severe injuries)
Time frame: 12 months
Time to first fall resulting in any injuries
I.e. a fall that results in minor, moderate, or severe injuries
Time frame: 12 months
Total number of falls resulting in any injuries
I.e. a fall that results in minor, moderate, or severe injuries
Time frame: 12 months
Time to first non-injurious fall
I.e. a fall that results in no injuries
Time frame: 12 months
EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L)
The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension in the EQ-5D-5L has five response levels: no problems (Level 1); slight; moderate; severe; and extreme problems (Level 5). Furthermore, it includes a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) which provides a single global rating of self-perceived health and is scored on a 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable) scale.
Time frame: at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Minimum Data Set-Short Form (TOPICS-SF)
Data as measured by the The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Minimum Data Set-Short Form (TOPICS-SF) will be analysed based on the preference-weighted score, ranging from 1.90 to 9.78, with higher scores reflecting a better health status, as perceived by the respondent. The TOPICS - Short Form 2017 including Casemix forms were developed in collaboration with the Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Geriatrie (NvKG - Dutch Association for Clinical Geriatrics) to use as a Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) in the Dutch outpatient and clinical daily practice.
Time frame: at baseline and 12 months
iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)
Direct and indirect costs related to the intervention and care as usual will be assessed using the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ).
Time frame: at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)
The iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) is an instrument for measuring medical consumption. The iMCQ includes questions related to frequently occurring contacts with health care providers.
Time frame: at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Feasibility assessed by number of CDSS and patient portal use
To assess the feasibility of the intervention, the investigators will use data logged by the CDSS and patient portal to understand how (often) the CDSS and patient portal are used
Time frame: 12 months
Percentage of physicians attending the CDSS training via a questionnaire
To assess the feasibility of the intervention, the investigators will look at the percentage of physicians who attended the CDSS training. More specifically, this will be measured by asking physicians whether they attended the CDSS training online, offline or not at all as part of the CDSS user satisfaction questionnaire.
Time frame: 12 months
Correlation of percentage of physicians attending the CDSS training and CDSS user satisfaction
The correlation between the proportion of a department's staff members who did/did not participate in the CDSS training and user satisfaction regarding the CDSS will be assessed.
Time frame: 12 months
CDSS user satisfaction
To assess the feasibility of the intervention, the investigators will study the satisfaction regarding the CDSS (i.e. physician evaluations of the CDSS). Agreement with satisfaction statements will be scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1= totally disagree; 7 = totally agree).
Time frame: 12 months
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is designed to measure the adoption of a new technology/system based on user attitudes. 6 items aim to measure Perceived Usefulness on a 7-point Likert scale (1=totally disagree; 7 = totally agree), and 6 items aim to measure Perceived Ease of Use on a 7-point Likert scale (1=totally disagree; 7 = totally agree). Intention to use is measured through 1 item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=totally disagree; 7 = totally agree)
Time frame: at baseline
Website Satisfaction Scale (WSS)
The Website Satisfaction Scale (WSS) measures satisfaction with comprehensibility, satisfaction with attractiveness, and satisfaction with emotional support through 12 items, for each sub scale using a 7-point Likert response scale, ranging from 1 'totally disagree' to 7 'totally agree'.
Time frame: at 3 months
Observer OPTION Multiple Chronic Conditions (OPTION-MCC)
Videotaped consultations will be coded on triadic decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions by using the Observer OPTION Multiple Chronic Conditions (OPTION-MCC) coding scheme. Six types of physicians', patients', and caregivers' behaviors are coded. Physicians' behavior is coded on a 5-point scale (0= The behavior is not observed; 4=The behavior is executed to a very high standard), patients' behavior is coded on a 3-point scale (0=No or minimal participation, e.g. only yes or no; 2=Active participation, answers questions and asks questions, brings in own ideas and shares perceptions), and informal caregivers' behavior is coded on a 3-point scale (0=No or minimal participation, e.g. only yes or no; 2=Active participation, answers questions and asks questions, brings in own ideas and shares perceptions)
Time frame: 12 months
Rate of adherence to new medication plan using pharmacy records
To assess adherence to the medication advice, the investigators will compare a patient's new medication advice with their pharmacy records to determine whether a patient adheres to the new medication advice or whether they (eventually) change back to their old medication
Time frame: 12 months
Number of falls calendar entries
To assess adherence to the medication advice, the investigators will compare the new medication advice with falls calender entries on medication use to determine whether a patient adheres to the new medication advice or whether they (eventually) change back to their old medication
Time frame: 12 months
iSHARE
To evaluate how the intervention facilitates SDM, the investigators will use the iSHAREpatient and iSHAREphysician questionnaires. The iSHAREphysician consists of 16 items scored on a 6-point Likert scale (1= did not do this at all; 6 = completely did this). The iSHAREpatient consists of 16 items scored on a 6-point Likert scale (1= did not do this at all; 6 = completely did this). Dimension scores (range, 0-5) and a total score (the sum of the dimension scores; range, 0-30) for both iSHARE questionnaires will be calculated. The investigators will then apply a linear transformation to obtain a 0 to 100 total score ((score/30)\*100). Higher dimension and total scores indicate higher levels of SDM.
Time frame: 12 months
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS; low literacy scale)
To evaluate how the intervention facilitates SDM, the investigators will use the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS; low literacy scale). This scale consists of 10 questions, scored on 3 response categories (yes, do not know, no).
Time frame: at baseline
Preparation for Decision-making scale (PrepDM)
To evaluate how the intervention facilitates SDM, the investigators will use the Preparation for Decision-making scale (PrepDM). This scale consists of 10 items, scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1= not at all; 5 = a great deal)
Time frame: at baseline
Netherlands Patient Information Recall Questionnaire (NPIRQ)
To evaluate how the intervention facilitates SDM, the investigators will use the Netherlands Patient Information Recall Questionnaire (NPIRQ). This questionnaire consists of open questions.
Time frame: 12 months
Plan to share: Undecided — Currently no plan
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) →