ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05301959Updated Apr 29, 2026

Efficacy of Percutaneous Electrolysis in the Treatment of Achilles Tendinopathy

An interventional study of low intensity percutaneous musculoskeletal electrolysis and Sham application in Achilles Tendinopathy, sponsored by Maimonides University. Recruiting at 1 site in Argentina. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-29.

Sponsored by Maimonides University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2023; still recruiting 3 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Achilles tendinopathy (AT) is one of the most reported myotendinous pathologies due to overuse in the literature. In the general adult population, its incidence is 2.35 cases per 1,000 patients, with no difference between men and women. The international literature reports that up to 29% of patients fail with conservative treatment.

Within physiotherapy, new alternatives for the treatment of tendinopathies arise, applying electric currents percutaneously, which from a mechanical effect associated to the use of a needle and an electric effect by the use of galvanic currents, generate a local inflammatory response; activation of the central nervous system and analgesia.

The aim of the research is to evaluate the efficacy of adding low intensity percutaneous electrolysis to the treatment with a high load eccentric exercise program based on the protocol of Silbernagel et al. in adults with Achilles tendinopathy to improve its functionality.

A randomized, double-blind, blinded, evaluator-blinded, controlled clinical trial will be conducted in parallel groups (experimental treatment vs. sham treatment), with a follow-up at 26 and 52 weeks after the first intervention. Non-probability and intentional sampling will be performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Achilles Tendinopathy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • tendinopathy
  • physiotherapy
  • percutaneous electrolysis
03

In context

Tendinopathy

397 studies on the registry are indexed under Tendinopathy; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 102 is above the median of 48 across 332 interventional studies indexed under Tendinopathy.

Browse Tendinopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

Maimonides University is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of symptoms in one or both Achilles tendons with a minimum duration of two months. In case the symptoms are bilateral, the intervention or placebo will only be administered and its results evaluated- in the limb with greater symptomatology. If it is not possible to differentiate which one presents greater pain, the right Achilles tendon will be chosen.
  • Spontaneous pain of at least three points measured by a visual analog scale (VAS), reproducible by palpation between 2 and 6 cm above the insertion of the Achilles tendon in the calcaneal bone.
  • Evidence of tendinopathy by MRI.
  • Presence of post-static dyskinesia.
  • Willingness to not perform additional treatments (such as footwear modifications, physical therapy, orthotics, injections, or surgery) for Achilles tendon pain during the conduct of the trial.
  • Willingness to attempt to discontinue self-administration of medications (NSAIDs) for pain relief Achilles tendon(s) pain for at least 14 days prior to baseline assessment and during the course of the trial.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence or suspicion of pregnancy.
  • Previous surgical intervention on the AT in the symptomatic leg(s)
  • Total or partial rupture in the symptomatic AT
  • Chronic ankle instability, in the foot with symptomatic tendon(s).
  • Pathologies that can derive in pain in the region of the AT without being proper of the picture. (e.g.: osteoarthritis, impingement syndromes).
  • Presence of arthritis or any metabolic or endocrine disorder (type 1 or 2 diabetes).
  • Psychological disorders.
  • Oncologic history.
  • Treatment with quinolones or fluoroquinolones during the last two years.
  • Treatment with statins for the control of hypercholesterolemia for more than two months
  • Treatments within or at the periphery of the Achilles tendon, with anesthetics, or any other pharmacological agent during the last three months.
  • Needle phobia
  • Allergy to metal
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
102 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    A single weekly intervention of low intensity galvanic currents will be applied in an ultrasound-guided manner.

    Device: low intensity percutaneous musculoskeletal electrolysis · Other: Silbernagel protocol

  • Sham comparator
    Simulated group.

    The application of a single weekly intervention of low intensity galvanic currents will be simulated in an echogenic way, with the equipment turned off.

    Device: Sham application · Other: Silbernagel protocol

Interventions

  • Devicelow intensity percutaneous musculoskeletal electrolysis

    An acupuncture needle (0.30mm X 25mm) will be introduced into the device's strut. With the equipment on and with a base intensity of 120µA, the acupuncture needle is introduced in a proximal-distal and postero-anterior direction, in the area of the Achilles tendon body. The position of the needle will be checked with ultrasound and once the point to be treated is reached, the working intensity will be increased up to 600 µA. The emission will be maintained until the participant reports a pain of 60/100 in VAS. At that moment, the emission will be paused completely until the participant reports a sensation of at least 20/100 in VAS. After this period the emission will be continued at 600 µA. This cycle will continue until the emission lasts for more than 120 sec, continuously. At this point, the needle will be repositioned to repeat the emission protocol a maximum of 3 times in total.

    Also known as: percutaneous microelectrolysis

  • DeviceSham application

    A modification will be made in a second equipment, closing the circuit with a 10kΩ resistor inside the equipment, in the output strand chip. Allowing the simulation of emission without emitting current to the participant and without being able to appreciate any type of alteration in the handling of the equipment, by the operators. Therefore, the same steps will be followed as in the experimental group.

  • OtherSilbernagel protocol

    The Silbernagel et al. protocol comprises several heel raising exercises with concentric and eccentric movements, performed on two legs and one leg. It is composed of 3 sets of 15 repetitions and that during the exercises allows pain to be present, but not being disabling. The exercises will be performed only once a day. The progression will be made by changing from standing exercises to monopodal support, moving from concentric-eccentric to purely eccentric loading, adding weight in a backpack (in steps of 5 kg when pain does not exceed 5 in the pain monitoring model) and finally using fast rebound exercises and plyometric exercises.

    Also known as: Silbernagel et al. Achilles tendinopathy protocol

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Baseline

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 1

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: one week at study entry

  3. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 2

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: two week at study entry

  4. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 3

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: three week at study entry

  5. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 4

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: four week at study entry

  6. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 5

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: five week at study entry

  7. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 6

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: six week at study entry

  8. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 7

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: seven week at study entry

  9. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 8

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: eight week at study entry

  10. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 9

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: nine week at study entry

  11. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 10

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: ten week at study entry

  12. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 11

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: eleven week at study entry

  13. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 12

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: twelve week at study entry

  14. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 26

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: twenty-six week at study entry

  15. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles - Week 52

    patient reported outcomes specifically designed for the assessment of pain and function in the achilles tendinopathy. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Time frame: fifty-two week at study entry

Secondary outcomes

  1. visual analog scale - Baseline

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. visual analog scale - Week 1

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: one week at study entry

  3. visual analog scale - Week 2

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: Two week at study entry

  4. visual analog scale - Week 3

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: three week at study entry

  5. visual analog scale - Week 4

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: four week at study entry

  6. visual analog scale - Week 5

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: five week at study entry

  7. visual analog scale - Week 6

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: six week at study entry

  8. visual analog scale - Week 7

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: seven week at study entry

  9. visual analog scale - Week 8

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: eight week at study entry

  10. visual analog scale - Week 9

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: nine week at study entry

  11. visual analog scale - Week 10

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: ten week at study entry

  12. visual analog scale - Week 11

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: eleven week at study entry

  13. visual analog scale - Week 12

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: twelve week at study entry

  14. visual analog scale - Week 26

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: twenty-six week at study entry

  15. visual analog scale - Week 52

    The intensity of pain experienced during a sequence of three monopodal countermovement jumps with both hands on the waist will be evaluated on a graduated scale. A maximum of three jumps will be performed and the highest jump will be recorded. Immediately afterwards, participants will be asked to indicate with an "X" on a 100mm line the intensity of pain experienced in the Achilles tendon. It has a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain).

    Time frame: fifty-two week at study entry

  16. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Baseline

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: Baseline

  17. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 1

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: one week at study entry

  18. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 2

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: two week at study entry

  19. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 3

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: three week at study entry

  20. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 4

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: four week at study entry

  21. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 5

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: five week at study entry

  22. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 6

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: six week at study entry

  23. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 7

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: seven week at study entry

  24. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 8

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: eight week at study entry

  25. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 9

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: nine week at study entry

  26. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 10

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: ten week at study entry

  27. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 11

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: eleven week at study entry

  28. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 12

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: twelve week at study entry

  29. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 26

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: twenty-six week at study entry

  30. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure - Week 52

    an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. it's a patient reported outcomes which allows to quantify sport activity and participation. It has a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). It consists of 29 questions, divided into 2 subscales, activities of daily living and sports activities. The criterion for discharge is a value greater than or equal to 90 points.

    Time frame: fifty-two week at study entry

  31. ultrasound Shear Wave elastography - baseline

    Shear Wave Elastography (SWS), which consists of a special ultrasound methodology that allows quantitative characterization of the elastic capacity of a tissue through the propagation velocity of the ultrasound wave. The Siemens Acuson S2000 system with a model 9L4 linear transducer will be used. The patients will be placed on a table in ventral decubitus and the ankle outside the plane of the table in neutral position. To determine the point to be scanned, the maximum perpendicular distance between the anterior and posterior limits of the tendon between 2 to 6 cm from the insertion in the calcaneus will be taken and this value will be reported in mm. The SWS value will be expressed in m/s. The range of SWS is 0-9 m/s. The standard SWS measurement window size shall be 1cm2 , with a region of interest of 3mm. Three measurements will be recorded in each plane (regions of interest) where homogeneous tissue is considered and the average value of the 6 measurements will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline

  32. ultrasound Shear Wave elastography - Week 4

    Shear Wave Elastography (SWS), which consists of a special ultrasound methodology that allows quantitative characterization of the elastic capacity of a tissue through the propagation velocity of the ultrasound wave. The Siemens Acuson S2000 system with a model 9L4 linear transducer will be used. The patients will be placed on a table in ventral decubitus and the ankle outside the plane of the table in neutral position. To determine the point to be scanned, the maximum perpendicular distance between the anterior and posterior limits of the tendon between 2 to 6 cm from the insertion in the calcaneus will be taken and this value will be reported in mm. The SWS value will be expressed in m/s. The range of SWS is 0-9 m/s. The standard SWS measurement window size shall be 1cm2 , with a region of interest of 3mm. Three measurements will be recorded in each plane (regions of interest) where homogeneous tissue is considered and the average value of the 6 measurements will be reported.

    Time frame: four week at study entry

  33. ultrasound Shear Wave elastography - Week 8

    Shear Wave Elastography (SWS), which consists of a special ultrasound methodology that allows quantitative characterization of the elastic capacity of a tissue through the propagation velocity of the ultrasound wave. The Siemens Acuson S2000 system with a model 9L4 linear transducer will be used. The patients will be placed on a table in ventral decubitus and the ankle outside the plane of the table in neutral position. To determine the point to be scanned, the maximum perpendicular distance between the anterior and posterior limits of the tendon between 2 to 6 cm from the insertion in the calcaneus will be taken and this value will be reported in mm. The SWS value will be expressed in m/s. The range of SWS is 0-9 m/s. The standard SWS measurement window size shall be 1cm2 , with a region of interest of 3mm. Three measurements will be recorded in each plane (regions of interest) where homogeneous tissue is considered and the average value of the 6 measurements will be reported.

    Time frame: eight week at study entry

  34. ultrasound Shear Wave elastography - Week 12

    Shear Wave Elastography (SWS), which consists of a special ultrasound methodology that allows quantitative characterization of the elastic capacity of a tissue through the propagation velocity of the ultrasound wave. The Siemens Acuson S2000 system with a model 9L4 linear transducer will be used. The patients will be placed on a table in ventral decubitus and the ankle outside the plane of the table in neutral position. To determine the point to be scanned, the maximum perpendicular distance between the anterior and posterior limits of the tendon between 2 to 6 cm from the insertion in the calcaneus will be taken and this value will be reported in mm. The SWS value will be expressed in m/s. The range of SWS is 0-9 m/s. The standard SWS measurement window size shall be 1cm2 , with a region of interest of 3mm. Three measurements will be recorded in each plane (regions of interest) where homogeneous tissue is considered and the average value of the 6 measurements will be reported.

    Time frame: twelve week at study entry

  35. ultrasound Shear Wave elastography - Week 26

    Shear Wave Elastography (SWS), which consists of a special ultrasound methodology that allows quantitative characterization of the elastic capacity of a tissue through the propagation velocity of the ultrasound wave. The Siemens Acuson S2000 system with a model 9L4 linear transducer will be used. The patients will be placed on a table in ventral decubitus and the ankle outside the plane of the table in neutral position. To determine the point to be scanned, the maximum perpendicular distance between the anterior and posterior limits of the tendon between 2 to 6 cm from the insertion in the calcaneus will be taken and this value will be reported in mm. The SWS value will be expressed in m/s. The range of SWS is 0-9 m/s. The standard SWS measurement window size shall be 1cm2 , with a region of interest of 3mm. Three measurements will be recorded in each plane (regions of interest) where homogeneous tissue is considered and the average value of the 6 measurements will be reported.

    Time frame: twenty-six week at study entry

  36. ultrasound Shear Wave elastography - Week 52

    Shear Wave Elastography (SWS), which consists of a special ultrasound methodology that allows quantitative characterization of the elastic capacity of a tissue through the propagation velocity of the ultrasound wave. The Siemens Acuson S2000 system with a model 9L4 linear transducer will be used. The patients will be placed on a table in ventral decubitus and the ankle outside the plane of the table in neutral position. To determine the point to be scanned, the maximum perpendicular distance between the anterior and posterior limits of the tendon between 2 to 6 cm from the insertion in the calcaneus will be taken and this value will be reported in mm. The SWS value will be expressed in m/s. The range of SWS is 0-9 m/s. The standard SWS measurement window size shall be 1cm2 , with a region of interest of 3mm. Three measurements will be recorded in each plane (regions of interest) where homogeneous tissue is considered and the average value of the 6 measurements will be reported.

    Time frame: fifty-two week at study entry

  37. Vienna Achilles tendon morphological score - MRI - baseline

    A 1.5T Siemens Healthcare 1.5T scanner will be used for the MRI evaluation, using a gradient strength of 40 mT/m and an 8-channel coil. The standard MRI protocol will be identical for all examinations and will consist of a localizer set and three morphological MR sequences: 1) a sagittal fat-suppressed sequence; 2) a sagittal T1 sagittal spin echo (SE) sequence and 3) a T2-w sequence. Once the images are obtained, they will be evaluated with the "Vienna Achilles tendon morphological score" (VIMATS) protocol proposed by Apprich S. (2021) which conforms a semiquantitative rating scale where the score is composed of four different parameters: (1) thickness, (2) continuity, (3) signal and (4) associated pathologies. It has a continuous numerical scale from 0 to 100 where the higher the score, the better the patient's stage.

    Time frame: Baseline

  38. Vienna Achilles tendon morphological score - MRI - Week 4

    A 1.5T Siemens Healthcare 1.5T scanner will be used for the MRI evaluation, using a gradient strength of 40 mT/m and an 8-channel coil. The standard MRI protocol will be identical for all examinations and will consist of a localizer set and three morphological MR sequences: 1) a sagittal fat-suppressed sequence; 2) a sagittal T1 sagittal spin echo (SE) sequence and 3) a T2-w sequence. Once the images are obtained, they will be evaluated with the "Vienna Achilles tendon morphological score" (VIMATS) protocol proposed by Apprich S. (2021) which conforms a semiquantitative rating scale where the score is composed of four different parameters: (1) thickness, (2) continuity, (3) signal and (4) associated pathologies. It has a continuous numerical scale from 0 to 100 where the higher the score, the better the patient's stage.

    Time frame: four week at study entry

  39. Vienna Achilles tendon morphological score - MRI - Week 8

    A 1.5T Siemens Healthcare 1.5T scanner will be used for the MRI evaluation, using a gradient strength of 40 mT/m and an 8-channel coil. The standard MRI protocol will be identical for all examinations and will consist of a localizer set and three morphological MR sequences: 1) a sagittal fat-suppressed sequence; 2) a sagittal T1 sagittal spin echo (SE) sequence and 3) a T2-w sequence. Once the images are obtained, they will be evaluated with the "Vienna Achilles tendon morphological score" (VIMATS) protocol proposed by Apprich S. (2021) which conforms a semiquantitative rating scale where the score is composed of four different parameters: (1) thickness, (2) continuity, (3) signal and (4) associated pathologies. It has a continuous numerical scale from 0 to 100 where the higher the score, the better the patient's stage.

    Time frame: eight week at study entry

  40. Vienna Achilles tendon morphological score - MRI - Week 12

    A 1.5T Siemens Healthcare 1.5T scanner will be used for the MRI evaluation, using a gradient strength of 40 mT/m and an 8-channel coil. The standard MRI protocol will be identical for all examinations and will consist of a localizer set and three morphological MR sequences: 1) a sagittal fat-suppressed sequence; 2) a sagittal T1 sagittal spin echo (SE) sequence and 3) a T2-w sequence. Once the images are obtained, they will be evaluated with the "Vienna Achilles tendon morphological score" (VIMATS) protocol proposed by Apprich S. (2021) which conforms a semiquantitative rating scale where the score is composed of four different parameters: (1) thickness, (2) continuity, (3) signal and (4) associated pathologies. It has a continuous numerical scale from 0 to 100 where the higher the score, the better the patient's stage.

    Time frame: twelve week at study entry

  41. Vienna Achilles tendon morphological score - MRI - Week 26

    A 1.5T Siemens Healthcare 1.5T scanner will be used for the MRI evaluation, using a gradient strength of 40 mT/m and an 8-channel coil. The standard MRI protocol will be identical for all examinations and will consist of a localizer set and three morphological MR sequences: 1) a sagittal fat-suppressed sequence; 2) a sagittal T1 sagittal spin echo (SE) sequence and 3) a T2-w sequence. Once the images are obtained, they will be evaluated with the "Vienna Achilles tendon morphological score" (VIMATS) protocol proposed by Apprich S. (2021) which conforms a semiquantitative rating scale where the score is composed of four different parameters: (1) thickness, (2) continuity, (3) signal and (4) associated pathologies. It has a continuous numerical scale from 0 to 100 where the higher the score, the better the patient's stage.

    Time frame: twenty-six week at study entry

  42. Vienna Achilles tendon morphological score - MRI - Week 52

    A 1.5T Siemens Healthcare 1.5T scanner will be used for the MRI evaluation, using a gradient strength of 40 mT/m and an 8-channel coil. The standard MRI protocol will be identical for all examinations and will consist of a localizer set and three morphological MR sequences: 1) a sagittal fat-suppressed sequence; 2) a sagittal T1 sagittal spin echo (SE) sequence and 3) a T2-w sequence. Once the images are obtained, they will be evaluated with the "Vienna Achilles tendon morphological score" (VIMATS) protocol proposed by Apprich S. (2021) which conforms a semiquantitative rating scale where the score is composed of four different parameters: (1) thickness, (2) continuity, (3) signal and (4) associated pathologies. It has a continuous numerical scale from 0 to 100 where the higher the score, the better the patient's stage.

    Time frame: fifty-two week at study entry

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Maimonides University
    Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D. 1405, Argentina
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 41 months after the start.

Of 174 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Tendinopathy, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 41 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 183 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 27, 2022
First posted
Mar 31, 2022
StartActual
Jul 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Apr 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05301959
Lead sponsor
Maimonides University
Responsible party
Santiago Marcelo d'Almeida, PT SCS PhD Candidate (Research Professor, Maimonides University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 31, 2022
Start date
Jul 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 29, 2026

Study contacts

Santiago M d'Almeida, PT SCS
Contact
dalmeida.santiago@maimonides.edu
01140573099
Santiago M d'Almeida, PT SCS
principal investigator · Maimonides University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion