ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05383040Updated Feb 27, 2023

Percutaneous Release vs Steroid Injection for Trigger Finger

An interventional study of Percutaneous release in Trigger Finger, sponsored by Armed Police Force Hospital, Nepal. Completed at 1 site in Nepal. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-27.

Sponsored by Armed Police Force Hospital, Nepal · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
112
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Trigger fingers (TF) is the common cause of pain and disturbed function of hand. Many studies show that percutaneous release of A1 pulley has better outcome than the steroid injection. However, over the past many years, steroid injection has been considered as the choice of treatment after the failure of conservative treatment methods. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of percutaneous release of A1 pulley compared with the local Steroid injection in the treatment of trigger fingers.

This study is based on a randomized clinical trial to compare the effect of the percutaneous release of A1 pulley with steroid injection in trigger fingers. A total of 112 participants aged 18 years and above suffering from trigger fingers with failed conservative treatment will be intervened randomly (56 participants in injection group and 56 participants in percutaneous release group). The Quinnell's classification, VAS scoring system and active range of movement in the affected site will be assessed at the baseline and the same criteria will be at one month and three month as end line assessment. Statistical analyses will be performed using independent t-test and Mann Whitney U test to compare between the two means. The outcome of this study will help to guide the physicians to choose the better therapeutic approach among the patients suffering from trigger fingers.

Read the detailed description

Stenosing flexor tenosynovitis also known as trigger finger. It is a common clinical condition where there is locking and clicking during flexion and extension of the involved digit or even locking. The trigger ring finger is the first commonest, and the trigger thumb is the second commonest of trigger fingers. Flexor tendon gliding motion is dependent on a 'Critical Tendon Sheath Caliber Tolerance' which allows passage of flexor tendon through the A1 pulley in the Metacarpophalangeal joint.

The prevalence of trigger finger is 2 % in the general population, which is most common in women in the fifth or sixth decade of life. The possibility of a trigger finger is between 2 and 3% during the lifetime, which increases up to 10 % in diabetic patients. The trigger finger in diabetic patients suffered from worse renal function and glycemic control, along with a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease. The causes of Trigger finger are still not well known, some factors may increase the risk of developing the condition such as forceful hand activities (mechanical irritation, congenital and medical conditions (Diabetes and Rheumatoid arthritis). Trigger thumb is caused by thickening of flexor tendon gliding at the tendon A1 pulley interface or thickening of A1 pulley.

Diagnosis is primarily made based on physical examination. The patients often present with pain or clicking at the metacarpal head, which causes difficulty in holding or grasping objects. In most advanced cases, there is locking in flexion or extension position.

Nowadays, the morphological changes in the case of trigger fingers can be ruled out by high-resolution ultrasonography with a high-frequency transducer, and it has been found that the cut-off for pathological findings is a 20% increase in tendon thickness compared to the contralateral tendon. The average width and thickness of the A1 pulley are 7.1 mm and less than 1 mm respectively.

Treatment of Trigger fingers includes conservative such as splinting, oral medications, injection, and surgical management such as open release, and percutaneous release. Steroid injection has been serving us as a traditional way of injection therapy for many years for those who are not getting better with oral medications and physiotherapy. Steroid injection is effective because of its anti-inflammatory properties.

The first percutaneous release was performed in 1958 and the success rate was 100% without any reported complications. Percutaneous A1 pulley release has been the method of choice for patients who does not respond to conservative treatment (local steroid) with low complication rates.

There is a concern regarding percutaneous release in the thumb, where tendon sheath and neurovascular bundle are in proximity.

The technique of local steroid injection into the flexor sheath was described by Howard in 1953. It has become an accepted initial treatment for trigger fingers largely due to its use within the outpatient department and its low complication rate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trigger Finger

Keywords

  • Trigger fingers
  • Trigger digits
  • Steroid injection
  • Percutaneous release
03

In context

Trigger Finger Disorder

93 studies on the registry are indexed under Trigger Finger Disorder; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 112 is above the median of 66 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Trigger Finger Disorder.

Browse Trigger Finger Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Armed Police Force Hospital, Nepal is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants aged 18 years and above
  • Duration of symptoms :≥ 3 months
  • Triggering in any of the digits of hand
  • Trigger finger type II-IV based on Quinnell classification

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There is prior treatment for trigger finger, or Trigger thumb
  • There had been previous surgery or other hand pathology such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, Dupuytren's contracture and diabetic mellitus.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
112 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    percutaneous release

    Percutaneous release of A1 pulley release will be performed in the well-managed operation theater set up, using an 18 gauge hypodermic needle, after preparation of the skin and injection of 1ml 2% plain lidocaine. The proper location of the pulley will be defined using surface landmarks in each digit after waiting a few minutes to allow the anesthetic to take effect the 18 gauge needle will be longitudinally moved to keep the level of the needle parallel with the tendon grating sensation will be elucidated confirming the cut of pulley until there is no grating sensation felt and improvement of symptoms. A sterile dressing will be placed.

    Procedure: Percutaneous release

  • No intervention
    Steroid injection

    The steroid injection mixed with 1 ml of methyl prednisone (40mg) with 0.5 ml of 2% plain lidocaine will be inserted into the flexor tendon sheath over the A1 pulley, which will also be performed in the operation theater for patient safety.

Interventions

  • ProcedurePercutaneous release

    Percutaneous release of A1 pulley release will be performed in the well-managed operation theater set up, using an 18 gauge hypodermic needle, after preparation of the skin and injection of 1ml 2% plain lidocaine. The proper location of the pulley will be defined using surface landmarks in each digit after waiting a few minutes to allow the anesthetic to take effect the 18 gauge needle will be longitudinally moved to keep the level of the needle parallel with the tendon grating sensation will be elucidated confirming the cut of pulley until there is no grating sensation felt and improvement of symptoms. A sterile dressing will be placed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional mobility improvement

    Compare the effects of percutaneous release versus steroid injection on functional mobility at baseline, one month and three months.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Pain reduction

    Compare the effects of percutaneous release versus steroid injection on pain reduction at baseline, one month and three months.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Decrease in the thickness of the A1 pulley

    Compare the effects of percutaneous release versus steroid injection on decrease in the thickness at baseline, one month and three months.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Recurrence of problem within 3 months

    Compare the effects of percutaneous release with steroid injection on problem recurrence in three months.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Armed Police Force Hospital
    Kathmandu, Bagmati +9779851147339, Nepal
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Moore JS. Flexor tendon entrapment of the digits (trigger finger and trigger thumb). J Occup Environ Med. 2000 May;42(5):526-45. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200005000-00012. PubMed 10824306 ↗
  • Maneerit J, Sriworakun C, Budhraja N, Nagavajara P. Trigger thumb: results of a prospective randomised study of percutaneous release with steroid injection versus steroid injection alone. J Hand Surg Br. 2003 Dec;28(6):586-9. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00172-4. PubMed 14599834 ↗
  • Makkouk AH, Oetgen ME, Swigart CR, Dodds SD. Trigger finger: etiology, evaluation, and treatment. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008 Jun;1(2):92-6. doi: 10.1007/s12178-007-9012-1. PubMed 19468879 ↗
  • Mineoka Y, Ishii M, Hashimoto Y, Yuge H, Toyoda M, Nakamura N, Katsumi Y, Fukui M. Trigger finger is associated with risk of incident cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Apr;9(1):e002070. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-002070. PubMed 33832915 ↗
  • David M, Rangaraju M, Raine A. Acquired triggering of the fingers and thumb in adults. BMJ. 2017 Nov 30;359:j5285. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5285. No abstract available. PubMed 29191846 ↗
  • Lunsford D, Valdes K, Hengy S. Conservative management of trigger finger: A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2019 Apr-Jun;32(2):212-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Dec 28. PubMed 29290504 ↗
  • Takahashi M, Sato R, Kondo K, Sairyo K. Morphological alterations of the tendon and pulley on ultrasound after intrasynovial injection of betamethasone for trigger digit. Ultrasonography. 2018 Apr;37(2):134-139. doi: 10.14366/usg.17038. Epub 2017 Jul 25. PubMed 28870061 ↗
  • Pan M, Sheng S, Fan Z, Lu H, Yang H, Yan F, E Z. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Release of A1 Pulley by Using a Needle Knife: A Prospective Study of 41 Cases. Front Pharmacol. 2019 Mar 26;10:267. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00267. eCollection 2019. PubMed 30971922 ↗
  • Bianchi S, Gitto S, Draghi F. Ultrasound Features of Trigger Finger: Review of the Literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Dec;38(12):3141-3154. doi: 10.1002/jum.15025. Epub 2019 May 20. PubMed 31106876 ↗
  • LORTHIOIR J Jr. Surgical treatment of trigger-finger by a subcutaneous method. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958 Jul;40-A(4):793-5. No abstract available. PubMed 13549516 ↗
  • Blumberg N, Arbel R, Dekel S. Percutaneous release of trigger digits. J Hand Surg Br. 2001 Jun;26(3):256-7. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0569. PubMed 11386779 ↗
  • Park MJ, Oh I, Ha KI. A1 pulley release of locked trigger digit by percutaneous technique. J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Oct;29(5):502-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.03.015. PubMed 15336757 ↗
  • Ragoowansi R, Acornley A, Khoo CT. Percutaneous trigger finger release: the 'lift-cut' technique. Br J Plast Surg. 2005 Sep;58(6):817-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.04.003. PubMed 15936736 ↗
  • Eastwood DM, Gupta KJ, Johnson DP. Percutaneous release of the trigger finger: an office procedure. J Hand Surg Am. 1992 Jan;17(1):114-7. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(92)90125-9. PubMed 1538091 ↗
  • Lyu SR. Closed division of the flexor tendon sheath for trigger finger. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 May;74(3):418-20. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B3.1587893. PubMed 1587893 ↗
  • Bain GI, Turnbull J, Charles MN, Roth JH, Richards RS. Percutaneous A1 pulley release: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 1995 Sep;20(5):781-4; discussion 785-6. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80430-7. PubMed 8522744 ↗
  • HOWARD LD Jr, PRATT DR, BUNNELL S. The use of compound F (hydrocortone) in operative and non-operative conditions of the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1953 Oct;35-A(4):994-1002. No abstract available. PubMed 13108902 ↗
  • Dala-Ali BM, Nakhdjevani A, Lloyd MA, Schreuder FB. The efficacy of steroid injection in the treatment of trigger finger. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012 Dec;4(4):263-8. doi: 10.4055/cios.2012.4.4.263. Epub 2012 Nov 16. PubMed 23205235 ↗
  • Wang J, Zhao JG, Liang CC. Percutaneous release, open surgery, or corticosteroid injection, which is the best treatment method for trigger digits? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jun;471(6):1879-86. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2716-6. Epub 2012 Dec 4. PubMed 23208122 ↗
  • Quinnell RC. Conservative management of trigger finger. Practitioner. 1980 Feb;224(1340):187-90. No abstract available. PubMed 7367373 ↗
  • Sato ES, Gomes Dos Santos JB, Belloti JC, Albertoni WM, Faloppa F. Treatment of trigger finger: randomized clinical trial comparing the methods of corticosteroid injection, percutaneous release and open surgery. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Jan;51(1):93-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker315. Epub 2011 Oct 29. PubMed 22039269 ↗
  • Sahu R, Gupta P. Experience of Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release under Local Anesthesia in the Medical College of Mullana, Ambala, Haryana. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Sep;4(5):806-9. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.141558. PubMed 25328798 ↗
  • Ha KI, Park MJ, Ha CW. Percutaneous release of trigger digits. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Jan;83(1):75-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b1.11247. PubMed 11245542 ↗
  • Saldana MJ. Trigger digits: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001 Jul-Aug;9(4):246-52. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200107000-00004. PubMed 11476534 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05383040
Lead sponsor
Armed Police Force Hospital, Nepal
Responsible party
Dev Ram Sunuwar (Dietitian/Researcher, Armed Police Force Hospital, Nepal) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 19, 2022
Start date
Jun 1, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 2, 2022
Completion
Nov 2, 2022
Last update
Feb 27, 2023

Study contacts

Mandeep Karki, MS
principal investigator · Nepal Orthopedic Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion