ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05257837Updated Nov 20, 2024Results posted

Follow-up Gun Study: Can Safety Videos Mitigate Interest in Guns in Children?

An interventional study of Gun handling behavior and Debriefing in Psychology, Social and Adolescent Behavior, sponsored by Ohio State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-20.

Sponsored by Ohio State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
245
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators' previous research has shown that children exposed to media characters with guns in movies and video games are more likely to use real guns themselves (e.g., touch them, hold them, pull the trigger). This research tests whether exposure to a gun safety video a week before the study can help counteract dangerous behavior around guns.

Read the detailed description

Guns are prominent in movies that target children. An analysis of top selling films found that the depiction of guns in violent scenes in PG-13 films that target youth has increased from the level of G and PG files in 1985 when the rating was introduced, to the level of R films by 2005, to exceed the level of R films since 2012, a trend that has continued.

Research in the investigator's lab has shown that children are more likely to use guns (e.g., handle them, pull the trigger) after exposure to movie characters who use guns. The investigators replicated this study using video games, and also found that children who had taken a gun safety course were less likely to engage in dangerous behavior around firearms. However, it is difficult to draw causal inferences about the gun safety course because children were not randomly assigned to take or not take a gun safety course.

The present research will aim to reduce dangerous behavior around firearms by first exposing participants to a gun safety video recorded by The Ohio State University Chief of Police. The control video is about car safety. Children will see the videos about a week before they come into the lab.

In the lab, children will be tested in pairs. They will first watch a film clip from one of two different PG rated films, either in its original form (with guns) or with the guns edited out. After exposure to the film, participants will be placed in a room with toys, including two real unloaded guns that have been modified for safety and include a trigger pull counter.

The study uses 2 (gun safety video vs. car safety video) X 2 (movie with guns vs. movie without guns) between-subjects factorial design.

The investigators predict that children will be less likely to engage in dangerous behavior around real firearms after viewing the gun safety video than those who viewed the car safety video, even if they see a movie with guns in the lab.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psychology, Social
  • Adolescent Behavior

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • adolescent
  • gun
  • violence
  • media
03

In context

Adolescent Behavior

75 studies on the registry are indexed under Adolescent Behavior; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 245 is above the median of 178 across 67 interventional studies indexed under Adolescent Behavior.

Browse Adolescent Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Ohio State University is the lead sponsor of 661 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.

Of its 66 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 8-12 yrs
  • No prior participation in the study
  • Able to schedule participation with a known peer (8-12yo).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 8 yrs old
  • Older than 12 yrs old
  • Prior study participation
  • Could not schedule participation with a known peer (8-12yo)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
245 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Gun safety vid x Movie clip - guns present

    Participants in this condition will view a gun safety video featuring The Ohio State University Chief of Police about a week before coming into the lab. In the lab, they will watch a \~20 minute clip of either The Rocketeer or National Treasure featuring guns.

    Behavioral: Gun handling behavior · Other: Debriefing

  • Active comparator
    Gun safety vid x Movie clip - guns absent

    Participants in this condition will view a gun safety video featuring The Ohio State University Chief of Police about a week before coming into the lab. In the lab, they will watch a \~20 minute clip of either The Rocketeer or National Treasure with the guns edited out.

    Behavioral: Gun handling behavior · Other: Debriefing

  • Active comparator
    Seatbelt safety video x Movie clip - guns present

    Participants in this condition will view a seatbelt safety video about a week before coming into the lab. In the lab, they will watch a \~20 minute clip of either The Rocketeer or National Treasure featuring guns.

    Behavioral: Gun handling behavior · Other: Debriefing

  • Active comparator
    Seatbelt safety video x Movie clip - guns absent

    Participants in this condition will view a seatbelt safety video about a week before coming into the lab. In the lab, they will watch a \~20 minute clip of either The Rocketeer or National Treasure featuring guns.

    Behavioral: Gun handling behavior · Other: Debriefing

Interventions

  • BehavioralGun handling behavior

    Children will play in an observed room for 20 minutes. Aside from a selection of toys, two real handguns will be placed in a drawer. The handguns have been modified so they cannot fire. Inside the magazine, the handgun contains no bullets. Instead, it contains a sensor that counts the number of times the trigger is pulled with sufficient force to discharge the gun. This allows us to distinguish reliably the children who pull the trigger from those who handle the gun but do not pull the trigger

  • OtherDebriefing

    Children and their parents will be debriefed on the actual purpose of the study, including the role of the safety video and how the movie clips were edited.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Behavioral: Gun Location

    Trained research assistants, blind to video game condition and experimental hypotheses, will independently code the play session videos. Coders will identify whether the participants found the handguns, how long the participants held the handgun, and whether or not they pulled the trigger.

    Time frame: 20 minutes play session

  2. Behavioral: Gun Location Response - Told Adult

    If the participants found the handguns, the coders will identify whether the participants told an adult.

    Time frame: 20 minutes play session

  3. Behavioral: Gun Location Response - Touched Gun

    If the participants found the handguns, the coders will identify whether the participants touched the handgun.

    Time frame: 20 minute play session

  4. Behavioral: Gun Holding Time

    If participants handle the gun, coders will record how long the gun was held.

    Time frame: 20 minutes play session

  5. Behavioral: Trigger Pulled

    When the gun was handled, this measures whether or not the participant(s) pulled the trigger.

    Time frame: 20 minute play session

  6. Number of Trigger Pulls

    The two guns hidden in the playroom contain sensors that count how often the trigger is pulled with sufficient force to discharge the gun. A counter on the weapon displays the number of pulls, which will be entered into a data file along with the observational data described below. Observational data will also be used to confirm trigger pull counts. Note: This measure includes all 216 participants who found the handguns.

    Time frame: 20 minutes play session

  7. Gun Pointing With Trigger Pull

    Trained research assistants, blind to video game condition and experimental hypotheses, will independently code the play session videos. If participants pulled the trigger, were they pointing the gun at themselves or their partners? Calculations done using all participants who found a firearm.

    Time frame: 20 minute play session

Secondary outcomes

  1. Attitudes Toward Guns

    Participants will complete a post-test questionnaire that collects data on the child's attitudes towards guns. Questionnaire is a 15-item attitudes towards guns survey (e.g., "I don't like being around people with guns because someone could end up getting hurt"; 0=strongly disagree to 4=strongly agree

    Time frame: After 20 minutes play session, 5 minute questionnaire

07

Results

Posted Nov 20, 2024

Participant flow

Participants were recruited via Facebook ads, ResearchMatch, and referrals by parents/guardians.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Absent
Started58605850
Completed54585450
Not completed4240
Withdrew: Excluded (did not find the guns)4240

Outcome measures

PrimaryBehavioral: Gun Location

Trained research assistants, blind to video game condition and experimental hypotheses, will independently code the play session videos. Coders will identify whether the participants found the handguns, how long the participants held the handgun, and whether or not they pulled the trigger.

Time frame:
20 minutes play session
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Behavioral: Gun Location
ParticipantsSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns Present
Found guns50545854
Didn't find guns (excluded from final analyses)0424
PrimaryBehavioral: Gun Location Response - Told Adult

If the participants found the handguns, the coders will identify whether the participants told an adult.

Time frame:
20 minutes play session
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Behavioral: Gun Location Response - Told Adult
ParticipantsSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns Present
Behavioral: Gun Location Response - Told Adult651820
Statistical analysis
  • Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Absent vs Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Present · t-test, 2 sided · p = <.001
PrimaryBehavioral: Gun Location Response - Touched Gun

If the participants found the handguns, the coders will identify whether the participants touched the handgun.

Time frame:
20 minute play session
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Behavioral: Gun Location Response - Touched Gun
ParticipantsSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns Present
Behavioral: Gun Location Response - Touched Gun37332618
Statistical analysis
  • Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Absent vs Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Present · t-test, 2 sided · p = <.001
PrimaryBehavioral: Gun Holding Time

If participants handle the gun, coders will record how long the gun was held.

Time frame:
20 minutes play session
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Behavioral: Gun Holding Time
secondsSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns Present
Behavioral: Gun Holding Time101.42 ± 219.91100.40 ± 174.4753.43 ± 143.1331.55 ± 95.01
Statistical analysis
  • Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Absent vs Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Present · t-test, 2 sided · p = .012
PrimaryBehavioral: Trigger Pulled

When the gun was handled, this measures whether or not the participant(s) pulled the trigger.

Time frame:
20 minute play session
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Behavioral: Trigger Pulled
ParticipantsSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns Present
Behavioral: Trigger Pulled171473
PrimaryNumber of Trigger Pulls

The two guns hidden in the playroom contain sensors that count how often the trigger is pulled with sufficient force to discharge the gun. A counter on the weapon displays the number of pulls, which will be entered into a data file along with the observational data described below. Observational data will also be used to confirm trigger pull counts. Note: This measure includes all 216 participants who found the handguns.

Time frame:
20 minutes play session
Reported as:
Mean · Trigger pulls
Number of Trigger Pulls
Trigger pullsSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns Present
Number of Trigger Pulls7.26 ± 14.667.90 ± 17.366.41 ± 26.511.96 ± 9.55
Statistical analysis
  • Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Absent vs Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Present · t-test, 2 sided · p = .217
PrimaryGun Pointing With Trigger Pull

Trained research assistants, blind to video game condition and experimental hypotheses, will independently code the play session videos. If participants pulled the trigger, were they pointing the gun at themselves or their partners? Calculations done using all participants who found a firearm.

Time frame:
20 minute play session
Reported as:
Mean · Trigger pulls
Gun Pointing With Trigger Pull
Trigger pullsSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns Present
Gun Pointing With Trigger Pull2.60 ± 12.961.74 ± 8.642.34 ± 5.781.38 ± 4.83
Statistical analysis
  • Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Absent vs Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Present · t-test, 2 sided · p = .745
SecondaryAttitudes Toward Guns

Participants will complete a post-test questionnaire that collects data on the child's attitudes towards guns. Questionnaire is a 15-item attitudes towards guns survey (e.g., "I don't like being around people with guns because someone could end up getting hurt"; 0=strongly disagree to 4=strongly agree

Time frame:
After 20 minutes play session, 5 minute questionnaire
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Attitudes Toward Guns
units on a scaleSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns Present
Attitudes Toward Guns2.99 ± 0.62.82 ± 0.63.06 ± 0.63.15 ± 0.6

Adverse events

Collected over Each participant was called two weeks after the date of the study and given a follow-up survey.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Absent0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)
Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns Present0/58 (0%)0/58 (0%)0/58 (0%)
Gun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns Absent0/60 (0%)0/60 (0%)0/60 (0%)
Gun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns Present0/58 (0%)0/58 (0%)0/58 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns PresentTotal
Mean10.0 ± 1.410.5 ± 1.310.1 ± 1.49.4 ± 1.29.98 ± 1.38
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns PresentTotal
Female20292529103
Male30253325113
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns PresentTotal
Hispanic or Latino21126
Not Hispanic or Latino48535752210
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns PresentTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00101
Asian22206
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American21982049
White37283427126
More than one race7412528
Unknown or Not Reported21126
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns PresentTotal
United States50545854216
Trait Aggressiveness
Trait Aggressiveness(units on a scale)Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns PresentTotal
Mean.55 ± .5.36 ± .3.49 ± .4.45 ± .4.46 ± .4
Gun ownership
Gun ownership(Participants)Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns PresentTotal
Firearm present in the home523152770
No firearm present in the home45314227145
No response00101
Estimated interest in guns
Estimated interest in guns(units on a scale)Seatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentSeatbelt Safety Video x Movie Clip - Guns PresentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns AbsentGun Safety Vid x Movie Clip - Guns PresentTotal
Mean1.86 ± 1.21.52 ± 1.31.69 ± 1.31.67 ± 1.41.68 ± 1.3

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • The Ohio State University
    Columbus, Ohio 43201, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kjaervik SL, Bushman BJ. Effect of a Gun Safety Video on Children's Behavior Around Real Guns: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Sep 1;177(9):903-910. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.2397. PubMed 37459089 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and informed consent form · Jan 14, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 5, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified data will be shared upon request

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: After the manuscript is accepted for publication. No expiration date.

Access criteria: Data will be open and available to all who want to examine them.

Data sharing details ↗ · osf.io

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05257837
Responsible party
Brad Bushman (Professor of Communication and Psychology, Ohio State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 25, 2022
Start date
Feb 2, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 16, 2022
Completion
Oct 16, 2022
Results posted
Nov 20, 2024
Last update
Nov 20, 2024

Study contacts

Brad J Bushman, PhD
principal investigator · Ohio State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion