CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05381740Updated Jun 3, 2024

A Novel Brain Stimulation for Bimanual Motor Function and Control in Chronic Stroke

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Novel rTMS Approach and Sham rTMS Approach in Stroke, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-03.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Dec 2023, 2 years 10 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The long-term goal of this project is to develop and test upper Iimb rehabilitation interventions that can improve bimanual motor function, or the ability to use both arms and hands together, for stroke survivors with moderate to severe impairment.

This study will utilize a novel method of non-invasive brain stimulation in conjunction with upper limb training given for 12 visits over a period of 6 weeks.

The study will include the following site visits:

  • Eligibility Screening and Informed Consent Visit
  • Baseline testing (4 visits total): 1 visit each for MRI, upper limb and bimanual motor function test, bimanual motor control, and neurophysiology related to control of the upper limbs
  • Repeat baseline testing (4 visits total) of MRI, upper limb and bimanual motor function test, bimanual motor control, and neurophysiology related to control of the upper limbs
  • 12 intervention visits during which patients will receive upper limb therapy in conjunction with non-invasive brain stimulation
  • Repeat testing (4 visits total) of MRI, upper limb and bimanual motor function test, bimanual motor control, and neurophysiology related to control of the upper limbs
  • A follow-up visit 1 month after the completion of interventions
Read the detailed description

In a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial, 18 stroke survivors more than 6 months after stroke onset, and have upper limb impairment will be enrolled. Participants will be randomized to receive a form of non-invasive brain stimulation called repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or sham rTMS. Real or sham rTMS will be delivered over an area in the brain called the higher motor cortices within the stroke-unaffected hemisphere, cHMC for short. This area (cHMC) is important for using both arms and hands together, or bimanual motor function. Real or sham cHMC rTMS will be given prior to upper limb therapy twice a week for 6 weeks in the lab. The investigators will measure bimanual motor function and control twice at the beginning, once after the 6-week treatment and once at 1-month after treatment. The investigators will also test possible mechanisms related to the treatment using brain functional MRI and TMS twice at the beginning and once after 6-week treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stroke
  • brain stimulation
  • TMS
  • Upper Limb
  • rehabilitation
  • MRI
  • CVA
  • neuromodulation
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 818 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 89 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-90 yrs
  • ≥6 months since first clinical stroke
  • Impairment of the paretic hand, indicated by a score of \<= 11 out of 14 on the hand section of UEFM
  • Sufficient range of motion in the wrist and fingers for functional task practice: have at least 10 degrees active wrist extension, 10 degrees active thumb abduction/extension, and 10 degrees active extension in at least 2 additional digits
  • Sufficient active shoulder and elbow movement to volitionally position the paretic hand in the workspace for table-top task practice

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Brainstem or cerebellar stroke
  • Bilateral strokes or multiple strokes affecting sensorimotor structures
  • Cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination \<24)
  • Severe impairment of the paretic hand that limits functional task practice (UEFM hand score \< 4 out of 14)
  • Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale >3) or upper limb contracture
  • Occupational therapy or upper limb Botox completed ≤ 2 months prior
  • Contraindications to TMS or MRI (e.g. metal implant in head, seizure history, cardiac pacemaker)
05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    cHMC rTMS + Upper Limb Training Training

    Real Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation given to facilitate the Contralesional Higher Motor Cortices+ Upper Limb Training

    Device: Novel rTMS Approach

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS + Upper Limb Training Training

    Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over Contralesional Higher Motor Cortices+ Upper Limb Training

    Device: Sham rTMS Approach

Interventions

  • DeviceNovel rTMS Approach

    Participants in this arm will receive rTMS-based facilitation of the contralesional higher motor cortices located in the non-stroke hemisphere before the start of each rehabilitation session. High-frequency rTMS (5Hz) will be delivered using 42 10 second trains of 50 pulses each (total 2100 pulses) for a period of 22 minutes. Immediately after the completion of rTMS, participants will undergo therapist-guided upper limb therapy for a total of one hour. Participants will receive these interventions 2 days a week for 6 weeks for a total of 12 sessions.

  • DeviceSham rTMS Approach

    Participants in this arm will receive sham rTMS given over the contralesional higher motor cortices located in the non-stroke hemisphere before the start of each rehabilitation session. Immediately after the completion of sham rTMS, participants will undergo therapist-guided upper limb therapy for a total of one hour. Participants will receive these interventions 2 days a week for 6 weeks for a total of 12 sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Bimanual Assessment Measure (BAM)

    Measure of the functional ability to perform 11 bimanual tasks scoring the spontaneous role of the affected hand, timing, and quality of movement.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 weeks and 2 weeks), after intervention(up to 7 weeks) and after end of 1 month of follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Bimanual Grip Force Modulation Task

    Measure the ability to produce and maintain differing levels of force using hand dynamometers. This measurement represents patient's ability to perform independent tasks with each hand.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 weeks and 2 weeks), after intervention(up to 7 weeks) and after end of 1 month of follow-up.

  2. Change in ABILHAND

    ABILHAND assesses the participant's perception of bimanual ability by rating the difficulty of performing 23 bimanual activities without assistance on a 3 point ordinal scale (impossible, difficult, easy) This test has excellent reliability (ICC = 0.85-0.91).

    Time frame: Baseline (0 weeks and 2 weeks), after intervention(up to 7 weeks) and after end of 1 month of follow-up.

  3. Change in Upper Extremity Fugyl-Meyer Score (UEFM)

    Impairment will be measured using UEFM, one of the most widely used assessments in stroke. UEFM will serve as our primary outcome because it is sensitive to discerning the effects of rTMS/rehabilitation, and has excellent reliability (ICC= 0.97), consistency (Cronbach's α= 0.84) and validity. UEFM has a score ranging from 0-66 (0 meaning there is no movement of the paretic arm, and 66 meaning there is no functional limitation of the paretic arm.)

    Time frame: Baseline (0 weeks and 2 weeks), after intervention(up to 7 weeks) and after end of 1 month of follow-up.

  4. Change in Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)

    Functional ability to use the paretic upper limb in a variety of tasks will be assessed using WMFT. Time to complete each task will be noted and converted to rate (60/Performance Time (sec)), optimized for measurement in moderately/severely-impaired patients. Grip strength will also be recorded with WMFT.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 weeks and 2 weeks), after intervention(up to 7 weeks) and after end of 1 month of follow-up.

  5. Change Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging(rsfMRI)

    Functional connectivity will assess the connectivity between cHMC and iM1 using temporal correlation of blood oxygneation level-dependent (BOLD) signal given as z-scores.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 weeks and 2 weeks), after intervention(up to 7 weeks)

  6. Change in excitability of cortical and corticospinal physiology (TMS)

    Transcranial magnetic stimulation will be used to test crossed and uncrossed output from both hemispheres and will be measured as motor evoked potentials(MEPS) of the Extensor Digitorum Communis (EDC).

    Time frame: Baseline (0 weeks and 2 weeks), after intervention(up to 7 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Haaland KY, Mutha PK, Rinehart JK, Daniels M, Cushnyr B, Adair JC. Relationship between arm usage and instrumental activities of daily living after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Nov;93(11):1957-62. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 May 24. PubMed 22634230 ↗
  • Sankarasubramanian V, Machado AG, Conforto AB, Potter-Baker KA, Cunningham DA, Varnerin NM, Wang X, Sakaie K, Plow EB. Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jun;128(6):892-902. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Mar 21. PubMed 28402865 ↗
  • Liao WW, Whitall J, Wittenberg GF, Barton JE, McCombe Waller S. Not all brain regions are created equal for improving bimanual coordination in individuals with chronic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug;130(8):1218-1230. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.04.711. Epub 2019 May 13. PubMed 31163366 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05381740
Lead sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
Collaborators
American Heart Association
Responsible party
Ela B. Plow (Assistant Professor, The Cleveland Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 19, 2022
Start date
Mar 8, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 6, 2023
Completion
Jan 1, 2024
Last update
Jun 3, 2024

Study contacts

Ela Plow, PhD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion