ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05268731TransHepaticUpdated Aug 29, 2023

Clinical Success of Different Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Procedures

An observational study in Extrahepatic Cholestasis, sponsored by Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig-Klinik GmbH. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-29.

Sponsored by Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig-Klinik GmbH · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2023, 2 years 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2022; still recruiting 4 years 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The clinical success of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage procedures (PTBDs) is usually measured by the the decrease of the serum bilirubin value. However, the bilirubin value can be biased by other disease conditions. Furthermore, the time course of the decrease of the bilirubin value after technically successful PTBD is not well known. Serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), a liver enzyme which is typically elevated in cholestatic liver diseases, might be a good alternative to bilirubin as an indicator for the clinical success of PTBDs. The aim of this study is to analyse the bilirubin level and the GGT level in patients with technically successful PTBD.

Read the detailed description

The medical records of adult patients who have received a technically successful PTBD will be screened sytematically in terms of bilirubin and GGT values in the follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention. Bilirubin and GGT values have been routinely examinated every 1 to 3 days. PTBD comprises external plastic endoprosthesis, combined external and internal endoprosthesis and primary metal stent insertion. The respective three procedures are considered separately. As PTBD is a rare intervention which is used after failed or impossible endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) medical records will be screened from 2002 to 2022 (20 years). It is expected that for example a decrease of GGT after three days might indicate a successful procedure. This in turn might has an impact on the early demission of the patient. On the other side, the precise definition of successful PTBD by bilirubin or GGT value might help to make this procedure better comparable to other alternative biliary drainage procedures such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage.

02

Conditions studied

  • Extrahepatic Cholestasis

Keywords

  • Extrahepatic Cholestasis
  • Self Expandable Metallic Stents
  • Drainage
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig-Klinik GmbH is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction and failed or impossible ERCP

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • technically successful PTBD

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • technically not successful PTBD
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Extrahepatic bile duct obstruction and failed ERCP

    Patients with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction and obstructive jaundice have received a percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. The choice between an insertion of an external or an external/internal drainage has been made during the procedure depending on whether the guide wire could be accessed to the jejunum/duodenum or not. The choice between internal/external drainage or a primary metal stent has been made by the investigators preference or was made on the basis of an existing malign bile duct obstruction or not.

    Procedure: External plastic endoprosthesis · Procedure: Combined external internal plastic endoprosthesis · Procedure: Primary metal stent

Interventions

  • ProcedureExternal plastic endoprosthesis

    Ultrasound- or fluoroscopy-guided bile duct puncture with insertion of an external plastic endoprosthesis if the duodenum or jejunum cannot be accessed by a guide wire

  • ProcedureCombined external internal plastic endoprosthesis

    Ultrasound- or fluoroscopy-guided bile duct puncture with insertion of an external/internal plastic endoprosthesis if the duodenum or jejunum can be accessed by a guide wire. No definitive drainage intended in initial procedure.

  • ProcedurePrimary metal stent

    Ultrasound- or fluoroscopy-guided bile duct puncture with insertion of a self-expanding metal stent if the duodenum or jejunum can be accessed by a guide wire. A definitive drainage is intended in the initial procedure, for example in patients with malign bile duct obstruction

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bilirubin value

    Change of serum bilirubin value

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. GGT value

    Change of serum bilirubin value

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Born P, Rosch T, Triptrap A, Frimberger E, Allescher HD, Ott R, Weigert N, Lorenz R, Classen M. Long-term results of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for benign and malignant bile duct strictures. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998 May;33(5):544-9. doi: 10.1080/00365529850172142. PubMed 9648997 ↗
  • Tsai CC, Mo LR, Lin RC, Kuo JY, Chang KK, Yeh YH, Yang SC, Yueh SK, Tsai HM, Yu CY. Self-expandable metallic stents in the management of malignant biliary obstruction. J Formos Med Assoc. 1996 Apr;95(4):298-302. PubMed 8935298 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All data of the study will be available on request

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2023, 21 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 24, 2022
First posted
Mar 7, 2022
StartActual
Mar 15, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 15, 2023
CompletionEst.
Dec 15, 2023
Last update
Aug 29, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05268731
Lead sponsor
Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig-Klinik GmbH
Collaborators
Helios Kliniken Schwerin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 7, 2022
Start date
Mar 15, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 29, 2023

Study contacts

Dr.med. D Schmitz, MD
Contact
s.daniel_427@gmx.de
+49491758674415
Martin Kliment, MD
Contact
Martin.Kliment@helios-gesundheit.de
+49 385 520 - 2601
Daniel Schmitz, MD
principal investigator · Theresienkrankenhaus Mannheim, University of Heidelberg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion