CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05422872Updated Nov 30, 2023

Delphi Study on Psychological Safety Competencies in Healthcare Training Curricula

An observational study in Psychological Safety and Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, sponsored by Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-30.

Sponsored by Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
173
Ages
30 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Psychological safety refers to the shared belief that a work team can face complex challenges when there is an environment of mutual respect and trust. Thus, healthcare professionals provide safer care when causes and ways to avoid clinical errors can be discussed and analyzed without fear of criticism or sanctions. A psychological safety climate can be a determinant of patient safety. In this way, this provides safer care when it is possible to discuss and analyze the causes and how to avoid clinical errors without fear of criticism or sanctions.

This study aims to explore the mentors' opinion on what psychological safety competencies are being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents, hereafter "trainees") through current training programs and what actions should be taken to promote such competencies in clinical settings.

Read the detailed description

Consensus study based on the Delphi technique. To develop the questionnaire 0 structured interviews will be conducted. This study step includes the development of a consultation instrument in questionnaire format to conduct the Delphi study. Only the legibility, face and content validity of the questionnaire will be assessed through interviews to ensure its correct completion by the participants.

One member of the research team for each participating country will act as national study coordinator in that country.

The study procedure will be structured in the following steps:

  1. Research team constitution.
  2. Request for study evaluation and approval by an Ethics Committee in each of the participating countries. This step is required only in the case of countries where ethical evaluation is mandatory to conduct this type of study. A common draft of the protocol will be available to support each national coordinator.
  3. Collect preliminary information for the subsequent questionnaire re-define for the Delphi study. For this purpose, the available literature on the topic of the study and the WHO Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030 (more specifically, objective 5) has been reviewed beforehand. Once the first version of the questionnaire has been drafted from the information collected, interviews will be conducted with 3 mentors from each participating country to assess the legibility, face, and content validity of the draft questionnaire (readability, comprehension, clarity, coherence, relevance, and appropriateness). A template will be available to conduct it.
  4. Revision and improvement of the initial version of the questionnaire based on the information gathered through the interviews to ensure the face and content validity of the instrument.
  5. Approval of the questionnaire by the research team based on the information collected in steps 3 and 4. The questionnaire will be translated from English into the local languages of the participating countries by two native experts independently. Inconsistencies will be resolved with the participation of a third researcher.
  6. Recruitment of participants. The national coordinator will be responsible for contacting the teaching units of healthcare institutions in their country to establish, through them, contact with trainees' mentors. A minimum of 20 participants from each country is expected. They will be working in family medicine, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and medicine departments.
  7. Invitation to the study. The questionnaire will be designed on a web platform, property of the research team, hosted on a secure server, and specifically designed for conducting Delphi studies. The responses given to the questionnaire will be treated as fully confidential. However, given the nature of the study (Delphi with several rounds), each participant will access the web platform through personalized credentials to allow continuity in data collection and analysis. Personal information (username and password) will be deleted, and the responses of the same person to the different rounds will be linked by a unique double-blind code. The questionnaire will be disseminated by e-mail. Three reminders are foreseen to ensure an adequate response rate.
  8. First round and successive rounds up to expert consensus. A minimum of two rounds will be carried out, and the maximum will be determined by reaching a consensus among the participants.
  9. Data analysis and interpretation of the results. Preparation of an article for publication in a scientific journal.
  10. Dissemination of the results. The results will be translated into practice to improve the training programs of next generations of health professionals through schools and faculties, ministries of health, and other agencies and scientific societies involved in curricula design. The results will also be disseminated through the usual scientific media (journals, conferences, etc.) and social networks.
02

Conditions studied

  • Psychological Safety
  • Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Keywords

  • Psychological Safety
  • Healthcare students
  • Delphi study
  • Knowledge, attitudes, skills
  • Trainee mentors
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana is the lead sponsor of 43 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Trainees' mentors who would be working in inpatient or outpatient settings or community or social care centers mentoring residents in the fields of family medicine, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and medicine department.

Inclusion criteria

  • Trainees mentors in healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community and social care centers) in Croatia, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Israel, Lithuania, Malta, Portugal, Serbia, Slovakia, and Spain.
  • Working in inpatient or outpatient settings or community or social care centers mentoring residents in the fields of family medicine, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and medicine department.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Academic mentors. The study setting is social and health care centers, not academia.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
173 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Croatia

    Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Croatian healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.

    Other: Delphi study

  • Estonia

    Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Estonian healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.

    Other: Delphi study

  • Finland

    Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Finnish healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.

    Other: Delphi study

  • Germany

    Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to German healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.

    Other: Delphi study

  • Israel

    Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Israeli healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.

    Other: Delphi study

  • Lithuania

    Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Lithuanian healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.

    Other: Delphi study

  • Malta

    Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Maltese healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.

    Other: Delphi study

  • Portugal

    Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Portuguese healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.

    Other: Delphi study

  • Slovakia

    Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Slovakian healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.

    Other: Delphi study

  • Spain

    Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Spanish healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.

    Other: Delphi study

  • Serbia

    Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Serbian healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.

    Other: Delphi study

Interventions

  • OtherDelphi study

    A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Psychological safety competencies - Degree of KNOWLEDGE acquisition (round 1)

    What knowledge in psychological safety is being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents referred to as "trainees") through their clinical internships. The questionnaire contains 7 items referring to knowledge. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each knowledge (competence component) according to its degree of acquisition (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Data collection for the first round of the Delphi study will extend from the start of the study for 20 days.

  2. Psychological safety competencies - Degree of significance of KNOWLEDGE (round 1)

    What knowledge in psychological safety is being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents referred to as "trainees") through their clinical internships. The questionnaire contains 7 items referring to knowledge. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each knowledge (competence component) according to its degree of significance (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Data collection for the first round of the Delphi study will extend from the start of the study for 20 days.

  3. Psychological safety competencies - Degree of ATTITUDE acquisition (round 1)

    What attitudes toward psychological safety are being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents referred to as "trainees") through their clinical internships. The questionnaire contains 6 items referring to attitudes. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each attitude (competence component) according to its degree of acquisition (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Data collection for the first round of the Delphi study will extend from the start of the study for 20 days.

  4. Psychological safety competencies - Degree of significance of the ATTITUDE (round 1)

    What attitudes toward psychological safety are being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents referred to as "trainees") through their clinical internships. The questionnaire contains 6 items referring to attitudes. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each attitude (competence component) according to its degree of significance (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Data collection for the first round of the Delphi study will extend from the start of the study for 20 days.

  5. Psychological safety competencies - Degree of SKILL acquisition (round 1)

    What psychological safety skills are being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents referred to as "trainees") through their clinical internships. The questionnaire contains 7 items referring to skills. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each skill (competence component) according to its degree of acquisition (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Data collection for the first round of the Delphi study will extend from the start of the study for 20 days.

  6. Psychological safety competencies - Degree of significance of the SKILL (round 1)

    What psychological safety skills are being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents referred to as "trainees") through their clinical internships. The questionnaire contains 7 items referring to skills. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each skill (competence component) according to its degree of significance (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Data collection for the first round of the Delphi study will extend from the start of the study for 20 days.

  7. Psychological safety INTERVENTIONS - Degree of implementation (round 1)

    What actions the healthcare institutions in which the trainees do their clinical internships should implement to promote the acquisition of these competencies. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each intervention according to its degree of implementation in their center (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Data collection for the first round of the Delphi study will extend from the start of the study for 20 days.

  8. Psychological safety INTERVENTIONS - Degree of significance (round 1)

    What actions the healthcare institutions in which the trainees do their clinical internships should implement to promote the acquisition of these competencies. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each intervention according to its degree of significance (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Data collection for the first round of the Delphi study will extend from the start of the study for 20 days.

  9. Psychological safety competencies - Degree of KNOWLEDGE acquisition (round 2)

    What knowledge in psychological safety is being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents referred to as "trainees") through their clinical internships. The questionnaire contains 7 items referring to knowledge. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each knowledge (competence component) according to its degree of acquisition (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Twenty-seven days after initiating the study, the second round of the Delphi study will extend for 20 days.

  10. Psychological safety competencies - Degree of significance of KNOWLEDGE (round 2)

    What knowledge in psychological safety is being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents referred to as "trainees") through their clinical internships. The questionnaire contains 7 items referring to knowledge. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each knowledge (competence component) according to its degree of significance (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Twenty-seven days after initiating the study, the second round of the Delphi study will extend for 20 days.

  11. Psychological safety competencies - Degree of ATTITUDE acquisition (round 2)

    What attitudes toward psychological safety are being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents referred to as "trainees") through their clinical internships. The questionnaire contains 6 items referring to attitudes. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each attitude (competence component) according to its degree of acquisition (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Twenty-seven days after initiating the study, the second round of the Delphi study will extend for 20 days.

  12. Psychological safety competencies - Degree of significance of the ATTITUDE (round 2)

    What attitudes toward psychological safety are being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents referred to as "trainees") through their clinical internships. The questionnaire contains 6 items referring to attitudes. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each attitude (competence component) according to its degree of significance (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Twenty-seven days after initiating the study, the second round of the Delphi study will extend for 20 days.

  13. Psychological safety competencies - Degree of SKILL acquisition (round 2)

    What psychological safety skills are being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents referred to as "trainees") through their clinical internships. The questionnaire contains 7 items referring to skills. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each skill (competence component) according to its degree of acquisition (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Twenty-seven days after initiating the study, the second round of the Delphi study will extend for 20 days.

  14. Psychological safety competencies - Degree of significance of the SKILL (round 2)

    What psychological safety skills are being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents referred to as "trainees") through their clinical internships. The questionnaire contains 7 items referring to skills. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each skill (competence component) according to its degree of significance (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Twenty-seven days after initiating the study, the second round of the Delphi study will extend for 20 days.

  15. Psychological safety INTERVENTIONS - Degree of implementation (round 2)

    What actions the healthcare institutions in which the trainees do their clinical internships should implement to promote the acquisition of these competencies. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each intervention according to its degree of implementation in their center (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Twenty-seven days after initiating the study, the second round of the Delphi study will extend for 20 days.

  16. Psychological safety INTERVENTIONS - Degree of significance (round 2)

    What actions the healthcare institutions in which the trainees do their clinical internships should implement to promote the acquisition of these competencies. Participants (mentors of healthcare trainees) will have to assess each intervention according to its degree of significance (5-point Likert scale).

    Time frame: Twenty-seven days after initiating the study, the second round of the Delphi study will extend for 20 days.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Grupo ATENEA
    San Juan De Alicante, Alicante 03550, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • O'Donovan R, McAuliffe E. A systematic review exploring the content and outcomes of interventions to improve psychological safety, speaking up and voice behaviour. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4931-2. PubMed 32041595 ↗
  • Richard A, Pfeiffer Y, Schwappach DDL. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Speaking Up About Patient Safety Questionnaire. J Patient Saf. 2021 Oct 1;17(7):e599-e606. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000415. PubMed 28858000 ↗
  • Schwappach D, Sendlhofer G, Hasler L, Gombotz V, Leitgeb K, Hoffmann M, Jantscher L, Brunner G. Speaking up behaviors and safety climate in an Austrian university hospital. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Nov 1;30(9):701-707. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy089. PubMed 29701770 ↗
  • Schwappach D, Sendlhofer G, Kamolz LP, Kole W, Brunner G. Speaking up culture of medical students within an academic teaching hospital: Need of faculty working in patient safety. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222461. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31514203 ↗
  • Derickson R, Fishman J, Osatuke K, Teclaw R, Ramsel D. Psychological safety and error reporting within Veterans Health Administration hospitals. J Patient Saf. 2015 Mar;11(1):60-6. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000082. PubMed 24583957 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The databases, without identification and code registration, will be available at OSF (Center for Open Science) for access by the scientific community. the scientific community.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf, Csr

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 30, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05422872
Lead sponsor
Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana
Collaborators
Miguel Hernández University of Elche, European Cooperation in Science and Technology, COST, RheinMain University of Applied Science, University of Tartu, Tartu Health Care College, LAB University of Applied Sciences, University of Haifa, Vilnius university hospital Sanatros klinikos, University of Malta, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, University of Belgrade
Responsible party
José Joaquín Mira Solves (Professor, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 21, 2022
Start date
Jan 25, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 7, 2022
Completion
Oct 15, 2023
Last update
Nov 30, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion