CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05372393PERSONNELUpdated Sep 19, 2025

Carpal Tunnel Release Under Local Anaesthesia With or Without Distal Median Nerve Block

An interventional study of Local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release and Distal median nerve block with local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, sponsored by Kuopio University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Finland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-19.

Sponsored by Kuopio University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
118
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most commonly appearing entrapment neuropathy of the upper extremity. Treatment options include both non-operative and operative methods. Surgical treatment, carpal tunnel release (CTR), involves division of the transverse carpal ligament. Surgery can be performed under axillary or intravenous block, or general anaesthesia. There are no prior randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing local infiltration anaesthesia to local infiltration anaesthesia augmented with a distal median nerve block in CTR.

The aim of this trial is to investigate whether adding a distal median nerve block to local anaesthesia reduces the patient's perceived pain level for up to 72 hours after CTR, compared to using only local anaesthesia, i.e., an anaesthesia mixture injected solely in and around the planned incision and nerve release. The null hypothesis is that the use of distal median nerve block with local anaesthesia does not reduce pain after CTR compared to pure local anaesthesia.

PERSONNEL (carPal tunnEl ReleaSe lOcal iNfiltratioN mEdian bLockade) is a double-blinded, i.e., patient and investigators, RCT in patients with CTS. Patients will be randomly divided into two parallel trial groups, 1:1 in size to each other. Fifty-nine patients will be needed for each group to have adequate power. The primary outcome is the pain level perceived by the patient after the procedure during the first 72 hours using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include patient-rated outcome measures, safety, the entire consumption of pain killers after the surgery during the first 72 hours postoperatively, pain of performing the anaesthesia, and pain during and after the operation.

No trial comparing local anaesthesia to local anaesthesia augmented with distal median nerve block has been published before. There is also no trial noting individual tolerance to pain. The quality of the median nerve block at the wrist has been achieved by using sensory or sensory-motor nerve stimulation and has been proven effective. This increases trust in the effectiveness of the treatment method, but it still needs to be adequately proven which is the goal of this trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Keywords

  • carpal tunnel syndrome
  • carpal tunnel release
  • local anaesthesia
  • surgery
  • wide-awake local anaesthesia with no tourniquet
  • nerve block
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years of age
  • CTS verified by nerve conduction studies
  • Symptoms suitable for CTS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent CTS
  • Peripheral neuropathies
  • Known allergy to the trial drugs
  • Profound cognitive impairment
  • Pregnancy
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
118 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release

    The investigators allocate 59 patients in this arm. It serves as the control group, who receives local infiltration anaesthesia.

    Procedure: Local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release

  • Experimental
    Distal median nerve block with local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release

    The investigators allocate 59 patients in this arm. It serves as the experimental group, who receives local infiltration anaesthesia and distal median nerve block.

    Procedure: Distal median nerve block with local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release

Interventions

  • ProcedureLocal infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release

    The anaesthetic cocktail consists of 1 ml of (7.5%) sodium bicarbonate (Natriumbicarbonate Braun 75mg/ml), 4,5 ml of lidocaine with adrenaline 1% (Lidocain cum adrenalin 10 mg/ml), 4,5 ml of bupivacaine with adrenaline 0.5% (Marcain cum adrenalin 5mg/ml +5 µg/ml). The anaesthetic cocktail must be prepared in the above-mentioned order to avoid possible precipitation. A 24-gauge hypodermic needle and 10 ml syringe are used to inject the solution. The care provider pinches from the area of median nerve blockade prior to performing local anaesthesia. All the anaesthetic solution is injected locally. Additional anaesthetic solution can be injected locally if necessary.

  • ProcedureDistal median nerve block with local infiltration anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release

    The anaesthetic cocktail consists of 1 ml of (7.5%) sodium bicarbonate (Natriumbicarbonate Braun 75mg/ml), 4,5 ml of lidocaine with adrenaline 1% (Lidocain cum adrenalin 10 mg/ml), 4,5 ml of bupivacaine with adrenaline 0.5% (Marcain cum adrenalin 5mg/ml +5 µg/ml). The anaesthetic cocktail must be prepared in the above-mentioned order to avoid possible precipitation. A 24-gauge hypodermic needle and 10 ml syringe are used to inject the solution. Half of the anaesthetic solution is injected into the median nerve area 5-7 cm proximally from the distal wrist crease. The other half is injected locally. Additional anaesthetic solution can be injected locally if necessary.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The pain level perceived by the patient after the procedure using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The investigators measure the pain level perceived by the patient after the procedure every fourth hour while awake until third night postoperatively using VAS. The first assessment is performed four hours after the surgery. The mean VAS is calculated from all time points over the 72-hour period. The Visual analogue Scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Postoperatively during the first 72 hours after the operation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pressure pain (VAS)

    The investigators ask the patients to evaluate the pressure pain that the infiltration of the anaesthetic solution caused using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The Visual Analogue Scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Immediately after the infiltration of anaesthetic solution

  2. Burning pain (VAS)

    The investigators ask the patients to evaluate the burning pain that the infiltration of the anaesthetic solution caused using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The Visual Analogue Scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Immediately after the infiltration of anaesthetic solution

  3. Needle sting pain (VAS)

    The investigators ask the patients to evaluate the needle sting pain that the infiltration of the anaesthetic solution caused using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The Visual Analogue Scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Immediately after the infiltration of anaesthetic solution

  4. Total pain during the injection of the anaesthetic solution (VAS)

    The investigators ask the patients to evaluate the total pain that the infiltration of the anaesthetic solution caused using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The Visual Analogue Scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Immediately after the infiltration of anaesthetic solution

  5. Worst pain during the operation (VAS)

    The investigators ask the patients to evaluate the worst pain during the operation using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The Visual Analogue Scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Immediately after the operation

  6. Duration of anaesthesia

    The investigators assess the length of the anaesthesia by asking the patients to fill an online form when they first time feel pain in the operation field or have to use pain killers.

    Time frame: Postoperatively during the first 72 hours after the operation

  7. Self-reported symptom severity and functional status

    The investigators ask the patients to evaluate their symptoms using Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) score. It consists of the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) containing 11 questions, and it uses a five-point Likert rating scale from 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (most severe symptoms), and Functional Status Scale (FSS), which has 8 questions assessing the degree of complaints on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (most severe symptoms). Mean sum scores of both scales are calculated and used for analysis.

    Time frame: Before and 3 months postoperatively

  8. Patient satisfaction

    Patients evaluate how likely they would recommend the procedure to a fellow man using Net Promoter Score (NPS). Net Promoter Score is a measurement taken from asking patients how likely they are to recommend the procedure to others on a scale of 0-10. The higher score the better outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

  9. Adverse events (AE)

    Health care professional assessment

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

  10. Expected pain (VAS)

    The investigators ask the patient to evaluate the pain during the infiltration of the anaestetic solution using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The Visual Analogue Scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Before the infiltration of the anaesthetic solution

  11. Amount of perceived needle stings

    The investigators ask the patient to report how many needle stings they felt when the anaesthesia was performed.

    Time frame: Immediately after the infiltration of anaesthetic solution

  12. Consumption of pain killers

    The investigators record the consumption of pain killers after surgery

    Time frame: Postoperatively during the first 72 hours after the operation

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Kuopio University hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery
    Kuopio, Northern Savonia 70210, Finland
    • Yrjänä Nietosvaara, Prof. · Contact · yrjana.nietosvaara@pshyvinvointialue.fi · +358447176883
    • Noora Heikkinen · Sub investigator
    • Mikko Räisänen · Sub investigator
    • Mikael Hytönen · Sub investigator
    • Aukusti Savolainen · Sub investigator
    • Joonas Sirola · Sub investigator
    • Aleksi Reito · Sub investigator
    • Yrjänä Nietosvaara · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Shi Q, MacDermid JC. Is surgical intervention more effective than non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome? A systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Apr 11;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-17. PubMed 21477381 ↗
  • Piazzini DB, Aprile I, Ferrara PE, Bertolini C, Tonali P, Maggi L, Rabini A, Piantelli S, Padua L. A systematic review of conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rehabil. 2007 Apr;21(4):299-314. doi: 10.1177/0269215507077294. PubMed 17613571 ↗
  • Keir PJ, Rempel DM. Pathomechanics of peripheral nerve loading. Evidence in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Ther. 2005 Apr-Jun;18(2):259-69. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.02.001. PubMed 15891983 ↗
  • Kozak A, Schedlbauer G, Wirth T, Euler U, Westermann C, Nienhaus A. Association between work-related biomechanical risk factors and the occurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome: an overview of systematic reviews and a meta-analysis of current research. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Sep 1;16:231. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0685-0. PubMed 26323649 ↗
  • Padua L, Di Pasquale A, Pazzaglia C, Liotta GA, Librante A, Mondelli M. Systematic review of pregnancy-related carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2010 Nov;42(5):697-702. doi: 10.1002/mus.21910. PubMed 20976778 ↗
  • Mondelli M, Giannini F, Giacchi M. Carpal tunnel syndrome incidence in a general population. Neurology. 2002 Jan 22;58(2):289-94. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.2.289. PubMed 11805259 ↗
  • Shiri R, Pourmemari MH, Falah-Hassani K, Viikari-Juntura E. The effect of excess body mass on the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of 58 studies. Obes Rev. 2015 Dec;16(12):1094-104. doi: 10.1111/obr.12324. Epub 2015 Sep 23. PubMed 26395787 ↗
  • Shiri R. Hypothyroidism and carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Muscle Nerve. 2014 Dec;50(6):879-83. doi: 10.1002/mus.24453. Epub 2014 Oct 30. PubMed 25204641 ↗
  • Pourmemari MH, Shiri R. Diabetes as a risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2016 Jan;33(1):10-6. doi: 10.1111/dme.12855. Epub 2015 Aug 18. PubMed 26173490 ↗
  • Chammas M, Boretto J, Burmann LM, Ramos RM, Dos Santos Neto FC, Silva JB. Carpal tunnel syndrome - Part I (anatomy, physiology, etiology and diagnosis). Rev Bras Ortop. 2014 Aug 20;49(5):429-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.08.001. eCollection 2014 Sep-Oct. PubMed 26229841 ↗
  • Genova A, Dix O, Saefan A, Thakur M, Hassan A. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Review of Literature. Cureus. 2020 Mar 19;12(3):e7333. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7333. PubMed 32313774 ↗
  • Kim PT, Lee HJ, Kim TG, Jeon IH. Current approaches for carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;6(3):253-7. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.3.253. Epub 2014 Aug 5. PubMed 25177448 ↗
  • Wang L. Guiding Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018 Nov;29(4):751-760. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Sep 17. PubMed 30293628 ↗
  • Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, Pazzaglia C, Paolasso I, Loreti C, Caliandro P, Hobson-Webb LD. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Nov;15(12):1273-1284. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30231-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11. PubMed 27751557 ↗
  • Wipperman J, Goerl K. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2016 Dec 15;94(12):993-999. PubMed 28075090 ↗
  • Delaunay L, Chelly JE. Blocks at the wrist provide effective anesthesia for carpal tunnel release. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Jul-Aug;48(7):656-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03016199. PubMed 11495872 ↗
  • Cranford CS, Ho JY, Kalainov DM, Hartigan BJ. Carpal tunnel syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Sep;15(9):537-48. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200709000-00004. PubMed 17761610 ↗
  • Shiri R. Arthritis as a risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2016 Oct;45(5):339-46. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2015.1114141. Epub 2016 Mar 29. PubMed 27022991 ↗
  • Ozdag Y, Hu Y, Hayes DS, Manzar S, Akoon A, Klena JC, Grandizio LC. Sensitivity and Specificity of Examination Maneuvers for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2023 Jul 24;15(7):e42383. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42383. eCollection 2023 Jul. PubMed 37621797 ↗
  • Iqbal HJ, Doorgakant A, Rehmatullah NNT, Ramavath AL, Pidikiti P, Lipscombe S. Pain and outcomes of carpal tunnel release under local anaesthetic with or without a tourniquet: a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018 Oct;43(8):808-812. doi: 10.1177/1753193418778999. Epub 2018 Jun 5. PubMed 29871567 ↗
  • Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x. PubMed 16000093 ↗
  • Jarvinen TL, Sihvonen R, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Malmivaara A, Paavola M, Schunemann HJ, Guyatt GH. Blinded interpretation of study results can feasibly and effectively diminish interpretation bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):769-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.011. Epub 2014 Feb 20. PubMed 24560088 ↗
  • Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2020 Feb 5;368:m358. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m358. No abstract available. PubMed 32024659 ↗
  • Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, Powell AP. Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):927-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.021. Epub 2009 Jun 16. PubMed 19535272 ↗
  • Heikkinen N, Nietosvaara Y, Reito A, Sirola J, Hytonen M, Savolainen A, Raisanen MP. Carpal tunnel release under local anesthesia with or without distal median nerve block: Double-blind randomized clinical trial. Scand J Surg. 2025 Mar;114(1):13-21. doi: 10.1177/14574969241277028. Epub 2024 Sep 19. PubMed 39297416 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — This trial will share data with researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal after its completion, as well as with reviewers of the journal where the trial results will be published, if necessary.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05372393
Lead sponsor
Kuopio University Hospital
Collaborators
University of Eastern Finland
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 12, 2022
Start date
Sep 21, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 19, 2025

Study contacts

Noora Heikkinen, MBBS
Contact
noorheik@student.uef.fi
+358504421930
Yrjänä Nietosvaara, Prof.
Contact
yrjana.nietosvaara@pshyvinvointialue.fi
+358447176883
Yrjänä Nietosvaara, Prof.
study director · Kuopio University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion