CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05281224TRACHVestUpdated Feb 9, 2023

Ventilator Tube Holder for Patients With a Tracheostomy

An observational study in Critical Care, sponsored by Cardiff and Vale University Health Board. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-09.

Sponsored by Cardiff and Vale University Health Board · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients admitted to the critical care unit (CCU) at University Hospital Wales (UHW) have a variety of life-threatening conditions which require specialist care, often including a period of sedation and mechanical ventilation. As a consequence of critical illness, survivors often experience multiple sequela, including muscle weakness which leads to reduced mobility and physical function, especially if they experience a prolonged stay within critical care. Patients who require mechanical ventilation (MV) usually initially receive this via an endotracheal tube (ETT), but if the need for MV continues then this support is delivered through a tracheostomy tube. A small opening is made in the front of the patient's neck and the tracheostomy tube inserted into the trachea. This is connected to the ventilator and allows ventilatory support to be delivered without the need for an ETT. Consequently, sedation levels can be reduced, facilitating improved patient comfort, communication, eating, drinking and mobilisation.

Early rehabilitation is a key component of a patient's critical care journey and patients are supported with this by a number of specialist staff including physiotherapists, occupational therapists, nurses and support workers. Part of this rehabilitation may include helping a patient to sit on the edge of the bed, stand and mobilise. During rehabilitation sessions and other aspects of patient care, safety is paramount and staff must take care to ensure all lines and attachments are not dislodged. This includes tubing connecting the ventilator to the tracheostomy, excessive movement of which can cause damage to the airway, breakdown of skin and partial or complete dislodgement requiring immediate intervention.

The number of staff required to help mobilise a patient and maintain safety can be significant, especially when the patient has several attachments. Unfortunately, this staffing burden may contribute to reduced levels of patient mobilization and rehabilitation. However, it is possible that specially designed equipment may facilitate patient mobilization with increased safety and reduced resource requirements. This study will test a garment that may achieve this and obtain staff and patient opinion on its utility.

Read the detailed description

Patient A was an 85-year-old female with motor neurone disease and a permanent tracheostomy. She was dependent on a respiratory ventilator, but relatively mobile within the critical care unit. However, the ventilator tubing connecting the ambulatory ventilator (usually located behind the patient) to the tracheostomy interfered with the patient's freedom to move and disturbed the tracheostomy as she changed position. A custom-made garment was designed by the Medical Engineering Department of Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (CVUHB) to hold the tubing still and out of the way. This relieved any pressure or pulling on the tracheostomy tube and allowed the patient greater freedom of movement without requiring additional staff to manage/handle the tubing. Patient A used the garment every day for prolonged periods (2-3 hours) and for a duration of 3 months, before she became bedbound and no longer needed it.

The apparent success of this custom-made garment could be repeated in other patients with similar conditions. Furthermore, it may help to reduce the number of staff required when mobilising a patient and lower the handling burden. This project is intended to explore the use of such a garment in a critical care setting. Patients who can be moved out of bed may be moved several times a day, requiring 3 or more staff members each time. If the garment holds the connector tubing securely during these movements then there are several potential benefits:

  • Fewer staff may be required to move the patient
  • Improved manual handling processes for staff
  • Reduction in adverse events associated with mobilisation
  • Improved patient comfort during mobilisation Even small movements of the tracheostomy tube can cause discomfort and coughing, whereas larger movements risk tissue damage, airway trauma or dislodging the tracheostomy. In addition, the patient may have more freedom of movement when using the garment out of bed.

However, it is uncertain if or how the current design of the garment will impact on staff and patient activities. There are several potential disadvantages of using the garment:

  • It may be awkward to put on and take off, especially for patients with multiple device connections and/or cannulas, limited upper body mobility, and/or cognitive impairment
  • It may interfere with the use of a hoist
  • As a result, it may increase the time and/or staff members needed to move the patient
  • It may increase motion of the tracheostomy tube resulting in greater discomfort and risk of tissue damage or disruption of the ventilation
  • It may be uncomfortable or too hot for the patient
  • Staff may become dependent on the garment and be less vigilant of the tubing. Essentially, the study will observe staff using the garment to determine where the potential benefits and limitations exist.
02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Care
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cardiff and Vale University Health Board is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Critical care

Inclusion criteria

  • Inpatient on critical care unit for any admitting condition
  • Aged over 18
  • Any gender
  • A permanent or temporary tracheostomy
  • Dependant on a respiratory ventilator
  • Capable and expected to be out of bed and mobile on the critical care unit with the assistance of staff
  • Expected to remain on critical care unit for several days, and to retain their tracheostomy during this time.
  • Not currently Covid-positive (defined by local policy) and in area of reduced requirement for personal and protective equipment
  • Is able to give written, informed consent or have an appropriate consultee who can be approached

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Injuries or restricted movement of the arms or shoulders
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Staff opinion on potential to change occurrence of adverse events using TrachVest

    User feedback via questionnaires and focus groups to determine its potential to reduce adverse events. Questionnaires will be non-validated. Focus groups to follow structured questions.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceived benefits of the TrachVest on staff time

    User feedback via questionnaires and focus groups to determine its potential to reduce staff time. Questionnaires will be non-validated for staff and patients. Staff focus groups to follow structured questions.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Perceived benefits of the TrachVest on patient comfort

    User feedback via questionnaires and focus groups to determine its potential to improve patient comfort. Questionnaires will be non-validated for staff and patients. Staff focus groups to follow structured questions.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Usability of the TrachVest

    User feedback via questionnaires and focus groups to determine its usability within critical care. Questionnaires will be non-validated for staff and patients. Staff focus groups to follow structured questions.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cardiff and Vale UHB
    Cardiff, CF144XW, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 9, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05281224
Lead sponsor
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 16, 2022
Start date
Oct 21, 2021
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2022
Completion
Oct 31, 2022
Last update
Feb 9, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion