ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05445921Updated Feb 12, 2026Results posted

Stellate Ganglion Block for COVID-19-Induced Olfactory Dysfunction

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Stellate Ganglion Block in Anosmia, Hyposmia and Parosmia, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-12.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic olfactory dysfunction from the COVID-19 pandemic is a growing public health crisis with up to 1.2 million people in the Unites States affected. Olfactory dysfunction impacts one's quality of life significantly by decreasing the enjoyment of foods, creating environmental safety concerns, and affecting one's ability to perform certain jobs. Olfactory dysfunction is also an independent predictor of anxiety, depression, and even mortality. While the pandemic has increased the interest by the scientific community in combating the burgeoning health crisis, few effective treatments currently exist for olfactory dysfunction. Furthermore, patients impacted by "long COVID," or chronic symptoms after an acute COVID-19 infection, experience impairments other than olfactory and gustatory dysfunction, such as chronic dyspnea, impaired memory and concentration, and severe fatigue. These symptoms have been hypothesized to be a result of sympathetic positive feedback loops and dysautonomia. Stellate ganglion blocks have been proposed to treat this hyper-sympathetic activation by blocking the sympathetic neuronal firing and resetting the balance of the autonomic nervous system. Studies prior to the COVID-19 pandemic have supported a beneficial effect of stellate ganglion blocks on olfactory dysfunction, and recent news reports and a published case series have described a dramatic benefit in both olfactory function and other long COVID symptoms in patients receiving stellate ganglion blocks. Therefore, we propose a single cohort prospective study to generate pilot data on the efficacy and safety of sequential stellate ganglion blocks for the treatment of COVID-19-induced olfactory dysfunction and other long COVID symptoms.

Read the detailed description

One of the hallmark symptoms of infection with SARS-CoV-2 is olfactory dysfunction, and it is estimated that up to 1.2 million people in the United States will experience chronic olfactory dysfunction from the COVID-19 pandemic. While the majority of patients recover from COVID dysosmia, up to 15%-25% have long-term hyposmia. Olfactory impairment can take the form of hyposmia (diminished sense of smell), anosmia (absent sense of smell), or parosmia (distorted sense of smell). Etiologies of olfactory dysfunction include post-viral, traumatic, inflammatory (e.g., chronic rhinosinusitis), neurodegenerative (e.g., Parkinson's disease), and congenital, among others. Prior to the pandemic, post-viral anosmia was the most common cause of olfactory dysfunction, which has further increased as the dominant etiology as a result of COVID-19. The proposed pathophysiologic mechanisms of chronic COVID-19-induced olfactory dysfunction include inflammatory cytokine release, damage to the supporting environment of the olfactory epithelium, and retrograde propagation to higher order neurons. A unique feature of COVID-19-associated olfactory dysfunction is the high rate of persistent parosmia. In one study of 222 patients with COVID-19-associated olfactory dysfunction, 148 (67%) of these patients experienced parosmia at some point. Of the 148 patients with parosmia at any point, 84 (57%) had persistent parosmia after a mean of 6.5 months, distinguishing COVID-19-induced olfactory dysfunction from any other etiologies of olfactory dysfunction. Patients with olfactory dysfunction have decreased quality-of-life and describe their life as if "living in a box." These patients have concern for environmental safety, decreased enjoyment of their food, depression, anxiety, and even higher risk of mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of the sense of olfaction, however, there is a scarcity of effective treatments for olfactory dysfunction. Furthermore, chronic olfactory dysfunction is just one of the constellation of symptoms included in "long COVID," or persistent symptoms after recovery from acute illness due to COVID-19. Other symptoms of long COVID include fatigue, dyspnea, cough, and impaired memory and concentration, among many others.These chronic symptoms are hypothesized to be, at least in part, a result of sympathetic hyperactivity resulting in positive feedback loops. Therefore, the stellate ganglion block, which inhibits the sympathetic nervous system, is hypothesized to reset the balance of the autonomic nervous system and provide relief for long COVID symptoms, including olfactory dysfunction.

Treatment No standard of care treatment for post-viral olfactory dysfunction exists. The most commonly used treatment for post-viral olfactory dysfunction is olfactory training; however, a large proportion of patients do not receive benefit and continue to have persistent symptoms. A multitude of other therapies have been tried with minimal success, including theophylline, vitamin A, sodium citrate, and intranasal insulin. As a result, there is a critical need for the development of a novel intervention to address the large volume of patients with olfactory dysfunction as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The stellate ganglion block (SGB) involves an ultrasound-guided injection of a local anesthetic to inhibit the stellate ganglion. The SGB is proposed to inhibit the sympathetic neural connections within the head, neck, and upper extremity, improve regional blood flow, reduce adrenal hormone concentration, and even reestablish circadian rhythms through modulation of melatonin. The SGB has been used successfully in a multitude of disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder, cluster headache, complex regional pain syndrome, and peripheral vascular disease.

The SGB was first proposed to treat olfactory dysfunction by Lee et al in 2003, where 38 post-viral olfactory dysfunction participants were treated with SGB and 13 participants remained untreated as controls. Subjective olfactory function improved in 27 (71%) of the treated participants compared to zero (0%) of the controls. Olfactory perception was improved significantly in the SGB group assessed both by the butanol threshold test and odor identification test. There were no complications of SGB in the 38 treated participants. Another study in 2007 by Moon et al found that in 13 participants with various etiologies of olfactory dysfunction, seven (54%) demonstrated improvement with repeated SGBs. The same group conducted a study published in 2013 looking at the long-term results of SGB in treating olfactory dysfunction from various etiologies. Of 37 participants with olfactory dysfunction unresponsive to oral or intranasal steroids who underwent SGB, 15 (41%) were determined to be responsive and 22 (59%) unresponsive to the treatment. Importantly, the responsive group had a mean duration of olfactory dysfunction of 1.6 years vs. a mean duration of olfactory dysfunction of 4 years in the unresponsive group. The study found that in those who respond to SGB, the beneficial effects on olfaction last at least 5 years. Of the 37 treated participants there was only 1 who experienced a complication, which was a temporary brachial plexus block.

Most recently, anecdotal news reports and a published case series point to a possible beneficial effect of SGB on both chronic COVID-19-induced olfactory dysfunction and various other long COVID symptoms. A published case series by Liu et al describes two patients who underwent SGB for long COVID symptoms, including olfactory dysfunction. SGB was performed on the right side then either one or two days later to the left side. Both patients reported significant and durable improvement in symptoms, including fatigue, "brain fog," and olfactory and gustatory dysfunction that persisted at 60-day follow-up. Nearly all other long COVID symptoms, including cough, chest pain, heart palpitations, and orthostatic dizziness, also improved at the one week and two-month follow-up time points. The authors concluded that although the sample size is limited, SGB may have a significant impact on the dysautonomia caused by COVID-19 and improve long COVID symptoms, giving rationale to conduct a larger study. Therefore, we propose a single cohort prospective study to generate pilot data on the effectiveness and safety of sequential stellate ganglion blocks for the treatment of COVID-19-induced olfactory dysfunction and other long COVID symptoms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anosmia
  • Hyposmia
  • Parosmia
  • Olfactory Disorder

Keywords

  • COVID-19
03

In context

Anosmia

180 studies on the registry are indexed under Anosmia; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 114 interventional studies indexed under Anosmia.

Browse Anosmia studies →

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,803 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.

Of its 329 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 216 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults age 18 to 70
  2. Diagnosis of COVID at least 12 months prior to study enrollment with self-reported olfactory dysfunction
  3. Objective olfactory dysfunction due to COVID-19 that has persisted despite viral recovery, as defined by the UPSIT (≤ 34 in women, ≤ 33 in men)
  4. Ability to read, write, and understand English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of smell loss prior to COVID-19 infection
  2. History of conditions known to impact olfactory function:

    1. Chronic rhinosinusitis
    2. History of prior sinonasal or skull base surgery
    3. Neurodegenerative disorders (Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia)
  3. Currently using concomitant therapies specifically for the treatment of olfactory dysfunction
  4. Inability to tolerate a needle injection into the neck
  5. History of coexisting conditions that make SGB :

    1. Unilateral vocal cord paralysis
    2. Severe ( between 30-50% of predicted)
    3. Recent myocardial infarction within the last year
    4. Glaucoma
    5. Cardiac conduction block of any degree
  6. Currently taking blood thinners or antiplatelet agents
  7. Allergy to local anesthetic
  8. Inability to extend the neck for any reason (e.g., severe arthritis)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stellate Ganglion Block

    The ultrasound guided stellate ganglion blocks will be performed by a pain management specialist with extensive experience performing these blocks. The first SGB at the initial visit will be performed on the right side, and the second SGB will be on the left side 5-10 days after the first SGB, given that the patient tolerated the first SGB.

    Drug: Stellate Ganglion Block

Interventions

  • The stellate ganglion will be identified using ultrasound guidance, and after a test does of 1% lidocaine, 1% mepivacaine will be injected near the stellate ganglion.

    Also known as: mepivacaine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score

    Participants will be asked about their change in olfactory dysfunction on a 7-point Likert scale from much better to much worse.

    Time frame: 5-10 days post SGB #1 and 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)

    Participants will complete the 40-item scratch and sniff UPSIT and mean change will be assessed. The UPSIT has a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 40 with lower scores indicating a greater degree of impairment. An UPSIT score of \>33 for men and \>34 for women is considered normosmic, and the minimal clinically important difference is a change of 4 points.

    Time frame: baseline, 5-10 days, and 1 month

  2. Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR)

    Participants will be asked to complete the ODOR, which is a patient-reported outcome measure assessing physical problems, functional limitations, and emotional consequences of olfactory dysfunction. The ODOR has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 112 with higher scores indicating a greater degree of impairment and limitation. The minimal clinically important difference is a change of 15 points.

    Time frame: baseline, 5-10 days post SGB #1, and 1 month

  3. Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score

    Participants will be asked about the severity of their olfactory dysfunction (and gustatory dysfunction) on a 5-point Likert scale from no smell loss to severe smell loss.

    Time frame: baseline, 5-10 days, and 1 month

07

Results

Posted Nov 7, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStellate Ganglion Block
Started20
Completed20
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryClinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score

Participants will be asked about their change in olfactory dysfunction on a 7-point Likert scale from much better to much worse.

Time frame:
5-10 days post SGB #1 and 1 month
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score
ParticipantsStellate Ganglion Block
CGI-I for Smell Loss at 1 Week — About the Same12
CGI-I for Smell Loss at 1 Week — Slightly Better8
CGI-I for Smell Loss at 1 Week — Moderately Better0
CGI-I for Smell Loss at 1 Week — Much Better0
CGI-I for Smell Loss at 1 Month — About the Same10
CGI-I for Smell Loss at 1 Month — Slightly Better6
CGI-I for Smell Loss at 1 Month — Moderately Better3
CGI-I for Smell Loss at 1 Month — Much Better1
CGI-I for Smell Distortion at 1 Week — About the Same11
CGI-I for Smell Distortion at 1 Week — Slightly Better9
CGI-I for Smell Distortion at 1 Week — Moderately Better0
CGI-I for Smell Distortion at 1 Week — Much Better0
CGI-I for Smell Distortion at 1 Month — About the Same11
CGI-I for Smell Distortion at 1 Month — Slightly Better6
CGI-I for Smell Distortion at 1 Month — Moderately Better2
CGI-I for Smell Distortion at 1 Month — Much Better1
CGI-I for Taste Loss at 1 Week — About the Same15
CGI-I for Taste Loss at 1 Week — Slightly Better4
CGI-I for Taste Loss at 1 Week — Moderately Better1
CGI-I for Taste Loss at 1 Week — Much Better0
CGI-I for Taste Loss at 1 Month — About the Same14
CGI-I for Taste Loss at 1 Month — Slightly Better3
CGI-I for Taste Loss at 1 Month — Moderately Better2
CGI-I for Taste Loss at 1 Month — Much Better1
CGI-I for Taste Distortion at 1 Week — About the Same13
CGI-I for Taste Distortion at 1 Week — Slightly Better6
CGI-I for Taste Distortion at 1 Week — Moderately Better1
CGI-I for Taste Distortion at 1 Week — Much Better0
CGI-I for Taste Distortion at 1 Month — About the Same12
CGI-I for Taste Distortion at 1 Month — Slightly Better5
CGI-I for Taste Distortion at 1 Month — Moderately Better2
CGI-I for Taste Distortion at 1 Month — Much Better1
SecondaryUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)

Participants will complete the 40-item scratch and sniff UPSIT and mean change will be assessed. The UPSIT has a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 40 with lower scores indicating a greater degree of impairment. An UPSIT score of \>33 for men and \>34 for women is considered normosmic, and the minimal clinically important difference is a change of 4 points.

Time frame:
baseline, 5-10 days, and 1 month
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)
units on a scaleStellate Ganglion Block
UPSIT at Baseline16.5 (4 to 32)
UPSIT at 1 Week21 (10 to 31)
UPSIT at 1 Month22.5 (10 to 35)
SecondaryOlfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR)

Participants will be asked to complete the ODOR, which is a patient-reported outcome measure assessing physical problems, functional limitations, and emotional consequences of olfactory dysfunction. The ODOR has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 112 with higher scores indicating a greater degree of impairment and limitation. The minimal clinically important difference is a change of 15 points.

Time frame:
baseline, 5-10 days post SGB #1, and 1 month
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating (ODOR)
score on a scaleStellate Ganglion Block
ODOR at Baseline62 (16 to 85)
ODOR at 1 Week57 (13 to 82)
ODOR at 1 Month50.5 (2 to 75)
SecondaryClinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score

Participants will be asked about the severity of their olfactory dysfunction (and gustatory dysfunction) on a 5-point Likert scale from no smell loss to severe smell loss.

Time frame:
baseline, 5-10 days, and 1 month
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score
ParticipantsStellate Ganglion Block
CGI-S for Smell Loss at Baseline — No Problem0
CGI-S for Smell Loss at Baseline — Very Mild Problem1
CGI-S for Smell Loss at Baseline — Mild Problem2
CGI-S for Smell Loss at Baseline — Moderate Problem5
CGI-S for Smell Loss at Baseline — Severe Problem12
CGI-S for Smell Loss at 1 Week — No Problem0
CGI-S for Smell Loss at 1 Week — Very Mild Problem3
CGI-S for Smell Loss at 1 Week — Mild Problem2
CGI-S for Smell Loss at 1 Week — Moderate Problem8
CGI-S for Smell Loss at 1 Week — Severe Problem7
CGI-S for Smell Loss at 1 Month — No Problem0
CGI-S for Smell Loss at 1 Month — Very Mild Problem5
CGI-S for Smell Loss at 1 Month — Mild Problem1
CGI-S for Smell Loss at 1 Month — Moderate Problem9
CGI-S for Smell Loss at 1 Month — Severe Problem5
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at Baseline — No Problem1
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at Baseline — Very Mild Problem1
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at Baseline — Mild Problem1
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at Baseline — Moderate Problem5
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at Baseline — Severe Problem12
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at 1 Week — No Problem1
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at 1 Week — Very Mild Problem1
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at 1 Week — Mild Problem4
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at 1 Week — Moderate Problem4
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at 1 Week — Severe Problem10
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at 1 Month — No Problem3
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at 1 Month — Very Mild Problem1
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at 1 Month — Mild Problem2
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at 1 Month — Moderate Problem5
CGI-S for Smell Distortion at 1 Month — Severe Problem9
CGI-S for Taste Loss at Baseline — No Problem0
CGI-S for Taste Loss at Baseline — Very Mild Problem3
CGI-S for Taste Loss at Baseline — Mild Problem2
CGI-S for Taste Loss at Baseline — Moderate Problem4
CGI-S for Taste Loss at Baseline — Severe Problem11
CGI-S for Taste Loss at 1 Week — No Problem0
CGI-S for Taste Loss at 1 Week — Very Mild Problem4
CGI-S for Taste Loss at 1 Week — Mild Problem2
CGI-S for Taste Loss at 1 Week — Moderate Problem5
CGI-S for Taste Loss at 1 Week — Severe Problem9
CGI-S for Taste Loss at 1 Month — No Problem0
CGI-S for Taste Loss at 1 Month — Very Mild Problem5
CGI-S for Taste Loss at 1 Month — Mild Problem2
CGI-S for Taste Loss at 1 Month — Moderate Problem7
CGI-S for Taste Loss at 1 Month — Severe Problem6
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at Baseline — No Problem2
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at Baseline — Very Mild Problem2
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at Baseline — Mild Problem1
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at Baseline — Moderate Problem3
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at Baseline — Severe Problem12
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at 1 Week — No Problem2
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at 1 Week — Very Mild Problem3
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at 1 Week — Mild Problem1
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at 1 Week — Moderate Problem5
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at 1 Week — Severe Problem9
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at 1 Month — No Problem3
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at 1 Month — Very Mild Problem2
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at 1 Month — Mild Problem2
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at 1 Month — Moderate Problem6
CGI-S for Taste Distortion at 1 Month — Severe Problem7

Adverse events

Collected over 5 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Stellate Ganglion Block0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)20/20 (100%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent other events
EventStellate Ganglion Block
Horner syndromeNervous system disorders20/20
HoarsenessNervous system disorders9/20
GlobusNervous system disorders7/20
Brief lightheadednessCardiac disorders5/20
Numbness of the faceNervous system disorders4/20
Mild shortness of breathRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/20
Nasal congestionGeneral disorders3/20
Pain at the injection siteGeneral disorders3/20
FatigueGeneral disorders3/20
CoughGeneral disorders1/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Stellate Ganglion Block
Mean46 ± 11
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Stellate Ganglion Block
Female16
Male4
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Stellate Ganglion Block
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White20
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Hospital
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Khan AM, Kallogjeri D, Piccirillo JF. Growing Public Health Concern of COVID-19 Chronic Olfactory Dysfunction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Jan 1;148(1):81-82. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.3379. PubMed 34792577 ↗
  • Hintschich CA, Fischer R, Hummel T, Wenzel JJ, Bohr C, Vielsmeier V. Persisting olfactory dysfunction in post-COVID-19 is associated with gustatory impairment: Results from chemosensitive testing eight months after the acute infection. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 23;17(3):e0265686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265686. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35320821 ↗
  • Fortunato F, Martinelli D, Iannelli G, Milazzo M, Farina U, Di Matteo G, De Nittis R, Ascatigno L, Cassano M, Lopalco PL, Prato R. Self-reported olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions in COVID-19 patients: a 1-year follow-up study in Foggia district, Italy. BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 22;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07052-8. PubMed 35065619 ↗
  • Welge-Lussen A, Wolfensberger M. Olfactory disorders following upper respiratory tract infections. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;63:125-132. doi: 10.1159/000093758. PubMed 16733337 ↗
  • Seiden AM. Postviral olfactory loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2004 Dec;37(6):1159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2004.06.007. PubMed 15563908 ↗
  • Cazzolla AP, Lovero R, Lo Muzio L, Testa NF, Schirinzi A, Palmieri G, Pozzessere P, Procacci V, Di Comite M, Ciavarella D, Pepe M, De Ruvo C, Crincoli V, Di Serio F, Santacroce L. Taste and Smell Disorders in COVID-19 Patients: Role of Interleukin-6. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020 Sep 2;11(17):2774-2781. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00447. Epub 2020 Aug 19. PubMed 32786309 ↗
  • Chang K, Kallogjeri D, Piccirillo J, House SL, Turner J, Schneider J, Farrell NF. Nasal inflammatory profile in patients with COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Jul;12(7):952-954. doi: 10.1002/alr.22939. Epub 2022 Jan 10. No abstract available. PubMed 34890110 ↗
  • Bryche B, St Albin A, Murri S, Lacote S, Pulido C, Ar Gouilh M, Lesellier S, Servat A, Wasniewski M, Picard-Meyer E, Monchatre-Leroy E, Volmer R, Rampin O, Le Goffic R, Marianneau P, Meunier N. Massive transient damage of the olfactory epithelium associated with infection of sustentacular cells by SARS-CoV-2 in golden Syrian hamsters. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Oct;89:579-586. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.06.032. Epub 2020 Jul 3. PubMed 32629042 ↗
  • Han AY, Mukdad L, Long JL, Lopez IA. Anosmia in COVID-19: Mechanisms and Significance. Chem Senses. 2020 Jun 17:bjaa040. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa040. Online ahead of print. PubMed 32556089 ↗
  • Lerner DK, Garvey KL, Arrighi-Allisan AE, Filimonov A, Filip P, Shah J, Tweel B, Del Signore A, Schaberg M, Colley P, Govindaraj S, Iloreta AM. Clinical Features of Parosmia Associated With COVID-19 Infection. Laryngoscope. 2022 Mar;132(3):633-639. doi: 10.1002/lary.29982. Epub 2021 Dec 13. PubMed 34870334 ↗
  • Keller A, Malaspina D. Hidden consequences of olfactory dysfunction: a patient report series. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2013 Jul 23;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-13-8. PubMed 23875929 ↗
  • Santos DV, Reiter ER, DiNardo LJ, Costanzo RM. Hazardous events associated with impaired olfactory function. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Mar;130(3):317-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.3.317. PubMed 15023839 ↗
  • Pang NY, Song HJJMD, Tan BKJ, Tan JX, Chen ASR, See A, Xu S, Charn TC, Teo NWY. Association of Olfactory Impairment With All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 May 1;148(5):436-445. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.0263. PubMed 35389456 ↗
  • Aiyegbusi OL, Hughes SE, Turner G, Rivera SC, McMullan C, Chandan JS, Haroon S, Price G, Davies EH, Nirantharakumar K, Sapey E, Calvert MJ; TLC Study Group. Symptoms, complications and management of long COVID: a review. J R Soc Med. 2021 Sep;114(9):428-442. doi: 10.1177/01410768211032850. Epub 2021 Jul 15. PubMed 34265229 ↗
  • Fischer L, Barop H, Ludin SM, Schaible HG. Regulation of acute reflectory hyperinflammation in viral and other diseases by means of stellate ganglion block. A conceptual view with a focus on Covid-19. Auton Neurosci. 2022 Jan;237:102903. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102903. Epub 2021 Nov 10. PubMed 34894589 ↗
  • Addison AB, Wong B, Ahmed T, Macchi A, Konstantinidis I, Huart C, Frasnelli J, Fjaeldstad AW, Ramakrishnan VR, Rombaux P, Whitcroft KL, Holbrook EH, Poletti SC, Hsieh JW, Landis BN, Boardman J, Welge-Lussen A, Maru D, Hummel T, Philpott CM. Clinical Olfactory Working Group consensus statement on the treatment of postinfectious olfactory dysfunction. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 May;147(5):1704-1719. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.12.641. Epub 2021 Jan 13. PubMed 33453291 ↗
  • Kang CK, Oh ST, Chung RK, Lee H, Park CA, Kim YB, Yoo JH, Kim DY, Cho ZH. Effect of stellate ganglion block on the cerebrovascular system: magnetic resonance angiography study. Anesthesiology. 2010 Oct;113(4):936-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ec63f5. PubMed 20823762 ↗
  • Treggiari MM, Romand JA, Martin JB, Reverdin A, Rufenacht DA, de Tribolet N. Cervical sympathetic block to reverse delayed ischemic neurological deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2003 Apr;34(4):961-7. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000060893.72098.80. Epub 2003 Mar 20. PubMed 12649526 ↗
  • Mulvaney SW, McLean B, de Leeuw J. The use of stellate ganglion block in the treatment of panic/anxiety symptoms with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder; preliminary results of long-term follow-up: a case series. Pain Pract. 2010 Jul-Aug;10(4):359-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00373.x. Epub 2010 Apr 20. PubMed 20412504 ↗
  • Lipov EG, Joshi JR, Sanders S, Slavin KV. A unifying theory linking the prolonged efficacy of the stellate ganglion block for the treatment of chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS), hot flashes, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Med Hypotheses. 2009 Jun;72(6):657-61. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.01.009. Epub 2009 Feb 23. PubMed 19237252 ↗
  • Liu LD, Duricka DL. Stellate ganglion block reduces symptoms of Long COVID: A case series. J Neuroimmunol. 2022 Jan 15;362:577784. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577784. Epub 2021 Dec 8. PubMed 34922127 ↗
  • Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M. Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav. 1984 Mar;32(3):489-502. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90269-5. PubMed 6463130 ↗
  • Doty RL. Office procedures for quantitative assessment of olfactory function. Am J Rhinol. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):460-73. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3043. PubMed 17882917 ↗
  • Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37. PubMed 20526405 ↗
  • Dunlop BW, Gray J, Rapaport MH. Transdiagnostic Clinical Global Impression Scoring for Routine Clinical Settings. Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Jun 27;7(3):40. doi: 10.3390/bs7030040. PubMed 28653978 ↗
  • McLean B. Safety and Patient Acceptability of Stellate Ganglion Blockade as a Treatment Adjunct for Combat-Related Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Quality Assurance Initiative. Cureus. 2015 Sep 10;7(9):e320. doi: 10.7759/cureus.320. PubMed 26487996 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2022 to primary completion in Dec 2022, 3 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2023, 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 2, 2022
First posted
Jul 6, 2022
StartActual
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completionActual
Dec 12, 2022
CompletionActual
Dec 12, 2022
Results first posted
Nov 7, 2023
Last update
Feb 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05445921
Responsible party
Nyssa Farrell (Nyssa Farrell, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Anterior Skull Base Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 6, 2022
Start date
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 12, 2022
Completion
Dec 12, 2022
Results posted
Nov 7, 2023
Last update
Feb 12, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Mepivacaine

Start the discussion