ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05276024Updated Oct 8, 2026

Evaluation of the iFuse Bedrock Technique in Association With Posterior Lumbosacral Fusion With Iliac Fixation.

An observational study in Sacroiliitis, Sacroiliac; Fusion and Lumbosacral; Fusion, sponsored by Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-08.

Sponsored by Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine · Observational

Updated Oct 8, 2026Now CompletedEnrollment updated+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
48
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to describe the impact of the iFuse Bedrock technique to decrease post-operative pains in patients who underwent multilevel posterior lumbosacral fusion.

Read the detailed description

This study is a multicentric, post-marked clinical investigation to assess the efficacy of the iFuse Bedrock technique to avoid post-operative pains in patients who underwent open posterior multilevel lumbosacral fusion. Subjects will be monitored for lumbar pains (Oswestry score, VAS, SF-12 questionnaire) and sacroiliac joint pains (provocative tests) up to 12 months after initial procedure. A single CT-scan acquisition will be performed at 12 months to detect any iFuse system-related abnormality (implants loosening or breakages).

02

Conditions studied

  • Sacroiliitis
  • Sacroiliac; Fusion
  • Lumbosacral; Fusion
  • Spine Deformity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sacroiliac joint pain
  • Sacroiliac joint fusion
  • Bedrock technique
  • Open posterior lumbosacral fusion
  • Spine deformties
03

In context

Sacroiliitis

42 studies on the registry are indexed under Sacroiliitis; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is below the median of 120 across 13 observational studies indexed under Sacroiliitis.

Browse Sacroiliitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All participants enrolled in the study are adult subjects who underwent an open posterior lumbosacral fusion procedure with additional sacroiliac joint fusion according to the iFuse Bedrock technique (insertion of the iFUSE-3D implant). Lumbosacral fusion involved at least the following vertebrae : L4, L5 and S1.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject scheduled for open posterior lumbosacral arthrodesis (including at least the following three vertebrae: L4, L5 and S1) associated with a sacroiliac fusion procedure and iliac fixation (thoracolumbar fusion procedures extended to sacrum are eligible in the study);
  • Insertion of at least 1 iFuse-3D implant according to the iFuse Bedrock technique (uni- and bilateral insertion are eligible);
  • Subject who preoperatively responded positively to pain provocation tests for SIJ dysfunction with or without a positive SIJ infiltration test;
  • Patient with a degenerative sacroiliac joint disease requested a fusion procedure;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major osteoporosis (DEXA scan > 3);
  • Any previous history of sacroiliac joint fusion or any surgical procedure involving a S2-iliac fusion;
  • Subjects requested a SIJ fusion without the iFuse-3D device or iFuse-3D not inserted according to the manufacturer instruction (Bedrock technique);
  • Subjects with a medical or surgical preventing the intervention from being performed or potentially interfering in the interpretation of the data collected (neurologic condition, local or systemic infection, any known allergy to surgical implants, psychiatric diseases, ...);
  • Currently pregnant or planning pregnancy;
  • Prisoner or a ward of the state;
  • Subject no willing to participate in the study;
  • Subject not affiliated to a social security insurance.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • iFuse Bedrock technique

    Multilevel lumbar fusion procedure with additional sacroiliac joint stabilization using the iFuse-3D system

    Device: iFuse Bedrock technique

Interventions

  • DeviceiFuse Bedrock technique

    Lumbosacral arthrodesis on 2 or more spinal segments (including at least L4, L5 and S1 vertebrae) associated with a sacroiliac fusion procedure according to the Bedrock technique using the iFuse 3D system and iliac fixation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in self-reported Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 months

    A decrease of 16 points in the ODI score at 12 months compared to the preoperative score is expected in order to demonstrate a 30% effecacy of the iFuse Bedrock technique in reducing postoperative pain.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in sacroiliac joint pain provocation tests.

    The number of positive SIJ pain provocation tests (Östgaard test, Faber test, Gaenslen test, Lasegue test, Compression, Long ligament test) performed at 3, 6 and 12 months will be compared against baseline (preoperative).

    Time frame: During 12 months

  2. Assessment of the Oswestry Disability Index

    Change from baseline in self reported Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 3 and 6 months.

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months

  3. Improvement of back and leg pains at 3, 6 and 12 months compared to preoperative scores

    Back and leg pain intensity self-report will be assessed before and after initial procedure for each patient (at 3, 6 and 12 months) using a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (0: no pain ; 10: most imaginable pain).

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  4. Change in Patient's quality of life

    Change from baseline in self reported 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) score at 3, 6 and 12 months.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  5. Proportion of subjects with postoperative SIJ fusion failure

    Proportion of subjects with SIJ fusion failure on CT scan as interpreted by the investigator

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Impact of iFuse Bedrock technique on Pelvic Incidence

    Measurement of postoperative Pelvic Incidence (PI) using EOS stereography at 3, 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. Pelvic Incidence is the angle between the line perpendicular to the S1 endplate from the midpoint of the endplate and the connecting line from the midpoint of the S1 endplate to center of the femoral head.

    Time frame: During 12 months

  7. Impact of iFuse Bedrock technique on Pelvic Tilt

    Measurement of postoperative Pelvic Tilt (PT) using EOS stereography at 3, 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. Pelvic Tilt is the angle between the connecting line from the midpoint of the S1 endplate to the center of the femoral head and the vertical line.

    Time frame: During 12 months

  8. Impact of iFuse Bedrock technique on Sacral Slope

    Measurement of postoperative Sacral Slope (SS) using EOS stereography at 3, 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. Sacral Slope is the angle between the tangent and the horizontal line of S1 endplate.

    Time frame: During 12 months

  9. Impact of iFuse Bedrock technique on Lumbar Lordosis

    Measurement of postoperative Lumbar Lordosis (LL) using EOS stereography at 3, 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. Lumbar Lordosis is the angle between the L1 upper endplate and the S1 upper endplate.

    Time frame: During 12 months

  10. Impact of iFuse Bedrock technique on Thoracic Kyphosis

    Measurement of postoperative Thoracic Kyphosis (TK) using EOS stereography at 3, 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. Thoracic Kyphosis is the angle between the T4 upper endplate and the T12 lower endplate.

    Time frame: During 12 months

  11. Impact of iFuse Bedrock technique on the Odontoid Hip Axis

    Measurement of postoperative Odontoid Hip Axis (OD-HA) using EOS stereography at 3, 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. Odontoid Hip Axis is the angle between the vertical and the highest point of the odontoid process (dens) connecting to the centre of the acetabulum (bi-coxo-femoral axis)

    Time frame: During 12 months

  12. Impact of iFuse Bedrock technique on the T1 pelvic angle

    Measurement of postoperative T1 pelvic angle (TPA) using EOS stereography at 3, 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. TPA is the angle between the line from centroid of T1 to the femoral head axis and the line from femoral head axis to middle of the S1 endplate

    Time frame: During 12 months

  13. Proportion of subjects with iFuse-3D implant-related complications

    Proportion of subjects with any of the following complications related to the iFuse-3D implant : malposition of the implant (intra-operative evaluation), loosening, displacement, abnormal bone reaction, breakage or any other complication directly related to the insertion or use of the iFuse-3D implant.

    Time frame: 12 months

  14. Incidence of any serious adverse events

    Record of any intra and postoperative complications

    Time frame: During 12 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
    Bordeaux, 33300, France
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Marseille
    Marseille, 13005, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2022 to primary completion in Apr 2026, 45 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 21, 2022
First posted
Mar 11, 2022
StartActual
Jun 10, 2022
Primary completionActual
Apr 1, 2026
CompletionActual
Apr 1, 2026
Last update
Oct 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 8, 2026
Enrollment
50 (estimated)→48 (actual)
Oct 8, 2026
Eligibility
Revised
Oct 8, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 8, 2026
    Recruiting→Completed
    Enrollment 50 (estimated)→48 (actual)
    Eligibility Revised
    + 7 other changes: identifiers, verification date, date precision, oversight details, contact details, site details and index terms

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05276024
Lead sponsor
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
Collaborators
SI-BONE, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 11, 2022
Start date
Jun 10, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2026
Completion
Apr 1, 2026
Last update
Oct 8, 2026

Study contacts

Jean Charles Le Huec, M.D., PhD
principal investigator · VERTEBRA Institute, Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion