CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05314309mtFITUpdated Jan 11, 2023

Prospective Clinical Validation of a Novel Multitarget FIT in CRC Screening

An observational study in CRC and Advanced Neoplasia, sponsored by The Netherlands Cancer Institute. Status unknown at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 55 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-11.

Sponsored by The Netherlands Cancer Institute · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2023), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
14,712
Ages
55 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary goal of the population-based colorectal (CRC) screening is early detection and interception of CRC and its precursors to decrease CRC-related morbidity and mortality. To improve current CRC screening programs, the investigators have developed and retrospectively validated a test that combines the detection of multiple proteins in stool (the multitarget faecal immunochemical test, mtFIT). mtFIT was found to have a higher accuracy to detect advanced neoplasia (AN), which includes CRC, advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps, in comparison to FIT. Thus, this multitarget test has the potential to improve the screening program's efficiency in reducing CRC-related incidence, morbidity and mortality. This new test, in comparison to FIT, shows specifically higher sensitivity in the detection of advanced adenomas, without affecting specificity.

Read the detailed description

Background:

The primary goal of population-based CRC screening is early detection and interception of CRC and its precursors to decrease CRC-related morbidity and mortality. New tests, with higher sensitivity for advanced precursor lesions than the current FIT, are desired. The investigators have developed a protein-based multitarget faecal immunochemical test (mtFIT) that shows higher sensitivity for advanced adenomas without losing in specificity.

Objective:

To prospectively validate the better performance of the mtFIT in comparison to FIT in the setting of a population-based CRC screening program.

Material and Methods:

In this prospective study, participants of the Dutch National CRC screening program (55-75 years of age) will be invited to participate. Individuals who consent to participate in the study, will be asked to take two stool samples from the same bowel movement. In a central laboratory these two samples then will be analyzed. One with the standard of care faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and the other with the multi-target faecal immunochemical test (mtFIT). If either one of these two tests is positive, individuals will be referred to undergo a colonoscopy procedure. The performance of mtFIT, in comparison to FIT, will be evaluated against the colonoscopy findings.

Expected results:

mtFIT has higher sensitivity for AN, and in particular advanced adenomas, than FIT, at equal positivity rate.

02

Conditions studied

  • CRC
  • Advanced Neoplasia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14,712 is above the median of 204 across 1,683 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

The Netherlands Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 224 studies on the registry; 66 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
55 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The intended population of this study consists of subjects participating in the national Dutch National CRC screening program

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals of the Dutch population suitable for CRC screening (age between 55 and 75 years old) will be randomly selected.
  • The participants will be invited in phases and are selected out of different age groups.
  • The selected participants will participate in the population CRC screening program for either the first, second, third or fourth time.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Collection of stool not complete for both tests (FIT and mtFIT)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
14,712 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • mtFIT

    Individuals who consent to participate in the study, will be asked to take two stool samples from the same bowel movement. In a central laboratory these two samples then will be analyzed. One with the standard of care faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and the other with the multi-target faecal immunochemical test (mtFIT). If either one of these two tests is positive, individuals will be referred to undergo a colonoscopy procedure. The performance of mtFIT, in comparison to FIT, will be evaluated against the colonoscopy findings.

    Diagnostic Test: Comparison of two tests (FIT and mtFIT) in the same bowel movement

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testComparison of two tests (FIT and mtFIT) in the same bowel movement

    Invitees for the Dutch National CRC screening program will be randomly selected by the Screening Organization and invited to participate in this study, where next to the current FIT, participants will also perform the mtFIT in one bowel movement. Both tests will be analysed and if one of the two test results is positive, the individual will be referred for colonoscopy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Detection rate of advanced neoplasia

    Relative sensitivity of mtFIT compared to FIT in the detection of advanced neoplasia (AN; CRC, advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps) at an equal positivity rate.

    Time frame: 10 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic yield of mtFIT in comparison to FIT

    mtFIT detects more CRC, more early-stage CRC and more advanced polyps (advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps) compared to FIT.

    Time frame: 10 months

Other outcomes

  1. Long-term mtFIT efficacy

    mtFIT reduces CRC incidence and CRC-related mortality compared to FIT and is cost-effective to be used in a CRC screening program.

    Time frame: 10 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05314309
Lead sponsor
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Collaborators
Amsterdam University Medical Centres (AUMC), Erasmus Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 6, 2022
Start date
Mar 25, 2022
Primary completion
May 31, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 11, 2023

Study contacts

Gerrit A Meijer, MD, PhD
principal investigator · The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Evelien Dekker, MD, PhD
study chair · Amsterdam University Medical Centres (AUMC)
Manon CW Spaander, MD, PhD
study chair · Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam (Erasmus MC)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion