An observational study in Pharmacist-Patient Relations, sponsored by Murielle Surquin. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 75 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-14.
Sponsored by Murielle Surquin · Observational
The clinical pharmacists present in the hospitalisation units aim to ensure the daily review of the drug prescriptions of hospitalized patients.
In order to optimize their work, the objective of this study would be to provide them with a clinical decision support tool via artificial intelligence in order to improve the patient's medication management. This study will test the Pharmaclass® software.
Murielle Surquin is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Hospitalized patient entering the SU06 or SU13 geriatrics unit of the Paul Brien site of the CHU Brugmann Hospital between November 16 2021 and April 15, 2022
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: Pharmaclass® software
Clinical decision support tool via artificial intelligence in order to improve the patient's medication management.
Time
Time required to perform an intervention (pharmacist versus software)
Time frame: 5 months
Dosage compliance
Dosage compliance with existing recommendations and laboratory results/clinical parameters (pharmacist versus software)
Time frame: 5 months
Medication error severity
Severity of the medication error that could be avoided (pharmacist versus software)
Time frame: 5 months
Geriatrician approval
Number of interventions validated/refused by the geriatrician (pharmacist versus software)
Time frame: 5 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Murielle Surquin