CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05258630D-HOMESUpdated Nov 7, 2024Results posted

Diabetes Homeless Medication Support

A Phase 2 interventional study of Diabetes Homeless Medication Support (D-Homes) and Enhanced usual care in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Housing Problems and Psychological Distress, sponsored by Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-07.

Sponsored by Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized pilot trial of the Diabetes Homeless Medication Support intervention vs. brief diabetes education will test the perception and feasibility of anticipated study procedures and refine randomization and blinding.

Read the detailed description

This study has an overall goal to develop and pilot test a collaborative care intervention using motivational interviewing and behavioral activation alongside education and psychosocial support to improve medication adherence tailored to the experiences of people experiencing homelessness and diabetes (DH). The investigators' central hypothesis is that medication adherence and diabetes self-care (and eventual glycemic control, health care use/cost) will improve with an intervention tailored to the unique context of DH.

This study will involve addition of a randomization schema to compare D-Homes to brief diabetes education. The study team will enroll participants (n=54), and refine procedures for the randomized trial outcome measures. This includes an assessment of sustained impact of the program at 24-weeks post-treatment. These will complement 12-week post-treatment primary outcome measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  • Housing Problems
  • Psychological Distress
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 38 is below the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 69 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18 yrs. or older
  2. English-speaking
  3. Homelessness by federal definition (HEARTH ACT) in the past 24 mos.
  4. Self-reported diagnosis of type 2 diabetes with A1c >7.5%, later verified in medical record and study point-of-care lab test.
  5. Plan to stay in local area or be reachable by phone for the next 24 weeks
  6. Willingness to work on medication adherence and diabetes self-care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to provide informed consent (e.g., presence of a legal guardian, prisoners)
  2. Active psychosis or intoxication precluding ability to give informed consent
  3. Pregnant or lactating people
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    D-Homes intervention

    Behavioral treatments by a diabetes wellness coach as defined below.

    Behavioral: Diabetes Homeless Medication Support (D-Homes) · Behavioral: Enhanced usual care

  • Active comparator
    Enhanced usual care

    Brief diabetes educational session by a diabetes wellness coach.

    Behavioral: Enhanced usual care

Interventions

  • BehavioralDiabetes Homeless Medication Support (D-Homes)

    There will be 10 sessions offered within 12 weeks to participants. Sessions will last approximately 30 minutes. During sessions a diabetes wellness coach will use behavioral activation and motivational interviewing to get to know participants and set goals to improve diabetes care. The coach will encourage a focus on medication adherence behaviors to the extent that participants are willing. The coach will also help with resource and care coordination. The coach will also provide a tailored tool to the patient's needs/goals and tailored diabetes education as needed.

  • BehavioralEnhanced usual care

    Trained diabetes wellness coaches will provide an approximately 15 minutes of instruction about the basic concepts of diabetes. They will use handouts aligned with American Diabetes Association guidelines. They will read these with participants and answer basic questions. Handouts will cover (1) general diabetes knowledge, (2) healthy eating with diabetes, (3) physical activity with diabetes. The coach will also provide a general tool to support medication adherence (e.g. pillbox).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Experience During the Intervention

    The acceptability of the intervention to participants will be measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, 8-item version, with a score range from 8-32, higher score indicating higher satisfaction.

    Time frame: Assessed at 16 weeks

  2. Retention in Assessments

    The study team will track enrolled participants who complete both post-treatment assessment visits (12-16 week post-treatment assessment and 24-30 week assessment). Retention will be measured as the percentage of enrolled participants who complete both assessments as assessed at 30 weeks.

    Time frame: Assessed at 30 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Glycemic Control

    The study team will measure glycemic control using hemoglobin A1c. This will be done on a consistent, validated point-of-care machine using fingerstick blood samples. The study team will compare glycemic control from baseline to 16 weeks and from baseline to 30 weeks.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, 16 weeks, and 30 weeks.

  2. Psychological Wellness

    Psychological wellness is measured with the 5-item Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5), a brief transdiagnostic screening tool attuned to broader concepts of wellbeing and distress than other available measures. MHI-5 scores are computed and transformed on a 0 to 100 point scale with higher scores indicating more wellness. We compare MHI-5 scores from baseline to 16 weeks and from baseline to 30 weeks.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 16 weeks, and 30 weeks

  3. Diabetes Medication Adherence

    As measured by the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scales-Diabetes (ARMS-D), Total scores range from 12-48, with higher values indicating worse outcomes. The study team will compare ARMS-D scores from baseline to 16 weeks and baseline to 30 weeks.

    Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, 16 weeks, and 30 weeks

07

Results

Posted Nov 7, 2024
Limitations and caveats
Due to the limited resources available in the grant (career development) and delays due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, recruitment was closed before reaching our targeted number of participants.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneD-Homes InterventionEnhanced Usual Care
Started1919
Completed1816
Not completed13
Withdrew: Protocol deviation w/o increased risk to pt11
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up02

Outcome measures

PrimaryExperience During the Intervention

The acceptability of the intervention to participants will be measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, 8-item version, with a score range from 8-32, higher score indicating higher satisfaction.

Time frame:
Assessed at 16 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Experience During the Intervention
score on a scaleD-Homes InterventionEnhanced Usual Care
Experience During the Intervention29.06 ± 4.2628.22 ± 3.66
PrimaryRetention in Assessments

The study team will track enrolled participants who complete both post-treatment assessment visits (12-16 week post-treatment assessment and 24-30 week assessment). Retention will be measured as the percentage of enrolled participants who complete both assessments as assessed at 30 weeks.

Time frame:
Assessed at 30 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of pts
Retention in Assessments
percentage of ptsD-Homes InterventionEnhanced Usual Care
Retention in Assessments10089
SecondaryChange in Glycemic Control

The study team will measure glycemic control using hemoglobin A1c. This will be done on a consistent, validated point-of-care machine using fingerstick blood samples. The study team will compare glycemic control from baseline to 16 weeks and from baseline to 30 weeks.

Time frame:
Assessed at Baseline, 16 weeks, and 30 weeks.
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of HbA1c
Change in Glycemic Control
percentage of HbA1cD-Homes InterventionEnhanced Usual Care
Baseline10.3 ± 2.110.4 ± 2.2
16 weeks9.7 ± 2.39.6 ± 2.4
30 weeks9.7 ± 2.79.6 ± 2.4
SecondaryPsychological Wellness

Psychological wellness is measured with the 5-item Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5), a brief transdiagnostic screening tool attuned to broader concepts of wellbeing and distress than other available measures. MHI-5 scores are computed and transformed on a 0 to 100 point scale with higher scores indicating more wellness. We compare MHI-5 scores from baseline to 16 weeks and from baseline to 30 weeks.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline, 16 weeks, and 30 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Psychological Wellness
score on a scaleD-Homes InterventionEnhanced Usual Care
Baseline34.4 ± 24.939.8 ± 21.2
16 weeks38 ± 20.237.6 ± 17.3
30 weeks34.7 ± 20.636.7 ± 24.4
SecondaryDiabetes Medication Adherence

As measured by the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scales-Diabetes (ARMS-D), Total scores range from 12-48, with higher values indicating worse outcomes. The study team will compare ARMS-D scores from baseline to 16 weeks and baseline to 30 weeks.

Time frame:
Assessed at Baseline, 16 weeks, and 30 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Diabetes Medication Adherence
score on a scaleD-Homes InterventionEnhanced Usual Care
Baseline15.6 ± 4.617.2 ± 3.9
16 weeks16.0 ± 5.216.7 ± 3.4
30 weeks15.2 ± 5.216.1 ± 3.7

Adverse events

Collected over Each participant was assessed for adverse events for the duration of their participation from baseline to 30 weeks for a total of up to 30 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
D-Homes Intervention0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)
Enhanced Usual Care0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Data from one participant from the intervention group and one participant from the enhanced usual care group were not analyzed due to their withdrawal from the study as a result of a protocol deviation.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)D-Homes InterventionEnhanced Usual CareTotal
Mean52.2 ± 10.251.9 ± 10.852.06 ± 10.34
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)D-Homes InterventionEnhanced Usual CareTotal
Female5611
Male131225
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)D-Homes InterventionEnhanced Usual CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino112
Not Hispanic or Latino171734
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)D-Homes InterventionEnhanced Usual CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American141226
White022
More than one race213
Unknown or Not Reported134
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)D-Homes InterventionEnhanced Usual CareTotal
United States181836
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Hennepin Healthcare
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 19, 2023
  • Informed consent form · Oct 13, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — As this work is pilot data to inform treatment development for later efficacy testing, we will not share individual participant data. The study team will submit for publication an overall paper describing our results and how they informed future intervention development.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05258630
Lead sponsor
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 28, 2022
Start date
Feb 23, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 27, 2023
Completion
Jul 12, 2023
Results posted
Nov 7, 2024
Last update
Nov 7, 2024

Study contacts

Katherine D Vickery, MD, MSc
principal investigator · Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion