CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05378568Updated Feb 22, 2023

Implementation and Evaluation of the Selection Scheme of Peripheral Venous Infusion Devices for Hospitalized Children

An interventional study of the selection scheme of peripheral venous access devices and the existing nursing routine in Children,Hospitalized and Vascular Access Devices, sponsored by Children's Hospital of Fudan University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 28 Days to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-22.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital of Fudan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4,652
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
28 Days to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design. The object is to evaluate the influence on patient outcomes, medical staff's evidence-based practice behavior and hospital context after implementation of the selection scheme of venous access devices comes from" Evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice of intravenous infusion therapy in children". This study sought to compare the appropriateness of peripheral venous access device selection, to compare the incidence of infiltration and extravasation and the cost of venous infusion consumables before and after the implementation of the scheme.

Read the detailed description

This study aimed to improve the standardization and suitability of device use and reduce complications associated with intravenous fluids by implementing best practice evidence for intravenous fluid device selection in children. In 2021, the Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Pediatrics released the " Evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice of intravenous infusion therapy in children". The researchers used the evidence in this guideline as a standard to understand the current status of clinical intravenous infusion device selection and the gap between the current situation and the evidence. The evidence tailor, baseline review, develop implementation plan, conduct implementation research. A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial divided into 5 steps, 10 clusters(units), and the step size was one month. Each included ward of a tertiary first-class pediatric hospital was regarded as a group, and each step was included into randomized two groups, and the observation was maintained for one month until all units were included in the intervention in the fifth month, with a total of 6 research periods. Given the practicality of the study design, limited additional inclusion and exclusion criteria will be added.

02

Conditions studied

  • Children,Hospitalized
  • Vascular Access Devices

Keywords

  • pediatric
  • implementation study
  • peripheral venous access devices
  • selection
  • effect evaluation
  • appropriateness
  • randomised trial
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital of Fudan University is the lead sponsor of 262 studies on the registry; 92 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
28 Days to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria for nurses:

  • Nurses have been working in the siting more than 1 year
  • Nurses who can independently perform nursing operations (complete the contents related to intravenous infusion in the standardized training of hospital and pass the examination)

Inclusion Criteria for patients:

  • Patients receiving intravenous infusion
  • Hospitalized patients aged 28 days to 18 years

Exclusion Criteria for nurses:

  • Nurses who has not obtained the practicing qualification certificate
  • Nurses refused to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria for patients:

  • The indwelling time is less than 24h
  • Patients who were put into intravenous catheter at admission and did not receive new catheter during hospitalization
  • Patients with only one stat(st) order for intravenous infusion during hospitalization
  • Patients refused to participate in the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
4,652 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    the selection scheme of peripheral venous access devices

    To implement the selection scheme of peripheral venous access devices, based on the Clinical Practice Guideline on Infusion Therapy in Children. Then observe the appropriateness of peripheral venous access devices selection.

    Other: the selection scheme of peripheral venous access devices

  • Active comparator
    the existing nursing routine

    Follow the existing nursing routine of intravenous infusion and the selection of peripheral venous access devices.

    Other: the existing nursing routine

Interventions

  • Otherthe selection scheme of peripheral venous access devices

    Based on the "Facilitator Toolkit" of the promoting action on research implementation in health services integrated framework(i-PARIHS), the implementation plan of peripheral intravenous infusion device selection in hospitalized children was formulated and applied, so as to change the practice behavior of nurses in the intervention group. The specific process mainly includes: tailoring evidence; baseline review; situational analysis; promotion and implementation strategy like lectures, group discussions, operation demonstrations, and scenario simulations.

  • Otherthe existing nursing routine

    To choose infusion device according to nurse's working experience. First, nurse placed a peripheral intravenous catheter. The patients and family decide whether to place the central intravenous infusion device according to the recommendation of the medical staff.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Error rate in peripheral intravenous infusion device selection

    The selection is made according to the recommendation of the guidelines. Those who conform to the recommendation are correct, those who do not conform are wrong. Calculation method: the error rate = (the number of cases with wrong peripheral intravenous infusion device selection)/(the total number of cases using peripheral intravenous infusion device)\* 100%.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The knowledge level of nurses' intravenous infusion device selection

    The questionnaire has a total of 50 questions, 24 choice questions, 12 judgment questions, and 14 fill-in-the-blank questions, each with 2 points, and the total score is 100 points. Before and after the implementation of the program, the evaluation will be conducted, a score of less than 60 is considered a failure, and a score of more than 80 is considered excellent.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Compliance of evidence-based practice behavior of nurses

    compliance of each review indicator = (the number of correct implementation of this indicator by nurses)/(the total number of reviews of this indicator) \*100%

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Incidence of infiltration and/or extravasation

    The bedside nurses document the number of incidents of peripheral venous infiltration and extravasation using "Pediatric Peripheral Venous Infiltration Scale". The incidence of infiltration and/or extravasation = (case numbers of infiltration and/or extravasation)/(Catheter Days per Month)×1000‰.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. The cost of intravenous infusion consumables

    including intravenous infusion devices (including the total number of catheters consumed by successful catheter placement and failed puncture), dress, central venous maintenance kits, infusion connectors, and tees.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Implementation process evaluation based on "Reach*Efficacy(RE)-Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance(AIM)" framework

    including Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance. Reach refers to the participation rate of training courses; Efficacy refers to the change of knowledge level and compliance of evidence-based practice behavior of nurses in the intervention group; Adoption refers to the proportion of evidence actually adopted by nurses in the intervention group and the changes of context; Implementation refers to the completion rate of each training plan in the implementation strategy;Maintenance refers to evaluating the maintenance of the selection scheme.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Hospital of Fudan University
    Shanghai, Shanghai 201102, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05378568
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital of Fudan University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 18, 2022
Start date
May 30, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2022
Completion
Oct 30, 2022
Last update
Feb 22, 2023

Study contacts

Ying Gu, doctor
study chair · Children's Hospital of Fudan University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion