CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05364554FRONTIER 2Updated Jun 1, 2026Results posted

A Long-term Extension Study of JNJ-77242113 in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 2 interventional study of JNJ-77242113 in Plaque Psoriasis, sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Completed at 60 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-01.

Sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
227
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term clinical response of JNJ-77242113 treatment in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Read the detailed description

The populations of people living with moderate to severe psoriasis is approximately 3.5 billion which are mostly managed with topical and conventional therapies. JNJ-77242113, investigational drug, targets the immune responses in the body and skin which impacts diseases, such as psoriasis and this study evaluates JNJ-77242113 as options of advanced therapies in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This is a long-term extension study of JNJ-77242113 in eligible participants who have completed the Week 16 visit of the originating Study 77242113PSO2001. The total duration of this study will be up to 40 weeks which will include a 36-week treatment period, and a 4-week safety follow-up period after the last study intervention administration. Safety will be assessed by adverse events (AEs), clinical safety laboratory assessments, electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs and physical examinations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Plaque Psoriasis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC is the lead sponsor of 912 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 278 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 131 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Must have completed the Week 16 visit in Protocol 77242113PSO2001
  • In the opinion of the investigator, may benefit from inclusion in this long term extension (LTE) study
  • Must agree to avoid prolonged sun exposure and avoid use of tanning booths or other ultraviolet light sources during the study
  • Must agree to discontinue all topical therapies that could affect psoriasis or the psoriasis area severity index (PASI) or investigator's global assessment (IGA) evaluation, other than nonmedicated emollient and salicylic acid shampoos, prior to first administration of study intervention
  • Agree not to receive a live virus or live bacterial vaccination during the study, or within 4 weeks after the last administration of study intervention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Was permanently discontinued from study intervention in Protocol 77242113PSO2001 for any reason
  • Has received any biologic therapy or experimental therapy since completion of the originating study, 77242113PSO2001
  • Has received any live virus or bacterial vaccination within 12 weeks before the first administration of study intervention
  • Has received the bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine within 12 months of the first administration of study intervention
  • Currently has hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) positive, or has other clinically active liver disease, or tests positive for HBsAg or anti-HCV
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
227 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1: JNJ-77242113 Dose 1 Once Daily (QD)

    Participants originally randomized to JNJ-77242113 Dose 1 QD in originating study 77242113PSO2001 will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 Dose 1 QD from Week 0 through Week 36 in this study.

    Drug: JNJ-77242113

  • Experimental
    Group 2: JNJ-77242113 Dose 2 QD

    Participants originally randomized to JNJ-77242113 Dose 2 QD in originating study 77242113PSO2001 will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 Dose 2 QD from Week 0 through Week 36 in this study.

    Drug: JNJ-77242113

  • Experimental
    Group 3: JNJ-77242113 Dose 3 QD

    Participants originally randomized to JNJ-77242113 Dose 3 QD in originating study 77242113PSO2001 will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 Dose 3 QD from Week 0 through Week 36 in this study.

    Drug: JNJ-77242113

  • Experimental
    Group 4: JNJ-77242113 Dose 1 Twice Daily (BID)

    Participants originally randomized to JNJ-77242113 Dose 1 BID in originating study 77242113PSO2001 will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 Dose 1 BID from Week 0 through Week 36 in this study.

    Drug: JNJ-77242113

  • Experimental
    Group 5: JNJ-77242113 Dose 3 BID

    Participants originally randomized to JNJ-77242113 Dose 3 BID in originating study 77242113PSO2001 will continue to receive JNJ-77242113 Dose 3 BID from Week 0 through Week 36 in this study.

    Drug: JNJ-77242113

  • Experimental
    Group 6: JNJ-77242113 Dose 3 QD

    Participants originally randomized to placebo in originating Study 77242113PSO2001 will receive JNJ-77242113 Dose 3 QD from Week 0 through Week 36 in this study.

    Drug: JNJ-77242113

Interventions

  • DrugJNJ-77242113

    JNJ-77242113 tablet will be administered orally.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index Score (PASI-75) at LTE Week 36

    Percentage of participants who achieved \>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI score at LTE Week 36 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score (PASI-90) at LTE Week 36

    Percentage of participants who achieved \>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI score at LTE Week 36 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score (PASI-100) at LTE Week 36

    Percentage of participants who achieved 100% improvement from baseline in PASI score at LTE Week 36 was reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe and 4=very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range on a scale of 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)

  3. Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at LTE Week 36

    Change from baseline in PASI total score at LTE Week 36 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at LTE Week 36

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (\>)1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Time frame: At LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)

  5. Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at LTE Week 36

    Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at LTE Week 36 was reported. PSSD was a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD: self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales were answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0=least severe and 100=most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. Baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)

  6. Change From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at LTE Week 36

    Change from baseline in PSSD sign scores at LTE Week 36 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily sign score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 6 items) on these scales were answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that sign score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal (=) 0 at LTE Week 36 Among Participants With a Baseline (Week 0 of the Originating Study) Symptoms Score >=1

    The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value is converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSD Signs Score=0 at Week 36 Among Participants With a Baseline (Week 0 of the Originating Study) Signs Score >=1

    The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily sign score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 6 items) on these scales are answered. The average value is converted into 0-100 scoring, such that sign score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any AE that occurred after receiving the treatment in originating study (77242113PSO2001). TEAEs and TESAEs that occurred during this study are reported.

    Time frame: From LTE Week 0 up to LTE Week 40

07

Results

Posted Jun 1, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
Started353539404038
Completed292733303335
Not completed6861073
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject543741
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up021211
Withdrew: Other122121

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index Score (PASI-75) at LTE Week 36

Percentage of participants who achieved \>=75% improvement from baseline in PASI score at LTE Week 36 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index Score (PASI-75) at LTE Week 36
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index Score (PASI-75) at LTE Week 3665.748.869.858.565.176.2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score (PASI-90) at LTE Week 36

Percentage of participants who achieved \>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI score at LTE Week 36 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score (PASI-90) at LTE Week 36
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score (PASI-90) at LTE Week 3657.127.941.936.651.264.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score (PASI-100) at LTE Week 36

Percentage of participants who achieved 100% improvement from baseline in PASI score at LTE Week 36 was reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body was divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe and 4=very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range on a scale of 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score (PASI-100) at LTE Week 36
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score (PASI-100) at LTE Week 3634.314.020.917.125.640.5
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PASI Total Score at LTE Week 36

Change from baseline in PASI total score at LTE Week 36 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at LTE Week 36
Units on a scalePlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at LTE Week 36-14.15 ± 8.068-13.55 ± 8.232-14.45 ± 6.878-13.24 ± 8.981-15.81 ± 8.908-18.46 ± 7.892
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at LTE Week 36

The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (\>)1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

Time frame:
At LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at LTE Week 36
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at LTE Week 3665.737.260.546.360.573.8
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at LTE Week 36

Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at LTE Week 36 was reported. PSSD was a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD: self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales were answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0=least severe and 100=most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. Baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at LTE Week 36
Units on a scalePlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at LTE Week 36-29.5 ± 25.59-30.1 ± 28.09-35.2 ± 30.81-31.2 ± 28.48-29.4 ± 27.41-47.7 ± 28.04
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at LTE Week 36

Change from baseline in PSSD sign scores at LTE Week 36 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily sign score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 6 items) on these scales were answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that sign score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at LTE Week 36
Units on a scalePlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
Change From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at LTE Week 36-42.8 ± 28.65-35.2 ± 29.02-39.2 ± 31.64-36.6 ± 29.16-43.1 ± 26.87-53.1 ± 22.03
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal (=) 0 at LTE Week 36 Among Participants With a Baseline (Week 0 of the Originating Study) Symptoms Score >=1

The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value is converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal (=) 0 at LTE Week 36 Among Participants With a Baseline (Week 0 of the Originating Study) Symptoms Score >=1
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal (=) 0 at LTE Week 36 Among Participants With a Baseline (Week 0 of the Originating Study) Symptoms Score >=134.318.621.417.130.226.2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving PSSD Signs Score=0 at Week 36 Among Participants With a Baseline (Week 0 of the Originating Study) Signs Score >=1

The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily sign score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 6 items) on these scales are answered. The average value is converted into 0-100 scoring, such that sign score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of first study drug administration date in 77242113PSO2001 study.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0 of originating study 77242113PSO2001), LTE Week 36 (52 weeks from originating study baseline)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSD Signs Score=0 at Week 36 Among Participants With a Baseline (Week 0 of the Originating Study) Signs Score >=1
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSD Signs Score=0 at Week 36 Among Participants With a Baseline (Week 0 of the Originating Study) Signs Score >=122.916.311.612.214.016.7
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any AE that occurred after receiving the treatment in originating study (77242113PSO2001). TEAEs and TESAEs that occurred during this study are reported.

Time frame:
From LTE Week 0 up to LTE Week 40
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
ParticipantsPlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
TEAEs231819272719
TESAEs102321

Adverse events

Collected over From LTE Week 0 up to LTE Week 40. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QD0/35 (0%)1/35 (2.9%)14/35 (40%)
JNJ-77242113 25 mg QD0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)13/35 (37.1%)
JNJ-77242113 50 mg QD0/39 (0%)2/39 (5.1%)15/39 (38.5%)
JNJ-77242113 25 mg BID0/40 (0%)3/40 (7.5%)17/40 (42.5%)
JNJ-77242113 100 mg QD0/40 (0%)2/40 (5%)20/40 (50%)
JNJ-77242113 100 mg BID0/38 (0%)1/38 (2.6%)15/38 (39.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
Cerebrovascular AccidentNervous system disorders1/350/350/390/400/400/38
Uterine LeiomyomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/350/350/390/400/401/38
Coronary Artery DiseaseCardiac disorders0/350/351/390/400/400/38
Non-Cardiac Chest PainGeneral disorders0/350/351/390/400/400/38
Foot DeformityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/350/351/390/400/400/38
Ventricular DysfunctionCardiac disorders0/350/350/391/400/400/38
DiverticulitisInfections and infestations0/350/350/390/401/400/38
Ligament InjuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/350/350/391/400/400/38
Intervertebral Disc ProtrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/350/350/390/401/400/38
Tonsillar HypertrophyRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/350/350/391/400/400/38
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BID
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations9/353/357/396/4011/405/38
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations4/356/353/393/402/404/38
Covid-19Infections and infestations2/351/353/391/402/403/38
BronchitisInfections and infestations1/351/353/391/400/400/38
InfluenzaInfections and infestations1/350/351/393/401/401/38
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/352/350/393/403/400/38
Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations2/351/351/391/400/402/38
Alanine Aminotransferase IncreasedInvestigations2/351/351/390/400/402/38
Aspartate Aminotransferase IncreasedInvestigations1/351/351/390/400/402/38
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/350/350/390/402/400/38

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Placebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDTotal
Mean44.3 ± 13.9645.1 ± 12.4344.6 ± 9.5146.1 ± 11.7543.8 ± 14.0341.6 ± 11.7144.2 ± 12.25
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDTotal
Female1591511101171
Male202624293027156
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDTotal
Hispanic or Latino32433217
Not Hispanic or Latino323234363736207
Unknown or Not Reported0111003
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0021104
Asian59977845
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0002002
Black or African American0002013
White302527273228169
More than one race0000000
Unknown or Not Reported0111014
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Placebo Then JNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg QDJNJ-77242113 50 mg QDJNJ-77242113 25 mg BIDJNJ-77242113 100 mg QDJNJ-77242113 100 mg BIDTotal
Canada76475534
France0121015
Germany66579538
Japan32334419
Poland69119121057
Korea, South12311311
Spain2112118
Taiwan14332013
United Kingdom2000013
United States74776839
08

