CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05272150VISIBLEUpdated Jun 24, 2026Results posted

Study of Guselkumab in Skin of Color Participants With Moderate-to-severe Plaque and/or Scalp Psoriasis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Guselkumab and Placebo in Plaque Psoriasis and Scalp Psoriasis, sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Completed at 94 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-24.

Sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
211
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab treatment versus placebo in skin of color participants with predominant moderate-to-severe body psoriasis or predominant moderate-to-severe scalp psoriasis by assessing improvements in the signs and symptoms of psoriasis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Plaque Psoriasis
  • Scalp Psoriasis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC is the lead sponsor of 912 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 278 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 131 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a diagnosis of plaque psoriasis (with or without psoriatic arthritis [PsA]) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study drug
  • Self-identify as non-white or non-caucasian
  • Be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for psoriasis
  • Have an involved body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=) 10 percent (%), psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12, investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and at baseline (Cohort A), or have a scalp surface area >=30%, psoriasis scalp severity index (PSSI) >=12, scalp specific investigator global assessment (ss-IGA) >=3, and one plaque outside of the scalp at screening and at baseline (Cohort B)
  • Agree not to receive a live virus or live bacterial vaccination during the study, or within 12 weeks after the last administration of study intervention
  • Agree not to receive a Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination during the study, and within 12 weeks after the last administration of study intervention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (example: erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
  • Has received ustekinumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, or brodalumab within 12 weeks of first dose of study drug
  • Has a history or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Participant has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to guselkumab or its excipients
  • Has or has had a serious infection (example: sepsis, pneumonia or pyelonephritis), or has been hospitalized or received intravenous antibiotics for an infection during the 2 months before screening
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
211 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort A: Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis

    Participants will receive either guselkumab subcutaneously (SC) or placebo SC. Placebo participants will then crossover to receive guselkumab SC.

    Drug: Guselkumab · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Cohort B: Moderate-to-severe Scalp Psoriasis

    Participants will receive either guselkumab SC or placebo SC. Placebo participants will then crossover to receive guselkumab SC.

    Drug: Guselkumab · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugGuselkumab

    Participants will receive guselkumab as subcutaneous injection.

    Also known as: CNTO1959, Tremfya

  • DrugPlacebo

    Participants will receive placebo as subcutaneous injection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation; 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (\>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 16

  2. Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 response (greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 90 percent \[%\] improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe and 4=very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Week 16

  3. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) or Very Mild Disease (1) at Week 16

    The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 16

  4. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) 90 Response at Week 16

    PSSI 90 response is defined as a percentage of participants who achieved at least 90% improvement from baseline in the PSSI score. PSSI is a physician assessment of severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation and extent of psoriasis involvement. Severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation each scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the extent of psoriasis involvement scored on a scale from 1 (\<10% of scalp involved) to 6 (90 to 100% of scalp involved). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the psoriasis involvement. The PSSI score ranged from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation; 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (\>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 16

  2. Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 response (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Week 16

  3. Cohort A: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

    Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  4. Cohort A: Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

    A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  5. Cohort A: Time to Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 90 Percent (%) Reduction in PASI Score

    Time to \>=90% reduction was defined as the time at which \>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline was achieved. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe and 4=very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: From baseline (Week 0) up to Week 16

  6. Cohorts A and B: Change From Baseline in Total Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in total DLQI score at Week 16 was reported. The DLQI was a dermatology specific health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much), where higher score indicated more impact on QoL. The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. Baseline = closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  7. Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >= 4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4

    PSSD was a patient reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 7 day recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Week 16

  8. Cohorts A and B: Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 7-day recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the weekly symptom score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  9. Cohorts A and B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >=1

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 7-day recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the weekly symptom score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Week 16

  10. Cohort B: Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Score at Week 16

    PSSI is a physician assessment of severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation and extent of psoriasis involvement. Severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation each scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the extent of psoriasis involvement scored on a scale from 1 (\<10% of scalp involved) to 6 (90 to 100% of scalp involved). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the psoriasis involvement. The PSSI score ranged from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  11. Cohort B: Percent Change From Baseline in Scalp Surface Area (SSA) at Week 16

    Scalp Surface Area (SSA) is defined as the extent of scalp skin affected by psoriasis, expressed as a percentage of the total scalp surface area. The adult SSA was 520-705 centimeter\^2 (cm\^2), which mean 1% SSA is 5.2 - 7.1 cm\^2. The thumbprint has an average surface area of 5.5 cm\^2 +/- 1.3 cm\^2. The thumb (in particular, the thumb projection) was used as a tool for accurate measurement of 1% SSA. The overall SSA affected by psoriasis was thus be estimated based on the participant's thumb. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  12. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) at Week 16

    The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 16

  13. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSI 100 Response at Week 16

    PSSI 100 response is defined as a percentage of participants who achieved 100% improvement from baseline in the PSSI score. PSSI is a physician assessment of severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation and extent of psoriasis involvement. Severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation each scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the extent of psoriasis involvement scored on a scale from 1 (\<10% of scalp involved) to 6 (90 to 100% of scalp involved). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the psoriasis involvement. The PSSI score ranged from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Week 16

  14. Cohort B: Time to >=90% Reduction in PSSI Score

    Time to \>=90% reduction was defined as the time at which \>=90% improvement in PSSI from baseline was achieved. PSSI is a physician assessment of severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation and extent of psoriasis involvement. Severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation each scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the extent of psoriasis involvement scored on a scale from 1 (\<10% of scalp involved) to 6 (90 to 100% of scalp involved). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the psoriasis involvement. The PSSI score ranged from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 16

  15. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline Scalp Itch Score >=4

    The scalp itch NRS was a single-item scale that asks participants to rate the severity of their scalp itching due to psoriasis by considering their worst level of itching over the past 24 hours. The 11-point scalp itch NRS ranged from 0 (no scalp itch) to 10 (worst scalp itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated more severe scalp itch. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Time frame: Week 16

  16. Cohorts A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. TEAE was defined as any AE that occurred after the start of initial study agent administration and those AEs that were presented at baseline but worsened in severity after the start of initial study agent administration.

    Time frame: Cohorts A and B: Placebo: From Week 0 to Week 16; Cohorts A and B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 16 to Week 112; Cohorts A and B: Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 0 to Week 112

  17. Cohorts A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. Serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any AE that occurred after the start of initial study agent administration and those AEs that were presented at baseline but worsened in severity after the start of initial study agent administration.

    Time frame: Cohorts A and B: Placebo: From Week 0 to Week 16; Cohorts A and B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 16 to Week 112; Cohorts A and B: Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 0 to Week 112

07

Results

Posted Jun 24, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Started26772781
Participants who crossed over to guselkumab250240
Completed22672077
Not completed41074
Withdrew: Adverse event0100
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy0010
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3630
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1334

Outcome measures

PrimaryCohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16

The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation; 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (\>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
Percentage of participantsCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16074.0
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Adjusted treatment difference: 74.1 · 95% CI 64.4 to 83.7
PrimaryCohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16

Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 response (greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 90 percent \[%\] improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe and 4=very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participantsCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 163.857.1
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Adjusted treatment difference: 53.3 · 95% CI 40.1 to 66.6
PrimaryCohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) or Very Mild Disease (1) at Week 16

The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) or Very Mild Disease (1) at Week 16
Percentage of participantsCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) or Very Mild Disease (1) at Week 1611.568.4
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Adjusted treatment difference: 56.7 · 95% CI 40.9 to 72.5
PrimaryCohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) 90 Response at Week 16

PSSI 90 response is defined as a percentage of participants who achieved at least 90% improvement from baseline in the PSSI score. PSSI is a physician assessment of severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation and extent of psoriasis involvement. Severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation each scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the extent of psoriasis involvement scored on a scale from 1 (\<10% of scalp involved) to 6 (90 to 100% of scalp involved). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the psoriasis involvement. The PSSI score ranged from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) 90 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participantsCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) 90 Response at Week 163.865.8
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Adjusted treatment difference: 61.9 · 95% CI 48.9 to 74.8
SecondaryCohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16

The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation; 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (\>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16
Percentage of participantsCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16032.5
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Adjusted treatment difference: 32.5 · 95% CI 22.1 to 42.9
SecondaryCohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16

Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 response (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participantsCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16029.9
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = =0.002 · Adjusted treatment difference: 29.9 · 95% CI 19.7 to 40.1
SecondaryCohort A: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent change
Cohort A: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16
Percent changeCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort A: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16-8.30 (-19.04 to 2.45)-84.49 (-90.89 to -78.09)
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg · Mixed-Effect Model for Repeated Measure · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -76.19 · 95% CI -88.43 to -63.96
SecondaryCohort A: Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent change
Cohort A: Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16
Percent changeCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort A: Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16-0.94 (-15.49 to 13.60)-77.92 (-86.72 to -69.12)
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg · Mixed-Effect Model for Repeated Measure · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -76.98 · 95% CI -93.47 to -60.48
SecondaryCohort A: Time to Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 90 Percent (%) Reduction in PASI Score

Time to \>=90% reduction was defined as the time at which \>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline was achieved. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe and 4=very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
From baseline (Week 0) up to Week 16
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Cohort A: Time to Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 90 Percent (%) Reduction in PASI Score
WeeksCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort A: Time to Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 90 Percent (%) Reduction in PASI ScoreNA (NA to NA)13.2 (8.4 to NA)
SecondaryCohorts A and B: Change From Baseline in Total Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 16

Change from baseline in total DLQI score at Week 16 was reported. The DLQI was a dermatology specific health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much), where higher score indicated more impact on QoL. The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. Baseline = closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a Scale
Cohorts A and B: Change From Baseline in Total Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 16
Units on a ScaleCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohorts A and B: Change From Baseline in Total Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 16-2.48 (-4.39 to -0.56)-12.06 (-13.22 to -10.91)-2.16 (-4.76 to 0.44)-9.66 (-11.09 to -8.23)
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -9.59 · 95% CI -11.76 to -7.42
  • Cohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -7.5 · 95% CI -10.44 to -4.55
SecondaryCohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >= 4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4

PSSD was a patient reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 7 day recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >= 4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4
Percentage of participantsCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >= 4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=416.766.7
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Adjusted treatment difference: 50 · 95% CI 31.5 to 68.4
SecondaryCohorts A and B: Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16

Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 7-day recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the weekly symptom score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Cohorts A and B: Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16
Units on a scaleCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohorts A and B: Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16-8.19 (-15.76 to -0.62)-49.45 (-53.98 to -44.92)-8.28 (-18.42 to 1.87)-44.81 (-50.53 to -39.09)
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg · Mixed-Effect Model for Repeated Measure · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -41.26 · 95% CI -49.89 to -32.63
  • Cohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg · Mixed-Effect Model for Repeated Measure · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -36.53 · 95% CI -48.12 to -24.94
SecondaryCohorts A and B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >=1

PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 7-day recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the weekly symptom score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Cohorts A and B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >=1
Percentage of participantsCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohorts A and B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >=1010.43.821.3
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = =0.090 · Adjusted treatment difference: 10.4 · 95% CI 3.6 to 17.2
  • Cohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = =0.040 · Adjusted treatment difference: 17.3 · 95% CI 5.7 to 29.0
SecondaryCohort B: Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Score at Week 16

PSSI is a physician assessment of severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation and extent of psoriasis involvement. Severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation each scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the extent of psoriasis involvement scored on a scale from 1 (\<10% of scalp involved) to 6 (90 to 100% of scalp involved). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the psoriasis involvement. The PSSI score ranged from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent change
Cohort B: Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Score at Week 16
Percent changeCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort B: Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Score at Week 16-37.79 (-48.09 to -27.49)-87.62 (-93.42 to -81.81)
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg · Mixed-Effect Model for Repeated Measure · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -49.83 · 95% CI -61.51 to -38.15
SecondaryCohort B: Percent Change From Baseline in Scalp Surface Area (SSA) at Week 16

Scalp Surface Area (SSA) is defined as the extent of scalp skin affected by psoriasis, expressed as a percentage of the total scalp surface area. The adult SSA was 520-705 centimeter\^2 (cm\^2), which mean 1% SSA is 5.2 - 7.1 cm\^2. The thumbprint has an average surface area of 5.5 cm\^2 +/- 1.3 cm\^2. The thumb (in particular, the thumb projection) was used as a tool for accurate measurement of 1% SSA. The overall SSA affected by psoriasis was thus be estimated based on the participant's thumb. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent change
Cohort B: Percent Change From Baseline in Scalp Surface Area (SSA) at Week 16
Percent changeCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort B: Percent Change From Baseline in Scalp Surface Area (SSA) at Week 16-33.40 (-45.69 to -21.11)-86.56 (-93.46 to -79.67)
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg · Mixed-Effect Model for Repeated Measure · p = <0.001 · Ls mean difference: -53.16 · 95% CI -67.07 to -39.26
SecondaryCohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) at Week 16

The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) at Week 16
Percentage of participantsCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) at Week 163.857.9
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Adjusted treatment difference: 53.9 · 95% CI 40.6 to 67.2
SecondaryCohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSI 100 Response at Week 16

PSSI 100 response is defined as a percentage of participants who achieved 100% improvement from baseline in the PSSI score. PSSI is a physician assessment of severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation and extent of psoriasis involvement. Severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation each scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the extent of psoriasis involvement scored on a scale from 1 (\<10% of scalp involved) to 6 (90 to 100% of scalp involved). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the psoriasis involvement. The PSSI score ranged from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSI 100 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participantsCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSI 100 Response at Week 163.859.2
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Adjusted treatment difference: 55.2 · 95% CI 42.0 to 68.5
SecondaryCohort B: Time to >=90% Reduction in PSSI Score

Time to \>=90% reduction was defined as the time at which \>=90% improvement in PSSI from baseline was achieved. PSSI is a physician assessment of severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation and extent of psoriasis involvement. Severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation each scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the extent of psoriasis involvement scored on a scale from 1 (\<10% of scalp involved) to 6 (90 to 100% of scalp involved). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the psoriasis involvement. The PSSI score ranged from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 16
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Cohort B: Time to >=90% Reduction in PSSI Score
WeeksCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort B: Time to >=90% Reduction in PSSI ScoreNA (NA to NA)11.6 (6.0 to 15.3)
SecondaryCohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline Scalp Itch Score >=4

The scalp itch NRS was a single-item scale that asks participants to rate the severity of their scalp itching due to psoriasis by considering their worst level of itching over the past 24 hours. The 11-point scalp itch NRS ranged from 0 (no scalp itch) to 10 (worst scalp itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated more severe scalp itch. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline Scalp Itch Score >=4
Percentage of participantsCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline Scalp Itch Score >=424.069.4
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg vs Cohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Adjusted treatment difference: 45.1 · 95% CI 25.7 to 64.5
SecondaryCohorts A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. TEAE was defined as any AE that occurred after the start of initial study agent administration and those AEs that were presented at baseline but worsened in severity after the start of initial study agent administration.

Time frame:
Cohorts A and B: Placebo: From Week 0 to Week 16; Cohorts A and B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 16 to Week 112; Cohorts A and B: Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 0 to Week 112
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohorts A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohorts A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)5135831163
SecondaryCohorts A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. Serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any AE that occurred after the start of initial study agent administration and those AEs that were presented at baseline but worsened in severity after the start of initial study agent administration.

Time frame:
Cohorts A and B: Placebo: From Week 0 to Week 16; Cohorts A and B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 16 to Week 112; Cohorts A and B: Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 0 to Week 112
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohorts A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
ParticipantsCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Cohorts A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)013103

Adverse events

Collected over Cohorts A and B: Placebo: From Week 0 to Week 16, Cohorts A and B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 16 to Week 112, Cohorts A and B: Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 0 to Week 112. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cohort A: Placebo0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)5/26 (19.2%)
Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg0/25 (0%)1/25 (4%)8/25 (32%)
Cohort A: Guselkumab 100 mg0/77 (0%)3/77 (3.9%)36/77 (46.8%)
Cohort B: Placebo0/27 (0%)1/27 (3.7%)2/27 (7.4%)
Cohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)8/24 (33.3%)
Cohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg0/81 (0%)3/81 (3.7%)43/81 (53.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/261/250/770/270/240/81
Viral RashInfections and infestations0/260/250/771/270/240/81
Perforation Bile DuctHepatobiliary disorders0/260/251/770/270/240/81
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/260/251/770/270/240/81
Gallbladder AbscessInfections and infestations0/260/251/770/270/240/81
PyelonephritisInfections and infestations0/260/251/770/270/240/81
Angina PectorisCardiac disorders0/260/250/770/270/241/81
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders0/260/250/770/270/241/81
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/260/250/770/270/241/81
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent other events
EventCohort A: PlaceboCohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: PlaceboCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mg
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations1/261/2513/771/276/2420/81
Covid-19Infections and infestations0/260/255/770/271/2413/81
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/262/259/770/271/246/81
HypertensionVascular disorders3/260/255/770/270/242/81
Food PoisoningGastrointestinal disorders0/260/250/770/272/241/81
MigraineNervous system disorders0/260/251/770/272/240/81
Tooth AbscessInfections and infestations0/262/250/770/270/240/81
Aspartate Aminotransferase IncreasedInvestigations0/262/251/770/271/240/81
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/262/251/770/270/240/81
Type 2 Diabetes MellitusMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/260/254/770/270/246/81

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mgTotal
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years22752777201
>=65 years420410
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mgTotal
Female72283875
Male19551943136
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino124093394
Not Hispanic or Latino14371848117
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00011
Asian816122763
Black or African American2931024
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander10001
White00000
More than one race142512
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Other14481038110
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mgTotal
Mean42.3 ± 15.7344.7 ± 11.841 ± 12.8243.3 ± 13.5843.4 ± 13.11
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Cohort A: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort A: Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mgCohort B: Guselkumab 100 mgTotal
CANADA924123075
UNITED STATES17531551136
08

Study locations

94 sites
  • Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center
    Birmingham, Alabama 35203, United States
  • Cahaba Research Inc
    Birmingham, Alabama 35244, United States
  • Stoll Dermatology
    Beverly Hills, California 90212, United States
  • California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute
    Encinitas, California 92024, United States
  • First OC Dermatology
    Fountain Valley, California 92708, United States
  • Center for Dermatology Clinical Research
    Fremont, California 94538, United States
  • Community Regional Medical Center
    Fresno, California 93701, United States
  • Paul Wallace MD
    Ladera Heights, California 90056, United States
  • The Grimes Center for Medical and Aesthetic Dermatology
    Los Angeles, California 90036, United States
  • Care Access Research 1
    Newport Beach, California 92660, United States
  • MedDerm Associates
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Synergy Clinical Research
    San Francisco, California 94132, United States
  • Southern California Dermatology
    Santa Ana, California 92701, United States
  • Clinical Science Institute
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • University of Connecticut Health Center
    Farmington, Connecticut 06030, United States
  • Center for Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • Skin Care Research
    Boca Raton, Florida 33486, United States
  • Driven Research LLC
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134, United States
  • Florida Academic Dermatology Centers
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134, United States
  • Hollywood Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery
    Hollywood, Florida 33021, United States
  • International Dermatology Research, Inc.
    Miami, Florida 33144, United States
  • Tory P Sullivan M D PA
    North Miami Beach, Florida 33162, United States
  • Park Avenue Dermatology
    Orange Park, Florida 32073, United States
  • Riverchase Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33028, United States
  • GCP Research
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33705, United States
  • Forcare Clinical Research Inc
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Hamilton Dermatology Atlanta Dermatology, Vein & Research Center, LLC
    Alpharetta, Georgia 30022-1160, United States
  • Advanced Medical Research
    Atlanta, Georgia 30328, United States
  • Skin Care Physicians of Georgia
    Macon, Georgia 31217, United States
  • University Dermatology and Vein Clinic
    Darien, Illinois 60561, United States
  • Northshore University Healthsystem
    Skokie, Illinois 60077, United States
  • Dundee Dermatology
    West Dundee, Illinois 60118, United States
  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46256, United States
  • Indiana Clinical Trial Center
    Plainfield, Indiana 46168, United States
  • Epiphany Dermatology of Kansas, LLC
    Overland Park, Kansas 66210, United States
  • Ds Research
    Louisville, Kentucky 40241, United States
  • Callender Center for Clinical Research
    Glenn Dale, Maryland 20769, United States
  • Care Access Research
    Marriottsville, Maryland 21104, United States
  • DermAssociates, PC
    Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
  • Lawrence J Green MD LLC
    Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
  • Allcutis Research
    Beverly, Massachusetts 01915, United States
  • Metro Boston Clinical Partners
    Brighton, Massachusetts 02135, United States
  • David Fivenson MD, Dermatology
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103, United States
  • St Joseph Dermatology and Vein Clinic
    Saint Joseph, Michigan 49085, United States
  • Somerset Skin Centre
    Troy, Michigan 48084, United States
  • Henry Ford Medical Center
    West Bloomfield, Michigan 48322, United States
  • Twin Cities Dermatology Center
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416, United States
  • Skin Specialists
    Omaha, Nebraska 68144, United States
  • Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey
    East Windsor, New Jersey 08520, United States
  • Hudson Dermatology & Skin Cancer Center
    Hoboken, New Jersey 07030, United States
  • Schweiger Dermatology Group
    Verona, New Jersey 07044, United States
  • Forest Hills Dermatology Group PLLC
    Forest Hills, New York 11375, United States
  • MDCS Dermatology
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Sadick Research Group
    New York, New York 10075, United States
  • Markowitz Medical OptiSkin
    New York, New York 10128, United States
  • Accellacare Research of Cary
    Cary, North Carolina 27511, United States
  • Darst Dermatology
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28277, United States
  • Dermatology Specialists
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28277, United States
  • Accellacare of Raleigh
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27612, United States
  • PMG Research of Rocky Mount, LLC
    Rocky Mount, North Carolina 27804, United States
  • PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28401, United States
  • Wake Forest Health Sciences
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27104, United States
  • Advanced Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center
    Boardman, Ohio 44512, United States
  • Wright State Physicians Health Center
    Dayton, Ohio 45324, United States
  • Apex Dermatology Mayfield Heights
    Mayfield Heights, Ohio 44124, United States
  • Central Sooner Research
    Norman, Oklahoma 73071, United States
  • Schweiger Dermatology Group 1
    Exton, Pennsylvania 19341, United States
  • Temple University School of Medicine
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Dermatology and Laser Center of Charleston
    Charleston, South Carolina 29407, United States
  • Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC
    Fountain Inn, South Carolina 29644, United States
  • Arlington Center for Dermatology
    Arlington, Texas 76011, United States
  • Dermatology Treatment & Research Center, PA
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Modern Research Associates PLLC
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Center for Clinical Studies
    Houston, Texas 77004, United States
  • Suzanne Bruce and Associates - The Center for Skin Research
    Houston, Texas 77056-4132, United States
  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research
    Pflugerville, Texas 78660, United States
  • Progressive Clinical Research
    San Antonio, Texas 78213, United States
  • Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists
    San Antonio, Texas 78218, United States
  • Dermatology Research Institute Inc
    Calgary, Alberta T2J 7E1, Canada
  • Beacon Dermatology
    Calgary, Alberta T3E 0B2, Canada
  • Alberta DermaSurgery Centre
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2C1, Canada
  • Dr. Chih ho Hong Medical
    Surrey, British Columbia V3R 6A7, Canada
  • Dr. Lorne E. Albrecht
    Surrey, British Columbia V3V 0C6, Canada
  • CCA Medical Research Corporation
    Ajax, Ontario L1S7K8, Canada
  • Dr Dusan Sajic Medicine Professional Corporation
    Guelph, Ontario N1L 0B7, Canada
  • Lynderm Research Inc.
    Markham, Ontario L3P 1X2, Canada
  • North York Research Inc
    North York, Ontario M2M 4J5, Canada
  • JRB Research Inc
    Ottawa, Ontario K1K 4L2, Canada
  • Nectar Research Group Inc
    Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1A5, Canada
  • Canadian Dermatology Center
    Toronto, Ontario M3B 0A7, Canada
  • Toronto Research Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M3H 5Y8, Canada
  • FACET Dermatology
    Toronto, Ontario M4E 2Y9, Canada
  • Research Toronto
    Toronto, Ontario M4W 2N4, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Alexis A, McMichael A, Vashi N, Bhutani T, Yeung J, Alkousakis T, Rowland K, Choi O, Ma T, Chan D, Lester J, Rodriguez AO, Yadav G, Kindred C, Grimes P, Taylor SC, Desai SR. The Impact of Post-inflammatory Pigment Alteration After Psoriasis: Novel Data from the VISIBLE Study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Apr;16(4):2031-2045. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01688-z. Epub 2026 Mar 2. PubMed 41770445 ↗
  • Alexis A, McMichael A, Soung J, Choi O, Alkousakis T, Alonso-Llamazares J, Shahriari M, Rodriguez AO, Bhutani T, Chan D, Rowland K, Sauder M, Hong HC, Yadav G, Yeung J, Jeyarajah J, Ma T, Gao LL, Park-Wyllie L, Green L, Lee M, Vashi N, Kindred C, Grimes P, Taylor SC, Desai SR; VISIBLE Trial Investigators. Guselkumab for Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Across All Skin Tones: Cohort A of the VISIBLE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Sep 1;161(9):901-911. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.1836. PubMed 40560559 ↗
  • McMichael A, Shahriari M, Stein Gold L, Alkousakis T, Choi O, Bhutani T, Rodriguez AO, Tyring SK, Chan D, Rowland K, Albrecht L, Lynde C, Yadav G, Yeung J, Park-Wyllie L, Ma T, Jeyarajah J, Gao LL, Smith S, Moore AY, Vashi N, Kindred C, Grimes P, Desai SR, Taylor SC, Alexis A; VISIBLE Trial Investigators. Guselkumab for Moderate to Severe Scalp Psoriasis Across All Skin Tones: Cohort B of the VISIBLE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Sep 1;161(9):912-922. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.1849. PubMed 40560554 ↗
  • Alexis A, McMichael A, Vashi N, Bhutani T, Rodriguez AO, Yeung J, Choi O, Chan D, Alkousakis T, Bronner DN, Park-Wyllie L, Gao LL, Grimes P, Shahriari M, Yadav G, Kindred C, Taylor SC, Desai SR. Improving Diversity in a Novel Psoriasis Study: VISIBLE as a Framework for Clinical Trial Quality Improvement. JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Mar 1;161(3):256-264. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.5103. PubMed 39661358 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Nov 2, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jun 23, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05272150
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 9, 2022
Start date
Jul 13, 2022
Primary completion
May 30, 2025
Completion
May 30, 2025
Results posted
Jun 24, 2026
Last update
Jun 24, 2026

Study contacts

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion