CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05426538CROCUSUpdated Aug 24, 2022

Craving to Biologics Used in Severe Asthma

An observational study in Asthma, sponsored by Medical Centre Leeuwarden. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-24.

Sponsored by Medical Centre Leeuwarden · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
150
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Some patients treated with biologics for severe asthma experience a craving to the next biological administration. This phenomenon has never been described before. In this study, the researchers aim to further elucidate the feeling of needing the next administration of a biologic for severe asthma.

Read the detailed description

Recent research by Kroes and colleagues on omalizumab levels has shown that approximately half of patients on long-term omalizumab therapy (>4 months) experience a subjective craving for the next dose. These patients had a need (Borg scale 3-10) for the next dose of biologic before the usual periodic dose, while other patients indicated that they had no or a low need (Borg scale 0-2) for the next dose at the usual dosing moment. This so-called 'craving' has not been described in the literature before. Patients in the high-requirement group had significantly lower median omalizumab trough levels than patients in the low-requirement group. There may be a relationship between blood levels of biologics and the need for the next dose. However, data is currently only available on the variability in serum trough levels of omalizumab, but not yet on the other biologics for asthma, some of which are administered as a fixed dose and some are dosed by body weight. No assays are currently available for blood level determinations from the other biologics.

Before investigating the relationship between blood levels and the need for biologics, it is important to fully map the 'craving'. Some patients who are responders to biologic therapy based on improvements in clinical outcomes still do not have good enough control of their asthma and indicate that the dosing interval is not optimal. In addition to patients that indicate a need for the next dose, there are also patients that would like a longer dosing interval. To date, dosing interval adjustments have been made based on the patient's subjective experience and the physician's clinical judgment. This study investigates how big the problem of need for the next dose is, how patients experience this need, what this need exactly entails, whether this occurs more often in patients treated for a longer period and what possible problems patients experience in the treatment with biologics against serious problems.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Biological treatment
  • Patient-reported outcome measures
  • Treatment evaluation
03

In context

Asthma

3,921 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 506 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is close to the median of 150 across 970 observational studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical Centre Leeuwarden is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population concerns patients in the Medical Center Leeuwarden (MCL) with severe asthma who are treated with a biologic (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab or dupilumab) for more than 4 months.

A treatment duration longer than 4 months has been chosen, so that only responders to the biologics are included in the study and the therapy has its effect.

About 20 patients are interviewed. Subsequently, the questionnaire will be presented to approximately 30 patients per biologic, a total of approximately 150 patients.

Inclusion criteria

  • Treated with a biologic for severe asthma in the Medical Centre Leeuwarden for more than 4 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not speaking Dutch
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Interview group

    A selection of patients will be interviewed, mapping the craving for the next biologic administration. These interviews will be used to develop a questionnaire to quantify the craving for the next administration in the total population.

  • Questionnaire group

    The remaining patients will be asked to fill in a questionnaire, based on the interviews from Group 1.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The prevalence of craving to the next biologic administration.

    Craving will be assessed as a BORG-scale score \>2. This scale ranges from 0 (No craving at all) to 10 (Extreme craving).

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. The character of craving to the next biologic administration.

    This will be assessed by scoring the prevalence of asthma-related symptoms in patients reporting a craving. Craving will be assessed as a BORG-scale score \>2. This scale ranges from 0 (No craving at all) to 10 (Extreme craving).

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Differences in craving (BORG-scale 0-10) between patients treated for more or less than 1 year.

    Craving will be assessed with a BORG-scale score. This scale ranges from 0 (No craving at all) to 10 (Extreme craving).

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Differences in craving (BORG-scale 0-10) between patients with different biologics.

    Craving will be assessed with a BORG-scale score. This scale ranges from 0 (No craving at all) to 10 (Extreme craving).

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Any other issues regarding the craving/administration of biologics for severe asthma, based on patient-level input from interviews.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical Centre Leeuwarden
    Leeuwarden, Friesland 8934AD, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No individual data will be shared, since data is collected in private interviews.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05426538
Lead sponsor
Medical Centre Leeuwarden
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 22, 2022
Start date
Dec 10, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2022
Completion
Aug 1, 2022
Last update
Aug 24, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion