ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05368974TiP-HepCUpdated Dec 18, 2024

The Treatment in Pregnancy for Hepatitis C ("TiP-HepC") Registry

An observational study in Hepatitis C, sponsored by The Task Force for Global Health. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-18.

Sponsored by The Task Force for Global Health · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Feb 2022; still recruiting 4 years 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Clinical interventions to reduce the risk of vertical transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection from mother to infant are highly limited. Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications have demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy in non-pregnant individuals, but there is a lack of data regarding the safety of these medications in pregnant women and the effectiveness of these medications in reducing mother-to-child transmission. Therefore, although HCV screening during pregnancy is now recommended in many countries, there is no approved treatment for HCV during pregnancy. An observational study is here proposed to assess outcomes of mother-infant pairs exposed to DAAs during pregnancy within a global clinical case registry. Data regarding the exposures and outcomes of mother-infant pairs exposed to DAAs during pregnancy will be solicited and collected from clinical providers, healthcare facilities, HCV treatment programs, and other clinical practices worldwide. Data will be shared and maintained within a secure database, and cumulative data will be analyzed at pre-determined six-month intervals. The primary outcome will be the number and proportion of mother-infant pairs with adverse pregnancy or birth outcomes. The results of this study will inform HCV treatment decisions by clinical providers and programs worldwide.

Read the detailed description

In 2016, approximately 6% of all women who were tested for HCV during pregnancy in the United States were HCV antibody-positive. That year, there were 14,417 live births delivered by HCV-positive women, which comprised 0.38% of all live births in the US. Globally, the HCV prevalence among pregnant women varies widely (0.06%-7%) depending on regional and local epidemiology and risk factors. Approximately 5.8% of infants born to HCV-infected mothers will acquire HCV infection with higher rates of transmission among women with HIV co-infection. The primary route for the vertical transmission of HCV is believed to be the perinatal exposure of the infant to maternal blood, though in utero transmission also occurs.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing for pregnant women is now recommended in many countries and universal HCV screening for pregnant women was adopted in the United States in 2020. No clinical interventions have been proven to reduce perinatal HCV transmission, but current and clinical practice guidelines include recommendations for the avoidance of potentially invasive procedures during delivery (ie, chorionic villus sampling, fetal scalp monitoring, episiotomy). The effect of virologic suppression or cure of HCV infection during pregnancy on the risk of mother-to-child HCV transmission has not been directly studied. Previous HCV treatment regimens were contra-indicated in pregnancy due to the inclusion of ribavirin and other teratogenic drugs. More recently, interferon- and ribavirin-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications have raised the potential for HCV treatment during pregnancy to prevent perinatal transmission of HCV and allow for treatment of women during pregnancy. Over half of women reported a preference for HCV treatment during pregnancy if it reduced the probability of vertical transmission to the infant. In addition to potentially reducing vertical transmission to the infant during the current pregnancy, treatment during pregnancy can increase the number of women treated for HCV, and decrease the likelihood of being infected during subsequent pregnancies. Many vulnerable women are at high-risk for loss-to-follow-up following delivery and many women living with HCV may only be eligible for health insurance during pregnancy and immediately postpartum.

Several DAA regimens have demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy profiles in non-pregnant individuals across multiple or all HCV genotypes, achieving cure in >95% of people in as few as 8 weeks of once-daily oral treatment. However, there are limited data regarding the safety and efficacy of DAAs in pregnancy. A phase I pharmacokinetic study of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) in 9 pregnant women demonstrated similar drug levels to non-pregnant individuals with excellent safety and efficacy profile, and a similar study of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) is currently enrolling participants. A prospective study of 15 women treated with SOF/LDV in India reported no adverse events. No other trials have been conducted or registered for pregnant individuals to date. The frequency and outcomes for women who become pregnant while on DAA treatment have been rarely reported. Currently, there is only one published study reporting outcomes of mother-infant pairs of women who became pregnant while on DAA treatment; among 100 women, 9 of whom completed 12 weeks of treatment with various regimens, no major adverse events were reported.

Given the paucity of data regarding the safety and efficacy of DAA treatment in pregnancy, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommend that DAAs "only be initiated in the setting of a clinical trial during pregnancy and that people who become pregnant while taking a direct-acting antiviral should be counseled in a shared decision-making framework about the risks and benefits of continuation." The Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (IDSA/AASLD) advise that "treatment can be considered during pregnancy on an individual basis after a patient-physician discussion about the potential risks and benefits". Treatment for HCV in pregnancy therefore remains an off-label use of DAA medications and clinical practices remain highly variable by providers and programs. The frequency, geographic distribution, safety profile or effectiveness of HCV treatment during pregnancy for mother-infant pairs have not been evaluated or reported.

The primary objective of this observational study is to assess the safety of DAA treatment in mother-infant pairs with exposure to DAA medications during pregnancy within a clinical case registry. The secondary objectives of this study are to describe the frequency and distribution of known cases of DAA exposure during pregnancy and to assess the effectiveness of DAA treatment in pregnancy in achieving HCV cure for mothers and reducing the transmission of HCV from mother to infant.

This is an observational study of the outcomes of mother-infant pairs exposed to DAA treatment during pregnancy in routine clinical practice using de-identified data from a convenience sample of health facilities, public health, government, and private entities globally. Data regarding the demographics, baseline clinical status, timing and type of DAA exposure, and pregnancy/birth outcomes of mother-infant pairs exposed to DAAs during pregnancy will be solicited from clinical providers, health facilities, HCV treatment programs, and other clinical practices or programs prescribing DAA treatment. Data will be coded, standardized, and pooled in a common database for analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatitis C

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pregnancy
  • hepatitis C
03

In context

Hepatitis C

1,743 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis C; 97 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 218 across 435 observational studies indexed under Hepatitis C.

Browse Hepatitis C studies →

Lead sponsor

The Task Force for Global Health is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Individuals with chronic HCV infection and documented pregnancy

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

-Documented pregnancy with: Estimated date of conception by documentation of either 1) date of last menstrual period or 2) ultrasound evaluation Actual date of delivery

  • Documented chronic infection prior to or during pregnancy (positive test for HCV RNA or HCV core antigen)
  • Documented DAA exposure occurring within 30 days of the estimated date of conception and before the pregnancy outcome (ie, fetal demise, spontaneous abortion, live delivery, etc). Eligible DAA drugs are listed in Appendix 1.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • DAA exposures that include ribavirin or interferon will be excluded given their established harm during pregnancy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DrugDirect Acting Antivirals

    Direct-acting antiviral exposure during documented pregnancy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of adverse pregnancy outcomes

    The primary outcomes measured in the study are adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes documented at the time of the outcome of the pregnancy (primary endpoint). Primary adverse pregnancy outcomes include preterm delivery (\<37 weeks gestational age), stillbirth or fetal demise, and maternal death.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Number of adverse birth outcomes

    Primary adverse birth outcomes include low birth weight (\<2500g), small for gestational age, need for neonatal intensive care, and presence of congenital anomaly.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of registry participants achieving SVR12

    Secondary outcomes of the study are the proportion of women achieving HCV cure by HCV PCR test 12 weeks following last DAA treatment (SVR12)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Proportion of infants with HCV infection

    proportion of infants with evidence of chronic HCV infection after 2 months of age by HCV PCR or after 18 months of age by anti-HCV antibody seropositivity

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The Taskforce for Global Health
    Atlanta, Georgia 30030, United States
    Recruiting
    • Lindsey Hiebert · Contactlhiebert@taskforce.org · 4043014134
    • John Ward, MD · Contact
    • Neil Gupta, MD · Contact
08

References and documents

Publications

  • AASLD & IDSA. HCV Guidance: Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C, v2021.1.
  • AbdAllah M, Alboraie M, Abdel-Razek W, Hassany M, Ammar I, Kamal E, Alalfy M, Okasha A, El Akel W, Shaaban E, Elbaz T, Hefny Z, Gomaa A, El-Bendary M, El-Serafy M, Esmat G, Doss W, El-Sayed MH. Pregnancy outcome of anti-HCV direct-acting antivirals: Real-life data from an Egyptian cohort. Liver Int. 2021 Jul;41(7):1494-1497. doi: 10.1111/liv.14913. Epub 2021 May 11. PubMed 33905164 ↗
  • Benova L, Mohamoud YA, Calvert C, Abu-Raddad LJ. Vertical transmission of hepatitis C virus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Sep 15;59(6):765-73. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu447. Epub 2014 Jun 13. PubMed 24928290 ↗
  • Chappell CA, Scarsi KK, Kirby BJ, Suri V, Gaggar A, Bogen DL, Macio IS, Meyn LA, Bunge KE, Krans EE, Hillier SL. Ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir in pregnant women with hepatitis C virus infection: a phase 1 pharmacokinetic study. Lancet Microbe. 2020 Sep;1(5):e200-e208. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30062-8. Epub 2020 Jul 27. PubMed 32939459 ↗
  • Cottrell EB, Chou R, Wasson N, Rahman B, Guise JM. Reducing risk for mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C virus: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jan 15;158(2):109-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-2-201301150-00575. PubMed 23437438 ↗
  • Kushner T, Cohen J, Tien PC, Terrault NA. Evaluating Women's Preferences for Hepatitis C Treatment During Pregnancy. Hepatol Commun. 2018 Oct 1;2(11):1306-1310. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1264. eCollection 2018 Nov. PubMed 30411077 ↗
  • Kushner T, Reau N. Changing epidemiology, implications, and recommendations for hepatitis C in women of childbearing age and during pregnancy. J Hepatol. 2021 Mar;74(3):734-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.027. Epub 2020 Nov 25. PubMed 33248169 ↗
  • Mok J, Pembrey L, Tovo PA, Newell ML; European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Network. When does mother to child transmission of hepatitis C virus occur? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 Mar;90(2):F156-60. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.059436. PubMed 15724041 ↗
  • Schillie SF, Canary L, Koneru A, Nelson NP, Tanico W, Kaufman HW, Hariri S, Vellozzi CJ. Hepatitis C Virus in Women of Childbearing Age, Pregnant Women, and Children. Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):633-641. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.029. PubMed 30342628 ↗
  • Schillie S, Wester C, Osborne M, Wesolowski L, Ryerson AB. CDC Recommendations for Hepatitis C Screening Among Adults - United States, 2020. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020 Apr 10;69(2):1-17. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6902a1. PubMed 32271723 ↗
  • Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org; Dotters-Katz SK, Kuller JA, Hughes BL. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #56: Hepatitis C in pregnancy-updated guidelines: Replaces Consult Number 43, November 2017. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;225(3):B8-B18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jun 8. PubMed 34116035 ↗
  • Yattoo G. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir combination during pregnancy. Hepatol Int. 2018;12(Suppl. 2):S292-3.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 52 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 26, 2022
First posted
May 10, 2022
StartActual
Feb 11, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
Last update
Dec 18, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05368974
Lead sponsor
The Task Force for Global Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 10, 2022
Start date
Feb 11, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 18, 2024

Study contacts

Neil Gupta, MD
Contact
ngupta-consultant@taskforce.org
4043014134
Lindsey Hiebert
Contact
lhiebert@taskforce.org
4043014134
John Ward, MD
principal investigator · The Taskforce For Global Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion