CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05380869POCT-PCTUpdated May 19, 2022

POCT PCT in Outpatient LRTI

An interventional study of Point-of-care Test in Antimicrobial Stewardship, Exacerbation of Allergic Asthma and Exacerbation Copd, sponsored by Hannover Medical School. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-19.

Sponsored by Hannover Medical School · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2020, registered Apr 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
114
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in patients with chronic lung diseases are a common acute reason to consult respiratory practitioners and often lead to inadequate prescription of antibiotics. The primary objective of the investigators study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care testing (POCT) for procalcitonin (PCT) in identifying pneumonia as a bacterial infection in outpatients with LRTI.

Read the detailed description

Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are a common acute reason to consult general practitioners or lung specialists and most patients receive an antibiotic prescription. Despite the vast majority of LRTI are caused by viruses, the lack of clinical, radiological, and laboratory tests to safely rule out bacterial involvement in LRTI still drives antibiotic treatment today Procalcitonin (PCT) has been shown to be a useful biomarker for differentiating between viral and bacterial infections in the emergency department and is now available as a point-of-care testing (POCT). The primary objective of the investigators study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCT PCT in identifying bacterial infection in outpatients with LRTI. All patients aged 18 years or older with signs and symptoms of an LRTI as the leading diagnosis of the respiratory physicians are eligible. The medical assistant measure PCT from venous or capillary whole blood using the portable commercially available BRAHMS PCT direct point-of-care test (Thermo-Fischer Scientific). The stepwise procedure involve pipetting 20µl of the sample into the test disc before loading this onto the analyzer and pressing run. This immunoassay provides a quantitative result in 20 minutes. In suspicion of pneumonia (positive auscultation finding or clinical noticed symptoms compatible with pneumonia) a chest x-ray will be done. Members of the study team conduct standardised phone interviews of all participants on day 28.

02

Conditions studied

  • Antimicrobial Stewardship
  • Exacerbation of Allergic Asthma
  • Exacerbation Copd
  • Community-acquired Pneumonia
  • Lower Respiratory Tract and Lung Infections

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Procalcitonin
  • Point-of-care-Testing
  • Antimicrobial stewardship
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 114 is close to the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Hannover Medical School is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Clinical diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active malignancies
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Solid organ or stem cell transplantation
  • Chronic infection (endocarditis, osteomyelitis, active tuberculosis)
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
114 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Point-of-care test Procalcitonin for LRTI

    Diagnostic study, a POCT-PCT is done in all included patients

    Diagnostic Test: Point-of-care Test

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPoint-of-care Test

    to test Point-of-care procalcitonin in suspected pneumonia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Description of outpatients with lower respiratory tract infection

    The study population will be described in terms of demographic characteristics using descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

  2. Determining the diagnostic accuracy of POCT PCT in identifying bacterial infection in outpatients with LRTI using portable commercially available BRAHMS PCT direct point-of-care test.

    For the diagnostic accuracy of the PCT the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) will be calculated.

    Time frame: up to 5 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical School Hannover
    Hannover, Lower Saxony 30625, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05380869
Lead sponsor
Hannover Medical School
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 19, 2022
Start date
Apr 1, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2021
Completion
Apr 30, 2021
Last update
May 19, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion