ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05400616Updated Dec 7, 2023

Nasal Microbiota Transfer Therapy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps (CRSsNP)

An interventional study of Microbiome Transplant and Placebo in Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis), sponsored by The University of Queensland. Recruiting at 3 sites in Australia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-07.

Primary conditionnone(registry's first term: Disease)No conditionIs this wrong?Disease describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about. The study names no condition we can place it under, so it is not compared with other studies by condition.

Sponsored by The University of Queensland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2022; still recruiting 4 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the nasal passage and paranasal sinuses that places significant burden on affected patients and global healthcare systems.

Current treatments for CRS such as long-term antibiotics, anti-inflammatory drugs, and surgery often reduce symptoms and signs of disease temporarily, however long-term results are much less satisfactory.

Recently, the theory of a damaged microbiome (dysbiosis) as a cause or promoting factor behind CRS has gained increasing evidence from the scientific community.

A condition of the gut with microbial dysbiosis (c.difficile) has previously employed microbiota transplant treatment with great success in long-term health outcomes. Such treatments are shown to repopulate bacterial microenvironment and restore protective commensal bacterial load.

A pilot study conducted by this study team trialed a novel intervention of a Nasal Microbiota Transplant in a small group of participants. Preliminary results suggested significantly improved CRS symptoms after treatment with a healthy donor microbiota transplant, compared to the pre-transplant baseline. The addition of a randomized-control trial with inclusion of a placebo group is the next step.

In this study, investigators aim to perform a two-arm, double-blinded, phase II randomized controlled clinical trial in order to assess the efficacy of a Nasal Microbiota Transplant against a placebo in a cohort of CRS patients without Nasal Polyps (CRSsNP).

Read the detailed description

Current treatments for CRS such as long-term antibiotics, anti-inflammatory drugs, and surgery often reduce symptoms and signs of disease temporarily, however long-term results are much less satisfactory.

A microbiota therapy, as an alternative treatment to antibiotics, has the potential of improving outcomes for CRS patients long-term, whilst reducing the use of antibiotics in the community.

Several attempts of studies to define the role of microbiota of the nose and paranasal sinuses in health and disease have not yet been able to achieve a universal consensus. This is in part due to the significant inter-individual microbiota variation and complexity within humans. Such challenges have also limited the use of probiotic assemblages of one or a combination of few bacterial species in treatment of CRS.

The data derived from this study will add to our understanding of the role of the microbiome in the airways and its role in interfering with respiratory pathogens and host immunity. This is likely to have implications for CRS microbiome-based therapies, and also other potentially related respiratory conditions such as asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

In this study, investigators will recruit patients suffering from chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps (CRSsNP) and healthy participants that do not have a history of sinonasal disease. The sinus microbiome transplants will occur over a 2 week period, with regular follow up for up to 6-months post intervention. Main outcomes include change in disease severity, symptom severity, inflammatory changes, and microbial composition across the study period. Successful results from this trial may pave the way for a novel therapeutic for CRS patients.

This study has received ethics approval from the Royal Brisbane and Women's Health Human Resource and Ethics Committee (RBWH HREC).

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • microbiota
  • transplant
  • paranasal sinuses
  • nasal lavage
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The University of Queensland is the lead sponsor of 91 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria (patient):

  • Diagnosis of Chronic Rhinosinusitis as defined by the presence of 2 or more major sinonasal symptoms (nasal blockage, nasal discharge, loss of smell, and facial pain/ fullness) for a minimum of 12 weeks
  • Endoscopic confirmation of middle meatus inflammation or presence of mucopurulence, and /or CT confirmation of paranasal sinus inflammation.
  • Previous nasal surgery with patent ostia to the diseased ethmoids and maxillary sinuses
  • Signed written

Inclusion criteria (donor):

  • No history of sinonasal or lower airway disease for the last 2 years other than the common cold.
  • No clinical findings of sinonasal disease at the inclusion visit.
  • Accepted as a donor by the patient.
  • Signed informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria (patient):

  • Aged \<18 or >80 years
  • Allergy to amoxicillin or clavulanate potassium and Clarithromycin.
  • Excessive Nasal polyposis
  • Antibiotic treatment in the last 4 weeks
  • Patients with a history supporting a diagnosis of immune deficiency will be tested (Immunoglobulin A (IgA), Immunoglobulin M (IgM), Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgG subclasses, MBL) and /or are due to disease and / or medication ( e.g., insulin dependent diabetes mellitis, systemic )
  • Patients who live with someone who is severly immunocompromised.
  • Patients with cystic fibrosis or ciliary dyskinesia
  • Patients who have been on an active therapy within 2 months of screening
  • Patients who have laboratory abnormalities
  • Patients who are pregnant, breast feeding or planning to become pregnant during the study
  • Patients who are not willing to use a double barrier method of during the study that is:-

    1. females must use contraceptive pill or Intra-uterine device (IUD) or similar and condoms
    2. males must use condoms and spermicidal gel
  • Patients currently on any medication that may affect the results in an unpredictable manner
  • The patient does not agree to comply with or is unable to meet all study requirements for the duration of the study period
  • Patients deemed by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in the study
  • Patients who have had Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) within the last month.

Exclusion criteria (donor):

  • Findings in the prestudy pathogen scan that makes the donor unsuitable. Prestudy pathogen scan: Prior to first donation, the donors will be tested for , Human T-lymphotropic virus 1 and 2, and C, Syphilis, Tuberculosis, Herpes Simplex (HSV 1 and 2), Varicella Zoster (VZV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and a standard panel for sinonasal pathogens (Pneumococci, H. Influenza, Beta-streptococci and M. Catarrhalis).
  • Donors who have had COVID-19 within the last 2 months.
  • If the donor is positive for Herpes Simplex, CMV or EBV they will be considered unsuitable as a donor for a patient negative for the same pathogen. If the donor is positive for any other pathogen they will be considered unsuitable as a donor entirely.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    For each nostril, the donated nasal wash sample is quiesced to 15 mls with saline Nasal Microbiota Transplant therapy.

    Procedure: Microbiome Transplant

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    For each nostril, 15 mls of saline will be used as the placebo therapy.

    Procedure: Placebo

Interventions

  • ProcedureMicrobiome Transplant

    A raw microbiome, is collected from a donor without any sinonasal health problems, as a nasal lavage.

  • ProcedurePlacebo

    Normal saline.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) - 22 Item Questionnaire

    Change of burden of disease as measured by the SNOT-22 (22 item sinonasal outcome test) questionnaire in patients. Each item graded 0-5. Minimum score 0, Maximum 105 Interpretation: Higher score indicates poorer disease control.

    Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1) to Week 20

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lund-Kennedy endoscopic assessment score

    Change of grading of disease severity using the Lund-Kennedy endoscopy score based on clinical assessment of the middle meatus. 4-item criteria, with score of 0-2 Minimum score: 0, Maximum 8 Interpretation: Higher score indicates a higher degree of disease severity based on clinical assessment.

    Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1) to Week 20

  2. Characterisation of nasal microbiome in study participants

    Change in nasal microbiome associated with clinical outcomes such as decrease in presence, absence or abundance of bacterial pathogens.

    Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1) to Week 20

  3. Characterisation of microbiome within effective donors as compared to ineffective donors

    Analysis of microbes (bacterial strains, viruses and fungi), and human cell types within donor specimens.

    Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1) - Week 2 (Day 9)

  4. Adverse events of Participating Patients

    Any adverse event

    Time frame: From the day participating patients give signed consent (2-4 weeks before baseline) until the day of their End of study visit (Up to 33 weeks).

  5. Cytokine level - Interleukin 5 or (IL-5)

    Change of lL-5 in nasal secretion/swab markers across duration of study. Each cytokine will be quantified using a highly sensitive immunoassay which will use biotinylated antibodies specific to each cytokine to bind the cytokine molecules in the sample. Interactions measured on a flow cytometer and compared against its relevant standard. this will result in a measure of the total concentration of the cytokine in the sample (pg/ml).

    Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1) to Week 20

  6. Cytokine level - Interleukin 13 (IL-13)

    Change of lL-13 in nasal secretion/swab markers across duration of study. Each cytokine will be quantified using a highly sensitive immunoassay which will use biotinylated antibodies specific to each cytokine to bind the cytokine molecules in the sample. Interactions measured on a flow cytometer and compared against its relevant standard. this will result in a measure of the total concentration of the cytokine in the sample (pg/ml).

    Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1) to Week 20

  7. Cytokine level - Interleukin 2 (IL-2)

    Change of lL-2 in nasal secretion/swab markers across duration of study. Each cytokine will be quantified using a highly sensitive immunoassay which will use biotinylated antibodies specific to each cytokine to bind the cytokine molecules in the sample. Interactions measured on a flow cytometer and compared against its relevant standard. this will result in a measure of the total concentration of the cytokine in the sample (pg/ml).

    Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1) to Week 20

  8. Cytokine level - Interleukin 6 (IL-6)

    Change of lL-6 in nasal secretion/swab markers across duration of study.Each cytokine will be quantified using a highly sensitive immunoassay which will use biotinylated antibodies specific to each cytokine to bind the cytokine molecules in the sample. Interactions measured on a flow cytometer and compared against its relevant standard. this will result in a measure of the total concentration of the cytokine in the sample (pg/ml).

    Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1) to Week 20

  9. Cytokine level - Interleukin 10 (IL-10)

    Change of lL-10 in nasal secretion/swab markers across duration of study.Each cytokine will be quantified using a highly sensitive immunoassay which will use biotinylated antibodies specific to each cytokine to bind the cytokine molecules in the sample. Interactions measured on a flow cytometer and compared against its relevant standard. this will result in a measure of the total concentration of the cytokine in the sample (pg/ml).

    Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1) to Week 20

  10. Cytokine level - Interferon gamma (IFN-γ)

    Change of IFN-Y in nasal secretion/swab markers across duration of study.Each cytokine will be quantified using a highly sensitive immunoassay which will use biotinylated antibodies specific to each cytokine to bind the cytokine molecules in the sample. Interactions measured on a flow cytometer and compared against its relevant standard. this will result in a measure of the total concentration of the cytokine in the sample (pg/ml).

    Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1) to Week 20

  11. Cytokine level - Interleukin 4 (IL-4)

    Change of IL-4 in nasal secretion/swab markers across duration of study.Each cytokine will be quantified using a highly sensitive immunoassay which will use biotinylated antibodies specific to each cytokine to bind the cytokine molecules in the sample. Interactions measured on a flow cytometer and compared against its relevant standard. this will result in a measure of the total concentration of the cytokine in the sample (pg/ml).

    Time frame: Week 1 (Day 1) to Week 20

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Marsh RL, Aho C, Beissbarth J, Bialasiewicz S, Binks M, Cervin A, Kirkham LS, Lemon KP, Slack MPE, Smith-Vaughan HC. Panel 4: Recent advances in understanding the natural history of the otitis media microbiome and its response to environmental pressures. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Mar;130 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):109836. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109836. Epub 2019 Dec 18. PubMed 31879084 ↗
  • Cho DY, Hunter RC, Ramakrishnan VR. The Microbiome and Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2020 May;40(2):251-263. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2019.12.009. Epub 2020 Jan 16. PubMed 32278449 ↗
  • Psaltis AJ, Wormald PJ. Therapy of Sinonasal Microbiome in CRS: A Critical Approach. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 Sep;17(9):59. doi: 10.1007/s11882-017-0726-x. PubMed 28785927 ↗
  • Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F, Cohen N, Cervin A, Douglas R, Gevaert P, Georgalas C, Goossens H, Harvey R, Hellings P, Hopkins C, Jones N, Joos G, Kalogjera L, Kern B, Kowalski M, Price D, Riechelmann H, Schlosser R, Senior B, Thomas M, Toskala E, Voegels R, Wang de Y, Wormald PJ. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology. 2012 Mar;50(1):1-12. doi: 10.4193/Rhino12.000. PubMed 22469599 ↗
  • Mahdavinia M, Keshavarzian A, Tobin MC, Landay AL, Schleimer RP. A comprehensive review of the nasal microbiome in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Clin Exp Allergy. 2016 Jan;46(1):21-41. doi: 10.1111/cea.12666. PubMed 26510171 ↗
  • Buckland JR, Thomas S, Harries PG. Can the Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) be used as a reliable outcome measure for successful septal surgery? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003 Feb;28(1):43-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00663.x. PubMed 12580880 ↗
  • Rudmik L. Economics of Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 Apr;17(4):20. doi: 10.1007/s11882-017-0690-5. PubMed 28337570 ↗
  • Wagner Mackenzie B, Waite DW, Hoggard M, Douglas RG, Taylor MW, Biswas K. Bacterial community collapse: a meta-analysis of the sinonasal microbiota in chronic rhinosinusitis. Environ Microbiol. 2017 Jan;19(1):381-392. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13632. Epub 2017 Jan 18. PubMed 27902866 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There may be a possibility to share deidentified individual outcome data upon request, if the request is in accordance with the privacy statements of this study.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Nov 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2024, 25 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 12, 2022
First posted
Jun 1, 2022
StartActual
Nov 10, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 2025
Last update
Dec 7, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05400616
Lead sponsor
The University of Queensland
Collaborators
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Monash Health, Queensland University of Technology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 1, 2022
Start date
Nov 10, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 7, 2023

Study contacts

Anders Cervin, MD,FRACS
Contact
a.cervin@uq.edu.au
617 3497 3588
Diane Maresco-Pennisi, PhD
Contact
d.marescopennisi@uq.edu.au
617 3346 6072
Anders Cervin, MD,FRACS
study director · University of Queensland/Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion