CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05447754Updated Jul 7, 2022

Comparison of the Effects of Robotic Rehabilitation Versus Traditional Balance Training on Balance and Fear of Falling in Stroke Patients

An interventional study of Combined RAGT and TBT and balance exercises in Stroke, Stroke Rehabilitation and Robotic Exoskeleton, sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-07.

Sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2022), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In the literature, it has been observed that traditional balance training (TBT) and robot-assisted walking training (RAGT) in stroke patients stimulate the balance mechanism by supporting the spinal muscles symmetrically and functionally. However, it is seen that there is no clear protocol for RAGT in the chronic period. Combined RAGT and TBT approaches over ten weeks have been shown to be more effective than TBT alone for the acute and subacute period. However, there is no definite expression for chronic period effects. No study was found in the literature in which an objective measuring device was used for balance assessment of patients receiving TBT and RAGT. If changes are detected between the two treatment groups in balance education in stroke patients as a result of objective evaluation, our study will lead to the necessity of including these changes in the treatment. Considering the effect of balance on activities of daily living, we believe that objective evaluation of the changes in balance after TBT and RAGT in stroke patients and shaping the treatment according to the evaluation results will contribute to the literature.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Robotic Exoskeleton

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Robot assisted gait training
  • Balance training
  • Fear of falling
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 42 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa is the lead sponsor of 680 studies on the registry; 208 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Being 18 years or older
  • Volunteering to participate in the study
  • Having been diagnosed with stroke (at least 3 months)
  • Age range 18 ≥ or 75 \<
  • Being able to walk independently (Functional Ambulation Scale> 3)
  • Modified Ashworth Scale ≤ 2 spasticity value

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being under the age of 18
  • Having severe visual and cognitive impairment
  • Having severe cardiovascular disease
  • Having experienced musculoskeletal injuries (osteoarthritis, contracture, osteoporosis, etc. in the joints of the lower extremities) or any skin problem (such as pressure sores)
  • Being involved in a robotic rehabilitation program before
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Combined RAGT and TBT

    Participants will be treated with Lokomat for 40 minutes, twice a week for 5 weeks, and RAGT with a body weight support system and combined TBT for 40 minutes each session 3 times a week. During RAGT, 30-40% of each participant's body weight will be taken with the body weight support system. In patients without drop foot and knee instability in the sessions after the first session, the body weight will be reduced by 10% and progression will be achieved. The speed of the treadmill will be adjusted between 1.2-2.6 km/h and the maximum speed tolerated by the patient will be reached during the sessions. TBT exercises 3 times a week for 40 minutes (weight transfer to the paretic leg during sitting and standing, weight transfer during sitting and standing with or without an assistive device) will be personalized according to the patient. Progression of exercises will be provided by adding upper extremity and trunk activities in addition to exercises.

    Other: Combined RAGT and TBT

  • Active comparator
    TBT Only

    Participants were given balance exercises (weight transfer to the paretic leg during sitting and standing, weight transfer during sitting and standing without an assistive device, walking on a flat surface to the forward and sideways) for 5 weeks, 5 times a week and for 40 minutes in each session. lying down while sitting and standing) will be applied.

    Other: balance exercises

Interventions

  • OtherCombined RAGT and TBT

    Combined RAGT and TBT: Participants will be treated with Lokomat for 40 minutes, twice a week for 5 weeks, and RAGT with a body weight support system and combined TBT for 40 minutes each session 3 times a week. During RAGT, 30-40% of each participant's body weight will be taken with the body weight support system. In patients without drop foot and knee instability in the sessions after the first session, the body weight will be reduced by 10% and progression will be achieved. The speed of the treadmill will be adjusted between 1.2-2.6 km/h and the maximum speed tolerated by the patient will be reached during the sessions. TBT exercises 3 times a week for 40 minutes (weight transfer to the paretic leg during sitting and standing, weight transfer during sitting and standing with or without an assistive device) will be personalized according to the patient. Progression of exercises will be provided by adding upper extremity and trunk activities in addition to exercises.

  • Otherbalance exercises

    TBT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Berg Balance Scale

    It is used to evaluate postural control and to determine fall risk. It consists of 14 questions with parameters such as standing up from sitting, standing, transfers, taking a step, turning. A score of 0-4 is given for each question and the time the person performs the desired activity is recorded. At the end of the test, the total score received by the subject is calculated.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  2. EncephaLog by Montfort® App

    The phone, which is fixed to the sternum of the participant, evaluates the static and dynamic balance with the integration of accelerometer and gyroscope. Static balance is evaluated in a neutral stance with feet open, feet together, feet together and eyes closed, in tandem stance for 10 seconds for each test. Starts the dynamic balance assessment with a 5 second countdown followed by a short audible tone and vibration. Participants stand up without any assistance or arm support and walk at their natural speed towards a cone positioned on the ground 3 m from their chair, then turn around the cone and walk back and sit. It provides objective data by recording the walking time and the test is repeated twice.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  3. International Fall Efficiency Scale (FES-I)

    It was developed to assess the fear of falling. The cut-off point is 24 to distinguish between people who have a fear of falling and those who do not. The participant is asked to rate his/her concern about the possibility of falling while performing activities of daily living. Fear of falling is determined by adding the scores between 1-4 obtained from each question after completing 16 questions.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  4. Timed Get Up and Go Test

    It is a measure for assessing balance and functional mobility. A chair and a stopwatch are required to administer the test. The shoes that are always used during the test are used and the test is continued with the assistive device if used. The person is asked to get up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back and sit, and the score is calculated by measuring how many seconds he or she completes the test. Completing the test in more than 12 seconds indicates that the risk of falling is high.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Foot Posture Index

    In this index, the medial and lateral palpation of the distal talus, the inequality in submalleolar and supramalleolar recesses, the position of the calcaneus, the medial protrusion of the navicular region in posterior observation, the evaluation of MLA, and the number of fingers visible medially or laterally when viewed from the posterior are evaluated. The regions examined are evaluated for each item up to (+2) according to the degree of pronation and (-2) according to the degree of supination, and the total score is determined as the sum of these values.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  2. Functional Ambulation Scale

    In this classification system, 6 functional levels are defined. This classification system is widely used to evaluate the outcome or effectiveness of rehabilitation and functional level in individuals recovering from stroke.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  3. Modified Ashworth Scale

    It is a 6-item scale that focuses on the subjective clinical assessment of muscle tone. It measures the level of resistance to passive movement, but cannot assess the speed of passive joint movement, the angle of contraction swing, or potential tendon retraction. MAS is effective in clinical practice due to its ease of use and speed.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  4. Fugl-Meyer Test- Lower Extremity

    The lower extremity section with a score of 34 including 17 items was used. Evaluates reflexes, synergy-dependent or synergy-independent voluntary movement, coordination and speed. Each item is evaluated out of 2 as follows; 0: cannot complete the movement/ no active movement, 1: partial movement, 2: the movement is completed / movements can be performed normally.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
    Istanbul, Turkey
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05447754
Lead sponsor
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Responsible party
Rüstem Mustafaoğlu (Associate Professor, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 7, 2022
Start date
May 13, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 13, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 13, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2022

Study contacts

Rüstem Mustafaoğlu, PhD
study chair · Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion