ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05385159CELLCORDES2Updated Sep 18, 2023

INNOVATIVE TREATMENT OF SCARRED VOCAL FOLDS BY LOCAL INJECTION OF AUTOLOGOUS ADIPOSE-DERIVED STROMAL VASCULAR FRACTION: EFFICACY VERSUS PLACEBO

A Phase 2 interventional study of AUTOLOGOUS ADIPOSE-DERIVED STROMAL VASCULAR FRACTION and Placebo in Scarred Vocal Folds, sponsored by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-18.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2022; still recruiting 4 years 1 month later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Vocal Folds scarring (whether congenitally or following phonosurgery) can result in a range of symptoms depending on severity and extent, such as hoarseness, breathy voice, increased effort to speak, and voice fatigue. The inability to phonate normally causes both physical and psychological disability, especially for professional communicators (teachers, tradesmen, singers, etc.). There are several therapies currently available but these are often disappointing, as the great complexity of vocal fold microstructure hinders the development of effective therapy. Thus, identification of innovative strategies able to improve vibrational mechanical properties of vocal folds remains an important clinical challenge.

Autologous Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction (ADSVF) is recognized as an easily accessible source of cells displaying angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and regenerative properties. Recent experimental and clinical reports also supported the anti-fibrotic potential of ADVSF, mainly attributed to the mesenchymal stem/stromal cell subset.

Safety in humans has already been confirmed in several studies, including our previous clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0262246; EudraCT number: 2015-000238-31). The main objective of this phase I/II trial was to measure for the first time the safety and tolerability of autologous ADSVF local injections in patients with scarred vocal folds. No severe adverse events occurred: only some minor adverse events were reported. Moreover, Voice Handicap Index was improved in all patients with a mean improvement from baseline of 40.1/120 and seven patients were considered as responders, defined as an improvement ≥ 18 points.

Based on these observations, we hypothesized that the injection of autologous ADSVF could reduce the process of fibrosis, improve vibration and then dysphonia and quality of life in patients with scarred vocal folds.

In the absence of a reference treatment, the effectiveness of the ADSVF will be compared to a placebo: the local injection of excipients solution.

This study will test efficacy of the autologous ADSVF to treat vocal folds scarring. It is a randomized, double-blind, phase II clinical trial conducted according to a 2-treatment parallel design, with medico-surgical and scientific collaboration.

Recruitment and follow-up of patients will be done in 4 university hospitals by the respective ENT teams (Marseille, Toulouse, Nice and Montpellier): 36 patients will be recruited and treated on a 24 months period.

At inclusion, 36 patients will be randomized (1:1 ratio) into two groups: ADSVF group and placebo group. Adipose tissue removal, ADSVF production and injection of ADSVF or placebo will be done on the same day during a short hospital stay. Patients will be followed and evaluated at 1 and 6 months with self-evaluation (Voice Handicap Index and a 10 points scale), video-laryngo-stroboscopic examination, vocal assessment with perceptive, acoustic and aerodynamic parameters and evaluation of adverse events. At the end of this 6-month follow-up (primary endpoint), patients of each group having tolerated the first injection well but in therapeutic failure (improvement of VHI \<18 as described by Jacobson in 1997 or improvement of VHI ≥ 18 but not normal which means > 20 according to Woisard, 2004) will be offered an injection of thawed and washed ADSVF. Patients will continue to be followed in open-label on the same endpoints.

02

Conditions studied

  • Scarred Vocal Folds
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille is the lead sponsor of 702 studies on the registry; 140 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subscription to the French Social Security System
  • signed ;
  • voice Handicap Index > 50/120;
  • scarred vocal folds, congenital (sulcus) or after phonosurgery;
  • scarred middle third in videolaryngostroboscopy;
  • at least six-months delay after initial surgery if appropriate;
  • patients aged between 18 and 70;
  • good general condition;
  • negative pregnancy test \& for women of child-bearing age.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of speech therapy;
  • history of malignant lesion or severe dysplasia of the scarred vocal fold;
  • history of laryngeal papillomatosis;
  • to local anesthesia;
  • anti-coagulant treatment;
  • coagulation disorders (Prothrombin Ratio \<65%, >1,2);
  • active infectious diseases;
  • any active viral infection from among the following: , HTLV I and II, VHB, VHC and Syphilis;
  • known sensitivity to human serum albumin (HSA);
  • necessity of intraoperative prophylactic antibiotics;
  • \< 18 kg/m2 to insure adequate abdominal or other subcutaneous adipose tissue accessible to lipoharvest.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ADSVF group

    Adults with Scarred vocal folds, congenital (sulcus) or after phonosurgery

    Drug: AUTOLOGOUS ADIPOSE-DERIVED STROMAL VASCULAR FRACTION

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo group

    Adults with Scarred vocal folds, congenital (sulcus) or after phonosurgery

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Adipose tissue removal, ADSVF production and injection of ADSVF will be done on the same day during a short hospital stay

  • DrugPlacebo

    Adipose tissue removal, ADSVF production, cryopreservation of ADSVF and injection of placebo will be done on the same day during a short hospital stay.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-evaluation with the Voice Handicap Index

    The Voice Handicap Index (VHI) is composed of 3 parts (E = emotional subscale, F = functional subscale, P = physical subscale), with lower scores indicating a better voice perception. Patients are considered as responders if they achieved the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) defined by Jacobson as a shift in the total VHI score of at least 18 / 120 (Jacobson, 1997).

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-evaluation of dysphonia

    on a scale from 0 to 10

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Aspect of vibration in videolaryngostroboscopy

    For each stroboscopic parameter, a four-point grading scale (0 = no deviance, 3 = severe deviance) is used. Analyses will be done by a single jury in Marseille, in a random order and a blind way

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. The signal to noise ratio

    reading of a short text and a sustained vowel: quantifies the aperiodic portion of the voice signal (the higher the signal the better) .

    Time frame: 6months

  4. The vocal range

    reading of a short text and a sustained vowel:difference between the maximum frequency and the minimum frequency

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. The jitter

    reading of a short text and a sustained vowel:refers to a short-term (cycle-to-cycle) perturbation in the fundamental voice frequency (the lower the better).

    Time frame: 6months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2024, 21 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 9, 2021
First posted
May 23, 2022
StartActual
Sep 22, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2024
CompletionEst.
Jun 2025
Last update
Sep 18, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05385159
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 23, 2022
Start date
Sep 22, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2023

Study contacts

Antoine GIOVANNI, Pr
Contact
antoine.giovanni@ap-hm.fr
04 91 33 58 55
Alexandra Giuliani
Contact
alexandra.giuliani@ap-hm.fr
04 91 38 28 70
Emilie GARRIDO-PRADALIE
study director · Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction

Start the discussion