An interventional study of Immobilisation and Exercise in Healthy, sponsored by Aalborg University. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-06.
Sponsored by Aalborg University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science
Homeostasis is important for maintaining a stable equilibrium of e.g., blood pressure, hormonal release, and release of neurotransmitters. Within the healthy brain, homeostatic plasticity mechanisms ensure stability in synaptic plasticity that maintains cortical excitability within a normal physiological range, while this regulation has been shown to be impaired in chronic pain conditions such as low back pain. Cortical excitability can also be decreased and increased experimentally, using immobilisation and exercise paradigms, respectively, yet it is unknown if this overall change in excitability is caused by a shift in homeostatic plasticity regulation. Investigating if immobilisation and exercise influences homeostatic plasticity responses, may therefore reveal important information on the malleability of homeostatic plasticity mechanisms and ways to modulate them.
The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of upper limb immobilisation and physical exercise of the hand on homeostatic plasticity in healthy individuals.
The study will be performed as a randomised cross-over study where each participant take part in three sessions, separated by approximately 24 hours. During each session, the participant will answer questionnaires and undergo quantitative sensory testing (QST). Baseline measures is obtained using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs), which is done before the induction of homeostatic plasticity using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). MEPs are then obtained every 10 minutes for 30 minutes. Lastly, QST measures are obtained again.
As no previous studies have investigated the effect of immobilisation and exercise on homeostatic plasticity response, a sample size calculation was estimated based on MEP analysis from a previous study using α of 0.05, β of 0.80, and effect size of 0.29, yielding 22 participants. This is consistent with recent exploratory research that suggested that up to 28 participants would be needed. Therefore, the current study aimed at including 28 participants with an interim analysis performed after 10-15 inclusions.
Each participant will attend three identical experimental sessions on the same time on three consecutive days. Eight hours before attending the experimental sessions with immobilisation the participant will be fitted a splint (MANU-Hit DIGITUS POLLEX, Clinical Innovations, DK) to immobilise the right hand. Similarly, eight hours before attending the exercise session, the participant will be instructed to perform 150 ballistic finger movements with a pace of 0.5 Hz. During the experiment, the participant will be seated comfortably with arms and hands at rest. Electromyography electrodes will be placed on the right first interosseous muscle to assess the corticomotor excitability by recording of TMS induced MEPs on the left primary motor cortex. A neoprene cap will then be mounted to the head, and the optimal site for TMS (hotspot) will be identified and marked on the cap for standardisation. The cortical excitability will be measured before and immediately after homeostatic plasticity induction (time point 0-min), and then every 10 minutes for 30 minutes.
Homeostatic plasticity will be induced using tDCS applied to the left primary motor cortex for 7 minutes, followed by a break of 3 minutes and another 5 minutes of tDCS. A constant current of 1mA will be transmitted through the tDCS system (Starstim 32, Neuroelectrics, Barcelona, Spain) using two gelled electrodes placed into holes of a neoprene cap at the position of C3 and Fp2.
The distribution of the data will be tested using a Shapiro-Wilk's test of normality. To investigate the effect of immobilisation and exercise on homeostatic plasticity, a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) will be conducted with factors Session (Session 1, session 2, and session 3) and Time (baseline, 0 min, 10 min, 20min, and 30 min) and a P value of \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Adjustments will be made for multiple post-hoc comparisons using appropriate corrections.
Aalborg University is the lead sponsor of 178 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
o Healthy, aged between 18-60 years, right-handed, and can speak, read, and understand Danish or English
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants will attend three sessions where two consist of immobilisation or exercise interventions.
Other: Immobilisation · Other: Exercise
Eight hours prior to attending the immobilisation session, a splint will be fitted to the hand of the participant and remain until the session start.
Eight hours prior to attending the exercise session, the participant will be instructed to perform 150 ballistic finger movements every hour until the session start.
Corticospinal excitability
Change in corticospinal excitability (compared to baseline), as reflected by motor-evoked potential amplitudes induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation, after homeostatic plasticity induction
Time frame: Immediately after [0 minutes after homeostatic plasticity induction] and every 10 minutes up until 30 minutes after [10-30 minutes after homeostatic plasticity induction]
Quantitative Sensory Testing: Cuff detection threshold
Cuff detection threshold \[kPa\]
Time frame: Before and 30 minutes post homeostatic plasticity induction
Quantitative Sensory Testing: Cuff pain tolerance threshold
Cuff pain tolerance threshold \[kPa\]
Time frame: Before and 30 minutes post homeostatic plasticity induction
Quantitative Sensory Testing: Conditioned pain modulation
Conditioned pain modulation \[kPa change\]
Time frame: Before and 30 minutes post homeostatic plasticity induction
Quantitative Sensory Testing: Temporal summation of pain
Temporal summation of pain \[pain rating; Visual analogue scale; 0-10 cm; higher scores means more pain\]
Time frame: Before and 30 minutes post homeostatic plasticity induction
Quantitative Sensory Testing: Mechanical pain threshold
Mechanical pain threshold (pin prick) \[force required for inducing pricking pain; nM\]
Time frame: Before and 30 minutes post homeostatic plasticity induction
Quantitative Sensory Testing: Handheld algometry at right dorsal interosseous muscle
Handheld algometry at right dorsal interosseous muscle \[kPa\]
Time frame: Before and 30 minutes post homeostatic plasticity induction
Quantitative Sensory Testing: Handheld algometry at left dorsal interosseous muscle
Handheld algometry at left dorsal interosseous muscle \[kPa\]
Time frame: Before and 30 minutes post homeostatic plasticity induction
Quantitative Sensory Testing: Handheld algometry at right tibialis anterior muscle
Handheld algometry at right tibialis anterior muscle \[kPa\]
Time frame: Before and 30 minutes post homeostatic plasticity induction
Questionnaires: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; 0-21; PSQI \> 5 means poor sleep quality)
Time frame: Before baseline corticospinal excitability measurements
Questionnaires: Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS; 0-52; higher score means more pain catastrophizing)
Time frame: Before baseline corticospinal excitability measurements
Questionnaires: International Physical Activity Questionnaire
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ; resting metabolic rate multiplied by activity per minutes performed \> higher means better physical activity)
Time frame: Before baseline corticospinal excitability measurements
Questionnaires: Positive and Negative Affective Schedule
Positive and Negative Affective Schedule - Short Form (PANAS; 10-50; higher scores = higher levels of negative or positive affect)
Time frame: Before baseline corticospinal excitability measurements
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Aalborg University