CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05293314Updated Nov 19, 2024Results posted

Assessment of an Exhaled Breath Test to Detect Bronchiectasis

An observational study in Bronchiectasis, sponsored by Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-19.

Sponsored by Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
544
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To investigate whether the breath test is able to detect bronchiectasis using breathomics. This study was conducted with a prospective specimen collection, evaluator-blinded, case-controlled clinical study designed to evaluate the accuracy of breathomics to diagnosis of bronchiectasis in adults.

Read the detailed description

Bronchiectasis is a chronic airway inflammation with irreversible expansion of bronchial walls, which is characteristic by chronic cough, mucinous sputum, dyspnea and wheezing. High resolution CT (HRCT) combined with clinical manifestations is the main diagnostic method of bronchiectasis, but HRCT is expensive and radioactive. Therefore, it is urgent to develop a new technology to diagnose bronchiectasis. Exhaled breath may be a better tool for bronchiectasis detection because of its noninvasive nature. Many efforts have been made to develop breath tests for lung cancer, asthma and Helicobacter pylori infection. However, little studies pay attention to bronchiectasis. High-pressure photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPPI-TOFMS) is a promising tool for breath testing, because it is highly sensitive, does not require pretreatment of exhaled breath, and holds great tolerance for humidity. In our case-control diagnostic study, we investigated whether a breath test combining HPPI-TOFMS and a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was able to distinguish patients with bronchiectasis from control individuals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bronchiectasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • bronchiectasis
  • breathomics
  • exhaled breath
03

In context

Bronchiectasis

368 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchiectasis; 104 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 544 is above the median of 160 across 132 observational studies indexed under Bronchiectasis.

Browse Bronchiectasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China is the lead sponsor of 149 studies on the registry; 91 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The age of all subjects were all older than 18 . The study population was recruited from Shanghai pulmonary hospital. Diagnosis of bronchiectasis was performed using chest HRCT scans in suspected patients with coughing and expectoration, or long durations of haemoptysis. Idiopathic bronchiectasis patients with acute exacerbation were included in the study. Healthy participants (HC) and unhealthy participants(UHC) were as control.

Inclusion criteria

BE Patients were recruited according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) Age>18 years; (2) the diagnosis of BE was according to European Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of adult bronchiectasis; (3) Willing to join in and sign the informed consent form.

Healthy control subjects were recruited according to the following inclusion criteria:(1) Age>18 years; (2) No history of any lung disease (according to pulmonary imaging and physical examinations); (3) Willing to join in and sign the informed consent form.

Unhealthy control subjects were recruited according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) Age>18 years; (2) The diagnosis of ILD was according to HRCT and clinical symptoms by two experts' consensus; (3) The diagnosis of Sarcoidosis (SA) was according to American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline;(4) Willing to join in and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

(1) Patients combined with serious comorbidities (chronic renal failure, hepatic disease, etc.); (2) Patients who are diagnosed with asthma, pneumonia, malignant tumor, and COPD; (3) Women who are pregnant or preparing for pregnancy or breastfeeding; (4) Participated in other clinical trials within three months; (5) Refused to join in and sign the informed consent form.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
544 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Adult patients with bronchiectasis (BE)

    Diagnosis of bronchiectasis was performed using chest HRCT scans in suspected patients with coughing and expectoration, or long durations of haemoptysis. High-resolution images were obtained during full inspiration at 1-mm collimation and 10-mm intervals from the apex to the base of the lungs. The presence of bronchiectasis was confirmed based on the following criteria: 1) lack of tapering in the bronchi; 2) dilation of the bronchi where the internal diameter was larger than that of the adjacent pulmonary artery; or 3) visualisation of the peripheral bronchi within 1 cm of the costal pleural surface or the adjacent mediastinal pleural surface.

    Diagnostic Test: An exhaled breath test

  • Healthy control group (HC)

    Control group is healthy participants.

    Diagnostic Test: An exhaled breath test

  • Unhealthy control group (UHC)

    Patients with interstitial lung disease or patients with Sarcoidosis. Interstitial lung disease is a heterogeneous pulmonary disease characterized with lung fibrosis and manifest with breathlessness. Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown etiology characterized by the formation of granulomas in various organs, mostly involved is the lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes .

    Diagnostic Test: An exhaled breath test

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testAn exhaled breath test

    All exhaled breath samples were collected by trained investigators following the same protocol. All participants fasted for at least 6 hours before breath collection. To reduce potential confounding factors, all participants were asked to not ingest spicy food, alcohol, or coffee the night before exhaled breath collection. Exhaled breath was collected in Tedlar air bags (DuPont de Nemours). The night before breath collection, the Tedlar bags were baked at 60 °C for 3 hours to fully release possible contaminants and continuously purged with high-purity nitrogen 4 times. Participants first gargled with pure water and then performed a single deep nasal inhalation followed by complete exhalation via their mouth into Tedlar bags. A total of 1000 mL of exhaled breath was collected from each participant. Breath sample detection was based on the HPPI-TOFMS platform.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Ability of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People

    Evaluate the ability of the breath test model to distinguish bronchiectasis from healthy individuals by measuring the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The maximum value in the area below the receiver is 1. The closer the value is to 1, the higher the prediction accuracy of the model.

    Time frame: One week.Exhaled breath samples were collected on the first day of patients' hospitalization and sent to detect VOCs.The entire process will take one week.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Sensitivity of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People

    Sensitivity=number of true positives/(number of true positives+number of false negatives) \* 100% Sensitivity is the rate of correctly judging patients.We calculated the sensitivity of the breath test model to distinguish bronchiectasis from healthy people.The maximum percentage of the sensitivity is 100%. The higher the percentage is , the more sensitive of the model.

    Time frame: One week.Exhaled breath samples were collected on the first day of patients' hospitalization and sent to detect VOCs.The entire process will take one week.

Other outcomes

  1. The Specificity of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People

    Specificity=number of true negative cases/(number of true negative cases+number of false positive cases) \* 100% The specificity is the rate of correctly judging non patients.We calculated the specificity of the breath test model to distinguish bronchiectasis from healthy people.The maximum percentage of the specificity is 100%. The higher the percentage is , the more specificity of the model.

    Time frame: One week.Exhaled breath samples were collected on the first day of patients' hospitalization and sent to detect VOCs.The entire process will take one week.

07

Results

Posted Nov 19, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePatients With BronchiectasisHealthy Control GroupUnhealthy Control Group
Started22823185
Completed21522174
Not completed131011

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Ability of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People

Evaluate the ability of the breath test model to distinguish bronchiectasis from healthy individuals by measuring the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The maximum value in the area below the receiver is 1. The closer the value is to 1, the higher the prediction accuracy of the model.

Time frame:
One week.Exhaled breath samples were collected on the first day of patients' hospitalization and sent to detect VOCs.The entire process will take one week.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Ability of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People
ParticipantsBronchiectasis ParticipantsHealthy ControlsUnhealthy Controls
The Ability of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People656723
Statistical analysis
  • Bronchiectasis Participants vs Healthy Controls · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.05 · Receiver operating characteristic: 0.964 · 95% CI 0.932 to 0.996
  • Bronchiectasis Participants vs Unhealthy Controls · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.05 · Receiver operating characteristic: 0.932 · 95% CI 0.879 to 0.982
SecondaryThe Sensitivity of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People

Sensitivity=number of true positives/(number of true positives+number of false negatives) \* 100% Sensitivity is the rate of correctly judging patients.We calculated the sensitivity of the breath test model to distinguish bronchiectasis from healthy people.The maximum percentage of the sensitivity is 100%. The higher the percentage is , the more sensitive of the model.

Time frame:
One week.Exhaled breath samples were collected on the first day of patients' hospitalization and sent to detect VOCs.The entire process will take one week.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Sensitivity of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People
ParticipantsBronchiectasis ParticipantsHealthy ControlsUnhealthy Controls
The Sensitivity of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People656723
Statistical analysis
  • Bronchiectasis Participants vs Healthy Controls · Sensitivity: 86.2 · 95% CI 77.1 to 95.2
  • Bronchiectasis Participants vs Unhealthy Controls · Sensitivity: 86.2 · 95% CI 77.1 to 95.2
Other pre-specifiedThe Specificity of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People

Specificity=number of true negative cases/(number of true negative cases+number of false positive cases) \* 100% The specificity is the rate of correctly judging non patients.We calculated the specificity of the breath test model to distinguish bronchiectasis from healthy people.The maximum percentage of the specificity is 100%. The higher the percentage is , the more specificity of the model.

Time frame:
One week.Exhaled breath samples were collected on the first day of patients' hospitalization and sent to detect VOCs.The entire process will take one week.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Specificity of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People
ParticipantsBronchiectasis ParticipantsHealthy ControlsUnhealthy Controls
The Specificity of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People656723
Statistical analysis
  • Bronchiectasis Participants vs Healthy Controls · Specificity: 92.5 · 95% CI 86.2 to 98.8
  • Bronchiectasis Participants vs Unhealthy Controls · Specificity: 73.9 · 95% CI 56 to 91.9

Adverse events

Collected over 1 day. Non-serious events are listed at a 0.196% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Patients With Bronchiectasis0/215 (0%)0/215 (0%)5/215 (2.3%)
Healthy Control Group0/221 (0%)0/221 (0%)0/221 (0%)
Unhealthy Control Group0/74 (0%)0/74 (0%)2/74 (2.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPatients With BronchiectasisHealthy Control GroupUnhealthy Control Group
short of breathRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/215—1/74
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/2150/2211/74

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Patients With BronchiectasisHealthy Control GroupUnhealthy Control GroupTotal
Median57 (49 to 66)52 (46 to 59)65 (56 to 69)56 (48 to 65)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Patients With BronchiectasisHealthy Control GroupUnhealthy Control GroupTotal
Female15014533328
Male657641182
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Patients With BronchiectasisHealthy Control GroupUnhealthy Control GroupTotal
Count of participants———0
BMI(Body Mass Index)
BMI(Body Mass Index)(kg/m^2)Patients With BronchiectasisHealthy Control GroupUnhealthy Control GroupTotal
Median21.1 (19.1 to 23.2)23.9 (22 to 25.8)24.2 (22.5 to 26.7)22.9 (20.6 to 25.4)
Smoking
Smoking(Participants)Patients With BronchiectasisHealthy Control GroupUnhealthy Control GroupTotal
Smoker27402895
Non-smoker18316246391
No record519024
Alcohol
Alcohol(Participants)Patients With BronchiectasisHealthy Control GroupUnhealthy Control GroupTotal
Drinker611320
Non-drinker20417371448
No record537042
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Shanghai pulmonary hospital
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200433, China
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 17, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05293314
Lead sponsor
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
Responsible party
Jin-Fu Xu (Chief of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 24, 2022
Start date
Jul 1, 2022
Primary completion
May 1, 2023
Completion
May 20, 2023
Results posted
Nov 19, 2024
Last update
Nov 19, 2024

Study contacts

Jin-fu Xu, MD
study director · Department of Respiratory and Critical Care

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion