CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05438225Updated Oct 27, 2023

Text Message Reminders for Hearing Healthcare

An interventional study of Automated text message reminder in Hearing Loss, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-27.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Many individuals with hearing loss do not receive adequate hearing healthcare. Given their close and long-term relationships with patients, primary care providers (PCPs) could play a vital role in improving access to hearing healthcare. Unfortunately, hearing loss is often underdiagnosed in primary care settings, because hearing screening is not a routine part of primary care visits, and the responsibility often falls on the patient or family to recognize and address the issue. The investigators propose to pilot test the use of text message reminders to encourage elderly patients to discuss hearing assessment with there PCPs. The study objectives are to: 1) design an automated text-messaging reminder system; 2) assess the feasibility of deploying the intervention in a clinical trial setting; and 3) evaluate whether the intervention increases willingness to seek hearing healthcare.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hearing Loss

Keywords

  • hearing loss; elderly; primary care; text message
03

In context

Hearing Loss

1,092 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 41 is close to the median of 40 across 764 interventional studies indexed under Hearing Loss.

Browse Hearing Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,117 studies on the registry; 425 are open to participants now.

Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • English-speaking adult patients aged 65 and older
  • Have not audiometric testing within the past 5 years
  • Has had at least one prior visit encounter with a Stanford primary care provider the past 1 year
  • Has a cell phone with a valid phone number

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of childhood hearing loss
  • Hearing aid users
  • Limited English proficiency
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Automated Text Message Reminder

    Participants will receive automated reminder text instructing them to discuss hearing issues with their PCPs, and to request a referral to audiology or otolaryngology if they have hearing loss.

    Behavioral: Automated text message reminder

  • No intervention
    Control Group

Interventions

  • BehavioralAutomated text message reminder

    Participants in the intervention group will receive monthly automated reminder text instructing them to discuss hearing issues with their PCPs, and to request a referral to audiology or otolaryngology if they have hearing loss.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Likelihood of patient-physician discussion of hearing loss or hearing assessment

    Participant-reported rating of the likelihood of discussing hearing assessment with their PCP in the next 6 months. Likelihood will be assessed on an 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Score range: 0 to 10 (0 = not likely, 10 = very likely). Participants who have already discussed hearing assessment with their PCP will be assigned a score of 10.

    Time frame: 3 months after enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Likelihood of obtaining audiogram

    Participant-reported rating of the likelihood of obtaining an audiogram in the next 6 months. Likelihood will be assessed on an 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Score range: 0 to 10 (0 = not likely, 10 = very likely). Participants who have already undergone audiometric testing will be assigned a score of 10.

    Time frame: 3 months after enrollment

  2. Likelihood of obtaining hearing aids

    Participant-reported rating of the likelihood of obtaining hearing aids if an audiogram showed significant hearing loss. Likelihood will be assessed on an 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Score range: 0 to 10 (0 = not likely, 10 = very likely). Participants who have already obtained hearing aids will be assigned a score of 10.

    Time frame: 3 months after enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05438225
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Responsible party
Uchechukwu Megwalu (Associate Professor of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 29, 2022
Start date
Oct 17, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 25, 2023
Completion
Oct 25, 2023
Last update
Oct 27, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion