CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05398016STARSUpdated Jun 13, 2025Results posted

Strategies for Treating Anxiety Research Study

An interventional study of low-intensity intervention for anxiety in Anxiety Disorders and Anxiety, sponsored by University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-13.

Sponsored by University of Nevada, Las Vegas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This single-arm pilot clinical trial will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and engagement of target mechanism, and preliminary impact of a low-intensity behavioral intervention for mild-to-moderate anxiety disorders. Treatment will delivered by trained lay counselors ("coaches;" n = 5-6) to 2-5 patient participants each depending on enrollment and scheduling (n = up to 25).

Read the detailed description

Anxiety is the most common adult mental health condition. Left untreated, it is costly and imparts significant personal and public health burden. Evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) is an acceptable and effective first-line treatment; however, rural, low-income, and other underserved areas suffer from provider shortages, rendering such treatment largely unavailable. International contexts are beginning to address this problem using provider task sharing, in which low-intensity behavioral health services are delivered by non-specialist health workers (i.e., those with no prior training as a mental health professional). This approach is designed to improve access to care, particularly for those with mild-to-moderate symptoms, and free up limited expert resources. What is lacking is a brief, evidence-based, low-intensity behavioral intervention for mild-to-moderate anxiety disorders as well as an implementation blueprint (e.g., identifying appropriate clinical setting, stakeholder needs, supervision requirements, other counselor and clinic supports) needed to successfully implement and sustain such a novel service model in U.S. contexts. This study will begin to address the above problem in two phases, while creating the foundation for a longterm research program and external funding applications. The primary objective of this work is to develop and preliminarily test a brief intervention for anxiety appropriate for primary care and other non-specialty contexts. Investigators will test the intervention and delivery method via a small, single-arm pilot clinical trial. Non-specialists "coaches" will be trained undergraduate or post-baccalaureate student "coaches" (approx. 5-6 to accommodate patient participant scheduling), each working with three patient participants with anxiety (N = up to 25) to provide preliminary data on fidelity, feasibility, acceptability, preliminary clinical outcomes, and engagement of the target clinical mechanism of avoidance. The activities of these aims will develop community and clinical partnerships for testing and future implementation of low-intensity treatment paradigms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety Disorders
  • Anxiety

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • task sharing
  • task shifting
  • lay counselor
  • psychological treatment
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders

4,868 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,390 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 27 is below the median of 80 across 4,174 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Nevada, Las Vegas is the lead sponsor of 75 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (40%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≥ 18 years,
  • score on Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) ≥ 16,
  • ability to speak English
  • willing and able to attend in-person study visits at UNLV
  • community dwelling

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other psychological conditions rendering the person unlikely to benefit from a brief treatment, including psychosis, bipolar disorder, cognitive impairment, and substance abuse or dependence (comorbid depression permitted);
  • active suicidal ideation or intent;
  • concurrent receipt of regular individual psychotherapy;
  • use of anxiolytic medication.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
27 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Low-intensity behavioral intervention

    Brief behavioral intervention for mild-to-moderate symptoms of anxiety. Delivered via weekly sessions by a trained lay counselor ("coach").

    Behavioral: low-intensity intervention for anxiety

Interventions

  • Behaviorallow-intensity intervention for anxiety

    Brief (6-8 weekly 30-min sessions) delivery of a structured behavioral treatment for mild-to-moderate anxiety. Treatment will be based on principles of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patient Participants Retained in the Intervention (Out of All of Those Enrolled), as Measured by Completion to All Study Treatment Visits.

    Retention of patient participants will be measured as an implementation outcome. This will entail quantifying the number of patients who complete the entire course of treatment out of all of those enrolled.

    Time frame: through treatment completion, up to 12 weeks

  2. Change in Anxiety Symptoms

    (Patient outcome) Change between pre- and post-treatment will be assessed using the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. This is a clinician-rated measure consisting of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms, to measure both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). Total summary score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe and frequent symptoms of anxiety. A corresponding interview guide will be used to increase the reliability of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. This measure has demonstrated sensitivity to change in clinical trials.

    Time frame: change in anxiety between pre- and post-treatment (6-8 weeks)

  3. Change in Avoidance

    (Patient outcome) Change in avoidance will be measured using the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (MEAQ). This is a 62-item self report assessment of avoidance. Total scores range from 62 to 372; higher scores reflect higher levels of avoidance. This will be used to measure activation of target mechanism of avoidance.

    Time frame: change in avoidance between pre- and post-treatment (6-8 weeks)

  4. Sustained Change in Anxiety Symptoms

    (Patient outcome) Change in anxiety between baseline (pre-treatment) and follow-up (12 weeks; 6 week after intervention end) will be assessed using the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. This is a clinician-rated measure consisting of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms, to measure both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). Total summary score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe and frequent symptoms of anxiety. A corresponding interview guide will be used to increase the reliability of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. This measure has demonstrated sensitivity to change in clinical trials.

    Time frame: change in anxiety between pre-treatment and follow-up (12 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    Self-report measure assessing perceived acceptability of the intervention (an implementation outcome). Scores range from 4-20; higher scores indicate a higher degree of perceived acceptability. Completed by the trained lay counselors.

    Time frame: Post-implementation (up to 1 year)

  2. Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

    Self-report measure assessing perceived feasibility of the intervention (an implementation outcome). Scores range from 4-20; higher scores indicate a higher degree of perceived feasibility. Completed by the trained lay counselors.

    Time frame: Post-implementation (up to 1 year)

  3. Implementation Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

    Self-report measure assessing perceived appropriateness of the intervention (an implementation outcome). Scores range from 4-20; higher scores indicate a higher degree of perceived appropriateness. Completed by the trained lay counselors.

    Time frame: Post-implementation (up to 1 year)

  4. World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)

    This 12-item generic health-status measure assesses functioning across six domains: communication, mobility, self-care, interpersonal, life activities, and participation. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0 = no difficulty to 4 = extreme difficulty or cannot do). The scores for each item are summed to create a total score. A total score is possible from 0-48, with 48 representing the highest level of disability.

    Time frame: change in functioning between pre- and post-treatment (6-8 weeks)

Other outcomes

  1. Sustained Change in Avoidance

    (Patient outcome) Sustained change in avoidance after treatment (12 weeks follow-up; this is 6 weeks after treatment end) will be measured using the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (MEAQ). This is a 62-item self report assessment of avoidance. Total scores range from 62 to 372; higher scores reflect higher levels of avoidance. This will be used to measure activation of target mechanism of avoidance.

    Time frame: change in avoidance between pre-treatment and follow-up (12 weeks)

07

Results

Posted Jun 13, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePatient ParticipantsCoach Participants
Started216
Completed176
Not completed40

Outcome measures

SecondaryAcceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

Self-report measure assessing perceived acceptability of the intervention (an implementation outcome). Scores range from 4-20; higher scores indicate a higher degree of perceived acceptability. Completed by the trained lay counselors.

Time frame:
Post-implementation (up to 1 year)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on scale
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
scores on scaleCoach Participants
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)4.88 (4 to 5)
SecondaryFeasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

Self-report measure assessing perceived feasibility of the intervention (an implementation outcome). Scores range from 4-20; higher scores indicate a higher degree of perceived feasibility. Completed by the trained lay counselors.

Time frame:
Post-implementation (up to 1 year)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on scale
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
scores on scaleCoach Participants
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)5 (5 to 5)
SecondaryImplementation Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

Self-report measure assessing perceived appropriateness of the intervention (an implementation outcome). Scores range from 4-20; higher scores indicate a higher degree of perceived appropriateness. Completed by the trained lay counselors.

Time frame:
Post-implementation (up to 1 year)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Implementation Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
scores on a scaleCoach Participants
Implementation Appropriateness Measure (IAM)4.88 (4 to 5)
PrimaryNumber of Patient Participants Retained in the Intervention (Out of All of Those Enrolled), as Measured by Completion to All Study Treatment Visits.

Retention of patient participants will be measured as an implementation outcome. This will entail quantifying the number of patients who complete the entire course of treatment out of all of those enrolled.

Time frame:
through treatment completion, up to 12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patient Participants Retained in the Intervention (Out of All of Those Enrolled), as Measured by Completion to All Study Treatment Visits.
ParticipantsPatient Participants
Number of Patient Participants Retained in the Intervention (Out of All of Those Enrolled), as Measured by Completion to All Study Treatment Visits.17
PrimaryChange in Anxiety Symptoms

(Patient outcome) Change between pre- and post-treatment will be assessed using the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. This is a clinician-rated measure consisting of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms, to measure both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). Total summary score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe and frequent symptoms of anxiety. A corresponding interview guide will be used to increase the reliability of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. This measure has demonstrated sensitivity to change in clinical trials.

Time frame:
change in anxiety between pre- and post-treatment (6-8 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on scale
Change in Anxiety Symptoms
scores on scalePatient Participants
Change in Anxiety Symptoms4.69 ± 4.44
PrimaryChange in Avoidance

(Patient outcome) Change in avoidance will be measured using the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (MEAQ). This is a 62-item self report assessment of avoidance. Total scores range from 62 to 372; higher scores reflect higher levels of avoidance. This will be used to measure activation of target mechanism of avoidance.

Time frame:
change in avoidance between pre- and post-treatment (6-8 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on scale
Change in Avoidance
scores on scalePatient Participants
Change in Avoidance6.68 ± 23.64
SecondaryWorld Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)

This 12-item generic health-status measure assesses functioning across six domains: communication, mobility, self-care, interpersonal, life activities, and participation. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0 = no difficulty to 4 = extreme difficulty or cannot do). The scores for each item are summed to create a total score. A total score is possible from 0-48, with 48 representing the highest level of disability.

Time frame:
change in functioning between pre- and post-treatment (6-8 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
score on a scalePatient Participants
World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)4.600 ± 10.99
PrimarySustained Change in Anxiety Symptoms

(Patient outcome) Change in anxiety between baseline (pre-treatment) and follow-up (12 weeks; 6 week after intervention end) will be assessed using the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. This is a clinician-rated measure consisting of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms, to measure both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). Total summary score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe and frequent symptoms of anxiety. A corresponding interview guide will be used to increase the reliability of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. This measure has demonstrated sensitivity to change in clinical trials.

Time frame:
change in anxiety between pre-treatment and follow-up (12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on scale
Sustained Change in Anxiety Symptoms
scores on scalePatient Participants
Sustained Change in Anxiety Symptoms4.75 ± 4.40
Other pre-specifiedSustained Change in Avoidance

(Patient outcome) Sustained change in avoidance after treatment (12 weeks follow-up; this is 6 weeks after treatment end) will be measured using the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (MEAQ). This is a 62-item self report assessment of avoidance. Total scores range from 62 to 372; higher scores reflect higher levels of avoidance. This will be used to measure activation of target mechanism of avoidance.

Time frame:
change in avoidance between pre-treatment and follow-up (12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on scale
Sustained Change in Avoidance
scores on scalePatient Participants
Sustained Change in Avoidance11.71 ± 10.93

Adverse events

Collected over Active treatment (6-8 weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Patient Participants0/21 (0%)0/21 (0%)0/21 (0%)
Coach Participants0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Patient ParticipantsCoach ParticipantsTotal
Mean28.9 (19 to 42)—28.9 (19 to 42)
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Patient ParticipantsCoach ParticipantsTotal
18 years of age or older21627
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Patient ParticipantsCoach ParticipantsTotal
Female18523
Male314
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Patient ParticipantsCoach ParticipantsTotal
Hispanic or Latino213
Not Hispanic or Latino19524
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Patient ParticipantsCoach ParticipantsTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian819
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White9312
More than one race213
Unknown or Not Reported213
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Patient ParticipantsCoach ParticipantsTotal
United States21627
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale(units on a scale)Patient ParticipantsCoach ParticipantsTotal
Mean11.9 ± 2.8—11.9 ± 2.8
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Nevada Las Vegas
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 23, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 31, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified participant data will be shared with investigators whose proposed data use has been approved through requests to the Principal Investigator. These requests will be considered after publication of the main outcome paper from the project.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05398016
Lead sponsor
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 31, 2022
Start date
Jan 8, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 18, 2024
Completion
Dec 6, 2024
Results posted
Jun 13, 2025
Last update
Jun 13, 2025

Study contacts

Brenna Renn, PhD
principal investigator · University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion