An interventional study of hemodynamic continuous monitoring and Standard Monitoring in Hemodynamic Monitoring and Orthopedic Procedures, sponsored by Instituto de Assistencia Medica ao Servidor Publico Estadual, Sao Paulo. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-13.
Sponsored by Instituto de Assistencia Medica ao Servidor Publico Estadual, Sao Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Recently, there has been an increase in the popularity of minimally invasive surgical techniques, including arthroscopic surgeries for shoulder procedures. Interscalene block is currently the gold standard technique for these surgeries, combined or not with general anesthesia. The last, when used in patients positioned in a beach chair can lead to serious hemodynamic and cerebral changes in the patients. Continuous non-invasive monitoring of the patient's cardiac output can provide data for better hemodynamics management compared to standard monitoring. Therefore, the aim of the study is to compare hemodynamic changes (cardiac output, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation) and intraoperative cerebral oxygenation using peripheral cerebral saturation monitoring with continuous measurement of cardiac output or standard hemodynamic between two anesthetic techniques for shoulder surgery: interscalene block with sedation versus interscalene block with general anesthesia. The groups will be evaluated as follows: group 1 general anesthesia plus interscalene brachial plexus block and group 2 sedation plus interscalene brachial plexus block. Additionally, each group will be subdivided into two more groups, one with continuous hemodynamic monitoring and the other with standard hemodynamic monitoring, that is, a total of 4 groups in the study. The analyzed variables will include gender, age, ASA, medications in use, comorbidities. Furthermore, duration of procedure and in the anesthetic recovery room, blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, peripheral oxygen saturation, cerebral oxygen saturation, BIS value, cardiac index, etCO2 will be evaluated. Besides, length of hospital stay, delirium, behavioral status and postoperative complication will also be assessed.
The study will be split in 4 groups, being group 1A general anesthesia plus interscalene brachial plexus block with continuos non-invasive monitoring, group 1B general anesthesia plus interscalene brachial plexus block with standard hemodynamic monitoring, group 2A sedation plus interscalene brachial plexus block with continuos non-invasive monitoring, gruop 2B sedation plus interscalene brachial plexus block with standard hemodynamic monitoring.
The standard hemodynamic monitoring includes blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, brain monitoring and cerebral oxygen saturation. The continuos non-invasive monitoring includes the standard monitoring plus cardiac output, cardiac index and hypotension predict index. These variables will be analyzed intraoperatively and compared between groups with the aim of demonstrating the benefit of continuous non-invasive monitoring.
In the postoperative will be evalueted delirium, lenght hospital stay, postoperative complication and pain. We will use the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS), Confusion Assessment Method in the ICU, visual analogue pain scale and visual numeric pain scale for evaluation postoperative.
Instituto de Assistencia Medica ao Servidor Publico Estadual, Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Continuos monitoring will be done with clearsight continuously assessing blood pressure, cardiac output and heart rate; NIRS electrode to access cerebral O2 saturation, peripheral O2 saturation, BIS value and axillary temperature.
Device: hemodynamic continuous monitoring
Standard monitoring will be done with non-invasive
Device: Standard Monitoring
Continuous monitoring will be done with clearsight continuously assessing blood pressure, cardiac output and heart rate; NIRS electrode to assess cerebral O2 saturation, peripheral O2 saturation, BIS value and axillary temperature.
Standard monitoring will be done with non-invasive blood pressure, heart rate, NIRS electrode to access cerebral O2 saturation, peripheral O2 saturation, axillary temperature, BIS value. In addition, patients will use Clearsight, but the device will be blind to the anesthesiologist. Pressure monitoring will be every 5 min.
Compare intraoperative hemodynamic changes: cardiac output
Compare cardiac output changes between continuous hemodynamic measurement of cardiac output or standard hemodynamics monitoring in two anesthetic techniques for shoulder surgery: interscalene block with sedation versus interscalene block with general anesthesia.
Time frame: Intraoperative
Compare intraoperative hemodynamic changes: blood pressure
Compare blood pressure changes between continuous hemodynamic measurement of cardiac output or standard hemodynamics monitoring in two anesthetic techniques for shoulder surgery: interscalene block with sedation versus interscalene block with general anesthesia.
Time frame: Intraoperative
Compare intraoperative hemodynamic changes: heart rate
Compare heart rate changes between continuous hemodynamic measurement of cardiac output or standard hemodynamics monitoring in two anesthetic techniques for shoulder surgery: interscalene block with sedation versus interscalene block with general anesthesia.
Time frame: Intraoperative
Evaluation of continuos hemodinamic monitoring non-invasive
Verify the superiority of continuos hemodynamic non-invasive monitoring of cardiac output compared to standard hemodynamic monitoring regarding blood pressure
Time frame: Intraoperative
Evaluation of cerebral tissue saturation
Compare changes in cerebral tissue saturation between groups
Time frame: Intraoperative
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Instituto de Assistencia Medica ao Servidor Publico Estadual, Sao Paulo