Study locations

60 sites
  • Pacific Skin Institute
    Sacramento, California 95815, United States
  • Renstar Medical Research
    Ocala, Florida 34470, United States
  • Forcare Clinical Research Inc
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Arlington Dermatology
    Rolling Meadows, Illinois 60008, United States
  • Indiana Clinical Trial Center
    Plainfield, Indiana 46168, United States
  • Hamzavi Dermatology
    Fort Gratiot, Michigan 48059, United States
  • Vivida Dermatology
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89119, United States
  • Windsor Dermatology, PC
    East Windsor, New Jersey 08520, United States
  • Oregon Dermatology and Research Center
    Portland, Oregon 97210, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Modern Research Associates
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Center for Clinical Studies
    Houston, Texas 77004, United States
  • Center for Clinical Studies
    Webster, Texas 77598, United States
  • Premier Clinical Research
    Spokane, Washington 99202, United States
  • Dermatrials Research
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 1Y2, Canada
  • Alliance Clinical Trials
    Waterloo, Ontario N2J 1C4, Canada
  • XLR8 Medical Research
    Windsor, Ontario N8T 1E6, Canada
  • Innovaderm Research Inc.
    Montreal, Quebec H2H2B5, Canada
  • Centre Hospitalier Le Mans
    Le Mans, 72037, France
  • Hopital Charles Nicolle
    Rouen, 76031, France
  • HIA Sainte Anne
    Toulon, 83800, France
  • Fachklinik Bad Bentheim
    Bad Bentheim, 48455, Germany
  • ISA - Interdisciplinary Study Association GmbH
    Berlin, 10789, Germany
  • CRS Clinical Research Services Berlin GmbH
    Berlin, 13627, Germany
  • Niesmann & Othlinghaus GbR
    Bochum, 44793, Germany
  • Rosenpark Research GmbH
    Darmstadt, 64283, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt
    Frankfurt am Main, 60590, Germany
  • Derma-Study-Center Friedrichshafen GmbH
    Friedrichshafen, 88045, Germany
  • MensingDerma research GmbH
    Hamburg, 22391, Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg
    Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
  • Universitatsklinikum Schleswig Holstein Kiel
    Kiel, 24105, Germany
  • Gemeinschaftspraxis Scholz/Sebastian/Schilling
    Mahlow, 15831, Germany
  • Hautarztpraxis
    Witten, 58453, Germany
  • Takagi Dermatological Clinic
    Obihiro-shi, 080-0013, Japan
  • Kume Clinic
    Sakai, 593 8324, Japan
  • Sapporo Skin Clinic
    Sapporo, 060-0063, Japan
  • Shizuoka General Hospital
    Shizuoka, 420-8527, Japan
  • Shirasaki Dermatology Clinic
    Takaoka, 933-0871, Japan
  • Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital
    Toyama, 930 8550, Japan
  • Nomura Dermatology Clinic
    Yokohama, 221 0825, Japan
  • Nzoz Zdrowie Osteo-Medic
    Bialystok, 15-351, Poland
  • Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o
    Lodz, 90-265, Poland
  • Dermodent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafal Czajkowski S C
    Osielsko, 86031, Poland
  • Klinika Ambroziak Estederm Sp. z o.o
    Warsaw, 02-953, Poland
  • Wro Medica
    Wroclaw, 51-685, Poland
  • Pusan National University Hospital
    Busan, 49241, South Korea
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
    Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, 03080, South Korea
  • Konkuk University Medical Center
    Seoul, 05030, South Korea
  • KyungHee University Hospital
    Seoul, 102-1703, South Korea
  • Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol
    Barcelona, 08916, Spain
  • Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre
    Madrid, 28041, Spain
  • Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe
    Valencia, 46026, Spain
  • Hosp. de Manises
    Valencia, 46940, Spain
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Kaohsiung City, 83342, Taiwan
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital
    Tainan, 704, Taiwan
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, 10048, Taiwan
  • Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, LinKou Branch
    Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
  • Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust
    London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
    Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Strawn D, Krueger JG, Bissonnette R, Eyerich K, Ferris LK, Paller AS, Pinter A, Richards D, Chen EY, Paget K, Horowitz D, Parast R, Rusbuldt JJ, Sendecki J, Bhagat S, Tomsho LP, Chou CH, Polak ME, Keyes BE, Bozenhardt E, Xiong Y, Zhou W, DeKlotz C, Newbold P, Waterworth DM, Miller M, Ota T, Yang YW, Leung MW, Miller LS, Cuff CA, McRae B, Ruane D, Kannan AK. Icotrokinra induces early and sustained pharmacodynamic responses in phase IIb study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. JCI Insight. 2025 Dec 22;10(24):e193563. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.193563. eCollection 2025 Dec 22. PubMed 41424381 ↗
  • LaRoche JK, Lanier J, Alvarenga R, Collins M, Costelloe T, Chiau A, Whetherly H, De Soete W, Faludi J, Rens K. Climate footprint of industry-sponsored in-human clinical trials: life cycle assessments of clinical trials spanning multiple phases and disease areas. BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 19;15(2):e085364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085364. PubMed 39971605 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Apr 6, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Dec 15, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05364554
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 6, 2022
Start date
Jun 10, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 29, 2023
Completion
Sep 29, 2023
Results posted
Jun 1, 2026
Last update
Jun 1, 2026

Study contacts

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion