ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05408156Updated May 21, 2024

Effects of Customized Insoles for Individuals With Symptomatic Hallux Valgus

An interventional study of Insoles in Hallux Valgus, Foot Diseases and Foot Deformities, sponsored by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-21.

Sponsored by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2024), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hallux valgus is one of the most common forefoot deformities. Its prevalence increases with age, representing approximately 23% in adulthood, being more common in females. Some studies indicate that the use of the insole associated with the finger separator promotes pain relief and that this may be related to better alignment of the hallux. However, there is still no consensus about the ideal insole or how long it should be used to relieve pain or improve function in patients with hallux valgus. Therefore, the objective of this study will be to evaluate the effect of the customized insole on pain and function of individuals with symptomatic hallux valgus.

Read the detailed description

This is a protocol for a randomized, controlled, blinded clinical trial. Eighty participants with hallux valgus pain will be evaluated and randomized into two intervention groups (40 per group): customized insole group or sham insole group. Assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), after six weeks (T6) and twelve weeks (T12) of insoles use, in addition to the follow-up that will be performed four weeks after the end of the intervention (T16). The primary outcome will be pain, assessed by the Numerical Pain Scale and the secondary outcome will be foot functionality, assessed by the Foot Function Index questionnaire. Statistical analysis: For normal data, analysis of variance with a mixed design will be considered, and for non-normal data, the Friedman test will be used, in addition to the interaction of time per group and intergroup and intragroup differences. The Bonferroni test will be performed in post hoc analyses. Intent-to-treat analysis will be used. A significance level of 5% and CI 95% will be adopted for all statistical analyses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hallux Valgus
  • Foot Diseases
  • Foot Deformities

Keywords

  • hallux valgus
  • insoles
  • pain
03

In context

Hallux Valgus

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Hallux Valgus; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 60 across 111 interventional studies indexed under Hallux Valgus.

Browse Hallux Valgus studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte is the lead sponsor of 86 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals of both sexes aged over 18 years;
  • Presence of mild to moderate hallux valgus, according to the Manchester scale;
  • Presenting no hallux with intensity greater than or equal to 3 points up to 8 points, according to the Numerical Pain Scale (END);
  • Be available to actively use the insole for at least 4 hours/day;
  • Commitment to wear closed shoes, for example (sneakers, shoes used by the patient, due to: wide toe cap and heel height of 2 to 3 cm) during the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being in physical therapy treatment for hallux valgus concomitantly with the research;
  • Previous hallux valgus surgeries performed in the last 5 years;
  • Presence of foot wounds and wounds, dislocations or metatarsophalangeal fractures in the foot with HV, in the last 5 years
  • Presence of diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, decompensated diabetes, gout, neurodegenerative diseases;
  • Cognitive and mental disorder being unable to respond; those related to the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Customized insoles group

    The participant allocated in the CIG will receive a semi-flexible non-moulded insole with a 2.5mm coverage with Shore A 28, a 5mm retrocapital bar with a Shore A 22 and a 2mm infracapital bar of the first metatarsal with a Shore A 35, produced in acetate. -ethylene vinyl (EVA) and manufactured by researcher C. The insole will be used on both feet to maintain symmetry between the limbs and generate greater comfort, since this will not be a corrective intervention.

    Other: Insoles

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Insoles Group

    The SIG will receive the same unmolded insole with a semi-flexible base and 2.5mm coverage with Shore A 28, but without the bars used in the intervention group.

    Other: Insoles

Interventions

  • OtherInsoles

    semi-flexible non-moulded insole with a 2.5mm coverage with Shore A 28, a 5mm retrocapital bar with a Shore A 22 and a 2mm infracapital bar of the first metatarsal with a Shore A 35, produced in acetate ethylene vinyl (EVA)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Numerical Pain Scale (END)

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numerical Pain Scale (END), in which individuals will classify their pain on a numerical scale from 0 to 10 points. This scale will be positioned in front of the participant and will vary from zero to ten points, with zero being the complete absence of pain and ten being the worst pain imaginable by the individual. The quantification of pain intensity will be evaluated at the first steps in the morning and throughout the day.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Foot Function Index (FFI)

    Foot functionality will be measured by the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire, which is capable of measuring the impact of foot pathologies related to pain, disability and activity restriction on the function. It consists of 23 items grouped into three subscales, five items related to disability, nine items related to pain and nine items about activity limitation32. The final result will be the average of all domains (the values are added and divided by three). Results can range from 0 to 100% and are directly proportional to the functional impairment of the foot.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  2. Change in Treatment expectation

    Treatment expectations will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. The following will be asked to participants at T0: "Do you think that by using customized insoles, you will: 1- get much worse, 2 - get worse, 3 - no changes, 4 - improve, or 5 - greatly improve?"

    Time frame: baseline

  3. Change in Self-assessment of treatment

    A 5-point Likert scale will be used to assess satisfaction with the intervention. Participants will be asked the following question: "How are you feeling after using the insoles?: 1- much worse, 2 - worse, 3 - no changes, 4 - better, or 5 - much better." A 5-point Likert scale will be used to assess satisfaction with the intervention. Participants will be asked the following question: "How are you feeling after using the insoles?: 1- much worse, 2 - worse, 3 - no changes, 4 - better, or 5 - much better."

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  4. Change in Blinding test

    Participants will be asked which group they believed they were allocated: CIG or SIG. This strategy has been recommended at the end of clinical trials to test whether the blinding strategy adopted was effective Blinding test

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  5. Change in Hours of insole use

    Participants of both groups will receive an insole control diary to register the number of hours per day spent with the insole. Participants should keep the diary for 12 weeks and return it to researchers at T12. Monitoring and motivation will be performed via telephone or WhatsApp messages to prevent participants from forgetting to use the insole

    Time frame: 16 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Marcelo Cardoso de Souza
    Natal, Rio Grande do Norte 59200-000, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Costa ARA, de Almeida Silva HJ, Mendes AAMT, Scattone Silva R, de Almeida Lins CA, de Souza MC. Effects of insoles adapted in flip-flop sandals in people with plantar fasciopathy: a randomized, double-blind clinical, controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Mar;34(3):334-344. doi: 10.1177/0269215519893104. Epub 2019 Dec 6. PubMed 31808352 ↗
  • Cavalcanti RR, Mendes AAMT, Barbosa GM, de Souza MC. Effects of custom insoles for symptomatic hallux valgus: protocol for a sham-controlled randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 3;13(7):e069872. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069872. PubMed 37400239 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Participant data (IPD) will not be available to other investigators

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05408156
Lead sponsor
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Responsible party
Marcelo Cardoso de Souza, PT, PhD. (Adjunct Professor, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 7, 2022
Start date
Aug 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 21, 2024

Study contacts

Marcelo C de Souza, PT, PhD
Contact
marcelo.cardoso@ufrn.br
558432912411
Marcelo C de Souza, PT, PhD
principal investigator · Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion