ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05296837ORBSUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Ocular Rosacea Biome Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of Doxycycline 40 MG ( 20mg twice daily) and Doxycycline 200 MG ( 100 mg twice daily) in Ocular Rosacea and Antimicrobial Resistance, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jul 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry; the sponsor requested a delay in submitting them in Jul 2026.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ocular rosacea is an inflammatory disease of the eyelids and ocular surface. Like the facial disease, the ocular condition is chronic and recurrent. Sequelae of ocular rosacea vary from mild to severe. Ocular rosacea may cause chronic eye redness, blepharitis, recurrent chalazia, dry eye, corneal erosion, corneal vascularization, and corneal ulceration. Rosacea affecting the cornea can result in vision loss.

Prescription eye drops and ointments can be used topically to control mild ocular rosacea. However, severe disease, or rosacea that is not well controlled with local treatments is treated systemically. The most commonly used systemic treatment for rosacea is the bacteriostatic antibiotic doxycycline. Rosacea treatment doses of doxycycline vary widely. Treatment-dose doxycycline for systemic infections is 100mg twice a day. However, as rosacea is considered an inflammatory disease, doxycycline is often dosed at what is termed, sub-microbial dose doxycycline (SDD). Initially introduced in the oral medicine literature, SDD are doses 40mg and lower because systemic administration at this dose does not appear to alter the oral mucosa flora or increase resistance rates when given long-term for periodontal disease. Whereas 100mg doxycycline, even when given short term, may increase the percentage of culturable nasopharyngeal flora that is resistant to doxycycline. The FDA does not categorize SDD an antibiotic, stating this dosing is expected to exhibit only anti-inflammatory activity.

Read the detailed description

Even though SDD is widely used for the treatment of rosacea, very little confirmatory data exists, to indicate if this dose alters any other systemic mucosa flora or increases antibiotic resistance rates. The classification of 40mg as "sub-microbial" has never been evaluated in patients diagnosed with ocular rosacea. Additionally, confirmation of a "sub-microbial" dose has not been investigated with more sophisticated genomics and resistance tools such as metagenomic deep sequencing (MDS). The goal of this proposal is to use MDS to determine whether SDD given to patients with ocular rosacea can be truly considered sub-microbial, or if a 40mg dose of doxycycline can in fact alter the microbiome of the conjunctiva and gut and increase resistance rates when prescribed for 8 weeks. The investigators plan to evaluate the effect of SDD on resistance and microbiome alteration through a randomized controlled masked trial.

This is a randomized, controlled, masked trial comparing sub-microbial dose doxycycline, treatment dose Doxycycline, and placebo in the treatment of ocular rosacea.

Participants will be recruited from the F.I. Proctor Foundation and the Ophthalmology clinics at the UCSF Wayne and Gladys Valley Center for Vision and consented for participation in an IRB-approved study protocol. Participants with a diagnosis of ocular rosacea (n=50) will be prospectively enrolled and randomized to one of three arms in a 2:2:1 fashion:

Arm A will receive submicrobial dose doxycycline (40mg) administered as 20mg twice day for 8 weeks Arm B will receive a placebo twice a day for 8 weeks Arm C will receive 200mg of oral doxycycline administered as 100mg twice a day for 8 weeks

02

Conditions studied

  • Ocular Rosacea
  • Antimicrobial Resistance

Browse trials for

03

In context

Rosacea

233 studies on the registry are indexed under Rosacea; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 61 across 200 interventional studies indexed under Rosacea.

Browse Rosacea studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,169 studies on the registry; 372 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 202 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have symptomatic ocular disease attributed to ocular rosacea as the primary diagnosis
  • Ability to give
  • Be aged 18 years old or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have an active ocular or systemic infection
  • Have a known allergy or intolerance to tetracycline antibiotics
  • Have had prior use of oral antibiotics within the last three months
  • Pregnancy or the possibility of becoming pregnant within the 8-week study medication timeline.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    40mg of oral doxycycline

    Arm A will receive submicrobial dose doxycycline (40mg) administered as 20mg twice a day for 8 weeks

    Drug: Doxycycline 40 MG ( 20mg twice daily)

  • Active comparator
    ***200mg*** of oral doxycycline

    Arm C will receive 200mg of oral doxycycline administered as 100mg twice a day for 8 weeks

    Drug: Doxycycline 200 MG ( 100 mg twice daily)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Arm B will receive a placebo twice a day for 8 weeks

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Frequency of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) genetic determinants

    The frequency of AMR genetic determinants in rectal swab samples between arms will be compared, correcting for baseline

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Differences in Simpson's diversity of the microbiome of the conjunctiva and gut

    Simpson's diversity is the probability that any two randomly chosen reads will be for different organisms (at the genus level). This will be expressed in terms of effective number.

    Time frame: 4 weeks , 8 weeks, 3 - 6 months

  2. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) will be compared

    Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Standard 12-question created by the Outcomes Research Group at Allergan Inc will be used.

    Time frame: 4 weeks , 8 weeks, 3 - 6 months

  3. Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) scores will be compared

    Numbers representing how many seconds after a full blink a discontinuity in the tear film appears. Obtained with the Oculus keratography topographer This is a scale typically measured from 1-10, and the seconds correspond to the amount of time it takes for a tear film discontinuity to be observed. The lower the number the faster the tear break up and the worse the objective dry eye.

    Time frame: 4 weeks , 8 weeks, 3 - 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, San Farncisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schaller M, Kemeny L, Havlickova B, Jackson JM, Ambroziak M, Lynde C, Gooderham M, Remenyik E, Del Rosso J, Weglowska J, Chavda R, Kerrouche N, Dirschka T, Johnson S. A randomized phase 3b/4 study to evaluate concomitant use of topical ivermectin 1% cream and doxycycline 40-mg modified-release capsules, versus topical ivermectin 1% cream and placebo in the treatment of severe rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Feb;82(2):336-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.063. Epub 2019 May 29. PubMed 31150711 ↗
  • Zhang M, Silverberg JI, Kaffenberger BH. Prescription patterns and costs of acne/rosacea medications in Medicare patients vary by prescriber specialty. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Sep;77(3):448-455.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.04.1127. Epub 2017 Jun 23. PubMed 28651825 ↗
  • Nagler AR, Del Rosso J. The Use of Oral Antibiotics in the Management of Rosacea. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019 Jun 1;18(6):506. PubMed 31251542 ↗
  • Del Rosso JQ, Schlessinger J, Werschler P. Comparison of anti-inflammatory dose doxycycline versus doxycycline 100 mg in the treatment of rosacea. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008 Jun;7(6):573-6. No abstract available. PubMed 18561589 ↗
  • Preshaw PM, Novak MJ, Mellonig J, Magnusson I, Polson A, Giannobile WV, Rowland RW, Thomas J, Walker C, Dawson DR, Sharkey D, Bradshaw MH. Modified-release subantimicrobial dose doxycycline enhances scaling and root planing in subjects with periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):440-52. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070375. PubMed 18315426 ↗
  • Skidmore R, Kovach R, Walker C, Thomas J, Bradshaw M, Leyden J, Powala C, Ashley R. Effects of subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline in the treatment of moderate acne. Arch Dermatol. 2003 Apr;139(4):459-64. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.4.459. PubMed 12707093 ↗
  • Anon. Periostat [package insert]. Place of publication: Galderma; 2001
  • Schaller M, Almeida LM, Bewley A, Cribier B, Dlova NC, Kautz G, Mannis M, Oon HH, Rajagopalan M, Steinhoff M, Thiboutot D, Troielli P, Webster G, Wu Y, van Zuuren E, Tan J. Rosacea treatment update: recommendations from the global ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel. Br J Dermatol. 2017 Feb;176(2):465-471. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15173. Epub 2017 Feb 5. PubMed 27861741 ↗
  • Del Rosso JQ, Brantman S, Baldwin H. Long-term inflammatory rosacea management with subantibiotic dose oral doxycycline 40 mg modified-release capsules once daily. Dermatol Ther. 2022 Jan;35(1):e15180. doi: 10.1111/dth.15180. Epub 2021 Dec 2. PubMed 34713539 ↗
  • Woo YR, Lee SH, Cho SH, Lee JD, Kim HS. Characterization and Analysis of the Skin Microbiota in Rosacea: Impact of Systemic Antibiotics. J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 9;9(1):185. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010185. PubMed 31936625 ↗
  • Mahmud H, Keenan JD, Gonzales J, Schallhorn J, Chan M, Arnold B, Cavallino V, Lietman TM, Doan T, Seitzman GD. Ocular Rosacea microBiome Study (ORBS)-sub-microbial versus antibiotic dosing of doxycycline versus placebo in treatment of symptomatic ocular rosacea: study protocol for a parallel-arm randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2022 Dec 20;23(1):1033. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06948-9. PubMed 36539810 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2023 to primary completion in Jul 2025, 24 months.

Of 12 phase 4 interventional studies under Rosacea, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 21. This study's 24 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 16, 2022
First posted
Mar 25, 2022
StartActual
Jun 22, 2023
Primary completionActual
Jul 14, 2025
CompletionActual
Jul 14, 2025
Results delay requested
Jul 9, 2026
Last update
Oct 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date, description and arm descriptions
1 update, last Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 3 other changes: verification date, description and arm descriptions

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05296837
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 25, 2022
Start date
Jun 22, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 14, 2025
Completion
Jul 14, 2025
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Study contacts

Gerami Seitzman, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Doxycycline

Start the discussion